Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Comp Picks Awarded - Set Draft Order (for Colts)


Recommended Posts

As expected, Colts have no comp picks this year. 

 

Coin flip still to decide 49ers and Raiders. 

 

Colts are picking 3, 36, 67, 104, 140, 178, and 221.

 

NFL Draft Order

 

Compensatory Draft Picks Awarded

 

Third Round
97. Cardinals
98. Texans
99. Broncos
100. Bengals

 

Fourth Round
133. Packers
134. Cardinals
135. Giants
136. Patriots
137. Cowboys

 

Fifth Round
170. Bengals
171. Cowboys
172. Packers
173. Cowboys
174. Packers

 

Sixth Round
207. Packers
208. Cowboys
209. Chiefs
210. Raiders
211. Texans
212. Raiders
213. Vikings
214. Texans
215. Ravens
216. Raiders
217. Raiders
218. Vikings

 

Seventh Round
251. Chargers
252. Bengals
253. Bengals
254. Cardinals
255. Buccaneers
256. Falcons

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ColtJ82 said:

I may not be thinking straight here, but why is it not pick 35 in the second round? 

 

Tied teams "cycle picks" beginning in round 2. Houston was the only other 4-12 team, so we should alternate with them (or whoever has the pick).

 

The Colts would be:

 

Round 1 - Pick #3

Round 2 - Pick #4

Round 3 - Pick #3

Round 4 - Pick #4

Round 5 - Pick #3

Round 6 - Pick #4

Round 7 - Pick #3

 

Looks like Football DungeonWalter Football, and Tankathon all have it the same way:

 

Round 1 - Pick #3

Round 2 - Pick #4

Round 3 - Pick #3

Round 4 - Pick #4

Round 5 - Pick #3

Round 6 - Pick #4

Round 7 - Pick #3

 

Barring trades, the Colts picks are set at: 3, 36, 67, 104, 140, 178, and 221.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

For whatever it's worth...   the drafted trade value chart had us picking 3rd and not 4th in R4.

 

They show the Colts picking 103rd and not 104th overall.    Either way, it's not a big deal, just wanted to note the difference..

 

(Still hoping for a RB with that 4th R pick)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Fir whatever it's worth...   the drafted trade value chart had us picking 3rd and not 4th in R4.

 

They show the Colts picking 103rd and not 104th overall.    Either way, it's not a big deal, just wanted to note the difference..

 

(Still hoping for a RB with that 4th R pick)

 

 

Yeah. The NFL has not released anything "official" yet, so people are going off of past "commonly known" rules. At any time a new wrinkle to the rule could surface. 

 

I am pretty sure the Colts draft picks are set at : 3, 36, 67, 104, 140, 178, and 221.

 

We will see soon enough though.

 

I am not targeting any running back for any particular round, but some people look at it that way. I am not as big on positional value as most people are. I target the players I like, and if they are the BPA when it's time to roll, then I'd roll with them. 

 

I am not against taking Barkley at No. 3 or even moving back a couple of times and taking Guice. I am not against using our second on Ronald Jones, Sony Michel, Nick Chubb, or Rashaad Penny. If the Colts front office like any of those players and they are the BPA on the Colts board then I am all for it. 

 

Same thing with guards. If the front office wants to move back and take Nelson then count me in as being pleased. There will probably be some good offensive line talent in the second round too. I won't even get mad if they double up on the OL in the first and the second. There is so much interior offensive line talent in this draft that some first round talent is going to fall.

 

I cannot image a scenario where James Daniels, Billy Price, Isaiah Wynn, and Frank Ragnow are all off the board when we pick at No. 36. In my opinion, all of them are either first round talents or pretty close to it. I might even add Connor Williams to the list of interior offensive linemen on my board soon. Depending on his arm-length at the combine, he might get kicked inside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BlueShoe said:

Colts are picking 3, 36, 67, 104, 140, 178, and 221.

