Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Can we have a little sympathy for Dallas?


oldunclemark

Recommended Posts

It's not nearly as big a deal as people are making out of it. The dynasty lost 2 straight, the first 2 no less, without Emmitt. When he came back the won the SB. Now no Zeke isn't coming back that fast but Dak wasn't going to be perfect again either. My original prediction was an unappreciated 9-7 season for the Cowboys. That's probably where they would be with Zeke plus Dak's sophomore stumble. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one shed a tear for NE when Tom was forced to sit out for much lesser perceived violations....why would we feel bad for Dallas? I don't blame the league for trying to come down hard on players that have possibly violated and physically harmed women....especially in this current culture we are in now....they are going to take a hard line on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's funny they are losing. I get to caught up in what the media says though and what fans Post in general on websites I admit. Meaning a QB has 1 Very Good/Great season and almost everyone thinks they are a God = Carr, Dak, Winston, Cousins, etc.. None of those QB's will sniff the Playoffs this season. None of them have had the Career Andrew Luck has had either and Luck hasn't been healthy in 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎11‎/‎24‎/‎2017 at 4:14 PM, dgambill said:

No one shed a tear for NE when Tom was forced to sit out for much lesser perceived violations....why would we feel bad for Dallas? I don't blame the league for trying to come down hard on players that have possibly violated and physically harmed women....especially in this current culture we are in now....they are going to take a hard line on that.

So cheating is less perceived? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, crazycolt1 said:

So cheating is less perceived? 

Sorry...maybe misworded it. The evidence in both is perceived...the investigations I wouldn't say are conclusive in either....all I meant was the crime is much much less. The qbs get to doctor the balls all week...it made no difference in the outcome of the game that they probably were doctored a little after the refs expected them. Do I think the Pats covered it up and lied...sure...but a 4 game suspension and the circus around it was ridiculous. If the NFL had just came out and fined the Pats (the typical penalty for such actions) it should never have came to a suspension....but Elliott....this to me is a big issue...one that should bear the weight of suspension...so no I don't feel sorry. That was all I meant by it. It was poorly worded. Sometimes I type from my cell and its a real pain so I don't do the best job wording what I'm saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Go Chargers! Rivers is the best QB in that Division, I hope they keep rolling. I am now rooting for the Titans in the South too.

We had a ROUGH transition with the head coaching change, and working out what our Offense would look like and the defense changing from a hybrid 3-4 to a 4-3 AND the move to LA and...

 

But we are young and hungry and Philip has more years left in him and still loves the game (and his family doesn't want him to stop playing).  There's absolutely no quit in our team and that's the best thing as their confidence grows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Girlzarefanstoo said:

We had a ROUGH transition with the head coaching change, and working out what our Offense would look like and the defense changing from a hybrid 3-4 to a 4-3 AND the move to LA and...

 

But we are young and hungry and Philip has more years left in him and still loves the game (and his family doesn't want him to stop playing).  There's absolutely no quit in our team and that's the best thing as their confidence grows.

I have always liked Rivers as a QB. Most Colts fans hate him because of our history but my respect for him is huge. He took Peyton on many times and beat him a few times. He is a lot like Luck IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Girlzarefanstoo said:

Personally, I thoroughly enjoyed the whooping' my boys gave the "boys!"  Gotta resolve the kicking position though, geez....  

 

I might pull for you guys to win that division. The Chiefs are self-destructing and can't catch up to the Pats now (even though they have a tiebreaker), plus the Bills have beaten everyone in your division except for the Chargers, so if you win the AFC West, it makes the Bills getting into the playoffs a bit easier (we'd have tiebreakers over the Chiefs/Broncos/Raiders, but not you guys). I'll believe it when I see it but 9-7 may get into the playoffs in the AFC this year. Bills could do that by beating the Dolphins both times and the Colts (already wrote off both Patriots games, so we're on thin ice as is).

 

For your kicking position, seems to be a recent curse with the Cowboys. The Eagles kicker got injured at the beginning of the game (which was the Sunday before the Thanksgiving game) and the Eagles went for it on 4th down in the red zone each time and went for 2 after scoring TDs, and was largely successful on that front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
    • Things have now gone from bad to worse.     After I explained myself, I was kind of hoping you’d simply come back with “I’m sorry, I misunderstood you,  may bad.”  And we’d be done with this.  It would be over.      But instead, you double down on the roommate issue and follow up by questioning everything I said by breaking down some of my comments and what you think I really meant by them.     In other words, you’re telling me my motive, my meaning, as if you know my meaning better than I do.    It’s interesting to me…. I was recently told there’s an unofficial moderator policy:  don’t attack the poster, attack the argument.    Well, I don’t see that here.  You attacked me personally the first time and instead of a simple apology, you’ve double downed on a bad hand by attacking me personally AGAIN.      Why you’re comfortable telling me you know my meaning , my intention, better than I do is mystifying to me.  And frankly, I think you’re comfortable doing this because one of us is a moderator, and it certainly is NOT me.     I’ll say it again: you misunderstood my meaning, and intention,  the first time, and you’ve misunderstood me even worse the second time.   As I said before, I’m happy to withdraw and apologize for “go figure”, but the negative inference was not my intention.  Poorly phrased, I give you (in two posts now).   I don’t know what else to say…. I’m hoping this brings this very unfortunate exchange to an end.       
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...