CR91

If Luck doesnt play next week

Recommended Posts

Which doesn't look like it will happen, can someone explain to me what was the point of taking him off the pup list

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CR91 said:

Which doesn't look like it will happen, can someone explain to me what was the point of taking him off the pup list

It's so he can practice with the team. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He told Gruden and Donahue he wasn't playing - they said it in the booth last night.  So you're exactly right - the handling of Luck this season was a train wreck.  From the start.  Management butchered it.  I understand he couldn't have practiced the last two weeks, but from what we've read, and heard, what difference would that have made?  Going with Tolzien, being forced to trade for a QB in September, taking up a roster spot on Luck all year, it is all a mess.  Ballard missing on the OL he drafted and signed and the QB situation were not exactly high water marks for him in my mind.  He really missed on both. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luck is not playing next week. He's already been ruled out.

 

The decision to place him on IR was made before week 1 of the season. At that time, they were hopeful that 1) he could practice with the team as part of his recovery back on to the field; 2) he may have recovered fast enough to have played within the first 6 weeks.

 

Unfortunately he has not gotten to the point where he can play, but he has been practicing. He would not have been able to practice with the team if he was IR'd.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, he's not playing vs Jacksonville. He needs probably 1 more week of practice. I think he plays Cincinnati for his debut game. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, CR91 said:

Which doesn't look like it will happen, can someone explain to me what was the point of taking him off the pup list

Read the other multiple threads that this is talked about.  He has been practicing...on PUP he would not be practicing. It very straight forward!

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DaColts85 said:

Read the other multiple threads that this is talked about.  He has been practicing...on PUP he would not be practicing. It very straight forward!

This

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

can someone please explain to me why this question keeps popping up?  Even if Luck hadn't started practicing yet, I still don't get the outrage.  All we'd have gained is one single roster spot, right?  Is Luck not important enough to take up that roster spot just in case he might have  been able to play sooner rather than later?  and who is the one magic player that we could have used that roster spot on that would have been the missing X factor that would have led to more than just 2 wins to this point?

 

I honestly think this question keeps coming up for the simple fact that some people want absolutely ANY excuse to bash the Colt FO/coaching staff.

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ColtsBlitz said:

Yeah, he's not playing vs Jacksonville. He needs probably 1 more week of practice. I think he plays Cincinnati for his debut game. 

I was thinking that too but the way they talked last night is that he is not even close to returning. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Dirty Mudflaps said:

He told Gruden and Donahue he wasn't playing - they said it in the booth last night.  So you're exactly right - the handling of Luck this season was a train wreck.  From the start.  Management butchered it.  I understand he couldn't have practiced the last two weeks, but from what we've read, and heard, what difference would that have made?  Going with Tolzien, being forced to trade for a QB in September, taking up a roster spot on Luck all year, it is all a mess.  Ballard missing on the OL he drafted and signed and the QB situation were not exactly high water marks for him in my mind.  He really missed on both. 

 

what have you read and heard that leads you to believe the past 2 weeks worth of practice have not made any difference as to when Luck could return?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

what have you read and heard that leads you to believe the past 2 weeks worth of practice have not made any difference as to when Luck could return?

I think Hasselbeck stating his opinion last night pre-game that Luck was a long way off (weeks) after watching him "practice" was as real and true as I've heard - and from a guy who knows the position, the player, and what it takes to play QB in the NFL.  And many writers have said the same thing for months now.  Hasselbeck went so far as to suggest that Luck is having difficulty even with drops and timing, which doesn't even get into the meat of the issue, the strength of the shoulder, which Hasselbeck said is not ready after watching him throw. 

 

So the debate, to me, is could the Colts have benefited from any part of this absence in a better way than was decided.  Because what we have on the one hand is one of 53 roster spots taken, and one of the inactives spots taken each week, and three practices so far.  So the answer to me is clear, yes, they should have signed a veteran QB over the summer, should have left Luck on the Reserve/PUP and used that roster spot for, I don't care, anything, anyone, since they can't play 60 minutes and are 2-4 and are dead last in point differential in the 4th quarter, and nowhere deep enough at any position.  There were three or four Colts who were cut I would have wanted on the 53 man.  And given time I'm sure I could find 3 or 4 more who were cut by other teams.  All of whom could have actually contributed to on-field production. 

 

What I'm suggesting is, one day of practice two weeks ago, and two days last week, for a grand total of three, may well have had to happen regardless, but I kind of think that Luck coming back off the Reserve/PUP could have gone straight to three days in week one and accomplished the same exact progress.  We shall see this week.  And the Colts would have had an able bodied player all these weeks, and should have had an able bodied vet at QB who maybe doesn't let leads to the Cards and Titans bleed out. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, J@son said:

can someone please explain to me why this question keeps popping up?  Even if Luck hadn't started practicing yet, I still don't get the outrage.  All we'd have gained is one single roster spot, right?  Is Luck not important enough to take up that roster spot just in case he might have  been able to play sooner rather than later?  and who is the one magic player that we could have used that roster spot on that would have been the missing X factor that would have led to more than just 2 wins to this point?

