twfish

Is Marlon Mack our bell cow of the future?

Recommended Posts

Or is he going to be a complientary back? I'm a huge Mack fan and can not for the life of me understand why we don't run more stretch plays and counters with him. My guess is we do not retain Gore this coming year so do we target a higher profile back in the draft? I think Barkley is a beast but I can't see us spending that early of a pick on him. A back that's been my favorite for awhile is Nick Chubb. I think with his prior Knee injury it could push him into the second. There are tons of other great backs in this class but should we target another?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, twfish said:

Or is he going to be a complientary back? I'm a huge Mack fan and can not for the life of me understand why we don't run more stretch plays and counters with him. My guess is we do not retain Gore this coming year so do we target a higher profile back in the draft? I think Barkley is a beast but I can't see us spending that early of a pick on him. A back that's been my favorite for awhile is Nick Chubb. I think with his prior Knee injury it could push him into the second. There are tons of other great backs in this class but should we target another?

Mack is a good backup but Barkley I believe is even better and stronger than Zeke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think he's our bell cow of the future.  Complimentary back possibly.  I'm hoping we find our guy this draft.  They say this is a great RB class.  Barkley would be awesome.  If we make a trade back and gain some picks I can see us taking one in the first three rounds. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, twfish said:

Or is he going to be a complientary back? I'm a huge Mack fan and can not for the life of me understand why we don't run more stretch plays and counters with him. My guess is we do not retain Gore this coming year so do we target a higher profile back in the draft? I think Barkley is a beast but I can't see us spending that early of a pick on him. A back that's been my favorite for awhile is Nick Chubb. I think with his prior Knee injury it could push him into the second. There are tons of other great backs in this class but should we target another?

So far I have seen no one calling Mack our bell cow. Those who have the knowledge understands his roll and he is not considered a lead back. If he can learn to block he could be our next Addai. If he can't learn to block we will see less of him with another lead runner getting more reps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think he's shown enough between the tackles running for us to be counting him as a future bell cow. I think we still need a 3 downs back. Versatility of your players is of huge importance for several reasons - one being you don't pay multiple players to do the same job and secon - yes, you can use different backs in different situations and let them share the responsibility, but it tips your hand.(this has been one of the biggest problems for this team's playcalling both on D and on O). For example when Mack gets in the game I bet the opponents don't think, damn, he's going to run between the tackles. They pretty much know it's a run to the outside and if they stop it, they are good. This is why having players that can do different things is important - you leave all your options open, your QB can audible different protections and not worry that his back is not good enough at picking up blitzes. Your linebacker can either drop in coverage or blitz or spy on the QB or... anything you need him to do, etc. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I don't see a lead back.      Never have.

 

But I do see a weapon when used properly.     He's got more than just speed.     He's got the ability to make defenders miss,  he's scary in space,  he's got some wiggle and burst and suddeness.    But once his game is more fully developed,  then he'll be able to be a much bigger and better asset for the Colts.

 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I don't see a lead back.      Never have.

 

But I do see a weapon when used properly.     He's got more than just speed.     He's got the ability to make defenders miss,  he's scary in space,  he's got some wiggle and burst and suddeness.    But once his game is more fully developed,  then he'll be able to be a much bigger and better asset for the Colts.

 

 

Yeah, IMO a back like Mack is best utilized in a combination with someone like Nick Chubb. I love Chubb... I'd love to have him on the Colts. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, stitches said:

Yeah, IMO a back like Mack is best utilized in a combination with someone like Nick Chubb. I love Chubb... I'd love to have him on the Colts. 

 

He's very much on my radar too.

 

I love a big tough pounding RB that defenses just hate to face....

 

I hope we pick one in the upcoming draft...     There are a number of them,  and Chubb is one of them.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven’t seen it. The best RBs in the league are the big physical runners who can run it up the gut and wear down the defense. I haven’t seen that ability from Mack yet. I’d pair him with someone like Nick Chubb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Imagine Barkley and Mack together with a healthy Luck+Ty.

I don't think you see much of Mack if you have Barkley on the roster. Would you want Mack taking carries or receptions away from Barkley? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, akcolt said:

I don't think you see much of Mack if you have Barkley on the roster. Would you want Mack taking carries or receptions away from Barkley? 

I like Mack but I am not sure he is a 3 down back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I like Mack but I am not sure he is a 3 down back.

I haven't seen anything to make me think he is a 3 down back. My point was if we take Barkley I don't think we see Mack. Barkley is a 3 down back and I'd be disappointed if we drafted him then had him split carries. I think we take a guy like Royce Freeman the middle of the draft. I could see Mack getting 3rd down work in that scenario. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, akcolt said:

I haven't seen anything to make me think he is a 3 down back. My point was if we take Barkley I don't think we see Mack. Barkley is a 3 down back and I'd be disappointed if we drafted him then had him split carries. I think we take a guy like Royce Freeman the middle of the draft. I could see Mack getting 3rd down work in that scenario. 

