Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Quincy Wilson..... inactive again


twfish

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

I can't believe you making that comment. A lot of injuries come on what could be called freaky plays. There are players who have non contact injuries every season and now you are an authority on the subject?

C-mon DD, you know better.

And some get more hurt more frequently on freaky plays than others.  You might call a player like that fragile.  We'll see, never know, but so far his short college and football career has been mired in injuries that keep him from playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

6 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

You've been trashing the Hooker pick since we made it.    One post after another.

 

And now this?     Glancing blow?     Chicken leg?

 

Wow......     Sigh......

 

Watch the tape.  He got hit in the thigh when the leg was in the air moving up....yet the knee buckled.  Not the stoutest.  Not saying it shouldn't have, but its not a given it would have with other DBs.

 

Not elite coverage skill, not elite tackling skill, not elite durability...only elite at playing the ball in the air, which does no good against quick paced offenses, yet he was picked at 15, and rated higher. 

 

The unconditional love bestowed upon him since draft day is quite amazing actually.

 

And then, as a rookie, while on IR, and after protesting...he comes up with a sportswear logo.   :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

So can you make me a list of rookie players who play his position that have played like a veteran.

His position is one of the hardest positions on the field to learn to play. Most rookies at safety take at least two to three years just to earn a starting spot.

If you knew this you wouldn't be so quick to call him a disappointment. But it seems you don't.

 

i disagree that safety is one of the harder transitions from college to pros

 

jamal adams has been good.  i have to go this morning, but i can make you that list later if you really want it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, aaron11 said:

i disagree that safety is one of the harder transitions from college to pros

 

jamal adams has been good.  i have to go this morning, but i can make you that list later if you really want it

For one thing I didn't say college to pros. I said rookies earning a starting spot. There is a difference.

Let's see your list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DougDew said:

Watch the tape.  He got hit in the thigh when the leg was in the air moving up....yet the knee buckled.  Not the stoutest.  Not saying it shouldn't have, but its not a given it would have with other DBs.

 

Not elite coverage skill, not elite tackling skill, not elite durability...only elite at playing the ball in the air, which does no good against quick paced offenses, yet he was picked at 15, and rated higher. 

 

The unconditional love bestowed upon him since draft day is quite amazing actually.

 

And then, as a rookie, while on IR, and after protesting...he comes up with a sportswear logo.   :lol:

It only take 25 lbs. of pressure to break a bone or damage a knee when hit in the right spot. It makes no difference if the foot is planted on the ground.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, crazycolt1 said:

It only take 25 lbs. of pressure to break a bone or damage a knee when hit in the right spot. It makes no difference if the foot is planted on the ground.

 

Ok thanks Doc.  Just comparing hits I see and then the commentary thereafter, many blown out knees occur because the leg is planted, unless its chicken-like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

For one thing I didn't say college to pros. I said rookies earning a starting spot. There is a difference.

Let's see your list.

list of what exactly?  rookie safetys that have been good?  that wont be hard

 

do you want a list of rookies that tackle and play the run better than hooker?  that wont be hard either, since he is terrible at it

 

if we are making a list of rookies that get interceptions but dont do much else, hooker would be right near the top

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DougDew said:

Watch the tape.  He got hit in the thigh when the leg was in the air moving up....yet the knee buckled.  Not the stoutest.  Not saying it shouldn't have, but its not a given it would have with other DBs.

 

Not elite coverage skill, not elite tackling skill, not elite durability...only elite at playing the ball in the air, which does no good against quick paced offenses, yet he was picked at 15, and rated higher. 

 

The unconditional love bestowed upon him since draft day is quite amazing actually.

 

And then, as a rookie, while on IR, and after protesting...he comes up with a sportswear logo.   :lol:

If I am not mistaken, before the freaky injury, where his leg was slammed into on a high impact play (basic physics at work), the rookie was tied for the interception lead in the entire NFL.  He was improving steadily and delivering upon his impact ball hawking reputation.  Hooker was well on his way to living up to both the promise and expectation placed upon him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, rockywoj said:

If I am not mistaken, before the freaky injury, where his leg was slammed into on a high impact play (basic physics at work), the rookie was tied for the interception lead in the entire NFL.  He was improving steadily and delivering upon his impact ball hawking reputation.  Hooker was well on his way to living up to both the promise and expectation placed upon him.