 

I honestly think this question keeps coming up for the simple fact that some people want absolutely ANY excuse to bash the Colt FO/coaching staff.

It isn't only the roster spot.  It's Tolzien in week one.  It's a mad-scramble trade in September for Brissett who still doesn't know the whole O.  It's only 16 chances to win, and with the most important position on the field, the Colts were ok going with Tolzien and then a kid from another system entirely.  That's sad.  That's a mess.  Now I'm presuming the Colts have always known Luck wouldn't be ready too.  If this has all been a mystery, if this was truly the best they could do because they truly believed Luck would be ready week one, than I can soften my stance.  But I don't believe that for a second. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, coltsleafs said:

I was thinking that too but the way they talked last night is that he is not even close to returning. 

Prob wont return until after bye if at all

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, CR91 said:

Which doesn't look like it will happen, can someone explain to me what was the point of taking him off the pup list

 

To keep fan interest up in the early part of the season and to provide fans with the hope that Luck would be back in a couple of weeks, which they knew was never going to happen. Hasselbeck said on ESPN last night that after watching Luck throw he isn't close to returning. Anybody that thinks the Colts are above doing things like this just remember the day after the story popped up that Luck was unhappy and wanted out of Indy, what did they do?  They trotted Luck out to stand at the practice field for everyone to see.  The only time they did that all year. Why would they do that? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but this question is getting so old... it's really not that hard to understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Dirty Mudflaps said:

He told Gruden and Donahue he wasn't playing - they said it in the booth last night.  So you're exactly right - the handling of Luck this season was a train wreck.  From the start.  Management butchered it.  I understand he couldn't have practiced the last two weeks, but from what we've read, and heard, what difference would that have made?  Going with Tolzien, being forced to trade for a QB in September, taking up a roster spot on Luck all year, it is all a mess.  Ballard missing on the OL he drafted and signed and the QB situation were not exactly high water marks for him in my mind.  He really missed on both. 

His handling this season? I'm still trying to figure why he didn't have the surgery when he lacerated his kidney. And these people (Luck included) seem not to be held accountable by the media. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, GusFring said:

His handling this season? I'm still trying to figure why he didn't have the surgery when he lacerated his kidney. And these people (Luck included) seem not to be held accountable by the media. 

 

The media should hold Luck accountable for the decision he made about his body? 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bottom line is this: it doesn't matter whether it's Luck, Tolzien or Brissett, or hell even Peyton freaking Manning, if the coaches force you to call certain plays and to completely go predictable the entire second half, refuse to play their main running threat who has big play potential every carry, and then force the D to play a jacked up version of zone Defense.

 

with this coaching staff, it doesn't matter. They absolutely suck and I think we can now see why Grigson micromanaged them so much.  Pagano and his entire staff should have been fired alongside Grigson last year.  This will not get better just cause we get Luck back.  We have not lost due to poor QB play.... outside of perhaps the Rams game that is. It's the coaching staff putting our players into positions/formations that they don't do well in. And having ZERO accountability amongst the players.  

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, csmopar said:

Bottom line is this: it doesn't matter whether it's Luck, Tolzien or Brissett, or hell even Peyton freaking Manning, if the coaches force you to call certain plays and to completely go predictable the entire second half, refuse to play their main running threat who has big play potential every carry, and then force the D to play a jacked up version of zone Defense.

 

with this coaching staff, it doesn't matter. They absolutely suck and I think we can now see why Grigson micromanaged them so much.  Pagano and his entire staff should have been fired alongside Grigson last year.  This will not get better just cause we get Luck back.  We have not lost due to poor QB play.... outside of perhaps the Rams game that is. It's the coaching staff putting our players into positions/formations that they don't do well in. And having ZERO accountability amongst the players.  

And the cardinals game,   but JB was thrown into a bad situation

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The videos that where posted on here last week looked like his shoulder was fine.  He was throwing deep and had zip.

 

Timing of course is probably off, he didn't get to practice at all until recently.  

 

On the other hand I do trust Hasselbeck's knowledge of both what's required to play the position and his knowledge of Luck as a player.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/17/2017 at 11:41 AM, Dirty Mudflaps said:

He told Gruden and Donahue he wasn't playing - they said it in the booth last night.  So you're exactly right - the handling of Luck this season was a train wreck.  From the start.  Management butchered it.  I understand he couldn't have practiced the last two weeks, but from what we've read, and heard, what difference would that have made?  Going with Tolzien, being forced to trade for a QB in September, taking up a roster spot on Luck all year, it is all a mess.  Ballard missing on the OL he drafted and signed and the QB situation were not exactly high water marks for him in my mind.  He really missed on both. 

