Smonroe

Pagano - 11th Best Coach in the NFL

Recommended Posts

I can see it. As much as the fan base seems to hate him for only going 8-8 last season, he is one of those coaches who you just want to play for due to his character.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah,  I can see it as well.  Back to back 8-8 seasons and with all the circumstances surrounding those seasons  is pretty remarkable really.  The players really play hard for him, no question.  Hopefully CB finds him better players to work with and he's off to a great start IMO. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Next year, I want the Pagano haters to find me a better, available coach... just to see the results we get. If anyone says Marvin Lewis.... I'm just done.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

I know right!!!!!!! hahahahahahahahalmaolmaolmaolmao

What coaches have a better winning percentage over the last 5 years?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ColtsBlitz said:

Next year, I want the Pagano haters to find me a better, available coach... just to see the results we get. If anyone says Marvin Lewis.... I'm just done.

That's the trick now isn't it?  Too many Indy fans suffer from "the grass is always greener" syndrome.  The problem not only is finding a better coach, but if you do replace him, will the next "sure fire" candidate actually be better?

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

What coaches have a better winning percentage over the last 5 years?

I'm not doing this again. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

I'm not doing this again. 

Why ?  Because there isn't 11 coaches with a better winning percentage?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, ColtsBlitz said:

Next year, I want the Pagano haters to find me a better, available coach... just to see the results we get. If anyone says Marvin Lewis.... I'm just done.

 

Sean Payton, of course.  He has experience working with an elite QB, a great offense and porous defenses.

 

Pay no attention to his 7-9 record the last three years.  We'll think of better excuses.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

What coaches have a better winning percentage over the last 5 years?

Ron Meeks winning percentage as a DC was really good too. Just saying..

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you know he's not a BAD coach per se, he's just not  great coach. But he's also somewhat inexperienced compared to the others listed above him. Not saying he'll ever be on their level, but there's much worse out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, MPStack said:

Ron Meeks winning percentage as a DC was really good too. Just saying..

Dc isn't head coach

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, PeterBowman said:

you know he's not a BAD coach per se, he's just not  great coach. But he's also somewhat inexperienced compared to the others listed above him. Not saying he'll ever be on their level, but there's much worse out there.

Not to mention that he lacked a full compliment of quality players

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pagano that high isn't too out there, I'd put him at around 15 or so though.

This post reminded me. I really, really thought we were going to fire Pagano and hire Gase last offseason. I thought it made too much sense. Dolphins got a potentially great coach.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Often DCs and OCs are often better qualified

 Yep, one is in Arizona now.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

Why ?  Because there isn't 11 coaches with a better winning percentage?

I've already told you Andrew Luck and our worthless division at the time skew Chucks winning percentage.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

Pagano that high isn't too out there, I'd put him at around 15 or so though.

This post reminded me. I really, really thought we were going to fire Pagano and hire Gase last offseason. I thought it made too much sense. Dolphins got a potentially great coach.

We should have luck would be winning MVPs 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

I've already told you Andrew Luck and our worthless division at the time skew Chucks winning percentage.

 

Didn't have Luck much in 15, and the lack of talent should balance out that argument.

 

I often wonder how any of those other coaches would have fared with our roster.

 

This season is going to be the decision point.  Every team in the division has improved (well, maybe not the Texans but they were already good).  I don't think Chuck gets in on Ballard's honeymoon period.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

Didn't have Luck much in 15, and the lack of talent should balance out that argument.

 

I often wonder how any of those other coaches would have fared with our roster.

 

This season is going to be the decision point.  Every team in the division has improved (well, maybe not the Texans but they were already good).  I don't think Chuck gets in on Ballard's honeymoon period.

I just hate the black and white argument that is winning percentage. When your division is a cakewalk for your first 4 years yeah you will have a higher percentage then say someone in the AFC North 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, cdgacoltsfan said:

And they have done what?

Represented the NFC in the 2015 SB. Next question?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

I just hate the black and white argument that is winning percentage. When your division is a cakewalk for your first 4 years yeah you will have a higher percentage then say someone in the AFC North 

 

And I (and I'm sure many others) hate the notion of completely disregarding the winning percentage due to having Luck and being in the AFC South.  the 2015 season completely invalidates the "only because of Luck" argument, and as far as the schedule, I'm sorry the scheduling committee didn't include tougher teams on the colts schedule but it is what it is.  Considering Pagano & co. beat teams like San Fran, Denver and Seattle when they were dominating at least calls into question the stated opinions that Chuck's record would be far worse in a different division.  No one knows that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MPStack said:

Represented the NFC in the 2015 SB. Next question?

 

BTW, Chuck's team represented the AFC in the championship game (only one game away from the SB) the year before and did so with a far inferior roster.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Not to mention that he lacked a full compliment of quality players

Why do all the pagano supporters give him a pass on his own player aquisition and development. He is not a bad coach but many say he was not giving quality players. As if, any head coaches in the NFL do not have tons of roster control. He is mediocre. IMO his 3-4 is bland and predictable. He also has made poor scheme decisions for the talent he aquired. Grigson has become his scapegoat. I hope he succeeds as a colts fan. If anything Luck will just "will" this team to wins easier with this improved roster.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, life long said:

Why do all the pagano supporters give him a pass on his own player aquisition and development. He is not a bad coach but many say he was not giving quality players. As if, any head coaches in the NFL do not have tons of roster control. He is mediocre. IMO his 3-4 is bland and predictable. He also has made poor scheme decisions for the talent he aquired. Grigson has become his scapegoat. I hope he succeeds as a colts fan. If anything Luck will just "will" this team to wins easier with this improved roster.

 

Because player acquisition wasn't part of his job.  It was Grigson's job.  Sure, Pagano had input as all coaches do, but we have no idea specifically which players pagano wanted and which ones Grigson said "too bad, I'm taking this guy".

 

In terms of player development, what do you call getting decent starter performance out of guys like Rashaan Melvin and Edwin Jackson?  What do you call helping guys like Darius Butler and Vontae Davis turn their careers around?  Getting quality play from guys like Jack Doyle and TY McGill.  Even Kerr performed better than you typically get from an UDFA.  These are just a few examples off the top of my head. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

And I (and I'm sure many others) hate the notion of completely disregarding the winning percentage due to having Luck and being in the AFC South.  the 2015 season completely invalidates the "only because of Luck" argument, and as far as the schedule, I'm sorry the scheduling committee didn't include tougher teams on the colts schedule but it is what it is.  Considering Pagano & co. beat teams like San Fran, Denver and Seattle when they were dominating at least calls into question the stated opinions that Chuck's record would be far worse in a different division.  No one knows that. 

That's the thing we would beat teams like San Fran, Denver, and Seattle one week then we would turn around and be blown out by teams like the Rams, Bills, and Jets the following week. I don't think he is the worst coach in the NFL but he can certainly coach dumb and be predictable to many times, especially after a big win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

Because player acquisition wasn't part of his job.  It was Grigson's job.  Sure, Pagano had input as all coaches do, but we have no idea specifically which players pagano wanted and which ones Grigson said "too bad, I'm taking this guy".

 

In terms of player development, what do you call getting decent starter performance out of guys like Rashaan Melvin and Edwin Jackson?  What do you call helping guys like Darius Butler and Vontae Davis turn their careers around?  Getting quality play from guys like Jack Doyle and TY McGill.  Even Kerr performed better than you typically get from an UDFA.  These are just a few examples off the top of my head. 

I always felt that with RG/CP that our roster was the bottom of the league, especially on D and with our O-line. We would be playing with rotational guys or second/third string players as starters at the start of the season versus waiting for injuries for these players making an appearance, with the last two seasons being the worst. With the turnover of midlevel FA idk if this is gonna change this season but I think the quality of the players acquired is far better then what RG ever put on the table for CP, and I defiantly think that the D will be huge overall improvement which should hopefully increase the number of games we win next season and make it to the playoffs again.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

Because player acquisition wasn't part of his job.  It was Grigson's job.  Sure, Pagano had input as all coaches do, but we have no idea specifically which players pagano wanted and which ones Grigson said "too bad, I'm taking this guy".

 

In terms of player development, what do you call getting decent starter performance out of guys like Rashaan Melvin and Edwin Jackson?  What do you call helping guys like Darius Butler and Vontae Davis turn their careers around?  Getting quality play from guys like Jack Doyle and TY McGill.  Even Kerr performed better than you typically get from an UDFA.  These are just a few examples off the top of my head. 

The same defensive players had just turned in the worst defense in colts history. You are right, he did turn their careers around. To be serious though, i like a lot of the young guys we have on D. I think we will do well this year. Oddly enough i am more optimistic than paganos supporters. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

And I (and I'm sure many others) hate the notion of completely disregarding the winning percentage due to having Luck and being in the AFC South.  the 2015 season completely invalidates the "only because of Luck" argument, and as far as the schedule, I'm sorry the scheduling committee didn't include tougher teams on the colts schedule but it is what it is.  Considering Pagano & co. beat teams like San Fran, Denver and Seattle when they were dominating at least calls into question the stated opinions that Chuck's record would be far worse in a different division.  No one knows that. 

Then turn around and get blown out by the rams he's a good coach 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

Then turn around and get blown out by the rams he's a good coach 

People will only turn on Pagano and figure out he's a bad coach when they are "allowed too" and he is fired or released, just like the same with Grigson. It's the same misguided loyalty where a portion of the fanbase wouldn't dare talk bad about someone as long as they are a Colt, and they throw facts out the window. There's no convincing them. The best we can hope for is Ballard improves the team enough to be contenders in 2018, because it certainly won't be this year with Pagano as Coach, unless he magically turns a 180.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Chuck, I always have.  I think the players enjoy playing for him and I think he'll continue to get better with more and more experience.  My opinion really hasn't changed to much.  I think Grigson was the problem.  If the Colts draft well and are terrible the next few years, maybe I'll change my opinion.  I really don't think there are many qualified/winning coaches available for the taking right now who would also want to come to the Colts. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jared Cisneros said:

People will only turn on Pagano and figure out he's a bad coach when they are "allowed too" and he is fired or released, just like the same with Grigson. It's the same misguided loyalty where a portion of the fanbase wouldn't dare talk bad about someone as long as they are a Colt, and they throw facts out the window. There's no convincing them. The best we can hope for is Ballard improves the team enough to be contenders in 2018, because it certainly won't be this year with Pagano as Coach, unless he magically turns a 180.

You are right most will not admit that the Colts are held back by certain people like pagano 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

People will only turn on Pagano and figure out he's a bad coach when they are "allowed too" and he is fired or released, just like the same with Grigson. It's the same misguided loyalty where a portion of the fanbase wouldn't dare talk bad about someone as long as they are a Colt, and they throw facts out the window. There's no convincing them. The best we can hope for is Ballard improves the team enough to be contenders in 2018, because it certainly won't be this year with Pagano as Coach, unless he magically turns a 180.

Another big problem with our fan base is they fear change. They are so scared to change coaches because "we could always get worse" so unless it's a Superbowl winning head coach they would rather keep chuck and his stupid actions. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Pags is a great person. We can debate that he's a great coach until the cows come home. 

 

I guess at the end of this season is where the true test will be since he's finally rid of the dead weight of Griggles. I'd love to eat crow if Pags turns this team around under Ballard's watch. Maybe it was Griggles that was the problem the entire time.....maybe it wasn't. We shall see. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Barkley is still only a human. Unless we improve our O-line significantly, it doesn't matter who our RB is. With the depth of this RB class, I would be unhappy if they pick Bradley. I still hope they trade down and pick Nelson, who's also "a generational talent". Unless our O-line get fixed, we won't turn things around. Make Norwell the best paid lineman in the league and draft Nelson, and we'll be set for a long time, and Luck won't get killed. Then pick up a good RB prospect in the second round (remember we'll have traded down, and gotten an extra second rounder for certain).
    •   Overall, an excellent post, but I really want to focus on this part. Though even if Barkley didn't have this issue, I still wouldn't take him at #3.. I don't think RB is worth it.   Barkley doesn't hit lanes inside hard, with violence of someone like Gurley who was just savage at it in college. He tries to bounce outside, to an open space, where he is absolutely fantastic so it's understandable. Just as a pure runner, I don't think he's the best RB prospect to come out in recent years. If the hole isn't there inside, he has bad tendency to stop moving his feet. As you said, can it be coached out of him? And why does it happen. Is he little soft? Overcompensating for bad O-line? Or something else that can be coached out of him?   College football is different than NFL and though Barkley obviously had bad OL, the decision making before LOS for RB is crucial imo. That's one thing where prospects can be evaluated equally, no matter what scheme, competition or OL talent they run behind.   So.. Maybe Barkley won't be bell-cow back? But more like Reggie Bush? Reggie Bush didn't become a great runner until later in his career when his athleticism had declined. How soon will it happen with Barkley? However, there is no denying his athleticism and talent as a receiver. So the ideal usage for him might be more similar to how many scatbacks are used.. But he would probably be even bigger mismatch in the passing game and better runner than best scatbacks in the game today (Lewis, White, Riddick etc.). Or just bigger, more athletic and better pure runner than McCaffrey. I'd actually be more willing to use high pick on that kind of player than RB like Gurley, Elliott and Fournette.
    • It's a different situation because they didn't have the quarterback. We (hopefully!) do.   Look at the way the league is trending. It's all about building a defense that can limit the opposition or having a quarterback who can elevate the play of those around him. If you have both them you're basically the Pats.    Between 2011 and 2016 we spent only 5 of a possible 18 high draft picks on defense (with 4 of those being 3rd rounders!!!) and we've basically been swimming again at the tide of the NFL.   I've never seen a fan base so occupied with offense. It's time to look at what the Championship teams are doing and replicate it.
    • Unless they value the top 3 QBs exactly the same it would be stupid to take Saquan 1st overall and be left with 2nd or 3rd choice at QB. 
  • Members

    • #25HallOfFamer

      #25HallOfFamer 10

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ty4atd

      ty4atd 57

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Swan Ronson

      Swan Ronson 174

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CopenhagenColt

      CopenhagenColt 88

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 2,319

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsAC

      ColtsAC 54

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KelownaColtsFan

      KelownaColtsFan 47

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 624

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 222

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Carlos Danger

      Carlos Danger 921

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active: