Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Game Day

Colts Game Day Thread
All posting during Colts game time that is about the game, must either be in the game day thread or in chat.


202 topics in this forum

    • 1.2k replies
    • 28.3k views
    • 344 replies
    • 99k views
    • 1.8k replies
    • 89.8k views
    • 2.3k replies
    • 70.3k views
    • 1.9k replies
    • 64.4k views
    • 2k replies
    • 63.6k views
    • 1.3k replies
    • 59.4k views
    • 2k replies
    • 53.6k views
    • 1.2k replies
    • 50.7k views
    • 1.9k replies
    • 49.1k views
    • 1.5k replies
    • 48.9k views
    • 1.7k replies
    • 48.2k views
    • 1.4k replies
    • 48k views
    • 1.5k replies
    • 47.8k views
    • 1.3k replies
    • 46.7k views
    • 1.4k replies
    • 46.5k views
    • 1.1k replies
    • 45.7k views
    • 1.2k replies
    • 43.9k views
    • 1.3k replies
    • 43.8k views
    • 1.3k replies
    • 43.5k views
    • 1.8k replies
    • 43.4k views
    • 1.4k replies
    • 41.6k views
    • 1.5k replies
    • 41.4k views
    • 1.6k replies
    • 40.9k views
    • 1.4k replies
    • 39.9k views
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • COLTS TICKETS

    2020 Regular Season Ticketing Update: Click here for the latest information on Colts Tickets
  • Posts

    • Give them a franchise QB like they had in Luck they are right there.   Also I would TY and Doyle are not four of their top six players on the team.  I think Houston, Buckner, Leonard, Smith, Nelson, Rhodes, and Blackman are all better.  You could make a case for Mack, Bobby O and Walker too.  
    • I wasn't "comparing things under him".  I was showing you an inconsistent application of your standard.  You just got excited because it involved Grigson's name.   BTW, considering that AC, TY, Kelly, and Doyle may be 4 of our top 6 players (close for sure), how close are we to being a SB team from the AFC?  Keeping in mind that 3 of them may have to be replaced soon just to keep level set.
    • Then why even bring Grigson up if you didn’t want to compare things under him?  Oh that’s right you were spinning to get away from your bad take that Ballard wasn’t getting much Mileage out of his draft picks and you can’t just say okay maybe I was wrong and they are getting better mileage than I first thought.  Instead you tried to twist it into something about Grigson which I didn’t even bring up.     Grigson had nothing to do with my first replay to you,  My point which you clearly missed is that this team has a lot of talent because of Ballard’s drafting over the past four years.  So much so that if they had the QB they spent three of the past four off-seasons drafting for I think they would be one of the top two or three teams in the NFL if not the best.     you then tried to make it into something about well then I have to say to the Colts were good under Grigson because they made the playoffs under him which is not at all the point I was making.  My point has been and remains is that the Colts are getting great mileage out of their draft picks under Ballard.  You are just ignoring that point because you can’t dispute it.  Is it perfect?  No, no GM is. Is it better than most teams in the NFL?  Yes.     so if you want live in reality let’s live in reality and admit Ballard has done a good job drafting.  
    • Back to the intent of the thread...........no one answered this question....so I'll answer myself to the most honest of my abilities.   Of this list, the only QB's that I would consider franchise possibles, were.....   Bledsoe - 48 starts Fitzpatrick - 53 starts   So, that means 101 starts by a franchise caliber QB in 20 years out of a total 304 starts. that is just shy of 33% of the time.   
    • Huh?  I never said that they were one of the best teams under Grigson.  And that's not same thing as agreeing they weren't.   Obviously you've gotten your circuits in a loop because of the thought that Ballard cannot separate from Grison is any of the ways you have measured so far.   How about this as a standard?  Instead of gauging Ballard's roster by assuming what he would do with Luck  (which has already been accomplished), why not simply see what he does without Luck?    You know, reality
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...