 

Is it really that far-fetched to think that maybe this is how Luck wanted the situation to be handled? You're making sound like he didn't have any say in the matter, and I definitely don't believe that to be the case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, J@son said:

 

The media should hold Luck accountable for the decision he made about his body? 

Yes. He's a professional athlete. How does waiting so long help him or the team? Now it's looking like he's out for the year. So much for seeing light at the end of the tunnel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, GusFring said:

His handling this season? I'm still trying to figure why he didn't have the surgery when he lacerated his kidney. And these people (Luck included) seem not to be held accountable by the media. 

Surgery is never the first option. Always choose rest and natural healing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, GusFring said:

Yes. He's a professional athlete.

 

who cares?  it's his body.  He can do whatever he wants with it, which is going to be based on advice from medical professionals.

 

Quote

How does waiting so long help him or the team?

 

I'm not a Dr so I can't answer as to how waiting would or would not have helped him.

 

Quote

Now it's looking like he's out for the year.

 

What could you possibly be basing that on?  **edit, nevermind..just saw the thread about him being shut down in practice this week. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎10‎/‎17‎/‎2017 at 1:38 PM, stitches said:

It's so he can practice with the team. 

Did anyone really think that Luck would simply step up after his surgery and be ready to instantly play? I have had a similar injury, and I can tell you that he will need at least 6 weeks of practice even with the great recovery programs that an NFL team can afford. So lets just admit that Luck will need several more weeks of practice unless you really want him to aggravate the injury and require even More time to recover.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/17/2017 at 1:41 PM, Dirty Mudflaps said:

He told Gruden and Donahue he wasn't playing - they said it in the booth last night.  So you're exactly right - the handling of Luck this season was a train wreck.  From the start.  Management butchered it.  I understand he couldn't have practiced the last two weeks, but from what we've read, and heard, what difference would that have made?  Going with Tolzien, being forced to trade for a QB in September, taking up a roster spot on Luck all year, it is all a mess.  Ballard missing on the OL he drafted and signed and the QB situation were not exactly high water marks for him in my mind.  He really missed on both. 

I heard that Luck had to get a cortisone shot because his shoulder was sore.  So that's not good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/17/2017 at 7:09 PM, csmopar said:

Bottom line is this: it doesn't matter whether it's Luck, Tolzien or Brissett, or hell even Peyton freaking Manning, if the coaches force you to call certain plays and to completely go predictable the entire second half, refuse to play their main running threat who has big play potential every carry, and then force the D to play a jacked up version of zone Defense.

 

with this coaching staff, it doesn't matter. They absolutely suck and I think we can now see why Grigson micromanaged them so much.  Pagano and his entire staff should have been fired alongside Grigson last year.  This will not get better just cause we get Luck back.  We have not lost due to poor QB play.... outside of perhaps the Rams game that is. It's the coaching staff putting our players into positions/formations that they don't do well in. And having ZERO accountability amongst the players.  

I could not agree more! The play calling in the second half was beyond horrendous. I can't put into words how bad it was. They completely did away with the run. It was almost like they were trying to lose. They wore out the defense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Practice. He's human. He won't be instantly ready to play after an injury. He needs time to shake off the rust. Also, there was no way to know 6 weeks ago where he'd be with his shoulder. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

Is it really that far-fetched to think that maybe this is how Luck wanted the situation to be handled? You're making sound like he didn't have any say in the matter, and I definitely don't believe that to be the case.

I don’t know what you’re trying to convey with the above. This is how Luck wanted what situation handled?  His recovery?  The roster?  The trade?  IR or PUP or active roster?  The owner telling us all he’d be ready week one?  There isn’t a thing about this situation that was handled right in my estimation - save for not playing Luck before he was healthy.  So yes, it’s really far fetched for me to think Luck wanted “the situation” handled this way.  I can’t imagine anyone wanted this situation handled like it’s been so far - unless you’re in the tank the season camp.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/17/2017 at 1:36 PM, CR91 said:

Which doesn't look like it will happen, can someone explain to me what was the point of taking him off the pup list

 

 It is like you have been asleep for a couple months.
Or no explaining will help.  lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Dirty Mudflaps said:

I don’t know what you’re trying to convey with the above. This is how Luck wanted what situation handled?  His recovery?  The roster?  The trade?  IR or PUP or active roster?  The owner telling us all he’d be ready week one?  There isn’t a thing about this situation that was handled right in my estimation - save for not playing Luck before he was healthy.  So yes, it’s really far fetched for me to think Luck wanted “the situation” handled this way.  I can’t imagine anyone wanted this situation handled like it’s been so far - unless you’re in the tank the season camp.  