Nah.  Watch the tape.  It was high speed, but a bit of a glancing blow.  The WR's momentum was towards the sideline and Hooker's chicken leg did nothing to stop the momentum.  In fact, I think the WR took out other players on the side line like a bowling ball knocking down a bunch of pins.  Unimpeded.

 

Not disagreeing with facts.  He led the league in interceptions .....when the QB took a 7 step drop, turned, threw, and the ball was in the air about 3 seconds. 

 

Brady to Edelman takes about three seconds from snap to catch.  No need for an elite centerfielding FS against them.  We need an elite coverer and tackler then.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DougDew said:

Watch the tape.  He got hit in the thigh when the leg was in the air moving up....yet the knee buckled.  Not the stoutest.  Not saying it shouldn't have, but its not a given it would have with other DBs.

 

Not elite coverage skill, not elite tackling skill, not elite durability...only elite at playing the ball in the air, which does no good against quick paced offenses, yet he was picked at 15, and rated higher. 

 

The unconditional love bestowed upon him since draft day is quite amazing actually.

 

And then, as a rookie, while on IR, and after protesting...he comes up with a sportswear logo.   :lol:

 

Ah...

 

i think i see see what is really bothering you....

 

1.    He protested.

 

2.     He had a life outside football and came up with a sportswear logo...

 

3.     As for everything else, well, I'll just say that I respectfully disagree with most everything you stated....    you and I see most everything very differently...   but that's what makes the world go around...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DougDew said:

Nah.  Watch the tape.  It was high speed, but a bit of a glancing blow.  The WR's momentum was towards the sideline and Hooker's chicken leg did nothing to stop the momentum.  In fact, I think the WR took out other players on the side line like a bowling ball knocking down a bunch of pins.  Unimpeded.

 

Not disagreeing with facts.  He led the league in interceptions .....when the QB took a 7 step drop, turned, threw, and the ball was in the air about 3 seconds. 

 

Brady to Edelman takes about three seconds from snap to catch.  No need for an elite centerfielding FS against them.  We need an elite coverer and tackler then.  

Man, I just re-watched the video of the injury, pausing and going frame by frame to really see the impact.  The blow on Hooker's knee was brutal.  Sure, at fast speed it looks glancing, but if you frame by frame it, the hit is severe and the leg bends horribly the wrong way as a result of the impact.  Not sure what the heck you are looking at. 

 

Not many legs can survive that impact ... and the impact of a 200 & something pound player coming in at full speed, no leg is going to stop that monentum.  Of course the guy's body is going to fly through the leg, not noticeably impeded.  Like I originally said, it's pure physics.

 

A lot of car accidents don't look like much, either, until you look inside the car and see the bodies devastated by the momentum of the crash.  Trying to downplay the accident as being a case of Hooker having weak chicken legs is just entirely, and I mean ENTIRELY, a gross misrepresentation.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DougDew said:

Nah.  Watch the tape.  It was high speed, but a bit of a glancing blow.  The WR's momentum was towards the sideline and Hooker's chicken leg did nothing to stop the momentum.  In fact, I think the WR took out other players on the side line like a bowling ball knocking down a bunch of pins.  Unimpeded.

 

Not disagreeing with facts.  He led the league in interceptions .....when the QB took a 7 step drop, turned, threw, and the ball was in the air about 3 seconds. 

 

Brady to Edelman takes about three seconds from snap to catch.  No need for an elite centerfielding FS against them.  We need an elite coverer and tackler then.  

 

Dear God...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, aaron11 said:

pff had hooker rated as average, in case any one was wondering lol

 

Average in his first, what 4 or 5 games?  Not too shabby at all for a rookie, who also was tied for the league interception lead during that time.  Average would put him at about better than 50% of the league, give or take a few.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rockywoj said:

Not too shabby at all for a rookie, who also was tied for the league interception lead during that time.  Average would put him at about better than 50% of the league, give or take a few.

 

i know, and i dont think he is bad per say, just that he is over rated here 

 

im worried about his injuries and tackling at this point.  he did have 13 missed tackles in one year of college, that is a lot for a safety or anyone really.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hooker was making alot of tackles because the front seven wasn't. As for his knee injury, to call him a "chicken leg" is *ic. Remember E.G. Green? He broke his leg simply because it whipped around a defenders leg as he was being tackled. As for missed tackles, Hooker got hurt on a play 2 Colts had already missed the guy who caught the ball!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Ah...

