Recommended Posts

Brandon Coleman at 6-6 and 225 can go up and get it and 3 solid years with the Saints.....25 years old

 

Jordan Matthews at 6-3 and 225 who actually played in the slot too with 3 solid years in Philly beforeva "meh" year in Buffalo last year......25 years old

 

Young, could be had on cheap 3 year deals and provide solid production ESPECIALLY considering who will be throwing to them!

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Scott Pennock said:

Brandon Coleman at 6-6 and 225 can go up and get it and 3 solid years with the Saints.....25 years old

 

Jordan Matthews at 6-3 and 225 who actually played in the slot too with 3 solid years in Philly beforeva "meh" year in Buffalo last year......25 years old

 

Young, could be had on cheap 3 year deals and provide solid production ESPECIALLY considering who will be throwing to them!

 

 

Depending on the deal, I'd add Pryor to that list...   

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would be happy w either.

 

I am also hoping for Cody Latimer.

 

Hasn't gotten a huge chance in Denver, but he has progressed and he would likely come cheap.

 

Still only 25 and he is 6'2" 215 and has contributed on special teams in the past too.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Scott Pennock said:

Brandon Coleman at 6-6 and 225 can go up and get it and 3 solid years with the Saints.....25 years old

 

Jordan Matthews at 6-3 and 225 who actually played in the slot too with 3 solid years in Philly beforeva "meh" year in Buffalo last year......25 years old

 

Young, could be had on cheap 3 year deals and provide solid production ESPECIALLY considering who will be throwing to them!

 

No and No... they both are horrible and definitely not worth the money. 

 

Brice Butler makes the most sense and could be a steal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point you just need options....they need at least 3 more WR to go with Hilton and Rogers and will probably get at most 1 guy in the draft. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Indeee said:

No and No... they both are horrible and definitely not worth the money. 

 

Brice Butler makes the most sense and could be a steal

Brandon. Coleman is not horrible. I can tell you just googled his name and looked at his stats

 

he was the numnber 3 wr. He has great size and like the OP said, he can go up and get the ball. Great red zone target and isn’t afraid to set a block. He would be a good 3 with potential to move to the 2 if he’s given the opportunity. Ballard type of player, 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Coleman is limited athletically. He’s just a tall guy. Nothing special as a wr. 

 

Agree i I would rather add Latimer or Pryor. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, bertjones7 said:

2 other under the radar possibilities are - Brice Butler & Jaron Brown. 

I think Jaron Brown signed with the ravens, not sure I will have to check.

 

I was wrong.....

 

actually he's visiting the seahawks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Indeee said:

No and No... they both are horrible and definitely not worth the money. 

 

Brice Butler makes the most sense and could be a steal

Except that both of the guys I mentioned are younger and have had better production - insinuating that Brice Butler is better and saying the other two are horrible when film and stats don't bear that opinion out.....well that's why we all have opinions. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Indeee said:

No and No... they both are horrible and definitely not worth the money. 

 

Brice Butler makes the most sense and could be a steal

 

Huh?

 

Are you even aware that Matthews caught 225 passes his first three years?

 

That's 75 per year.   What part of that is terrible?

 

I like Butler...   for WR3...   that's what he did for Dallas.    I don't think he's shown he can be WR2.

 

Same with Latimore.   But for WR3, what he did for Denver.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Scott Pennock said:

Brandon Coleman at 6-6 and 225 can go up and get it and 3 solid years with the Saints.....25 years old

 

Jordan Matthews at 6-3 and 225 who actually played in the slot too with 3 solid years in Philly beforeva "meh" year in Buffalo last year......25 years old

 

Young, could be had on cheap 3 year deals and provide solid production ESPECIALLY considering who will be throwing to them!

 

Two solid finds. We need to find some receivers for Luck.  My 1st,. choice is Matthews. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, MightyLucks said:

Brandon. Coleman is not horrible. I can tell you just googled his name and looked at his stats

 

he was the numnber 3 wr. He has great size and like the OP said, he can go up and get the ball. Great red zone target and isn’t afraid to set a block. He would be a good 3 with potential to move to the 2 if he’s given the opportunity. Ballard type of player, 

If he isn't terrible then why did the saints dump him and want a 32 year old, shell of Jordy Nelson? This of course before Jordy signed with the raiders.  And why didn't saints keep him Especially considering the Saints tendered Snead on a low tender. seems to me Coleman would be a keeper in this situation. However,  Coleman sucks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pryor could be a huge asset for us.  6'-4" and fast and has a 1,000 yard season under his belt.  With Luck throwing him the ball, there is no reason to think he couldn't have a very solid year for us! 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Huh?

