Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts are releasing several scouting personnel.


MTC

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, PrincetonTiger said:

I have a feeling that CB wanted the people to stay until after the draft since they had developed the Scouting Reports

 

Yea, I was going to say, it would have been a colossal nightmare to fire them before the draft, because you can't just bring in new personnel before the draft and expect them to come up with an accurate draft board for their new team on such short notice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

A number of posters have said it,  but I'd like to echo the thought.....

 

This is NOT a surprise....     I posted this shortly after Ballard was hired and I think a few others did as well.

 

This is the business.     It's ugly and not away fair....     the guys we have will likely land on their feet elsewhere,  but it's hard on their families.       Selling a home,  pulling kids out of school,   separating them from the friends they made --- all of it.      It sucks.      But,  it's the business.

 

Ballard is entitled to bring in his own staff.     And you typically make the change right after the draft,  not when you're hired.      As others noted here,  you're in the middle of draft season --- bad time to move around.

 

Do it now.   Do it as quickly and quietly as possible and move on...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SDakColts said:

A couple more names to watch while Ballard fills his scouting staff. Rex Hogan the Jets Director of College Scouting, and Morocco Brown currently a 49ers scout, but scouted with Ballard in Chicago. La Canfora also mentioned their names a while back.

 

http://www.stampedeblue.com/2017/3/24/15049972/report-gives-a-few-names-to-keep-an-eye-on-potential-colts-scouting-department-hires-chris-ballard

 

I personally think that we should look into Scot McCloughan for a position on our staff. I believe he was unfairly a fall guy in Washington due to his conflicted relationship with Team President Bruce Allen. He has a great resume, and built a playoff roster quickly while he was there

 

He also may or may not have a drinking problem that derailed his career as a GM. I'm all for second chances though, and I agree that he would be a great asset to the scouting department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Grigson's Gaffes said:

 

He also may or may not have a drinking problem that derailed his career as a GM. I'm all for second chances though, and I agree that he would be a great asset to the scouting department.

 

How about third chances? Or maybe fourth chances? It's possible his time with the Niners and the Seahawks ended due to his drinking. His dismissal from the Niners was eerily similar to his dismissal from Washington.

 

The guy seems to be a master at building a team, but his drinking issues are well documented.

 

I think his best role moving forward is going to be as a consultant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, superrep1967 said:

Maybe that's what Irsay was talking about when he mentioned some arguments about some players selections. You don't want to argue with the boss. 

I missed that, where'd you see that at?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the draft over, Colts G.M. Chris Ballard is telling some of his college scouts their services will no longer be needed.

Colts director of college scouting T.J. McCreight and others in the scouting department have been fired, Adam Schefter of ESPN reports.

Former Colts G.M. Ryan Grigson hired McCreight shortly after Grigson took over the front office in 2012, and it’s no surprise that Ballard doesn’t want to keep Grigson’s guys around.

The Colts are the second team to make significant change in their personnel department today, with the Bills firing G.M. Doug Whaley and others in their scouting department

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Myles said:

Seems to make sense.   It sure would have been a good job to have. 

I'll give you a tryout after Ballard hires me. I have high expectations though, so you better produce. I'm currently batting 1.000 in the first round since the Luck era began.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jared Cisneros said:

I'll give you a tryout after Ballard hires me. I have high expectations though, so you better produce. I'm currently batting 1.000 in the first round since the Luck era began.

Just assign me to scout the lower level college players.   I'll find you a couple gems.  Plus I will have a great time during college football season.  A young female assistant right out of college would be appreciated too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it sucks, but it is the right thing to do long term, for not just Ballard but also the scouts so that they can get a footing somewhere else probably easily after the last 2 good looking drafts of the Colts, IMO.

