Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Let's just be positive post!


horseshoecrabs

Recommended Posts

We looked competitive in the first half.  Besides, this game loss just gave us another higher pick in next years draft.  I liked the way our defense looked for the first half of the game. Also, we finally have a good backup QB.  we're also closer to Luck coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, #12. said:

Positive - the rest of the division is 2-2 and Houston and Jacksonville have tough games next week.  If we can get the 49er game and Luck returns, we still have a shot.  49er game is a must.

I've heard that Luck will need about 4 weeks of practice before he's ready for live game action. This is based on Dr. Chao's assessment.

 

Also, when Luck returns, expect him to be very rusty. He hasn't played a live game or even had a preseason game. Just because he may return to the lineup doesn't mean we can expect to win. It will take time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question.

 

How many of the games so far do people think Andrew Luck would have won?  Brissett is 1-2, and Tolzein is 0-1, but the only game we lost so far that a more skilled quarterback might have won, is possible Arizona.  The Rams game and the Seattle game were both defensive disasters that it would have taken an act of God for any quarterback to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Flash7 said:

I've heard that Luck will need about 4 weeks of practice before he's ready for live game action. This is based on Dr. Chao's assessment.

 

Also, when Luck returns, expect him to be very rusty. He hasn't played a live game or even had a preseason game. Just because he may return to the lineup doesn't mean we can expect to win. It will take time.

 

I didn't say we were winning the Super Bowl.  I said we would have a shot - a shot to be in playoff contention at the end.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Flash7 said:

I've heard that Luck will need about 4 weeks of practice before he's ready for live game action. This is based on Dr. Chao's assessment.

 

Also, when Luck returns, expect him to be very rusty. He hasn't played a live game or even had a preseason game. Just because he may return to the lineup doesn't mean we can expect to win. It will take time.

 

That's what people don't seem to understand. Luck will be rusty and we could very easily lose a couple of games while he works off that rust. Peyton was not very good after his knee surgery and missing all of the preseason and it took him about 4 games to get things together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Flash7 said:

I've heard that Luck will need about 4 weeks of practice before he's ready for live game action. This is based on Dr. Chao's assessment.

 

Also, when Luck returns, expect him to be very rusty. He hasn't played a live game or even had a preseason game. Just because he may return to the lineup doesn't mean we can expect to win. It will take time.

He probably will be a little rusty but he will have the whole playbook at his disposal.  He will find it easier to check into a better play during the game than Brissett.  Let's face it a rusty Luck is a lot better than a healthy Brissett. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, #12. said:

 

I didn't say we were winning the Super Bowl.  I said we would have a shot - a shot to be in playoff contention at the end.   

I didn't either, and unfortunately, I a was alluding that we do not win enough, even with Luck, to make the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, George Peterson said:

I have a question.

 

How many of the games so far do people think Andrew Luck would have won?  Brissett is 1-2, and Tolzein is 0-1, but the only game we lost so far that a more skilled quarterback might have won, is possible Arizona.  The Rams game and the Seattle game were both defensive disasters that it would have taken an act of God for any quarterback to win.

 

2 maybe 3?

There's really no way to know, but it's also hard to quantify the stress a toothless offense puts on the defense, especially when they're spotting the other team 10+ points on turnovers too.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, lollygagger8 said:

At least the backup Center played extremely well for the conditions.......??

 

(I'm trying) 

Yeah it's tough during these types of seasons.

 

Where one spot is solid, the next position is a disaster. Lots of holes. 

 

Definitely gotta watch with some lowered expectations. 

 

As DFree used to say 'it is what it is' this season. They'll look a ton better with one more draft and FA class. I'm sure you'll agree on that. This year is an evaluation year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, horseshoecrabs said:

Ok I posted do we have a chance to be competitive post now let's just put aside all that and just be positive as a colts fan just positive feed back is welcome ! all negative 

feed back for this is just being a TROLL! Don't be branded as a troll every one would then know you!

 

       Stay strong, as my guitar gently weeps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The upside this season has to be the run D and our young secondary. Hooker, Wilson, Melvin, Hairston, and Farley are all improving and grinding. If we improve the online and improve the LB pass coverage, we are closing in on being a complete team once everyone is healthy. I feel Ballard could even use Vontae for trade bait. He underperformed last season, and got torched all night by seahawks. He was by far the weakest DB last night. The LB coverage was horrendous. Use Davis to get us coverage LB or a veteran OLineman!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, IinD said:

Yeah it's tough during these types of seasons.

 

Where one spot is solid, the next position is a disaster. Lots of holes. 

 

Definitely gotta watch with some lowered expectations. 

 

As DFree used to say 'it is what it is' this season. They'll look a ton better with one more draft and FA class. I'm sure you'll agree on that. This year is an evaluation year.

 

Yup, Ballard will turn us around....eventually :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Malik Hooker is everything they said he is.  I'd assume he's the front runner for DROY. And You hardly notice the absence of Mcafee with Sanchez. Hairston has been a pleasant surprise. And I can't believe I'm saying this but Melvin might be better than last season. Those are the positives from last nights game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, smittywerb said:

Hooker is a bonafide stud and the steal of the draft.  

 

1 hour ago, Defjamz26 said:

Malik Hooker is everything they said he is.  I'd assume he's the front runner for DROY.

 

Hooker has three interceptions in four games.  :rock:

 

And this is hopefully our worst football of the year so far.  If Luck/Kelly come back and we start building a lead on teams and force them to pass more...  :thmup:

 

I don't know if Hooker is going to set any records this year, but at this rate, he will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

 

Hooker has three interceptions in four games.  :rock:

 

And this is hopefully our worst football of the year so far.  If Luck/Kelly come back and we start building a lead on teams and force them to pass more...  :thmup:

 

I don't know if Hooker is going to set any records this year, but at this rate, he will.

 

Dude is just what we needed and can easily turn into the leader of this team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, The Fish said:

 

2 maybe 3?

There's really no way to know, but it's also hard to quantify the stress a toothless offense puts on the defense, especially when they're spotting the other team 10+ points on turnovers too.

 

 

 

Maybe a fully healthy Luck who went through the entire training camp and preason would have won 2-3 of those games. A rusty Luck, I'm not so sure.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My sleepers: (meaning, the kind of players coaches would like to have, more than what consensus big board gives credit to them. Some of them might need couple of years to attain their high potential, if drafted into suitable coaching environment, so a lot depends on that. Some of them have injury concerns too).   Most of them are high IQ players or high-effort, high-motor players - two traits I look for from the Drafted players, list is long but I like these guys.. gonna be interesting to see where they land and how it works out for them in long run.    Payton Wilson, LB, NC State Caelen Carson, CB, Wake Forest Kiran Amegadjie, OT, Yale Maason Smith, IDL, LSU Christian Mahogany, OG, Boston College Max Melton, CB, Rutgers Zak Zinter, OG, Michigan Bucky Irving, RB, Oregon Khyree Jackson, CB Oregon Dylan McMahon, C, NC State (good fit for Browns)  Tykee Smith, SAF, Georgia Ainias Smith, WR, Texas A&M Cam Hart, CB, Notre Dame Michael Barrett, LB Michigan Malachi Corley, WR, Western Kentucky Beaux Limmer, IOL, Arkansas   Kamren Kinchens, S, Miami McKinnley Jackson, IDL, Texas A&M Kalen King, CB, Penn State Justin Eboigbe, IDL, Alabama    Jacob Cowing, WR, Arizona Beau Brade, SAF, Maryland Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville Jalyx Hunt, EDGE, Houston Christian (I'm hoping for day 3 Vikings pickup, as Flores could work wonders with him)  Jaheim Bell, TE, Florida State Brennan Jackson, EDGE, Washington State  Delmar Glaze, OT, Maryland Myles Cole, EDGE, Texas Tech Kristian Boyd, DT, Northern Iowa Javontae Jean-Baptiste, DL, Notre Dame Jordan Magee, LB, Temple Myles Harden, CB, South Dakota Jalen Green, EDGE, James Madison (UDFA Target prospect)  Trey Taylor, S, Air Force (UDFA prospect) Eyabi Okie-Anoma, EDGE, Charlotte Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto  Sundiata Anderson, EDGE, Grambling State  Daequan Hardy, CB, Penn State (Special Teams, Returner)  Emani Bailey, RB, TCU   As for Vikings, I don't wanna rush to draft QB if the team isn't confident in the guys they could move up in draft range, and I'd like to just draft impact players that build the roster at this point.   Build the team, draft a franchise QB at right time, don't rush and ruin years trying to make someone work out in the NFL. 
    • If you are relying upon history, does accuracy matter?  I think the reason Smith ended up at RT is because the coaches tried him there out of necessity and he played well, and stayed there due to the coaches wishes.  I don't think that FO guys had much to say about it, because Smith was in fact drafted to be a G, not the RT.  Ballard's own words after day 2 of that draft was that they drafted Smith a bit higher than they had him ranked, because he was the "last remaining starting caliber G on the board".   So it does fit that Smith was not drafted by Ballard or the FO to be a RT...in part because of the measurables and arm length.   Also directing this response to @Matthew Gilbert
    • Same. And that's because over time that level of depth eventually decays. 
    • I don't think players like Davis (and especially Bryan, who I don't think will make the final 53) should impact our draft strategy at all. Not even a little bit. If we like Byron Murphy, figure out what to do with those other guys later. The other versatile guys you mention don't scratch the itch the way Murphy would be expected to -- he should be looked at as a disruptive 3T who plays there every down, not a matchup guy or passing downs guy.    If anything, maybe it's the other way around. The Colts already had a feel for the DTs in draft class and knew they wouldn't get what they want in the draft, so they addressed the position in free agency. And after this weekend, that might help people better understand the strategy at DB and WR...    The bolded really gets at the heart of it. I like Murphy, but I'm not offering him as a great player that you just have to take a chance on. But when it comes to draft strategy, I think taking the best players is the way to go. I'm directly opposed to needs-based drafting, and to passing on a really good prospect because you have backup level veterans already on the roster. 
    • I suppose Murphy being the next Donald is possible, but I wouldn’t think it’s likely.     As for Smith playing right tackle, I believe I was simply echoing Ballard’s initial viewpoint.  That Smith’s short arms made him an unlikely RT.  And that he had to be talked into it by Morocco Brown and Ed Dodds.   I don’t think I was stating MY personal view.    As for skillset vs measurements.  I think it’s been an issue for all of us because Ballard has such specific requirements for each position.  So we factor that into our judgements. 
  • Members

    • ChuggaBeer

      ChuggaBeer 1,756

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 153

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • boo2202

      boo2202 672

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • VikingsFanInChennai

      VikingsFanInChennai 2,990

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hark

      Hark 978

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Hammonds

      John Hammonds 4,928

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ShuteAt168

      ShuteAt168 961

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 311

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,313

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C0LT5

      C0LT5 86

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...