I actually hope we take Nelson and in the 2nd Round Draft a Pass Rusher, then maybe in the 3rd nab another RB. We can get good one in the 3rd IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not saying Mack will be the man or someone else......which begs the question is Turbin still under contract for next season?  If he is how would that factor in, the thinking at all about the priority of a RB be it Mack or someone else or a combo there of....) Does it make you lean more Barkley or Chubb as a draft prospect if he is......(PS I am not a fan of drafting a RB in the first, I wont hate it, but I just hope there are better choices defensive playmaker wise with that first round pick)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I like Mack but I am not sure he is a 3 down back.

I think it also matters what scheme Mack is utilized in and the types of runs that are scripted for him.  I think he'd flourish under the same scheme they utilized with Jamaal Charles in KC.   He still needs to develop the other aspects of his game such as blocking and making better reads on the inside runs though.  I also think he needs to get  in the weight room and get stronger.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People are being too hard on Mack.  Difficult to judge a rookie when he's more often than not getting hit 2 yards behind the line of scrimmage.

 

the Barkley talk....stop already. Never going to happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Mack could be our main back..our line is atrocious and we force him up the middle. Can’t talk about his size when there are starters around the league the same size or around it. He’s a east west runner with that 1 cut ability to take it deep north..remember Shady In Philly wasn’t much of a between the tackles back when he was there until he went to buffalo and they’ve had a good line built to run between the tackles..maybe he’s the zone stretch/ counter kind of back that doesn’t mean he’s not a bell cow it means we just don’t use him properly 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that after the Trent Richardson fiasco, that had Irsay saying we were building a monster, they are a little gun shy of drafting a running back to high in the draft. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/19/2017 at 10:59 PM, aaron11 said:

no

Thanks for the insightful post. But which part exactly are you saying no too?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, twfish said:

Thanks for the insightful post. But which part exactly are you saying no too?

the title

 

i dont think mack is a bell cow.  maybe he will get better at running between the tackles and that will change.  i think its more likely he keeps the role he has and we bring in somebody else to replace gore, or possibly gore comes back another year

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If M. Shanahan gets picked as the HC, he'll make the running back tandems of Barkley and Mack attack work to perfection.  Mack should have started or had more touches if we had the right OC.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/18/2017 at 11:32 AM, akcolt said:

I don't think you see much of Mack if you have Barkley on the roster. Would you want Mack taking carries or receptions away from Barkley? 

You would do what the Saints are doing. Ingram is having a career year but Kamara is explosive. So you give them a dose of both. Granted that Barkley is probably going to be a more polished receiver, a better runner in between the tackles, and faster, but Mack has his value. Plus Barkley can’t take every snap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, gacoop1 said:

If M. Shanahan gets picked as the HC, he'll make the running back tandems of Barkley and Mack attack work to perfection.  Mack should have started or had more touches if we had the right OC.

If Shannahan is brought in the chances of the colts drafting Barkley go from highly unlikely to zero.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BOTT said:

If Shannahan is brought in the chances of the colts drafting Barkley go from highly unlikely to zero.

Exactly what I was thinking. Shanahan would basically guarantee that we wouldn't take Barkley in the 1st.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Just for kicks....     I went through the thread to see if ANYONE thinks Mack is the Bell Cow?

 

My rough calculations are we have 29 "no" and one "too soon to know"...

 

But no one said yes.    Good.   We appear to all see roughly the same thing...    Mack is good as a complimentary back, but we'd love another back, preferably a pounder...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Just for kicks....     I went through the thread to see if ANYONE thinks Mack is the Bell Cow?

 

My rough calculations are we have 29 "no" and one "too soon to know"...

 

But no one said yes.    Good.   We appear to all see roughly the same thing...    Mack is good as a complimentary back, but we'd love another back, preferably a pounder...

 

It's still hard for me to say yes or no without seeing him get 20+ carries. One game where he did get some significant snaps he had a good game. I would like to see him get more pitches and tosses instead of handed up the gut.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. He’s a COP guy. We still need to replace Gore with a legit bell cow. 

 

I’d love to get Barkley. But I’d be interested in trading back more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/18/2017 at 1:29 AM, Dark Superman said:

Mack and Barkley together would be insane.