 

The only thing that was handled poorly IMO was Irsay saying he'd be ready for training camp. Aside from that, I honestly have no issues with how everything else was handled.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The best thing Indianapolis can do is shut down Luck for the season and allow him to fully heal. Fire Pagano, bring in a new Head Coach for 2018. If we can hit free agency and the draft the Colts can easily make the playoffs in 2018. But, we need Luck back at 110%

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How can you say they’re playing fine when our coverage is so bad. Maybe they’re one or two big plays but that’s how you lose football games. Lol 
    • With the Colts not playing this week, it allows a chance to look at where we are as a team and, if you are to look at our season so far based on pre-season expectations, it makes for quite good reading, in my opinion.   So I decided to make a list, based on pre season expectations, listing who has been a pleasant surprise so far, and who has been a disappointment:   Pleasant Surprises   Jacoby Brissett - Goes without saying, he has been a very solid stand in for Andrew.  Has made errors but I don't think anyone could expect a 2nd year player to move systems and play as well as he has.  Not worth thinking about how the team would have played with Tolzein under center. Cornerbacks - Did anyone expect Desir and Melvin to be as strong as they have been?  Melvin asking to go up against Brown last week says a lot about his character too. Nate Hairston - I love this guy.  Potentially my number one pick for this category and a long term asset for this defense. Al Woods - Hankins was the big money addition, and has done well, but Woods has been excellent value. John Simon - I cant decide if I love him or Hairston more!   Mathias Farley - Hard hitting, strong in the tackle.  Very solid player. Rigoberto Sanchez - When Locke was cut, did anyone else have a sinking feeling in their stomach?  Sanchez has played so well I don't even think anyone has missed Pat (for his punting anyway), which is a massive compliment to the kid.  Kudos Tom McMahon for unearthing this talent.   Disappointments   Vontae Davis - A real disappointment for me.  All the talk from training camp was that he was back to the old Vontae, then picks up an injury and comes back and plays poorly.  Donte Moncrief - It was interesting hear the WR coach talk about him last week, admitting that he has been "hot and cold" and its so frustrating to see the raw ability not convert to the field regularly enough.  I still think there is something there but would not be surprised if Ballard lets him go. Jack Doyle - It was interesting listening to the "Chopping Wood" podcast where they mentioned that Doyle cost us two games.  He did have that one game where he was phenomenal but he had high expectations from last year and being made TE1 for 2017.  I am not worried about him long term, but has to be listed here. Le-Raven Clark - Say no more.   Other Notes:   Marlon Mack - I don't think I can put him in as a pleasant surprise as there were expectations on him and, although he has been explosive in some instances, still a lot to work on in protection and inside running. Offensive Line - I did think hard about putting them in disappointments (not just Clark) but I don't think anyone came in thinking they would be an elite unit and, with the amount of injuries and shuffling, I actually think they have faired as I would have expected.  A long way to go but Castonzo has been strong I think (and unfairly targeted) and Kelly is a stud so there are strong building blocks and I trust Ballard will address this after focussing so hard on the defense this year. Honourable Mentions - Mingo, Gore, Hunt, Sheard.   Looking at the above, although the record is poor (and you are what your record says you are), to look at what we have done in recruitment and the increasing trajectory of play, a change of coaching (which seems inevitable) could mean we come back strong in 2018, with the potential for strong draft acquisitions.   Feel free to add your own for either category but thought I would share my perspective....  
    • Guys....   Not be a Debbie downer here, but let’s not fall into this trap again. We’ve been down this road many times with players who probably aren’t in the league anymore.   While I agree about Hairston, let’s pump the breaks on Desir. He’s had a couple nice moments, but future starter is jumping the gun for him. Let’s wait and see what the rest of the season is like for Desir. There was a time last year when the OL was “fixed”. I’m all in on Hairston who has been exceptional every week but one step at a time.
    • I think you are right, we'll never know for sure.  Let's just hope he recovers and is back next year...I think we all can agree on that.
    • I can't speak for anyone else, but personally I don't listen to radio or watch that much sports television besides broadcasts of Reds and Colts sporting events. Working in education with a full time job as a dad has put perspective on things important to me.    When it comes to Andrew and this whole injury saga, I highly doubt we will ever know the complete truth of everything that has transpired. Logic dictates that Luck was not getting cortisone treatments on a weekly basis in 2016, but that is only based on my opinion and nothing more. There isn't any full evidence to discredit or support the claim that he was indeed receiving these treatments.    I don't blame Irsay or the staff either for any "false" statements. When Jim made his comments about Luck returning this year, I believe he truly meant it. The ball has always been in Andrew's court. Only he for sure knows the truth about what is going on with his shoulder. 
  • Members