Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Drake Nevis


hockey878

Recommended Posts

Our LBs havent been the best at tackling once the runner gets to their level, esp if a big back, Here size may play a role

Yes, size plays a role, but technique also plays a role. Over the past six or seven years, our defenders have not practiced sound tackling technique, especially for small players. Their method of tackling seems to be to lower the shoulder and cannonball into the ball carrier hoping to knock him down with momentum. Not only does this lead to injuries for both defenders and ball carriers, but it is also not effective. Half the time the ball carrier gets knocked off balance and falls down or gets knocked out of bounds, but the other half of the time the defender just bounces off the ball carrier and alters his trajectory as he goes on for another 5 to 15 yards before the next defender cannonballs into him. I have pulled my hair out in frustration over this for years.

If I was trying to teach small defenders how to tackle, I would teach them to come in fast and hit with the upper body. When contact is made, wrap your arms around the ball carrier like a grappling hook and hang on for dear life. Try to bring him down with your momentum, but if you can't bring him down with initial contact, hold on tight and either go dead weight or dig in to try to stop him from going forward. Make him drag you forward so that you slow him down enough for your fast teammates to get there and gang tackle him. If you are not in the area to make initial contact, you should always be looking to assist with a gang tackle if the ball is in your area. The goal is not to make a highlight-reel tackle that makes people cringe when they watch it but to get the ball carrier on the ground with the minimum number of yards after contact. The Colts have one of the fastest defenses in the league from top to bottom. They should take better advantage of that.

Celsius or Fahrenheit?

Kelvin (but not Hayden).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, size plays a role, but technique also plays a role. Over the past six or seven years, our defenders have not practiced sound tackling technique, especially for small players. Their method of tackling seems to be to lower the shoulder and cannonball into the ball carrier hoping to knock him down with momentum. Not only does this lead to injuries for both defenders and ball carriers, but it is also not effective. Half the time the ball carrier gets knocked off balance and falls down or gets knocked out of bounds, but the other half of the time the defender just bounces off the ball carrier and alters his trajectory as he goes on for another 5 to 15 yards before the next defender cannonballs into him. I have pulled my hair out in frustration over this for years.

If I was trying to teach small defenders how to tackle, I would teach them to come in fast and hit with the upper body. When contact is made, wrap your arms around the ball carrier like a grappling hook and hang on for dear life. Try to bring him down with your momentum, but if you can't bring him down with initial contact, hold on tight and either go dead weight or dig in to try to stop him from going forward. Make him drag you forward so that you slow him down enough for your fast teammates to get there and gang tackle him. If you are not in the area to make initial contact, you should always be looking to assist with a gang tackle if the ball is in your area. The goal is not to make a highlight-reel tackle that makes people cringe when they watch it but to get the ball carrier on the ground with the minimum number of yards after contact. The Colts have one of the fastest defenses in the league from top to bottom. They should take better advantage of that.

Kelvin (but not Hayden).

The most important thing about tackling (from my experience) is wrapping up. It doesn't matter if he is bigger, faster and stronger than you. Wrap him up and if you fall down, that will likely cause the other person to fall down too. And if it doesn't, it'll slow him down enough that your teammates can come in and lay a good lickin' on him. While I'm sure the Colts coaching staff emphasizes the importance of a proper tackle and of wrapping up, I haven't been seeing it with our players. Like you said, our players tend to lower the shoulder and try to plow over the running. One play that really stands out for me last year was in game 1, Bullitt had the chance to tackle Foster on a play, but instead just hit him with the shoulder and Foster kept running while Bullitt hit the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I'm sure the Colts coaching staff emphasizes the importance of a proper tackle and of wrapping up...

I'm not so sure that they do. The tackling technique is so consistent across the defense (especially the LBs and secondary) that it almost looks like they have been taught to tackle that way. I was hoping that would change with a new head coach and defensive coordinator, but it hasn't. If I was a defensive coach (and there is definitely a good reason that I am not), I would be drilling tackling technique into my defense every day in practice until I started seeing it on the field during games. Yeah, it may be fundamentals and they may not want to devote practice time to it, but for this defensive scheme to function even moderately well, sound tackling fundamentals are critical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Round 1 - #15 A. Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas B. Brian Thomas, WR, LSU C. Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia   Round 2 - #46  A. Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M B. Marshall Kneeland, DE, Western Michigan C. Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State   Round 3 - #82 A. Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon B. Darius Robinson, DE/DT, Missouri C. Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State   Round 4 - #117 A. Jalyx Hunt, DE, Houston Christian B. Mason McCormick, OG, South Dakota State C. Malik Washington, WR, Virginia   Round 5 - #151 A. Beaux Limmer, OC, Arkansas B. Tanor Bortolini, OC, Wisconsin C. Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville   Round 6 - #191 A. Decamerion Richardson, CB, Mississippi State B. Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto C. Nick Gargiulo, OC, South Carolina   Round 7 - #234 A. Millard Bradford, SS, TCU B. Mark Perry, FS, TCU C. Dalton Tucker, OG, Marshall   BONUS: Will the Colts trade the #15 pick this year?  A: Yes, they will trade back.  
    • Yeah... Richardson needs players who can separate and who can get open deep. IMO "give the inaccurate QB a contested catch receiver with large catch radius" is one of the tropes that hasn't proven to work well. Contested catches have about 50-55% success rate even with the best of contested catch receivers and with relatively accurate QBs... now if you think AR's accuracy is not good, drop that rate even more. The best way to give a relatively inaccurate QB better chance to complete passes is to give him a WR who separates and and who is open so the QB would have more of a margin for error to throw the ball a little behind or ahead or a little higher or lower than ideal. (we are not talking about uncatchable balls here... those will be uncatchable for anyone really). In that regard, one thing I would agree about is - we need WRs who have good hands and have good ball skills.   And this is ignoring that AR has indeed been pretty good with his accuracy on passes at intermediate and long range. His biggest problem coming into the league was the short stuff and he was already showing improvements in that deparment before he got injured.    And Worthy is the WR who created the most separation from anybody in this draft :   
    • Richardson  accuracy  on deep balls is his strength.  Hence why you pair an elite deep threat in worthy.
    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
  • Members

    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rob220

      rob220 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...