Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts @ Bengals predictions


runthepost

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, DaColts85 said:

Jacoby Brissett will die behind this line.  Tolzein ends up playing.  Bengals 24 - Colts 10

 

Based on Chuck Pagano's decision not to bench Jacoby Brissett when he appeared to be banged up from taking way too many sacks, I would not bet on Scott Tolzein playing if your stupid coach has a choice.

 

I am interested in what the Bengals do this weekend because after your team they go to Jacksonville.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I better see Wilson and Desir play in this one.   Also hoping we crank up the blitz pressures more than we've been doing.  Can't let em stand back there all day long. Less zone with more man and some blitz is what I'm wanting.

 

Ted came in here talking about he's a pressure guy.   I haven't seen that yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, OLD FAN MAN said:

mixon 100 plus yds

dalton 300plus yds

atkins 3 plus sacks

aj green 3 plus tds

colts finally score 3 pt fg

mack 3 carries 30 plus yds

colts o-line allows 5 plus sacks

score 35 - 3 bengals 

pagano says we did not execute

It's on me for not having the team prepared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, JaguarsWoman said:

 

Based on Chuck Pagano's decision not to bench Jacoby Brissett when he appeared to be banged up from taking way too many sacks, I would not bet on Scott Tolzein playing if your stupid coach has a choice.

 

I am interested in what the Bengals do this weekend because after your team they go to Jacksonville.

Look at this. A few games into winnng season and we have Jags fans creepin over here. Doesn't take long...why don't you wait till you get in the playoffs for the first time since January 5th 2008. Calling our coach stupid, only we get to do that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CanuckColtsFan said:

Look at this. A few games into winnng season and we have Jags fans creepin over here. Doesn't take long...why don't you wait till you get in the playoffs for the first time since January 5th 2008. Calling our coach stupid, only we get to do that!

Actually everyone okin the planet gets to do that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This won't be as bad as the Jacksonville game, but we'll lose 24-7 or something to that degree. Bengals defense is better than people give it credit for, AJ Green will shred this defense. Joe Mixon isn't special or anything, but he could run on us for around 100 yds. Their offense is average, but 24 will be enough to beat us. I'll say Brissett throws one td to Mack, and that's our only score on the day.

 

Bengals 24

Colts 7

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, coltsva said:

Colts defense makes Andy Dalton look like Blake Bortles.

31-10 Bengals.

LOL! I wish I could "Like" this too! Blake Bortles is soo good though. The jags take the ball out of his hands every game, unless he's playing the Colts. 

 

Honestly, from what I remember, the last couple times playing in Cincinnati we haven't been very competitive. I don't think that will change this time around. Dalton and Greene will light us up. Mixon will be shut down however, they'll give him the ball probably 10 times for about 35 yards. Then Hill will score a 70 yard TD against us. (Just my fantasy salt coming out; starting Mixon this week) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prediction for Brissett- Pain

Prediction for Mack- 3 carries, 3 screen passes, 2 drops

Prediction for Hilton- his usual, 2 catches, tells media he is taking OL out for drinks

Prediction for Pagano- tells media he didn't have team prepared, says we all deserve better, writes another chapter in his book "16 Creative Ways to Lose Football Games", but shows up for work Monday as usual

Prediction for the game- actually think we keep it somewhat close, but we are playing on the road where we have been horrible, Cincy pulls away in the 4th  31-17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can too. And that will tell us everything we need to know about how the view him. It will tell us their feelings on the tight end room, and what direction they pick from there will tell us even more.    but if they take him at 15, we won’t know much about what might have happened, as they will be landing someone they had rated highly and fell to them. 
    • Glad that’s over…    if I wanted to argue about it, I would have responded far more in depth than pointing out how you were attempting to gaslight me. I did not. Meaning I was ending my part of whatever the argument was. You “putting a finality to it” and then listing bullet points tells me it was the argument you wanted all along, which makes sense why you brought Grigson up in the first place. Bait, hook, gaslight. Almost got me buddy. You are a funny guy, Doug 
    • Putting a finality on an argument you want to have.   There is a theory that Ballard won't draft a OL high because ARs injuries were not caused by a poor oline.  I felt it important to note that since Luck's major injuries were also not caused by his oline, Ballard could still want to improve it like he did in 2018 simply because AR is The Franchise. And its important to point that out because there has been a running (false) narrative for about 9 years that Luck's oline was the (main) reason for his injuries that kept him out of games.  The (false) narrative is based upon, IMO, a detest of Grigson, and not reality about the facts (or strong rumors) behind the kidney laceration and snowboarding shoulder. Therefore, mentioning Grigson and the (false) narrative was germain to the point about Ballard possibly drafting Oline high this draft to protect AR. Mentioning Grigson shouldn't trigger a CB vs RG discussion, unless people reading it are gaslighted by their own reading lens.
    • That is a very inaccurate description of what happened.  At this point it’s history and doesn’t need to be revisited but I will say Chloe adds value to this board and should be and is by most encouraged to post, even if people don’t always agree with her.  
    • My response was in regards to another posted suggesting that the Colts need to get the pick right when it comes to picking a WR. I agree with you .
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...