Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Eric Galko: At least 2 teams view Charles Harris as top-10 talent


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, OffensivelyPC said:

Regarding these two, i think Werner taught me what explosive was not, years down the road. It sucks he was a guinea pig for me on a Colts team, but, he is now a solid example I look to compare against, across any position really (not that i compare burst of DE with that of WR, but just what "burst" looks like).

 

Re #2 - you mentioned scheme differences and I think bend around the corner is important across both, but I think inabilityto bend as a 4-3 edge becomes exploited if transitioned 3-4 edge guy, especially in coverage. Its one of those traits that scheme ttanslations matter more than others IMO.

 

Yup, you have to distinguish between explosiveness and anticipation. Sometimes they go hand in hand. Sometimes one is disguised as the other. It's easy to be fooled, but context matters.

 

Bend around the corner is a trait, IMO. Certain measurements speak to it, and it's also visible on tape. If an edge rusher is stiff and slow to change the direction, I don't know if it matters whether he plays 3-4 OLB or 4-3 end, he's going to struggle to beat blockers. Maybe a great spin move will help him to make up for it (and Harris has a pretty good spin move, btw), but for the most part, it's a troubling deficiency for an edge rusher.

 

Bend is different from ability to move in space, but they can both be measured somewhat by certain timed agility drills. A 3-4 OLB is more likely to be used in space, so it's a factor, but I think it's overblown for a potential pass rusher who is going to be coming toward the line of scrimmage 80%+ of the time. 

 

Overall, just like with every other aspect of judging players, I'd rather have the tape tell me something the drills/times don't, than the other way around. But if a scout thinks a guy is explosive but he has an awful Combine, it's time to get back to the tape and see if you missed something. I think that's when you look at a player the most critically, and make sure you understand what you're seeing. Werner is a great example of that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

Yup, you have to distinguish between explosiveness and anticipation. Sometimes they go hand in hand. Sometimes one is disguised as the other. It's easy to be fooled, but context matters.

 

Bend around the corner is a trait, IMO. Certain measurements speak to it, and it's also visible on tape. If an edge rusher is stiff and slow to change the direction, I don't know if it matters whether he plays 3-4 OLB or 4-3 end, he's going to struggle to beat blockers. Maybe a great spin move will help him to make up for it (and Harris has a pretty good spin move, btw), but for the most part, it's a troubling deficiency for an edge rusher.

 

Bend is different from ability to move in space, but they can both be measured somewhat by certain timed agility drills. A 3-4 OLB is more likely to be used in space, so it's a factor, but I think it's overblown for a potential pass rusher who is going to be coming toward the line of scrimmage 80%+ of the time. 

 

Overall, just like with every other aspect of judging players, I'd rather have the tape tell me something the drills/times don't, than the other way around. But if a scout thinks a guy is explosive but he has an awful Combine, it's time to get back to the tape and see if you missed something. I think that's when you look at a player the most critically, and make sure you understand what you're seeing. Werner is a great example of that. 

Yeah, what you are saying, i think we agree on parts. Im still learning edge guys and their traits. Bend isnt end all, no disagreement there.  but i always thought it was an indicator of lateral movement. Maybe im confusing lateral explosiveness/agility with lateral strength. Curious on your take there.

 

Just FYI - Forget the combine, im talking tape for now. I think tape should be the vast majority of the grade. Combine IS important, but i agree with you that its only informative - such that your assessment is in line with his times and if its not, whatd we miss.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not really.   There's a theory that Ballard wants to draft an OL high because he said it's important to protect the QB, and Richardson was hurt last year. And the counter was that Richardson's injury/s probably aren't about the level of OL protection, and drafting an OL high wouldn't address that concern.
    • I'm thinking if we can trade to 8 or 9 and draft Odunze , we should do it if the price is reasonable. The value chart shows giving up P 15 and P 46 is the perfect number. Probably won't do it and I would think 2025 2nd for a 2024 4th added to the deal would make it work . That of coarse would depend on Atlanta or Chicago wanting to move to 15 . Obviously , as we all know , it takes 2 to make a trade.
    • I can too. And that will tell us everything we need to know about how the view him. It will tell us their feelings on the tight end room, and what direction they pick from there will tell us even more.    but if they take him at 15, we won’t know much about what might have happened, as they will be landing someone they had rated highly and fell to them. 
    • Glad that’s over…    if I wanted to argue about it, I would have responded far more in depth than pointing out how you were attempting to gaslight me. I did not. Meaning I was ending my part of whatever the argument was. You “putting a finality to it” and then listing bullet points tells me it was the argument you wanted all along, which makes sense why you brought Grigson up in the first place. Bait, hook, gaslight. Almost got me buddy. You are a funny guy, Doug 
    • Putting a finality on an argument you want to have.   There is a theory that Ballard won't draft a OL high because ARs injuries were not caused by a poor oline.  I felt it important to note that since Luck's major injuries were also not caused by his oline, Ballard could still want to improve it like he did in 2018 simply because AR is The Franchise. And its important to point that out because there has been a running (false) narrative for about 9 years that Luck's oline was the (main) reason for his injuries that kept him out of games.  The (false) narrative is based upon, IMO, a detest of Grigson, and not reality about the facts (or strong rumors) behind the kidney laceration and snowboarding shoulder. Therefore, mentioning Grigson and the (false) narrative was germain to the point about Ballard possibly drafting Oline high this draft to protect AR. Mentioning Grigson shouldn't trigger a CB vs RG discussion, unless people reading it are gaslighted by their own reading lens.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...