Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2017 NFL Draft Day 1 Thread [Merge]


CR91

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

True..but when confrontations come on the field..you have to make plays...you 'win' ore are 'defeated' by the guy you confront.

 

..and the SEC is talent laden....I'm just saying that you have plenty of opportunity to make accurate evaluations against quality foes

It's much easier for a LB to make plays when they have the ability to move freely, instead of having to shed O-linemen before making the play. Foster benefited from a stellar d-line and that is always a factor when you're scouting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shive said:

It's much easier for a LB to make plays when they have the ability to move freely, instead of having to shed O-linemen before making the play. Foster benefited from a stellar d-line and that is always a factor when you're scouting.

Sure it is...but he wasnt playing the JV....of the other SEC schools

...that also has to be considered...

 

That logic would suggest that talent playing with talent cant develop fully because of the talent

I cant go with you there

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oldunclemark said:

That logic would suggest that talent playing with talent cant develop fully because of the talent

I cant go with you there

 

Not saying they can't. Just saying that you have to take it into account.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

The Colts' defensive overhaul: New Indianapolis GM Chris Ballard has a vision, and he's executing it beautifully. Thursday's selection of Ohio State safety Malik Hooker was a fantastic value at No. 15 overall and immediately improves a woeful secondary. Since the start of March, Ballard has added defensive tackle Johnathan Hankins, linebackers Jabaal Sheard, John Simon and Sean Spence and defensive end Margus Hunt. No team has done a better job improving its toughness and defensive depth this offseason.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000803728/article/winners-and-losers-after-round-1-of-the-2017-nfl-draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, oldunclemark said:

I;m scrambling..I dont know a lot about him

Seriously?  I thought you were a big ten guy.  Hooker was a unanimous selection for all American.   He was ranked in the top ten of just about every pundit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Buddy Lee said:

With which CB(s)?

 

Pretty much all of them.

 

Most Seahawks players use different tackling techniques than they did in college. Seahawks use rugby-style tackling, which is fairly rare at college level. NFL too, though its been gaining popularity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jvan1973 said:

Seriously?  I thought you were a big ten guy.  Hooker was a unanimous selection for all American.   He was ranked in the top ten of just about every pundit 

I like the pick of Hooker very much. However, national awards have more to do with stats like 7 interceptions than they do with NFL prospectus. 

 

I agree with the Hooker pick, but it has absolutely nothing to do with college post-season awards. Johnny Manziel and Tim Tebow won Heisman's. There are many, many more examples in any of the awards voted on. College award winners have a relatively poor guarantee of any NFL success. Voters for college awards are not (or should not) be projecting to NFL prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Buddy Lee said:

I like the pick of Hooker very much. However, national awards have more to do with stats like 7 interceptions than they do with NFL prospectus. 

 

I agree with the Hooker pick, but it has absolutely nothing to do with college post-season awards. Johnny Manziel and Tim Tebow won Heisman's. There are many, many more examples in any of the awards voted on. College award winners have a relatively poor guarantee of any NFL success. Voters for college awards are not (or should not) be projecting to NFL prospects.

Did you read the post I responded to?  He said he hasn't heard of hooker before the pick.  I wasn't suggesting awards mean success in the NFL.  However,  safeties transfer better to the nfl than most spread offense qbs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Finball said:

 

Pretty much all of them.

 

Most Seahawks players use different tackling techniques than they did in college. Seahawks use rugby-style tackling, which is fairly rare at college level. NFL too, though its been gaining popularity.

Rugby-style? Inform me. When I have watched rugby, it is mostly in close quarters breaking out of a scrum. Not open field at all. Is it chest high tackling??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

Did you read the post I responded to?  He said he hasn't heard of hooker before the pick.  I wasn't suggesting awards mean success in the NFL.  However,  safeties transfer better to the nfl than most spread offense qbs

I'm not convinced. There is not a specific safety award but the Jim Thorpe award for DBs hasn't translated particularly well.

 

2016 Adoree Jackson USC 46 Solo, 9 Ast, 0.0 Sk, 5 Int
2015 Desmond King* Iowa 46 Solo, 26 Ast, 0.0 Sk, 8 Int
2014 Gerod Holliman* Louisville 34 Solo, 10 Ast, 1.0 Sk, 14 Int
2013 Darqueze Dennard* Michigan State 32 Solo, 28 Ast, 0.0 Sk, 4 Int
2012 Johnthan Banks* Mississippi State 39 Solo, 24 Ast, 0.0 Sk, 4 Int
2011 Morris Claiborne* LSU 32 Solo, 19 Ast, 0.0 Sk, 6 Int
2010 Patrick Peterson* LSU 29 Solo, 13 Ast, 0.0 Sk, 4 Int
2009 Eric Berry* Tennessee 56 Solo, 31 Ast, 0.0 Sk, 2 Int
2008 Malcolm Jenkins* Ohio State 34 Solo, 23 Ast, 1.0 Sk, 3 Int
2007 Antoine Cason Arizona 57 Solo, 14 Ast, 1.0 Sk, 5 Int
2006 Aaron Ross* Texas 47 Solo, 10 Ast, 1.0 Sk, 6 Int
2005 Michael Huff* Texas 44 Solo, 43 Ast, 2.0 Sk, 1 Int
2004 Carlos Rogers* Auburn 2 Int, 53 Yds, 1 TD
2003 Derrick Strait* Oklahoma 3 Int, 127 Yds, 0 TD
2002 Terence Newman* Kansas State 5 Int, 21 Yds, 0 TD
2001 Roy Williams Oklahoma 2 FR, 25 Yds, 1 TD
2000 Jamar Fletcher Wisconsin 7 Int, 179 Yds, 0 TD
1999 Tyrone Carter* Minnesota
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Buddy Lee said:

I'm not convinced. There is not a specific safety award but the Jim Thorpe award for DBs hasn't translated particularly well.

 

2016 Adoree Jackson USC 46 Solo, 9 Ast, 0.0 Sk, 5 Int
2015 Desmond King* Iowa 46 Solo, 26 Ast, 0.0 Sk, 8 Int
2014 Gerod Holliman* Louisville 34 Solo, 10 Ast, 1.0 Sk, 14 Int
2013 Darqueze Dennard* Michigan State 32 Solo, 28 Ast, 0.0 Sk, 4 Int
2012 Johnthan Banks* Mississippi State 39 Solo, 24 Ast, 0.0 Sk, 4 Int
2011 Morris Claiborne* LSU 32 Solo, 19 Ast, 0.0 Sk, 6 Int
2010 Patrick Peterson* LSU 29 Solo, 13 Ast, 0.0 Sk, 4 Int
2009 Eric Berry* Tennessee 56 Solo, 31 Ast, 0.0 Sk, 2 Int
2008 Malcolm Jenkins* Ohio State 34 Solo, 23 Ast, 1.0 Sk, 3 Int
2007 Antoine Cason Arizona 57 Solo, 14 Ast, 1.0 Sk, 5 Int
2006 Aaron Ross* Texas 47 Solo, 10 Ast, 1.0 Sk, 6 Int
2005 Michael Huff* Texas 44 Solo, 43 Ast, 2.0 Sk, 1 Int
2004 Carlos Rogers* Auburn 2 Int, 53 Yds, 1 TD
2003 Derrick Strait* Oklahoma 3 Int, 127 Yds, 0 TD
2002 Terence Newman* Kansas State 5 Int, 21 Yds, 0 TD
2001 Roy Williams Oklahoma 2 FR, 25 Yds, 1 TD
2000 Jamar Fletcher Wisconsin 7 Int, 179 Yds, 0 TD
1999 Tyrone Carter* Minnesota

A lot of those guys are corners

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

A lot of those guys are corners

OK. I prefaced by saying that there is no safety award. I did my best. It is all DBs.

 

Can you substantiate that safeties have translated better than DBs in general? So far it's just your proclamation? I have worked to support my view all you have done is nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Buddy Lee said:

OK. I prefaced by saying that there is no safety award. I did my best. It is all DBs.

 

Can you substantiate that safeties have translated better than DBs in general? So far it's just your proclamation? I have worked to support my view all you have done is nothing.

I said they have a better success rate than spread offense qbs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Buddy Lee said:

Rugby-style? Inform me. When I have watched rugby, it is mostly in close quarters breaking out of a scrum. Not open field at all. Is it chest high tackling??

 

No, hip high, target the upper thigh with the lead shoulder. 

 

Funny enough, Buckeyes and thus Hooker use that technique too, if I'm not mistaken.

 

http://www.espn.com/blog/seattle-seahawks/post/_/id/17538/rugby-style-tackling-continues-to-work-for-seahawks-defense

 

http://www.sbnation.com/2016/9/6/12341916/nfl-rugby-tackling-concussions-seahawks-falcons

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, backshoulderfade said:

Anyone watching on NFL Network? Mayock looking like a comic book super villain with that facial hair.

Normally, I get upset when Mike gets mocked, but I've gotta admit BSF, your post was accurate & very funny! 

 

It reminded me of the late Vincent Price actually. 

 

8dce218bb0df065d5c1c542a1a9595a9.jpg

 

 

hi-res-7aa0ffcf90ba398ef6112a763a1f9a52_

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to respectfully disagree here. I think, regardless of what the fans might think, their lack of FAs and re-signing all our own means the Colts believe this team is truly capable of making waves in 2024, being only 1 play away from a playoff birth/division title.    I think they believe that they are a couple pieces away but clearly need a top skill position wideout to pair with Pittman and Downs. Every pick after that is fillers, depth, and/or less important needs in their minds.    You could wind up being correct but I'm sticking with my trade up scenario where the only way I'm wrong is that we find out later, the Colts could not find a trade partner or that the trade partners really wanted to much in compensation.   I'm sticking with Colts trade to with Chargers and take Nabers at pick 5.        
    • Latest update not encouraging? Where's that at? Wasn't in that article.     Everything I have seen, has shown some athleticism has already started to come back.     I posted a couple rehab videos somewhere a month ago or so.   He is already dunking and looked very quick on take off and on his straight line running.   Can't remember if there was a change of direction in the the video but I think there was that as well.     Saying that, I think we still bring in a CB, but everything I have seen has been encouraging in regards to rehab.
    • Steelers picking at No.20 probably want him to get past Bengals and Jaguars so that they can draft Adonai Mitchell, so could be an article blessed by the organization too  
    • I think we stay at 15, hope Bowers is there but dont think he will be. With latest update not encouraging that Flowers will be ready seems like Corner more likely to be taken over WR.  First round corner paired with Brents with Jones first corner off the bench should yield better results then last season.   ttps://www.aol.com/cb-dallis-flowers-rehabbing-achilles-084056300.htm    
    • I think the draft falls this way:   1) Bears: Caleb 2) Commanders: Daniels 3) Vikings (trade with Pats) Maye 4) Cardinals: MHJ 5) Colts (trade with Chargers) Nabers   Reason for my top 5 is that I think the Patriots really like McCarthy, coupled with the Brady/McCarthy Michigan thing plus the Pats need more player help, it makes sense for the Pats to trade back to 11 but still be in front of the Raiders and Broncos to get their QB   Colts trade up reason: I think the Chargers need O-line help as well as other players like WR, however I believe the Chargers can still get a top LT at 15 and WR late in round one or if they trade back into round one which I believe they will attempt to do in this scenario. Plus, the Harbough Indy connection makes this trade likely.   Even if the Commanders take Maye at 2, I still think the Vikings trade up and then grab Daniels. Pats take McCarthy.   I think this is the year the Colts finally will mortgage a little bit of the future for the wideout. I'm going to stick with this. I hope my gut is correct here, we'll see.     
  • Members

    • twfish

      twfish 1,895

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Architects08

      Architects08 284

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NJFanatic

      NJFanatic 45

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indeee

      Indeee 1,829

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 2,380

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,570

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • K-148

      K-148 90

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,438

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...