Luck12-to-Hilton13

REPORT: Seahawks willing to TRADE Richard Sherman

Recommended Posts

Probably not for what they will want IMHO.  Now if it was say just a 3rd or 4th rounder, then perhaps.  But I doubt they will just let him walk for that low of a pick.  I would assume at least one 1st rounder would have to be offered?  I'm not sure how well he fits our scheme either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We seem to have a need at CB high on our draft board, from what I've read. Sherman is also age 28, which fits Ballard's apparent trend of recent signing's (excluding Butler), so it wouldn't be completely unusual for the Colts to pursue him. It would take probably a 1st rounder though, but if we're using that on a CB anyways, for an age 28 player, maybe it wouldn't be too crazy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Highly doubt it lol plus there'd have to be something wrong for them to trade thier best corner 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Sherman was also hurt for several weeks to end the year last season.

 

Also no way this happens with us, I highly doubt Ballard would go there......like really doubt it.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to ask why they are open to trading for him. It's either 1) he's not as good as perceived or 2) they see the CB talent in this draft and know they can replace him with a 1st round pick from a trade.

So if they want a first round pick for him I would pass and potentially use that pick on a CB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll trade Dwayne Allen straight up for Richard Sherman.

 

Oh wait.........

 

 

(sorry I promise sometime this offseason I stop with the Allen jokes)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would he fit our man to man scheme? We don't really have any outstanding safety's that will help him out like Seattle does.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pgt_rob said:

Would he fit our man to man scheme? We don't really have any outstanding safety's that will help him out like Seattle does.

That's a good point.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Luck12-to-Hilton13 said:

That's a good point.

 

He's a good player though but I would just be worried how he would fit in our defense. I'm pretty sure we take a corner in the lower rounds of the draft. We're kinda wide open there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a second rounder, yes. Like Superman pointed out, he does not have much guaranteed money left on his contract and I believe he can give us 2 years easily. Besides, it is not like we play man-to-man all the time. Even Vontae Davis gets safety help (however good or bad it might be) sometimes and there is plenty of zone that we play, mixing up Cover 2 and Cover 3 at times, IMO.

 

Some of you guys act like he is a bum without good safety help which he is not. The bigger issue, more than his money and skills, would be whether he fits in the Midwest profile of laying low, which he hands down WILL NOT. :)  However, for a soft team like ours lacking attitude on D, he might be good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't Sherman excel at zone defense while we use a man to man philosophy with our corners?

 

I don't think he'd fit into our defense all that well.

 

I'd much rather go to the draft.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, chad72 said:

For a second rounder, yes. Like Superman pointed out, he does not have much guaranteed money left on his contract and I believe he can give us 2 years easily. Besides, it is not like we play man-to-man all the time. Even Vontae Davis gets safety help (however good or bad it might be) sometimes and there is plenty of zone that we play, mixing up Cover 2 and Cover 3 at times, IMO.

 

Some of you guys act like he is a bum without good safety help which he is not. The bigger issue, more than his money and skills, would be whether he fits in the Midwest profile of laying low, which he hands down WILL NOT. :)  However, for a soft team like ours lacking attitude on D, he might be good.

The David Parry profile of laying low?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he leaves Seattle, he loses out on getting ignored for pass interference calls at home in their stadium. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:

Doesn't Sherman excel at zone defense while we use a man to man philosophy with our corners?

 

I don't think he'd fit into our defense all that well.

 

I'd much rather go to the draft.  

 

Seahawks play mostly pattern matching cover 3. Sherman's role is closer to man to man corner than typical zone corner.

 

I'd rather go to the draft but not because I'd have doubts about Shermans abilities outside of Seattle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Synthetic said:

If he leaves Seattle, he loses out on getting ignored for pass interference calls at home in their stadium. 

 

That actually sounds funny but it's true. Seattle gets BIG TIME CALLS in Seattle. And we saw it vs. Atlanta last year in Seattle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

I would trade our No.1 for Richard Sherman in a minute


Dude.......come on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Jules said:


Dude.......come on.

Richard Sherman?./.....lets get real.

....Top corner...in his prime.....no brainer

 

Its like asking would I trade my No.1 for JJ Watt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

id give our second for sherman, i dont see why the seahawks would take it though

 

i would not give our first for him at this time, i would want to wait until draft day and see what the board looks like

 

we could get a good corner with that pick ourselves

 

plus sherman mostly plays zone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

Richard Sherman?./.....lets get real.

....Top corner...in his prime.....no brainer

 

Its like asking would I trade my No.1 for JJ Watt

I am actually surprised the Texans dont entertain offers on Watt.  He has back issues and he may never be the same.  They could get some value out of him. A 1 and a 3 or something like that.  And they were pretty good without him.  

JMO

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

Richard Sherman?./.....lets get real.

....Top corner...in his prime.....no brainer

 

Its like asking would I trade my No.1 for JJ Watt

He is a zone corner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

He is a zone corner

Not totally....He can cover m-t-m...we've all seen it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

Not totally....He can cover m-t-m...we've all seen it

They don't do it often

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

They don't do it often

I agree...but Ithink he could adjust to being on 'an island'

   He was hurt late last year....and his attitude is  well.....volatile.....

.....but what's our pick...#15?    I'd take that trade if Seattle really wants to move him;

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe he is the best corner in the league and his man coverage ability is underrated. He has been used to shadow opponents' number one and has been great in that role, he's just better as a cover 3 left cornerback. That said, I wouldn't want to give up a first for him. I would for a second, but I doubt Seattle would take anything less than a first. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, The Peytonator said:

I believe he is the best corner in the league and his man coverage ability is underrated. He has been used to shadow opponents' number one and has been great in that role, he's just better as a cover 3 left cornerback. That said, I wouldn't want to give up a first for him. I would for a second, but I doubt Seattle would take anything less than a first. 

why wouldnt you give up the 15th pick ion the draft for a 'lets just say above average' starting cornerback in his prime?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

why wouldnt you give up the 15th pick ion the draft for a 'lets just say above average' starting cornerback in his prime?

 

 

I think that's sarcasm, but he's definitely better than above average. He may be in his prime but how long does that prime last? He'll be turning 29 in a few days and corners tend to start falling off a bit around 30. He has a cap hit of $13 million for the next two years, then when he's 30 he'll still cost a lot of money to keep. It's just too much of a risk for me. It may be cliche, but I want to build through the draft. Trading for him would not be what puts us on top so I wouldn't be willing to offer more than a second. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Jules said:

 

That actually sounds funny but it's true. Seattle gets BIG TIME CALLS in Seattle. And we saw it vs. Atlanta last year in Seattle.

 

 

And the Buffalo game too where Sherman tried to kill the field goal kicker and no call. 

 

 

This past year, Seattle was heavily penalized repeatedly against the Saints on the road in the Superdome. They lost that game and Sherman complained about the refs. They also had similar calls against Green Bay. When Seattle is at home, they can get away with murder. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Colt-in-Jax said:

Swap of #1 picks with MAYBE a 5th thrown in. It's not just the talent it's the big contract to.

The contract isn't that big.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No thanks.

 

Not worth the loss of draft picks, the big contract (11/12m per the next 2 years), the headache of having him in the locker room, his media coverage, the constant PI calls he'd get for the assault and battery on wideouts that he somehow gets away with in Seattle.

 

The CB class is loaded. We don't need a high priced, grabby 29yo CB.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    •   ^^^ ban this user!! ^^^
    • It was the only show I watched or listened to on ESPN. Now that they are no longer a team I will have no need to tune into ESPN at all.
    • I think you have done a very nice assessment of our teams progress and where we are right now.  Most of the teams improvement has come on the defensive side of the ball coming from additions and improvement from our young players.  The loss of Luck for the year and the hurried assimilation of Brissett to the lineup certainly has not helped the offense meet our preseason expectations.  I read where Doyle was second in the league in receptions among TE's before the Pittsburgh game.  A stat that blew me away actually.  Who knows what a healthy Luck and a better OL  would have done for Moncrief and the rest of the WR's.   I think you have to congratulate the coaches for this progress and continued improvement that we have seen from this team.  They have gotten better and that's what we are looking for.  It might be a lost season record wise but if you are looking at player and overall team development you have to be pleased with the great progress they have made this year.  No one is happy with the record but you can not ignore the overall improvements that have been achieved.  Everyone is looking forward to new coaches next year but this years staff has done some pretty impressive work teaching and improving the overall contributions of our players.  
    • That's just not the reality of how things work. Some players just don't pan out in the NFL. Look at Zach Banner, We drafted him round 4 and he was gone by the start of the season. 
    • I honestly didn’t expect much from him. Thought he was a ST’s guy who would take some time at CB. Ballard found a late round gem in his 1st draft. Pretty impressive. 
  • Members

    • VaAllDay757

      VaAllDay757 325

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ztboiler

      ztboiler 1,219

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • egg

      egg 306

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shive

      Shive 872

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jimmy g

      jimmy g 249

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HarryTheCat

      HarryTheCat 391

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • LockeDown

      LockeDown 1,276

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BloodyChamp

      BloodyChamp 714

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fisticuffs111

      Fisticuffs111 378

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,264

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active: