WarGhost21

NFL.com's Gil Brandt Ranks Colts Offseason 4th Best in League

23 posts in this topic

He is the polar opposite of ESPN...lol!  I am hopeful for a top 10 team, anything more is gravy!  Go Colts!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

brandt is one guy that I pay heed to, he is a genius and gives great analytical information

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This guy has forgotten more about football than most of us have learned.  He knows his stuff FWIW.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was just going to post about this.  Here's what he said about the Colts ...

 

4) Indianapolis Colts

 

 

Hiring Chris Ballard to be the general manager made this team better immediately -- that move by itself improved the Colts' fortunes dramatically. One of the things that hurt this team more than anything last year was the push-pull between the head coach, then-GM Ryan Grigson and the staff, and I think Ballard will eliminate that troublesome element. 

And look at the moves the Colts have made in his short tenure. Indianapolis signed a slew of defensive veterans -- including defensive lineman Johnathan Hankins and linebacker Jabaal Sheard-- and drafted Malik Hooker, a safety who could be a star in this league for the next 10 years. Second-rounder Quincy Wilson will be a solid corner and third-rounder Tarell Basham should help buttress the pass rush. It would've been nice to add a top-flight running back, but fourth-round pick Marlon Mack -- whose 10-yard split of 1.50 seconds was the best time of any running back at the NFL Scouting Combine -- has the quickness and pass-catching ability to be a very good pro. Mack will fill a third-down-back role that enables the Colts to run a lot of play action, which should help protect Andrew Luck -- as should fourth-round tackle Zach Banner.

 

______

 

I hope the season's performance vaults the Colts' offseason to number one. Go Colts!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's funny to me is when everybody ranks the Colts off-season among the top in the league and they all say how much the Colts have improved and then procede to rank them in the 20s in their power rankings(worse than we finished the previous season). Something has to give...

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't take early power rankings seriously. Last year they ESPN ranked the Falcons at 18th, and they ended up being the best team in NFL and almost winning the Superbowl. Were they wrong? Yes. Were they ignorant/stupid to put the Falcons at #18? No. So many things can go right or wrong. it's just too early to judge.

 

Btw, my top 5 looks different than Brandt's, but i'm OK with this one too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2017 Indianapolis Colts

W        

16       0

:rock:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't checked the other threads but I saw the Colts posted an NFL.com video where the guy has us at 11 wins AND division winners. We should have been at least a 10-11 win team last year (Detroit, Texans, Jags in London). We have to get back to winning one score games and if this defense moves up even 5 ranks, that's playoffs baby.

 

Edit: The guy I am talking about is Pete Shrager and the video I am referring to is right next to Brandt's write up if anyone wants to see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The division is getting back to their common sense lol with Peyton led teams the goal was to RUN on the colts and thier soft defense...division all has multiple running backs who can run now  so hopefully our run defense is better than before 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, stitches said:

What's funny to me is when everybody ranks the Colts off-season among the top in the league and they all say how much the Colts have improved and then procede to rank them in the 20s in their power rankings(worse than we finished the previous season). Something has to give...

 

Problem is that one of the biggest reasons our offseason is highly regarded is Ballard. That leads to a promising future more than present. That said, if this team stays healthy, we'll be pretty good. 

 

I could honestly see two South teams in the AFC playoffs. With the Texans being left out. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/17/2017 at 5:32 PM, BR-549 said:

I really like this... 

 

"Hiring Chris Ballard to be the general manager made this team better immediately -- that move by itself improved the Colts' fortunes dramatically"

 

Yep. Makes a world of difference when the GM is good

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luck is at his best based off of play-action this is way I wanted a RB in the draft. Hopefully Mack works out great for us. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, stitches said:

What's funny to me is when everybody ranks the Colts off-season among the top in the league and they all say how much the Colts have improved and then procede to rank them in the 20s in their power rankings(worse than we finished the previous season). Something has to give...

I sort of see where they are coming from though. See we were prob a bit worse than our 8-8 suggests and apart from 2014 than all our records suggests mainly because luck put so much paper over the cracks on the team and grigs thought it beneficial to barely fill in the cracks. This off-season defensively we have gotten better but that was by basically replacing the whole wall instead of filling it. So it's going to take some time for our defence to gel and excel in the new system, which most of them are learning.
Also I'm still a bit apprehensive about how close to 100% Luck will be come game 1. Not that the shoulder will not be healed but will he have regained the muscle he lost and the rapport with the WR/TE for this season. I could see a slow start to a season again. Our record I think depends how fast we can start firing on all cylinders. If it's fast then higher than the 20's if not i could see us in the 20's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, closed article soon as I saw New England was #1. A team that doesn't have a draft does NOT have the right of claiming to have the #1 best offseason.

 

The Colts clearly improved and did better than New England by miles. On account of New England not having a draft, they should be ranked #32.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, ReMeDy said:

Nope, closed article soon as I saw New England was #1. A team that doesn't have a draft does NOT have the right of claiming to have the #1 best offseason.

 

The Colts clearly improved and did better than New England by miles. On account of New England not having a draft, they should be ranked #32.

You know the Patriots cant do anything wrong or negative in the media's eyes. Golden boy Brady and God like Belichick draws all the attention no matter what they do. It even happens right here in the Colts forum! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, ReMeDy said:

Nope, closed article soon as I saw New England was #1. A team that doesn't have a draft does NOT have the right of claiming to have the #1 best offseason.

 

The Colts clearly improved and did better than New England by miles. On account of New England not having a draft, they should be ranked #32.

That is not a very good argument. The offseason is more than just the draft, which they got a few pretty good players in by the way. They got established players for their picks, not unproven rookies. How do you NOT consider that a good offseason. I can't fathom your logic.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ReMeDy said:

Nope, closed article soon as I saw New England was #1. A team that doesn't have a draft does NOT have the right of claiming to have the #1 best offseason.

 

The Colts clearly improved and did better than New England by miles. On account of New England not having a draft, they should be ranked #32.

 

Several points....  

 

First,  the list was about the off-season,  and not a ranking of the draft.

 

Second,   this is not the first list to talk about how good New England's draft was, and that includes the players they got in exchange for their 1st and 2nd round picks.

 

Third,   New England is not claiming anything.   Others are judging them and it's a widely held viewpoint.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing I see, besides agreeing with this being a great offseason, is that the sportscasters are starting to pay attention to what is going on here. It makes me feel kind of good for some reason. I think this year's team will be a tough out (as they say somewhere).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Encouraged by the weight loss to Goode, Banner, and Stewart.   Surprised by the gain to Morrison and Walker...though both are only 22 and 21 respectively and have yet to enter their primes so it could just be them filling out.    
    • To channel my inner Herm...   "You play to win the game!"
    • it's kind of a win win though if we do have a bad season I won't be too upset and if we have a great season then that's awesome. unless we keep our coach and get like a late 20s pick cuz I mean we'd still get value but not as much maybe as a top 10 pick obviously. it's not as simple as just want a good season not this year. even though I always want the Colts to kick butt
    •   Denver won a superbowl with Brock Osweiler (plus a living corpse Manning). Osweiler (and Siemian both) looked a lot better under Kubiak's hand than any QB under O'Brians hand since he left Boston. Not to mention, O'Brian replaced Fitzpatrick with Hoyer, who was worse than his predecessor, then replaced Hoyer with Osweiler who also was worse than his predecessor. Imo, O'Brian couldn't install a system for his lesser talented QB's, which would've helped them use their strengths.   On the other hand, Pagano is a secondary coach. Let's see what he has done there? The Colts (Grigson) didn't draft a single player in the secondary in the first 3 years. Of the free agent additions: Davis become a first team all pro. Mike Adams made the pro bowl multiple times and played his best football over age 30 in Indy. Dwight Lowery had a decent year here, one of his best. Greg Toler wasn't good, but he played his best football in Indy. The Laron Landry project failed, but it failed more due to not being able to stay healthy, than production. (I didn't particularly like him though, but I can't say he was terrible when healthy.) Darius Butler become a decent player, having his best years of his carreer in Indy. Then, when the Colts finally decided to draft in the secondary: D'Joun Smith turned out to be a bust. Health issues again. Geathers became a fine player - sadly, health issues there again.  For T.J. Green, Hooker and Wilson the jury is still out. And they found Rashan Melvin off the streets. This is not bad at all. Most players, who stayed healthy, played their best in Indy. Of course talent matters. You can't make pro-bowlers out of journeymen.     Pagano's record is 15-7 at home and 13-14 on the road against coaches ahead of him. That's not a bad record considering that coaches ahead of him usually have better rosters under their control. (The numbers might be off by one or two here or there, due to coaching changes, etc. I might counted - or not counted - a game played against a previous coach. I also counted games against Harbaugh and Kubiak supposing they'd be in top10 being active. Anyway the true record must be close to the above.).   All in all, I think Pagano is right there where he belongs to after 3 winning plus 2 down seasons. Middle of the pack. But ..... I think, based on "potential", he is better than his current value. He is a top10 coach on my list.   I know many of you guys strongly disagree, but that's my honest opinion. There are better coaches in the NFL than him. But not many. So I really wish Pagano will prove himself in 2017. Aaand, if he fails and will be fired, then I cross my fingers that there will be at least one guy available of those "not many". (Yes, despite my belief that he is a fine coach, I agree that he has to go if he fails to prove himself. Because that's the right decision. But honestly, I'll be scared if that happens. It won't be easy to find a better guy. And there is always a chance to be ChipKelly-d....)  
    • Banner was up to 260Lbs He was at 253lbs for the combine with a goal of 245lbs. I thought that's what I read.  Walker adding 7 so he's back up over 240.    Wilson at 207lbs jumps out to me. We heard about "football shape" for him. He was 211lbs at the combine. You'd think him being in better shape would make him a blink quicker. If he's a little faster we may not get him. I'm excited to see this kid with Hooker on the back end. If we can get Geathers back we could have something.   
  • Members

    • Yinkgo

      Yinkgo 39

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rock8591

      rock8591 655

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Buck Showalter

      Buck Showalter 2,770

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • gacker65

      gacker65 140

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • akcolt

      akcolt 1,920

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bradgt04

      bradgt04 117

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SilentHill

      SilentHill 2,640

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr.Debonair

      Mr.Debonair 782

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Zalazar Elijahh

      Zalazar Elijahh 54

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Peterk2011

      Peterk2011 38

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.