 

Are you even aware that Matthews caught 225 passes his first three years?

 

That's 75 per year.   What part of that is terrible?

 

I like Butler...   for WR3...   that's what he did for Dallas.    I don't think he's shown he can be WR2.

 

Same with Latimore.   But for WR3, what he did for Denver.

 

 

I don't think Matthews is terrible...but I do think his numbers were a bit inflated due to volume. He played in uptempo offenses that ran a ton of plays. And outside of 2014 (when Maclin was in PHI)...he was the WR1 because they had no one else. 

 

He also had several crucial drops while in PHI...and doesn't have great hands overall. Something that is crucial at the slot WR position.

 

And I don't think we can just totally ignore last season. Though I can't really hold it against him, since he was banged up and had poor QB play on a team that doesn't throw the ball (no BUF WR did anything last year).

 

I still don't see Ballard (and Reich) picking him up, but I wouldn't be completely against it. However, I would not be a fan of giving him one of these big WR deals we keep seeing. A one-year deal to rebuild his value could work...but might not be realistic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

I don't think Matthews is terrible...but I do think his numbers were a bit inflated due to volume. He played in uptempo offenses that ran a ton of plays. And outside of 2014 (when Maclin was in PHI)...he was the WR1 because they had no one else. 

 

He also had several crucial drops while in PHI...and doesn't have great hands overall. Something that is crucial at the slot WR position.

 

And I don't think we can just totally ignore last season. Though I can't really hold it against him, since he was banged up and had poor QB play on a team that doesn't throw the ball (no BUF WR did anything last year).

 

I still don't see Ballard (and Reich) picking him up, but I wouldn't be completely against it. However, I would not be a fan of giving him one of these big WR deals we keep seeing. A one-year deal to rebuild his value could work...but might not be realistic.

 

As you noted...  up tempo...  isn't that what Reich says he wants to do?   I think so...

 

Plus we would sign him to be WR2 and not WR1.   I think he can handle that.

 

I'd like to find a quality WR2 with some size and Matthews has it.   I'd like to sign Grant to be WR 3.   He's got very good hands.

 

This will be interesting to watch....

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of the group mentioned here, I think Cody has the best hands and a better chance to be WR2. I like Rogers as our 3, and don't want to take that from him. Butler, and Grant I beleive would be red zone specialist, or WR4. Don't want Pryor, unless great contract. He drops easy passes. I have no opnion on Mathews but him like Pryor drops easy passes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't like the format but the latter part, if they play sudden death for game 3 in all groups, no draws allowed, that would be perfect. I am sure FIFA is working on it and most likely, I think that would be how it will be done - either sudden death or OT leading to penalty shootout, if OT results in a tie.   I would prefer sudden death, like they did in South Korea for that first 16 X 3 format, at least for game 3 across all groups, so that the teams advancing have more in the tank to save PK shootouts for later and avoid two teams with a win already not just settling for a draw, just my two cents.
    • I don't believe this hogwash for a second.....he sounds like a bitter young man angry about not getting offered the money he thinks he's worth.   The class and dignity this organization has shown from top to bottom with the McDaniels incident alone tells me this is utter nonsense.
    • Yeah the Cubs hadn't won a WS in 108 years and everyone loved us outside of our fanbase until that happened. Everyone said the Cubs had the most loyal fans to put up with years of losing. Once the Cubs won it all, now everyone outside of our fanbase hates us and thinks Cubs fans are bandwagon fans . Funniest thing ever.  
    • Oh for sure they’re annoying. But they got 1 Super Bowl in 50 years. I’ll just let em enjoy it. Plus I always find rowdy celebrations that may or may not involve the consumption of horse crap to be hilarious  
    • I know I’m being unreasonable and they do deserve credit, but Eagles fans are the worst. I’m glad they beat the Pats but they are my second most hated team (after the Pats). 
  • Members

    • dw49

      dw49 2,788

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Gocolts-Rolltide

      Gocolts-Rolltide 20

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Blindside

      Blindside 10

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Tracy Denton

      Tracy Denton 241

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 15,179

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MarquisJ

      MarquisJ 219

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 7,899

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nesjan3

      Nesjan3 638

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Swan Ronson

      Swan Ronson 270

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Calmack

      Calmack 78

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active: