Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

MTC

Colts waive OC Jake Kirkpatrick

Recommended Posts

buccolts    2,460

I guess that's why the Cowboys didn't want to take him in the trade, 'cause they knew we'd end up cutting him , and they wouldn't have to give up anything (Jenkins).

jk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Smonroe    7,559

Nothing against Kirkpatrick, but I like how this regime is constantly looking to upgrade the team, even if they're PS players at best.

Also, it appears to me that players with injury concerns aren't even going to be addressed when it comes to choosing a team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DarkHorse    45

I personally believe he never had a shot. Too many new bodies on the offensive line that show better potential. Love the fact that we're always looking for better talent. Better talent Better competition Better team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MAC    2,498

I like how this regime is constantly looking to upgrade the team

Love the fact that we're always looking for better talent.

Is not every team in the league doing the same thing - such as by releasing the players that we later pick up as "improvements"?

Was the Colts prior FO working to downgrade the team?

The grass is always greener, and people always think that they can do something with a prospect that another team couldn't - yet the vast majority of fringe roster moves amount to absolutely nothing. I'm saving my applause until I see how it plays out on the field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DarkHorse    45

They sure did not make as many moves or adjustments to the roster especially offensive line via free agency or trade

Is not every team in the league doing the same thing - such as by releasing the players that we later pick up as "improvements"?

Was the Colts prior FO working to downgrade the team?

The grass is always greener, and people always think that they can do something with a prospect that another team couldn't - yet the vast majority of fringe roster moves amount to absolutely nothing. I'm saving my applause until I see how it plays out on the field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kenny    392

Is not every team in the league doing the same thing - such as by releasing the players that we later pick up as "improvements"?

Was the Colts prior FO working to downgrade the team?

The grass is always greener, and people always think that they can do something with a prospect that another team couldn't - yet the vast majority of fringe roster moves amount to absolutely nothing. I'm saving my applause until I see how it plays out on the field.

We have had a lot of loyalty to players past there prime or were just not good. Sanders, hayden, addai n clark to an extent, bracket plus many more. Thats why many were let go when we began cleaning house.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Warhorse    3,457

Is not every team in the league doing the same thing - such as by releasing the players that we later pick up as "improvements"?

Was the Colts prior FO working to downgrade the team?

The grass is always greener, and people always think that they can do something with a prospect that another team couldn't - yet the vast majority of fringe roster moves amount to absolutely nothing. I'm saving my applause until I see how it plays out on the field.

We pretty much tiptoed through opportunities in the past, talking about growing our own from the draft. I have to agree that this team is turning every stone in the creek, looking for improvement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HtownColt    2,932

Well if the coaches tells grigson this player has no shot to make the team. No sense to keep him around waive him and bring in somebody new and see what he has to offer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.