Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Conspiracy of the day


Zoltan

Recommended Posts

So I now believe the Colts did the same thing this year as the Peyton injury, waiting till the last moment then IR course he was still on IR from the beginning but they wanted to give the fan base hope that he would comeback midseason. Instead they lose and get a high draft pick.

 

Now to add into this lose on purpose conspiracy is how odd our activated roster has been this year. They start Green as CB week one, after playing well they haven't played Wilson since week 2, and just this last week they don't play Davis (Possibly because they know watson isn't playing and want to give savage a better chance of beating them). You also have how they have been using there new playmaker Marlon Mack, minimally after saying they need to use him more every week. Even the late addition of Jacoby Brissett shows that they didn't believe in there backups all preseason. adding Brissett late meant they could only play a simple offense possibly to help the opposing defense.

 

This is the Colts lost season and they have been playing it perfectly without actually saying they want to lose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Colton Stenger said:

So I now believe the Colts did the same thing this year as the Peyton injury, waiting till the last moment then IR course he was still on IR from the beginning but they wanted to give the fan base hope that he would comeback midseason. Instead they lose and get a high draft pick.

 

Now to add into this lose on purpose conspiracy is how odd our activated roster has been this year. They start Green as CB week one, after playing well they haven't played Wilson since week 2, and just this last week they don't play Davis (Possibly because they know watson isn't playing and want to give savage a better chance of beating them). You also have how they have been using there new playmaker Marlon Mack, minimally after saying they need to use him more every week. Even the late addition of Jacoby Brissett shows that they didn't believe in there backups all preseason. adding Brissett late meant they could only play a simple offense possibly to help the opposing defense.

 

This is the Colts lost season and they have been playing it perfectly without actually saying they want to lose. 

They just won a game last Sunday.    If they are trying to lose,   they are doing a terrible job.    They wouldn't have traded for JB is the tank was on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Colton Stenger said:

So I now believe the Colts did the same thing this year as the Peyton injury, waiting till the last moment then IR course he was still on IR from the beginning but they wanted to give the fan base hope that he would comeback midseason. Instead they lose and get a high draft pick.

 

Now to add into this lose on purpose conspiracy is how odd our activated roster has been this year. They start Green as CB week one, after playing well they haven't played Wilson since week 2, and just this last week they don't play Davis (Possibly because they know watson isn't playing and want to give savage a better chance of beating them). You also have how they have been using there new playmaker Marlon Mack, minimally after saying they need to use him more every week. Even the late addition of Jacoby Brissett shows that they didn't believe in there backups all preseason. adding Brissett late meant they could only play a simple offense possibly to help the opposing defense.

 

This is the Colts lost season and they have been playing it perfectly without actually saying they want to lose. 

I cant grasp your reasoning. Had they secretly be intentionally losing this season they would have never traded for Brissett. They would have stuck with a loser from the beginning.

Besides, He may be eccentric but Jim has always hated losing and that hasn't changed IMO. I think if Jim thought for one minute someone wasn't giving 100% he would be shown the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

I cant grasp your reasoning. Had they secretly be intentionally losing this season they would have never traded for Brissett. They would have stuck with a loser from the beginning.

Besides, He may be eccentric but Jim has always hated losing and that hasn't changed IMO. I think if Jim thought for one minute someone wasn't giving 100% he would be shown the door.

I agree they would of kept sending tolzien out there. No we have the record we have because we suck that bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Colton Stenger said:

So I now believe the Colts did the same thing this year as the Peyton injury, waiting till the last moment then IR course he was still on IR from the beginning but they wanted to give the fan base hope that he would comeback midseason. Instead they lose and get a high draft pick.

 

Now to add into this lose on purpose conspiracy is how odd our activated roster has been this year. They start Green as CB week one, after playing well they haven't played Wilson since week 2, and just this last week they don't play Davis (Possibly because they know watson isn't playing and want to give savage a better chance of beating them). You also have how they have been using there new playmaker Marlon Mack, minimally after saying they need to use him more every week. Even the late addition of Jacoby Brissett shows that they didn't believe in there backups all preseason. adding Brissett late meant they could only play a simple offense possibly to help the opposing defense.

 

This is the Colts lost season and they have been playing it perfectly without actually saying they want to lose. 

 

Manning was never put on IR I do agree that within house they gave up on the season before it began since Pagano will be fired after this season(most likely)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Colton Stenger said:

So I now believe the Colts did the same thing this year as the Peyton injury, waiting till the last moment then IR course he was still on IR from the beginning but they wanted to give the fan base hope that he would comeback midseason. Instead they lose and get a high draft pick.

 

Now to add into this lose on purpose conspiracy is how odd our activated roster has been this year. They start Green as CB week one, after playing well they haven't played Wilson since week 2, and just this last week they don't play Davis (Possibly because they know watson isn't playing and want to give savage a better chance of beating them). You also have how they have been using there new playmaker Marlon Mack, minimally after saying they need to use him more every week. Even the late addition of Jacoby Brissett shows that they didn't believe in there backups all preseason. adding Brissett late meant they could only play a simple offense possibly to help the opposing defense.

 

This is the Colts lost season and they have been playing it perfectly without actually saying they want to lose. 

Walmart has a sale on tin foil going on at the moment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we were tanking then Tolzien would be out there throwing the ball. At least Brissett gives us a little bit of light. He’s not an Allstar by any means, but he can zip the ball decently. I bet we win 2 or 3 more games and select like top 10 in the draft. There’s a lot of bad teams this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jvan1973 said:

They just won a game last Sunday.    If they are trying to lose,   they are doing a terrible job.    They wouldn't have traded for JB is the tank was on

 

4 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

I cant grasp your reasoning. Had they secretly be intentionally losing this season they would have never traded for Brissett. They would have stuck with a loser from the beginning.

Besides, He may be eccentric but Jim has always hated losing and that hasn't changed IMO. I think if Jim thought for one minute someone wasn't giving 100% he would be shown the door.

 

4 hours ago, jameszeigler834 said:

I agree they would of kept sending tolzien out there. No we have the record we have because we suck that bad.

You repeatedly say that they would of never traded for Brissett, I disagree because they get the chance to show him off all season and trade him in the offseason. This gives them further value and thats why they kept Pagano for one more year. Yes they won on Sunday but they tried there hardest in the 2nd half to lose the game, and they always seem to lose because of bad play in the second half. Also just think of all the game day activations, there's a lot that don't make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Colton Stenger said:

 

 

You repeatedly say that they would of never traded for Brissett, I disagree because they get the chance to show him off all season and trade him in the offseason. This gives them further value and thats why they kept Pagano for one more year. Yes they won on Sunday but they tried there hardest in the 2nd half to lose the game, and they always seem to lose because of bad play in the second half. Also just think of all the game day activations, there's a lot that don't make sense.

Please, just stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Colton Stenger said:

 

 

You repeatedly say that they would of never traded for Brissett, I disagree because they get the chance to show him off all season and trade him in the offseason. This gives them further value and thats why they kept Pagano for one more year. Yes they won on Sunday but they tried there hardest in the 2nd half to lose the game, and they always seem to lose because of bad play in the second half. Also just think of all the game day activations, there's a lot that don't make sense.

There is a lot more things about your comments that don't make sense. Game day activations? That sounds more like trying to win than trying to lose. If they were trying to lose there would be no activations.

If you think Irsay was keeping Pagano around just to lose you don't know too much about Irsay. As far as second half bad play the other team made adjustments and our defense gets gassed after trying to hold a lead without the offense scoring in the second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Nadine locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can too. And that will tell us everything we need to know about how the view him. It will tell us their feelings on the tight end room, and what direction they pick from there will tell us even more.    but if they take him at 15, we won’t know much about what might have happened, as they will be landing someone they had rated highly and fell to them. 
    • Glad that’s over…    if I wanted to argue about it, I would have responded far more in depth than pointing out how you were attempting to gaslight me. I did not. Meaning I was ending my part of whatever the argument was. You “putting a finality to it” and then listing bullet points tells me it was the argument you wanted all along, which makes sense why you brought Grigson up in the first place. Bait, hook, gaslight. Almost got me buddy. You are a funny guy, Doug 
    • Putting a finality on an argument you want to have.   There is a theory that Ballard won't draft a OL high because ARs injuries were not caused by a poor oline.  I felt it important to note that since Luck's major injuries were also not caused by his oline, Ballard could still want to improve it like he did in 2018 simply because AR is The Franchise. And its important to point that out because there has been a running (false) narrative for about 9 years that Luck's oline was the (main) reason for his injuries that kept him out of games.  The (false) narrative is based upon, IMO, a detest of Grigson, and not reality about the facts (or strong rumors) behind the kidney laceration and snowboarding shoulder. Therefore, mentioning Grigson and the (false) narrative was germain to the point about Ballard possibly drafting Oline high this draft to protect AR. Mentioning Grigson shouldn't trigger a CB vs RG discussion, unless people reading it are gaslighted by their own reading lens.
    • That is a very inaccurate description of what happened.  At this point it’s history and doesn’t need to be revisited but I will say Chloe adds value to this board and should be and is by most encouraged to post, even if people don’t always agree with her.  
    • My response was in regards to another posted suggesting that the Colts need to get the pick right when it comes to picking a WR. I agree with you .
  • Members

    • Moosejawcolt

      Moosejawcolt 5,180

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEV

      IndyEV 81

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfanej

      coltsfanej 738

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,738

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,482

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,302

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • indyagent17

      indyagent17 1,785

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hawkeyecolt

      Hawkeyecolt 1,028

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DougDew

      DougDew 8,951

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 52

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...