Sign in to follow this  
stitches

Holder: Colts will emphasize zone blocking in the new offense(implications for Nelson and other good and bad fits)

Recommended Posts

 

I'm posting this here since it is relevant to our draft. Nelson is more of a power-blocking guard and if there is any weakness(relative - it's still not bad, but it's not one of his strong attributes) in his game it's his pulling game that zone blocking schemes depend a lot on. 

 

Holder also posted this:

 

With all that said, I wonder if Nelson drops on our board simply because of not being a great fit with the system? 

 

In this case players you need to watch for that actually fit more of a zone-blocking scheme (this is not an exhaustive list of course)

Connor Williams,

Isaiah Wynn,

James Daniels,

Billy Price,

Braden Smith,

Wyatt Teller,

Colby Gossett,

Tyrell Crosby,

Kolton Miller... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then why did he resign Mewhort and sign Slauson who are both to me power blocking OGs. 

 

I do love Isaiah Wynn in the 2nd though. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

Then why did he resign Mewhort and sign Slauson who are both to me power blocking OGs. 

 

I do love Isaiah Wynn in the 2nd though. 

For depth? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smith

Daniels

Guice

Oliver

Crosby

Obgonnia 

 

Not a bad mock with no trade down, even more options if we trade down

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly I don’t see nelson being drafted by the colts .... CB loves the talent of linemen and is more then happy finding them in the second round as he has stated. If Chubb or barkley aren’t there at 6 I’m pretty sure we trade back EVEN if Nelson is there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

Then why did he resign Mewhort and sign Slauson who are both to me power blocking OGs. 

 

I do love Isaiah Wynn in the 2nd though. 

 

I'm guessing they both have modest $ contracts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, TdungyW/12 said:

Honestly I don’t see nelson being drafted by the colts .... CB loves the talent of linemen and is more then happy finding them in the second round as he has stated. If Chubb or barkley aren’t there at 6 I’m pretty sure we trade back EVEN if Nelson is there. 

This place is going to be so much fun when Nelson is on the board and Ballard trades back or takes a LB/DB instead.

  • Like 6
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We moved away from the power scheme a couple years ago did we not?  I remember Pagano and/or the GM who shall not be named made it known.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think anyone who thinks we should pass on Nelson because he's better at power blocking than zone should have their head seriously examined...

 

And that would include Chris Ballard (assuming he believes such nonsense..)

 

I appreciate this is the week for crazy talk, but this would indeed be crazy..

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, CheezyColt said:

This place is going to be so much fun when Nelson is on the board and Ballard trades back or takes a LB/DB instead.

Lol! Oh fits gonna hit the shan

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, CheezyColt said:

This place is going to be so much fun when Nelson is on the board and Ballard trades back or takes a LB/DB instead.

Taking Nelson at 6 is/was never going to happen.  Not sure why so many ever considered it.  Ballard will take Smith if its between Nelson and him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, DougDew said:

Taking Nelson at 6 is/was never going to happen.  Not sure why so many ever considered it.  Ballard will take Smith if its between Nelson and him.

I’m not sure that was always true but I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the way the Colts are now leaning. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:

I think anyone who thinks we should pass on Nelson because he's better at power blocking than zone should have their head seriously examined...

 

And that would include Chris Ballard (assuming he believes such nonsense..)

 

I appreciate this is the week for crazy talk, but this would indeed be crazy..

 

I agree Nelson will fit in a zone blocking scheme just fine.  Especially since "pulling" is a zone block scheme is not the old school pulling around the tackle and heading upfield to get the LB, it's usually more pulling and taking the DE just outside the tackle.

 

That being said, I don't think the Colts take Nelson if he is there at #6.  Reading between the lines when he said starting guards can be found in rounds 2-4 I take as meaning he is not going to spend a 1st round pick on a guard.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just two more days and all this non-sense goes away. I don't even care anymore....it's all white noise until the draft actually happens. It's been fun to speculate but there is no reason to worry about it now....what will happen will happen and hopefully Ballard and company do a good job and help this team take a big step in getting better in 2018.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

I agree Nelson will fit in a zone blocking scheme just fine.  Especially since "pulling" is a zone block scheme is not the old school pulling around the tackle and heading upfield to get the LB, it's usually more pulling and taking the DE just outside the tackle.

 

That being said, I don't think the Colts take Nelson if he is there at #6.  Reading between the lines when he said starting guards can be found in rounds 2-4 I take as meaning he is not going to spend a 1st round pick on a guard.

 

Yup...   that's my read of the tea leaves as well...   and I'm fine with that.   

 

This is is a strong class of interior lineman..   as long as we get one in R 2 or 3, I'm good...   it doesn't have to be Nelson or bust for me...

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I enjoy the gamesmanship / misdirection that is going on with the GM interviews... Anyone want to guess which team makes the first fubar selection?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid Ballard will not draft the immediate starter caliber lineman we need to get a good running game going... Not saying Nelson is the only solution, but I'd hate for us to pass on him and watch guys like Wynn and Hernandez come off the board in the 1st and all of a sudden there to be only developmental type of players left (even if they are talented). There really aren't that many day 1 starters on the O-line in this draft imo, even if there are some exciting guys in the class who aren't. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

I think anyone who thinks we should pass on Nelson because he's better at power blocking than zone should have their head seriously examined...

 

And that would include Chris Ballard (assuming he believes such nonsense..)

 

I appreciate this is the week for crazy talk, but this would indeed be crazy..

 

I don't think you pass on him because of it, but you certainly have to include it in you consideration. I don't know how heavy you weigh it, maybe not very, but of course you include it in your thought process. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, stitches said:

I don't think you pass on him because of it, but you certainly have to include it in you consideration. I don't know how heavy you weigh it, maybe not very, but of course you include it in your thought process. 

 

I want to be clear....

 

I'm totally fine if we do not draft Nelson.  

 

I get that there are very good guards available in R's 2 and 3.   And the one we take will likely start in week 1.   And I'm fine with that.

 

I just think if you're looking for a reason NOT to draft Nelson,  using the,  he's better in power blocking than zone blocking is just over-thinking things.   The best reason is we can take a difference maker on defense and still get a very good guard in the next round or two...   and that's legitimate...   and I'm fine with that....

 

You don't need to look for a reason....    there are legitmate reasons that are reasonable...

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I want to be clear....

 

I'm totally fine if we do not draft Nelson.  

 

I get that there are very good guards available in R's 2 and 3.   And the one we take will likely start in week 1.   And I'm fine with that.

 

I just think if you're looking for a reason NOT to draft Nelson,  using the,  he's better in power blocking than zone blocking is just over-thinking things.   The best reason is we can take a difference maker on defense and still get a very good guard in the next round or two...   and that's legitimate...   and I'm fine with that....

 

You don't need to look for a reason....    there are legitmate reasons that are reasonable...

 

 

I am still holding out slight hope that we would take Nelson. I have a feeling it may be false hope, but I am hoping nonetheless.

 

The way I see it, yes there is depth at interior OL. No there isn't ideal depth at pass rusher. But Chubb will likely be gone.

 

I am not sure if the depth at LB is better than interior OL or on par.

 

That said, Jonathan Cooper is the last OG (and only one in my memory) that went super high. I think he went 7th or so. And Nelson to me looks waaaaay better as a prospect.

 

I like Smith and Edmunds. I am good with either of them. I think I slightly prefer Smith, but that is neither here no there. Either way, I cannot think of many non-rushing LBs that went in the top-6 or so. As i said in another thread i think the last one was maybe Aaron Curry. He looked like a can't miss generational prospect at the time and we know that did not work out well lol.

 

I hope that we don't pass up Nelson for Smith or Edmunds. But currently all signs indicate we likely will.

 

I wonder how much of that is smoke and mirrors in lying season and how much is true.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, FalseStart said:

I enjoy the gamesmanship / misdirection that is going on with the GM interviews... Anyone want to guess which team makes the first fubar selection?

I'm going to say the Bears....I just have no confidence in the direction they are going. I want to root for them because they are my dad's team...and I'm sentimental...but I'm just not confident in what they do. I really feel like Nelson will be there for them (true he may go to TB but some reason I think they pick Ward) and I get the feeling they do something bone headed and pick a safety or corner instead...or like Calvin Ridley or something. So for me its Chi, Mia, or Cin will do something bone headed....but hey...if the Jets take Mayfield then they would be the first to do something dumb since they are higher up. Normally I would say Cleveland but I think they are getting it together. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, I definitely wasn't personally offended... I was merely bringing it up conversationally.   It has been pointed out that I was likely wrong in my assumption about the phrase. I was told at some point that it was a term used by the handlers of indentured railroad workers... After looking it up, it seems to be more like how you explained it in your reply.    I've never been personally offended by anything I've read on this forum, although I have vehemently disagreed with some posters on occasion... I just have a passing interest in linguistics, really.    Please don't feel like you'd have to censor yourself on my account... I wasn't trying to imply that you were being offensive in any way, only that it was strange to hear the coach say something that I had been (falsely, apparently) led to believe was racially insensitive... 
    • If Ballard thinks he makes the team better then yes. Don’t care that he bullied another grown man. 
    • Honestly, I think we're in trouble at CB now anyways. Even if one likes our starting CB's, we lack depth. Besides, I think Breeland's better than Wilson right now if healthy. At the very least, Wilson is a little bit of an unknown at the moment. 
    • Supposedly we received trade offers for Brissett.  Ballard said no probably to hedge agains Luck not being ready. If Luck returns fully recovered you can bet he will be gone next year and we will sign an older veteran backup.  If he has a good preseason we could easily get another 2nd. rd. pick at a minimum to help finish the rebuild.  Especially since next years QB class is not that great. 
    • If he is CB1, we are in trouble. He would not even be CB2 for the Redskins now. Even though they traded Kendall Fuller for Smith, they have  Norman, they signed Quinton Dunbar to an extension and then acquired Orlando Scandrick in free agency. Add Fabian Moreau and there just wasn't room for Breeland anymore.  That's why he was an FA. If he is CB2 at best for us, I'd feel better.   In 2016 PFF showed he was #1 slot CB in the league-   https://www.nbcsports.com/washington/washington-redskins/one-surprising-stat-shows-bashaud-breeland-may-be-better-suited-slot   A Falcons article reported this above as well (before he got hurt) and about maybe getting him for their Nickel back. But added-
        "Breeland isn’t without his blemishes on the field either. His eight penalties last season tied him for fourth among all DBs (Robert Alford had seven, as a reference point). He also has his fair share of bad games and has been susceptible to giving up big plays and big stat-lines in the past."   I wonder if his pay demands have dropped any (like Ryan Grant?) after he is healthy?    
  • Members

    • MB-ColtsFan

      MB-ColtsFan 1,063

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Carlos Danger

      Carlos Danger 971

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fisticuffs111

      Fisticuffs111 907

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JlynRN

      JlynRN 630

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheMarine

      TheMarine 215

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PureLuck

      PureLuck 29

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bsteves

      bsteves 84

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pgt_rob

      pgt_rob 1,958

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • axillarymac05

      axillarymac05 78

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shive

      Shive 1,286

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active: