Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

I like the Kendall Reyes pick, or maybe Kawann Short later on. As much as it'd be nice to land Fleener, we have more pressing needs than TE. Even if Clark goes, Tamme is more than capable. If we do draft one, I'd like Ladarius Green late in the draft.

Andrew Luck

Chase Minnifield

Kevin Zeitler

Kawann Short

Ryan Broyles

QB: Manning/Luck

RB: Brown/Addai

FB: Felton?

WR's: Garcon, Collie, Broyles (if Santonio Holmes is cut by Jets, wouldn't surprised to see him land here, had a good relationship with Arians at Pittsburgh. Also wouldn't surprise me if we picked up Stanford WR Chris Owusu as a UDFA)

TE: Tamme, Clark?

LT: Castonzo

LG: Reitz (would be nice to get Grubbs or Nicks but can't see it)

C: Saturday/Pollak

RG: Zeitler

RT: Ijalana

DE: Anderson

NT: Brandon McKinney (Ravens, FA) - would like Soliai but can we afford him?

DE: Short/Tyler Brayton/Brackett?

OLB: Mathis

ILB: Angerer

ILB: Brackett

OLB: Hughes? Brackett? (not sure where Brackett fits in this system)

CB: Powers

CB: Minnifield

FS: Bethea

SS: Zbikowski (Ravens, FA)

Let me know your thoughts on this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the Kendall Reyes pick, or maybe Kawann Short later on. As much as it'd be nice to land Fleener, we have more pressing needs than TE. Even if Clark goes, Tamme is more than capable. If we do draft one, I'd like Ladarius Green late in the draft.

Kawann Short is returning to Purdue for his senior season. I'm very high on Fleener. 6'6 and very fast, may not be as physical as Gronkowski but the kid has definite ability. He may be the first TE off the board. If he or Kendall Wright fall to 34 I would seriously consider taking them if Barron/Poe are off the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kawann Short is returning to Purdue for his senior season. I'm very high on Fleener. 6'6 and very fast, may not be as physical as Gronkowski but the kid has definite ability. He may be the first TE off the board. If he or Kendall Wright fall to 34 I would seriously consider taking them if Barron/Poe are off the board.

Ah I didn't realise that, sorry man! I'm a huge Fleener fan, I'd love him but like I say, not sure he's our biggest need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mocks look good, but IMO after the Colts get rid of some veteran drain on the salary cap, the draft is Offensive heavy. Luck in first. Then you need to replace og/ot/wrx2/te/rb/c. That is 8draft picks of our 10. Where do you think the Defense is going to draft. These are going to be needed if you want to keep your rookie QB healthy. This my opinion of how the draft is going to go. I hope I am wrong, but we all have seen what happens to rookie QBs that don't have the protection and help around them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Tamme is a free agent...and if we do cut Clark, then Eldridge is our only remaining TE

Possibly; some half decent free agents knocking about in John Carlson, Joel Dreessen...I think Tamme stays to be honest, but it would be good to have a really athletic Tight End.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.Andrew Luck

2 coby fleener TE Stanford (giving Luck a familiar weapon)

3 kendall reyes Dt/De Uconn (could play both DT/DE)

4 Dequan Menzie CB Alabama (desperatly Needed CB)

5 CB/Dt

6. CB/DT/LB

7. DT

I like Reyes in Pagano's defense. Very Antonio Smith-like, to me. Only saw him a couple of times, but I think he'd be a good fit. High motor, great size at 5-tech end, good interior pass rush at 3-tech tackle. His stock is climbing right now, but he'll probably still be available at #34. I don't know about #65.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Reyes in Pagano's defense. Very Antonio Smith-like, to me. Only saw him a couple of times, but I think he'd be a good fit. High motor, great size at 5-tech end, good interior pass rush at 3-tech tackle. His stock is climbing right now, but he'll probably still be available at #34. I don't know about #65.

Walter football has his at the final pick of the second round but the teams in that area aren't needing his position

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
    • Things have now gone from bad to worse.     After I explained myself, I was kind of hoping you’d simply come back with “I’m sorry, I misunderstood you,  may bad.”  And we’d be done with this.  It would be over.      But instead, you double down on the roommate issue and follow up by questioning everything I said by breaking down some of my comments and what you think I really meant by them.     In other words, you’re telling me my motive, my meaning, as if you know my meaning better than I do.    It’s interesting to me…. I was recently told there’s an unofficial moderator policy:  don’t attack the poster, attack the argument.    Well, I don’t see that here.  You attacked me personally the first time and instead of a simple apology, you’ve double downed on a bad hand by attacking me personally AGAIN.      Why you’re comfortable telling me you know my meaning , my intention, better than I do is mystifying to me.  And frankly, I think you’re comfortable doing this because one of us is a moderator, and it certainly is NOT me.     I’ll say it again: you misunderstood my meaning, and intention,  the first time, and you’ve misunderstood me even worse the second time.   As I said before, I’m happy to withdraw and apologize for “go figure”, but the negative inference was not my intention.  Poorly phrased, I give you (in two posts now).   I don’t know what else to say…. I’m hoping this brings this very unfortunate exchange to an end.       
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...