Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
VocableLoki

Mike Wells Mailbag

13 posts in this topic

57 minutes ago, VocableLoki said:

http://www.espn.com/blog/indianapolis-colts/post/_/id/20110/colts-furthest-theyve-been-to-being-super-bowl-contenders-with-andrew-luck-since-2012

 

In my mind, Wells contradicts himself in this response. If the Colts offense should get better this year and the defense can only get better in all likelihood, then shouldn't the team be better this season?

Additional factor: division appears to be much better.

 

Where they are on the spectrum of Super Bowl contenders, at this point in time, means little.  They are in the midst of a complete overhaul.  It will probably be two years before we fully appreciate  this fact.

 

Since Luck arrived, they have never been serious Super Bowl contenders.  True, they lucked out and made the AFCCG.  Unfortunately they lost 45-7.  

 

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I still feel deflated over the AFCCG . 

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I typically skip over anything written by Mike Wells, because it's usually 1400x1400_10970003.jpg

 

I have no clue how he's STILL employed by ESPN...

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, i frequented espn less after reading his articles for a handful of months. Didnt know who he was until they brought him in. I go to ESPN for stats only at this point, and Wells is a big reason for that. Hes just not interesting...

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

" The simply answer is no."

 

That's all you need to know about Mike Wells writing capabilities. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many people on here were saying the same thing before last season started and we didn't get better. Other teams can get better too and we still have many uncertainties to figure out before I feel comfortable even saying the Colts are a playoff team this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Bluefire4 said:

Many people on here were saying the same thing before last season started and we didn't get better. Other teams can get better too and we still have many uncertainties to figure out before I feel comfortable even saying the Colts are a playoff team this year.

This is one of the main problems that most people fail to acknowledge, that as we are or will get better (in this case), the other teams in our conference and division will be doing the same. Just in our division, The Texans are a QB away from being a competitive playoff team. The Jags are a QB and RB away. The Titans have both and are building their team well through the draft. They also have 6 picks in the top 75 to rival our draft. We have to hit in the draft next month just to stay relevant in a much improved division, let alone get ahead of everyone and win it. It's going to be a slow process. Only reason we have a chance with our roster the way it is is Andrew Luck and TY Hilton.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, VocableLoki said:

http://www.espn.com/blog/indianapolis-colts/post/_/id/20110/colts-furthest-theyve-been-to-being-super-bowl-contenders-with-andrew-luck-since-2012

 

In my mind, Wells contradicts himself in this response. If the Colts offense should get better this year and the defense can only get better in all likelihood, then shouldn't the team be better this season?

 

Wow, so many words and still he didn't manage to write anything... haha

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Mr Clueless said:

 

Wow, so many words and still he didn't manage to write anything... haha

IMO pretty much anything coming out of ESPN is a waist of time. What used to be the sports channel to watch is unwatchable now.

It has become face time and who can come up with what they think is the new catch phrase.

Sports reporting is secondary.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Jared Cisneros said:

This is one of the main problems that most people fail to acknowledge, that as we are or will get better (in this case), the other teams in our conference and division will be doing the same. Just in our division, The Texans are a QB away from being a competitive playoff team. The Jags are a QB and RB away. The Titans have both and are building their team well through the draft. They also have 6 picks in the top 75 to rival our draft. We have to hit in the draft next month just to stay relevant in a much improved division, let alone get ahead of everyone and win it. It's going to be a slow process. Only reason we have a chance with our roster the way it is is Andrew Luck and TY Hilton.

My point was more arguing what Wells wrote, he doesn't mention opponents but talks about our roster being worse. I don't see how that could be the case.

 

To your point: even if the Texans are a QB away from contention (which I don't necessarily agree with) that's still a pretty big piece they need to somehow acquire. Even if Romo lands to them: he's 37 and an injury risk.

 

The Jaguars haven't won more than five games since 2011, seems very generous to say they are two positions away. Given our success against the Titans, they still have more building to do. 

 

The division is better but with a better constructed defense we are still a good bet to win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • JSYK We dont have 31 million to spend 
    • I agree. As long as that that person is answering it like an opinion and everyone realizes it's an opinion, then everything is solid. It gets when people are telling opinions as facts that it starts to head south. You see plenty of both, but it's usually just a lot of debating from my point of view. Some good points of view, and some bad ones, but as long as we all acknowledge these point of views as opinions when they are, then I see nothing wrong with it. I think it just gets out of control when there are rumors, mostly during FA and the draft, and people take it out of context at times, myself included.
    •   Well.....   There's good conversation and then there's.....      NOT so good conversation.   And this website has plenty of both.     I'd love to have more of the good kind and less of the NOT so good kind.   Deciding now that a poster here --- any poster here --- knows what Chris Ballard thinks of a player is ridiculous because none of us knows anything.    Ballard may love the guy.    He may like the guy.    He may not like him.   But nobody knows.      So, stating as fact that Ballard doesn't like someone is a dog that just won't hunt.....  
    • Things went our way tonight all around. Pacers win, Hawks and Bucks lose. Now there is a 3 way tie for 5th. It will be interesting to see how we finish.   Bad night with injuries for this team though. We already knew GR3 hurt his calf in practice and then Stuckey and Al Jefferson go down tonight. I actually want to see more Brooks/Ellis/Miles and more Christmas so hopefully they can pick up momentum if we can make the playoffs.
    • I wouldn't call it a flaw at all. In fact, it's the main premise that a sports forum is built around. Trying to put pieces of the puzzle together on certain things and predicting the future. That's how conversation is started a lot of the time in particular and it keeps people engaged. Without people jumping to conclusions with little evidence, it'd just be people reporting facts on twitter and chat on gameday, which wouldn't be a lot of fun by itself.
  • Members

    • Coltfreak

      Coltfreak 483

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cjrichard

      cjrichard 38

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Samu-Rye

      Samu-Rye 27

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • aaron11

      aaron11 631

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • -JJ-

      -JJ- 1,034

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • akcolt

      akcolt 1,835

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 1,410

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Clem-Dog

      Clem-Dog 205

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts52761

      colts52761 65

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Imrryr

      Imrryr 79

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.