Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Brady And The Clutch Qb Enigma In General, Does "clutch" Exist?


chad72

Recommended Posts

Think it goes beyond that. I am more comfortable with Eli in a 2 minute drive and needing a score than I am the rest of the game.

There was a study done by Football Outsiders back in February of 2010 where they attempted to rate the most "clutch" QBs.

Know who topped the list even back then? Our boy #10.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/ramblings/2010/guest-column-adjusted-comeback-efficiency

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no arguing that 'clutch,' does exist. Your brain will trigger enzymes and chemicals like adrenaline which greatly heighten your awareness and co-ordination for a short time. How the media chooses to give certain players the clutch moniker is another topic. I think some QBs run hot the entire game and others need events to trigger their increased performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no arguing that 'clutch,' does exist. Your brain will trigger enzymes and chemicals like adrenaline which greatly heighten your awareness and co-ordination for a short time. How the media chooses to give certain players the clutch moniker is another topic. I think some QBs run hot the entire game and others need events to trigger their increased performance.

Nice, I like that explanation:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think of "Clutch" being the final drive in a close scoring game. Everyone's enzymes kick into over-drive, separating the rookies from the veterans, the nervous from the uncertain, and the skilled from the unskilled. The difficulty in defining "clutch" lies in football being a team sport, so you're evaluating multiple performers and trying to pin them on their respectful QB's. Unfortunately, when one of these performers is not clutch, it makes the QB look bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think of "Clutch" being the final drive in a close scoring game. Everyone's enzymes kick into over-drive, separating the rookies from the veterans, the nervous from the uncertain, and the skilled from the unskilled. The difficulty in defining "clutch" lies in football being a team sport, so you're evaluating multiple performers and trying to pin them on their respectful QB's. Unfortunately, when one of these performers is not clutch, it makes the QB look bad.

Yep....I realize this was a positional analysis, but in the playoffs and especially the Super Bowl there is no getting around it.

It kinda helps when the other 21 starters are "clutch".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by 21isSuperman, February 22, 2012 - spam
Hidden by 21isSuperman, February 22, 2012 - spam

Hi, I like this work in this web site, you are standing up with great things! This web site is much helpfull!

I´m Rosen, I´m from Bristol, and I will be a fan of this web page, my personal details may be boring but I will tell them off course I am very found of books as well as tv shows, and I also listen a lot Him on my roadtrips, I´m single at the moment so male users....just kidding :)! I already tried online dating It did not work out very well....

I made this comment because as I already said I really like your page I also have a web community just like you, but mine is many different from yours, it is about free poker money....:)

I will also have to apologize by my writting it is the only way I get to talk with you guys....BYe BYe to everybody, love you all

Link to comment

Bradys best years may be behind him but he will leave as a better QB than Manning. Mannings behavior versus Bradys is insulting. Manning bites his nails, whines when he fails, gets that whiney little boy expression on his face when he three and outs and hid his head more than once when the final play (S) were the deciding factor-win or lose. Brady on the other hand takes it like a man. Clutch? Don't forget #18's super bowl interception and playoff interceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think the defense is the same old. For starters, our defense is no longer undersized, and doesn't struggle against the run.   If the Colts draft a man coverage corner in the first round, it will signal a major departure from the previous way of doing things, and it probably means Gus Bradley is gone after this season. I'm not against any of that happening. I just don't expect it, based on the established pattern.   As for what Ballard said in his presser, he also acknowledged that the expected top three boundary corners were unavailable for most of the season. Brents was our highly drafted rookie, and only played 9 games; Flowers played four games; Rodgers was released. That left us with rookies and journeyman playing corner most of the season. With Brents in Year 2 and hopefully healthy, Flowers back and healthy, another year in for Jaylon Jones, that gives Bradley a lot more to work with in the secondary. And I think that's more what Ballard was implying with his comments. Otherwise, he probably would have signed a veteran corner already.
    • Are you going to tell me that I haven’t heaped tons of thanks on you?   How many times have I said thank you and that you are way too kind with your praise?  The answer is many.   I’m sorry you seem not to remember those moments.     Sorry about the headache.  The feeling was mutual.  
    • That has always been my issue going back to the Polian years. They preferred undersized players to fit this scheme. That was great when they had a lead and played indoors. The problem  is that teams started running the ball to keep Peyton on the bench. Plus, u get in bad weather and on grass, their speed is negated and they are just a bunch of undersized players getting blown off the ball. I am in favor of building a team that can play in any environment and that can run various schemes. I see flexibility with the offence, however the D is the same old. That's why I think this is an important draft defensively. Will the Colts stray from their previous tendancies of drafting players that fit the Seattle scheme or will they deviate and say draft a man corner? Last year we were all on the edge of our seats when a trade was made at 3. Will we get our qb at 4? We were all on pins and needles till they made that pick. This draft has that same excitement for me. At 15 will Ballard and company do something different? This team needs a play maker on D and I contend that is their biggest need. I don't believe they get that player moving back.  Sure u may get him at 15 but if u really want a playmaker, this just might be the year to say move up and get a guy like Mirchell and Latu who may fall because of the medical. I am not in favor of getting a wr or te. Richardson, if he is the guy, should deliver explosive plays with our current roster.  Jot a fan of Gus and this scheme, but I really don't think he has a lot to work with and Ballard kind of eluded to that in his post season pressers.
    • The move happened before the 1984 season. To put in perspective how great Luck was here, here are the top 3 QBs over 40 seasons here win wise: Regular Season as a starter 1. Peyton Manning = 141 wins 2. Andrew Luck = 53 wins 3. Jim Harbaugh = 20 wins   Post Season as a starter 1. Peyton Manning = 9 wins (won the SB in 2006) 2. Andrew Luck = 4 wins 3. Jim Harbaugh = 2 wins   Luck had 33 more wins than Jim did and 2 more playoff wins than Jim did. Luck is so far ahead of any QB (not named Peyton) regarding wins in the Regular Season and Post Season that it is laughable.   
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...