I actually appreciate our picks being laid out like this because I can cut & paste that order on my computer's desktop for easy reference when the draft rolls around. Thanks Blue Shoe. :hat:

 

I love when things are simple & straightforward with hardly any work required on my end. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BlueShoe said:

I am not against taking Barkley at No. 3 or even moving back a couple of times and taking Guice. I am not against using our second on Ronald Jones, Sony Michel, Nick Chubb, or Rashaad Penny. If the Colts front office like any of those players and they are the BPA on the Colts board then I am all for it. 

In all honesty, it will be nice when INDY finally hands in the draft card for #3 once & for all just to end the suspense for good. Whoever we take, I'll embrace because Ballard is the GM not Grigson anymore. 

 

I really respect what Cris did in Kansas City. He'll get our defense where it needs to be.

 

Besides, I've my thoughts clear on this pick in another thread. Enough said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I watch ESPN draft coverage, but every once in awhile I did flip over there when NFL Network was on a commercial break. It's gonna be strange not seeing Jon Gruden there anymore. 

 

I always remember how CC1 got a kick out of watching Chucky's eyes light up like a Christmas tree on TV whenever he got excited over somebody. I'm gonna miss that depraved gleam in Gruden's eye too. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, southwest1 said:

Not that I watch ESPN draft coverage, but every once in awhile I did flip over there when NFL Network was on a commercial break. It's gonna be strange not seeing Jon Gruden there anymore. 

 

I always remember how CC1 got a kick out of watching Chucky's eyes light up like a Christmas tree on TV whenever he got excited over somebody. I'm gonna miss that depraved gleam in Gruden's eye too. :D

:D------Or how every player he has ever seen is going to be a pro bowl player!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, richard pallo said:

 

 

27 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

:D------Or how every player he has ever seen is going to be a pro bowl player!! 

Uh huh, Gruden was definitely known for that. No question.  I'd just say Jon, Jon, Jon; shake my head, & laugh. 

 

Hey, you actually watch the draft with the sound up? Only teasing brother since you like to watch games with the sound off. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry BlueShoe, I should be discussing draft selections for us. I usually wait for the best & brightest on here to tell me who we should be going after. Not my strong suit. Thanks for your commentary after the order of our picks though. I like reading your insights. 

 

"I am not against taking Barkley at No. 3 or even moving back a couple of times and taking Guice," 

 

Appreciate that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, southwest1 said:

Sorry BlueShoe, I should be discussing draft selections for us. I usually wait for the best & brightest on here to tell me who we should be going after. Not my strong suit. Thanks for your commentary after the order of our picks though. I like reading your insights. 

 

"I am not against taking Barkley at No. 3 or even moving back a couple of times and taking Guice," 

 

Appreciate that. 

 

No worries. You have nothing to apologize about. Thank you for the kind words. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, southwest1 said:

 

Uh huh, Gruden was definitely known for that. No question.  I'd just say Jon, Jon, Jon; shake my head, & laugh. 

 

Hey, you actually watch the draft with the sound up? Only teasing brother since you like to watch games with the sound off. 

 

 

Nah, I just watched bits and pieces later. Shoot, I can't sit that long without taking a nap. :spit:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
    • Things have now gone from bad to worse.     After I explained myself, I was kind of hoping you’d simply come back with “I’m sorry, I misunderstood you,  may bad.”  And we’d be done with this.  It would be over.      But instead, you double down on the roommate issue and follow up by questioning everything I said by breaking down some of my comments and what you think I really meant by them.     In other words, you’re telling me my motive, my meaning, as if you know my meaning better than I do.    It’s interesting to me…. I was recently told there’s an unofficial moderator policy:  don’t attack the poster, attack the argument.    Well, I don’t see that here.  You attacked me personally the first time and instead of a simple apology, you’ve double downed on a bad hand by attacking me personally AGAIN.      Why you’re comfortable telling me you know my meaning , my intention, better than I do is mystifying to me.  And frankly, I think you’re comfortable doing this because one of us is a moderator, and it certainly is NOT me.     I’ll say it again: you misunderstood my meaning, and intention,  the first time, and you’ve misunderstood me even worse the second time.   As I said before, I’m happy to withdraw and apologize for “go figure”, but the negative inference was not my intention.  Poorly phrased, I give you (in two posts now).   I don’t know what else to say…. I’m hoping this brings this very unfortunate exchange to an end.       
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...