 

This also may send the message to Pagano that he may not have the luxury of barely making the playoffs as a wild card, he most likely has to win the division and a playoff game to keep his job, IMO. Ballard may very well have Dave Toub in his mind but it is purely up to Pagano and his staff to not provide too many cracks Ballard may latch on to should things head south. Ballard doesn't have an allegiance to Pagano either, that fact should not be lost on us, which also helps him objectively evaluate him after this year.

 

It also tells you that you can have the same set of scouts that gather information on CBs but then Grigson may put a premium on speed while Ballard may put a premium on height and physicality over speed. The scouts' eventual draft contributions definitely hinge on the GM that pulls the trigger based on their information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, ReMeDy said:

 

Yea, I was going to say, it would have been a colossal nightmare to fire them before the draft, because you can't just bring in new personnel before the draft and expect them to come up with an accurate draft board for their new team on such short notice.

 

CLE did that last year...but that was reportedly more about disagreement over Wentz. I don't think their draft was a disaster though...as Coleman, Ogbah and Nassib all look like promising players.

 

But it would have definitely been unusual if Ballard did it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Irrelevant said:

 

Are you crazy?! Griggles the monkey is replacing all the scouts! Out they go, he will get full control!

 

Looks like we got rid of one "Grig"gles to get another then. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chad72 said:

 

Looks like we got rid of one "Grig"gles to get another then. :) 

I like the shuffle at this time.   Gives Ballard a chance to put his own choices in place with allot of time to scout before next year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Zalazar Elijahh said:

If Ballard was able to have this much success in a draft with a bunch of grigson-ites which he clearly didn't really want to work with just imagine how our drafts will go in the future when Ballard his all his guys in place :) 

I would have to do some more research but I think there were some scouts that were here before Grigson was hired. So calling them Grigson-ites is not correct.

This blaming Grigson for everything from the great flood to the plague is getting old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, chad72 said:

Yeah, it sucks, but it is the right thing to do long term, for not just Ballard but also the scouts so that they can get a footing somewhere else probably easily after the last 2 good looking drafts of the Colts, IMO.

 

This also may send the message to Pagano that he may not have the luxury of barely making the playoffs as a wild card, he most likely has to win the division and a playoff game to keep his job, IMO. Ballard may very well have Dave Toub in his mind but it is purely up to Pagano and his staff to not provide too many cracks Ballard may latch on to should things head south. Ballard doesn't have an allegiance to Pagano either, that fact should not be lost on us, which also helps him objectively evaluate him after this year.

 

It also tells you that you can have the same set of scouts that gather information on CBs but then Grigson may put a premium on speed while Ballard may put a premium on height and physicality over speed. The scouts' eventual draft contributions definitely hinge on the GM that pulls the trigger based on their information.

IMO hiring new scouts has exactly zero to sending a message to Pagano.

Making an issue of Pagano at this point of the year is useless. Only time will hold the answers to Pagano.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

I would have to do some more research but I think there were some scouts that were here before Grigson was hired. So calling them Grigson-ites is not correct.

This blaming Grigson for everything from the great flood to the plague is getting old.

It is fair if these were the same scouts who Grigson allowed to feed him info so he could make the lousy choices he made.   Grigsons tenure was so bad that cleaning house is more of a positive than a negative.   Ballard has been stellar so far with his signings and this draft.   Only time will tell, but it seems like the Colts have made great strides.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Grigson's Gaffes said:

 

He also may or may not have a drinking problem that derailed his career as a GM. I'm all for second chances though, and I agree that he would be a great asset to the scouting department.

He definitely had a drinking problem as it is well documented during his time in SEA and SF. However, after hearing what the players had to say about him during his time in Washington I find it hard to believe that it was drinking that led to his firing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2017 at 4:45 PM, crazycolt1 said:

I would have to do some more research but I think there were some scouts that were here before Grigson was hired. So calling them Grigson-ites is not correct.

This blaming Grigson for everything from the great flood to the plague is getting old.

No it's not. It's actually spot on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Zalazar Elijahh said:

No it's not. It's actually spot on

Yep, just continue to whine about old news at this point. Grigson has paid for his lack of finding talent at a few positions. But yet we still have some very good players he did bring in including last years draft. Ballard made one move on the offensive line and made the statement he really liked what Grigson did do with the offensive line last season.

Had Grigson made those moves one year earlier he would still be here.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On April 30, 2017 at 7:09 PM, NewColtsFan said:

 

A number of posters have said it,  but I'd like to echo the thought.....

 

This is NOT a surprise....     I posted this shortly after Ballard was hired and I think a few others did as well.

 

This is the business.     It's ugly and not away fair....     the guys we have will likely land on their feet elsewhere,  but it's hard on their families.       Selling a home,  pulling kids out of school,   separating them from the friends they made --- all of it.      It sucks.      But,  it's the business.

 

Ballard is entitled to bring in his own staff.     And you typically make the change right after the draft,  not when you're hired.      As others noted here,  you're in the middle of draft season --- bad time to move around.

 

Do it now.   Do it as quickly and quietly as possible and move on...

 

A well written post that encapsulates the new GM situation perfectly NCF. Your last sentence is the best one to close your thesis. Make the change swiftly & quickly to curtail resentment & propel the franchise forward as soon as possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a tracker of scout and personnel movements:

 

http://insidethepylon.com/nfl/front-office/2017/05/01/dan-hatmans-2017-nfl-scout-movement-tracker/

 

According to this the staff we've released and acquired so far are the following:

Title Moving On Moving In
General Manager Ryan Grigson Chris Ballard (KC)
Vice President of Football Operations Jimmy Raye III  
Director of College Scouting TJ McCreight (PHI)  
Area Scout (Mid-Atlantic) Ahmad Russell  
College Scouting Coordinator None Kyle Childress (KC)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can too. And that will tell us everything we need to know about how the view him. It will tell us their feelings on the tight end room, and what direction they pick from there will tell us even more.    but if they take him at 15, we won’t know much about what might have happened, as they will be landing someone they had rated highly and fell to them. 
    • Glad that’s over…    if I wanted to argue about it, I would have responded far more in depth than pointing out how you were attempting to gaslight me. I did not. Meaning I was ending my part of whatever the argument was. You “putting a finality to it” and then listing bullet points tells me it was the argument you wanted all along, which makes sense why you brought Grigson up in the first place. Bait, hook, gaslight. Almost got me buddy. You are a funny guy, Doug 
    • Putting a finality on an argument you want to have.   There is a theory that Ballard won't draft a OL high because ARs injuries were not caused by a poor oline.  I felt it important to note that since Luck's major injuries were also not caused by his oline, Ballard could still want to improve it like he did in 2018 simply because AR is The Franchise. And its important to point that out because there has been a running (false) narrative for about 9 years that Luck's oline was the (main) reason for his injuries that kept him out of games.  The (false) narrative is based upon, IMO, a detest of Grigson, and not reality about the facts (or strong rumors) behind the kidney laceration and snowboarding shoulder. Therefore, mentioning Grigson and the (false) narrative was germain to the point about Ballard possibly drafting Oline high this draft to protect AR. Mentioning Grigson shouldn't trigger a CB vs RG discussion, unless people reading it are gaslighted by their own reading lens.
    • That is a very inaccurate description of what happened.  At this point it’s history and doesn’t need to be revisited but I will say Chloe adds value to this board and should be and is by most encouraged to post, even if people don’t always agree with her.  
    • My response was in regards to another posted suggesting that the Colts need to get the pick right when it comes to picking a WR. I agree with you .
  • Members

    • Moosejawcolt

      Moosejawcolt 5,180

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEV

      IndyEV 81

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfanej

      coltsfanej 738

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,738

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,482

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,302

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • indyagent17

      indyagent17 1,785

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hawkeyecolt

      Hawkeyecolt 1,028

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DougDew

      DougDew 8,951

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 52

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...