 

i think i see see what is really bothering you....

 

1.    He protested.

 

2.     He had a life outside football and came up with a sportswear logo...

 

3.     As for everything else, well, I'll just say that I respectfully disagree with most everything you stated....    you and I see most everything very differently...   but that's what makes the world go around...

 

Nope.  What's bothering me is what I said.  Not afraid to say it.   

 

I can see Tiger Woods having a sports logo, like, because he has accomplished something.  

 

Maybe Malik is just trying to take advantage of a target market and selling himself a certain way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Two_pound said:

Hooker was making alot of tackles because the front seven wasn't. As for his knee injury, to call him a "chicken leg" is *ic. Remember E.G. Green? He broke his leg simply because it whipped around a defenders leg as he was being tackled. As for missed tackles, Hooker got hurt on a play 2 Colts had already missed the guy who caught the ball!!!!

Yes I do.  He had chicken legs too.  So does RGIII, who also got whipped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, rockywoj said:

Man, I just re-watched the video of the injury, pausing and going frame by frame to really see the impact.  The blow on Hooker's knee was brutal.  Sure, at fast speed it looks glancing, but if you frame by frame it, the hit is severe and the leg bends horribly the wrong way as a result of the impact.  Not sure what the heck you are looking at. 

 

Not many legs can survive that impact ... and the impact of a 200 & something pound player coming in at full speed, no leg is going to stop that monentum.  Of course the guy's body is going to fly through the leg, not noticeably impeded.  Like I originally said, it's pure physics.

 

A lot of car accidents don't look like much, either, until you look inside the car and see the bodies devastated by the momentum of the crash.  Trying to downplay the accident as being a case of Hooker having weak chicken legs is just entirely, and I mean ENTIRELY, a gross misrepresentation.

 

 

I observe that DougDrew now ignores the facts, as conveyed in the above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, rockywoj said:

Man, I just re-watched the video of the injury, pausing and going frame by frame to really see the impact.  The blow on Hooker's knee was brutal.  Sure, at fast speed it looks glancing, but if you frame by frame it, the hit is severe and the leg bends horribly the wrong way as a result of the impact.  Not sure what the heck you are looking at. 

 

Not many legs can survive that impact ... and the impact of a 200 & something pound player coming in at full speed, no leg is going to stop that monentum.  Of course the guy's body is going to fly through the leg, not noticeably impeded.  Like I originally said, it's pure physics.

 

A lot of car accidents don't look like much, either, until you look inside the car and see the bodies devastated by the momentum of the crash.  Trying to downplay the accident as being a case of Hooker having weak chicken legs is just entirely, and I mean ENTIRELY, a gross misrepresentation.

 

 

 

Thank you.   

 

Really appreciate you confirming what most people saw.    It was a nasty looking hit.   I wasn't the least bit surprised when his serious injury was announced.

 

Glad you saw it too.    Thanks for this post.    :thmup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
    • Things have now gone from bad to worse.     After I explained myself, I was kind of hoping you’d simply come back with “I’m sorry, I misunderstood you,  may bad.”  And we’d be done with this.  It would be over.      But instead, you double down on the roommate issue and follow up by questioning everything I said by breaking down some of my comments and what you think I really meant by them.     In other words, you’re telling me my motive, my meaning, as if you know my meaning better than I do.    It’s interesting to me…. I was recently told there’s an unofficial moderator policy:  don’t attack the poster, attack the argument.    Well, I don’t see that here.  You attacked me personally the first time and instead of a simple apology, you’ve double downed on a bad hand by attacking me personally AGAIN.      Why you’re comfortable telling me you know my meaning , my intention, better than I do is mystifying to me.  And frankly, I think you’re comfortable doing this because one of us is a moderator, and it certainly is NOT me.     I’ll say it again: you misunderstood my meaning, and intention,  the first time, and you’ve misunderstood me even worse the second time.   As I said before, I’m happy to withdraw and apologize for “go figure”, but the negative inference was not my intention.  Poorly phrased, I give you (in two posts now).   I don’t know what else to say…. I’m hoping this brings this very unfortunate exchange to an end.       
  • Members

    • ShuteAt168

      ShuteAt168 956

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,452

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,239

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr. Irrelevant

      Mr. Irrelevant 938

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...