 

Thunder (Barkley) & Lightening (Mack)... Pick up 1-2 studs OL guys in FA/Draft... Offense might be offensive!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was glancing at Royce Freeman from Oregon. Seems like a good solid back to pair with Mack. Maybe bring in a third guy from FA like Jeremy Hill. Or maybe bring Christine Michael back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Royce Freeman or Nick Chubb would be my targets in the draft to pair along with Mack. This is how I feel as of today. Another guy I personally like quite a bit is Bo Scarborough. I think he's tough, has good vision, and when he sees a hole he hits it hard. If we are using a committee system which I'm sure we will then id set it up exactly how the Giants used to have it with Ahmad Bradshaw, Derrick Ward, and Brandon Jacobs. Scarborough of course reminds me of Jacobs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, krunk said:

Royce Freeman or Nick Chubb would be my targets in the draft to pair along with Mack. This is how I feel as of today. Another guy I personally like quite a bit is Bo Scarborough. I think he's tough, has good vision, and when he sees a hole he hits it hard. If we are using a committee system which I'm sure we will then id set it up exactly how the Giants used to have it with Ahmad Bradshaw, Derrick Ward, and Brandon Jacobs. Scarborough of course reminds me of Jacobs.

If we don't take Barkley at #3 Round 1, I am on the Bryce Love bandwagon in maybe Round 3 if he's there. Love is a workhorse and has pretty good break away speed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

If we don't take Barkley at #3 Round 1, I am on the Bryce Love bandwagon in maybe Round 3 if he's there. Love is a workhorse and has pretty good break away speed.

My thing with Love is I think he has similar traits to Mack. To me it would be like drafting the same style of back. I do need to study Love some more I will admit. Hes probably a better inside runner maybe. The guys I listed I think have more size and ability to grind and or take multiple carries. Guys who can stand in there and pass protect etc. Guys with a little more lead in there pants.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep...all I was saying was that it was a little concerning how they decided to pay everyone but him. I'm sure they have their reasons....obviously he has played great this year to make all-pro. I just had some concerns about him and what he may be asking for...along with the fact that Carolina (minus Cam) was absolutely awful running the ball this year.
    • First, we should acknowledge that the Jaguars might actually be good this year.  Not to say that they don't have flaws, but there team matches up well with Pittsburgh.  As far as the Steelers losing to inferior teams that me be the case but I don't think a team that averages 11-12 wins a year in the last 5 that is really a problem.  I can say the same thing for the Patriots.  They obviously lose to lesser teams because they've only had one undefeated season and are almost always the favorite.  They seem to lose to the Dolphins and Chiefs every year or so but it's no big deal.   Now the perception of the team being out of control because of outspoken players and guys making Facebook videos is way overblown.  Those same guys put in MVP performances week in and week out.  Tomlin has also went through an entire team, staff and scheme overhaul and has NO LOSING SEASONS in 11 years as coach.  They lost Dick LeBeau, Troy Polamalu, Jerome Bettis, Bruce Arians, Hines Ward, Joey Porter, and the list goes on and on.  They went from 3-4 "Blitzburgh" to a 4-3 "Dungyburgh" zone.  They went from bombs away Arians to dink and dunk Haley.  They move on from WR after WR from Superbowl MVP WRs to MVP candidate WRs.  And through all of that the team wins and is in contention.  He also develops talent quite well.  The Steelers don't have many "wasted" high picks and they've developed low picks like Antonio Brown or Villenueva.   I think his in game decision making is questionable at times but I'm not blaming the HC for the calls that the OC and DC make on 4th down or on critical 3rd downs.  I blame the HC for going for it on 4th or calling onside kicks or the big decisions.  Once they make the call the coordinators pick the play.  This perception of control or ruling with an iron fist is totally overrated and archaic.  These guys (especially the millennials) are going to more and more push back against that.  You don't always get the most out of people by keeping your thumb on them.  Sometimes working with them and letting them be themselves yields the best results.  Everyone is different.
    • And Monachino was an instant upgrade over Maunsky And Manusky was an instant upgrade over Coyer And Coyer was an instant upgrade over Meeks  And Meeks was an instant upgrade over Fangio.   He seems like he could be good but the last good DC the Colts had was Meeks.
    • http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/9919/andrew-norwell   thought I'd pass this along.    
    • I like the fact that he appears to be bringing in coordinators who are not retreads.  Coaches on the rise who are hungry and ready to prove themselves.  Brings a new mindset and enthusiasm to the organization.  A lot of the OC's and DC's that are making lateral moves, or moves back into a position they held previously are just trying to stay employed.  I always wondered why an OC or DC from a sub-.500 team would draw any interest from other organizations.  Why hore someone from a losing team if you're trying to build a winner?  I know the losing wasn't all their fault, but success breeds success...go out and hire coaches who come from winning organizations.  They must have been at least a part of that success.
  • Members

    • Swan Ronson

      Swan Ronson 169

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 27

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 13,983

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Clem-Dog

      Clem-Dog 239

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BlueShoe

      BlueShoe 3,123

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • deedub75

      deedub75 965

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 202

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 1,273

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr. Irrelevant

      Mr. Irrelevant 799

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewEra

      NewEra 2,401

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active: