Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
VocableLoki

Mike Wells Mailbag

13 posts in this topic

57 minutes ago, VocableLoki said:

http://www.espn.com/blog/indianapolis-colts/post/_/id/20110/colts-furthest-theyve-been-to-being-super-bowl-contenders-with-andrew-luck-since-2012

 

In my mind, Wells contradicts himself in this response. If the Colts offense should get better this year and the defense can only get better in all likelihood, then shouldn't the team be better this season?

Additional factor: division appears to be much better.

 

Where they are on the spectrum of Super Bowl contenders, at this point in time, means little.  They are in the midst of a complete overhaul.  It will probably be two years before we fully appreciate  this fact.

 

Since Luck arrived, they have never been serious Super Bowl contenders.  True, they lucked out and made the AFCCG.  Unfortunately they lost 45-7.  

 

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I still feel deflated over the AFCCG . 

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I typically skip over anything written by Mike Wells, because it's usually 1400x1400_10970003.jpg

 

I have no clue how he's STILL employed by ESPN...

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, i frequented espn less after reading his articles for a handful of months. Didnt know who he was until they brought him in. I go to ESPN for stats only at this point, and Wells is a big reason for that. Hes just not interesting...

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

" The simply answer is no."

 

That's all you need to know about Mike Wells writing capabilities. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many people on here were saying the same thing before last season started and we didn't get better. Other teams can get better too and we still have many uncertainties to figure out before I feel comfortable even saying the Colts are a playoff team this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Bluefire4 said:

Many people on here were saying the same thing before last season started and we didn't get better. Other teams can get better too and we still have many uncertainties to figure out before I feel comfortable even saying the Colts are a playoff team this year.

This is one of the main problems that most people fail to acknowledge, that as we are or will get better (in this case), the other teams in our conference and division will be doing the same. Just in our division, The Texans are a QB away from being a competitive playoff team. The Jags are a QB and RB away. The Titans have both and are building their team well through the draft. They also have 6 picks in the top 75 to rival our draft. We have to hit in the draft next month just to stay relevant in a much improved division, let alone get ahead of everyone and win it. It's going to be a slow process. Only reason we have a chance with our roster the way it is is Andrew Luck and TY Hilton.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, VocableLoki said:

http://www.espn.com/blog/indianapolis-colts/post/_/id/20110/colts-furthest-theyve-been-to-being-super-bowl-contenders-with-andrew-luck-since-2012

 

In my mind, Wells contradicts himself in this response. If the Colts offense should get better this year and the defense can only get better in all likelihood, then shouldn't the team be better this season?

 

Wow, so many words and still he didn't manage to write anything... haha

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Mr Clueless said:

 

Wow, so many words and still he didn't manage to write anything... haha

IMO pretty much anything coming out of ESPN is a waist of time. What used to be the sports channel to watch is unwatchable now.

It has become face time and who can come up with what they think is the new catch phrase.

Sports reporting is secondary.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Jared Cisneros said:

This is one of the main problems that most people fail to acknowledge, that as we are or will get better (in this case), the other teams in our conference and division will be doing the same. Just in our division, The Texans are a QB away from being a competitive playoff team. The Jags are a QB and RB away. The Titans have both and are building their team well through the draft. They also have 6 picks in the top 75 to rival our draft. We have to hit in the draft next month just to stay relevant in a much improved division, let alone get ahead of everyone and win it. It's going to be a slow process. Only reason we have a chance with our roster the way it is is Andrew Luck and TY Hilton.

My point was more arguing what Wells wrote, he doesn't mention opponents but talks about our roster being worse. I don't see how that could be the case.

 

To your point: even if the Texans are a QB away from contention (which I don't necessarily agree with) that's still a pretty big piece they need to somehow acquire. Even if Romo lands to them: he's 37 and an injury risk.

 

The Jaguars haven't won more than five games since 2011, seems very generous to say they are two positions away. Given our success against the Titans, they still have more building to do. 

 

The division is better but with a better constructed defense we are still a good bet to win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This info came out this week.     This is the first chance I've had to post it as I do every year.         Here is the actual roster with updated weights.       I printed out a roster after the draft and have now made notes about how much weight has been either lost or gained by our players.   http://www.colts.com/team/roster.html   I'm also going to write it up here....    the roster is for you to use as a cross reference...   Hope you enjoy!                 Aiken                  216      +1 Alie-Cox             267      +7 Anderson           301      +1 Ayers                 247      -8 Banner              358       -2 Basham             266      +4 Binford               185 Blackmon          185   Bond                 299       -3 Bostic               245   Boyd                 293      -17 Bray                  183      -3 Briggs                230 Brown                196 Butler                 192      +4 Castanzo            311 Clark                  311      -8 Cooper              311      +5 Crossan            203      +1 Daniels             246       -1 Davis                207 ]Dorsett            185 Doyle                262      -5 Edwards           271      -4 Farley               209       -1 Ferguson         205       +5 Geathers         220 George            234   Good               345     -10 G ore               212      -5 Graham          208 Green             211      +6 Haeg              305      +1 Hairston         195      +2 Hankins         325      +5 Hennessy      246 HIghtower     200 HIlton            178 Hooker          212      +7 Howard         214      -7 Hunt              298     +3 Jackson        234     +4 Jeter             251 Kelly             309 Langford      299      -6 Locke           208      +12 Luck             240 Mack           210        -3 McGill         299       -11 Melvin         196       +3 Mewhort      305       -7 Milton          196       +6 Mingo          239       -1 Mitchell        192       +9 Moncrief      216       -6 Morris         186        -2 Morrison      241      +6 Morris          219       +1 Mount         253        +4 Muir            309    Natson       153        -6 Parry          317       +7 Pope          205  Powell        211  Redmond   300       +5 Rhodes      238      -4 Ridgewawy 318     +1     Rogers        184     +4 Sanchez      195 Schwenke    310     -5 Sheard         265 Sickels         252     -9 Simon          250     -10 Smith           197     -8 Spence        231 Stewart        333     -14 Swoope       258     +1 Thomas       282    -10 Tolzien        215     +2 Ugokwe      315     -6 Vinatieri      212     +6 vujonvich    300 Walker        242     +7 Walker        216 Wlliams      260     +13 Wilson        206      -7 Woods       330      +23 Wylie          309   Griffey        209 Michael      220  
    • I love the talent in their def but I think luck had Wades number lol he's eaten up his defense  in wins/losses
    • A punch to the gut was how it was said to be by Pritchard. Bird sure left Pritchard a total mess. None of this is surprising to me about how the NBA direction is going. None of this is ever going to change as long as there is not a hard cap and the NBA gets paid for super stars getting put on the same teams. This started years ago with the Celtics. They always had the best teams money could buy and then when the cap come in they invented what is called the Larry Bird exception. Then the NBA seen the chance to cash in by letting teams pay them for going over the cap. Then the owners were getting paid by high dollar TV deals and couldn't care less about putting winners on the court as long as they were making money. Now the NBA is made popular by fans who really are not interested in watching basketball played in it's original form. All they want now is highlight dunks and three pointers. Defense has been lost forever right along with traditional basketball. Sad for those who remember the real basketball.
    • Fact is Pagano went 8-8 without Luck after using 5 different QBs with one of them coming right off the street. But it's things like this that gets overlooked by those who choose to. Moral superiority?? You have to be joking. That's even taking it over the top and is getting to the point of pure unaltered childishness.
    •     Sounds like we are seriously considering Lance Stephenson at starting point guard if Jeff Teague's     price is to high..   ..I know he's motivated to play hard and well but that's not something I'd be considering
  • Members

    • will426

      will426 671

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jho

      jho 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Steagles

      Steagles 142

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts_Fan12

      Colts_Fan12 3,532

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan0112

      Coltsfan0112 56

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 5,004

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 12,447

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheGreatManning18Fan

      TheGreatManning18Fan 81

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • STH2000

      STH2000 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • crazycolt1

      crazycolt1 5,494

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.