COLTS449

Are we wasting away Lucks career?

Are we wasting away Lucks career?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. Are we wasting away Lucks career?



Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Myles said:

Are they wasting him?   Currently, right now, No.   I think Ballard is doing some good things and I think that will continue.

 

What on earth are you seeing?

 

Ballard has signed....and RE-SIGNED... some stop-gap defensive players to stop-gap contracts to replace the stop-gap players who left.

 

On offense, he got rid of 1 TE and has yet to find a third TE, and replaced a C/OG another C/OG when we have a capable backup C.

 

The offseason, at best, has been one giant push...so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, DougDew said:

What on earth are you seeing?

 

Ballard has signed....and RE-SIGNED... some stop-gap defensive players to stop-gap contracts to replace the stop-gap players who left.

 

On offense, he got rid of 1 TE and has yet to find a third TE, and replaced a C/OG another C/OG when we have a capable backup C.

 

The offseason, at best, has been one giant push...so far.

I disagree.   The current team is better than last years team.   The difference is the depth and potential we have now.  I'm not saying it is vastly better, but other than the punter, I like the players we signed more than they players that left.  We added size and strength. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Myles said:

I disagree.   The current team is better than last years team.   The difference is the depth and potential we have now.  I'm not saying it is vastly better, but other than the punter, I like the players we signed more than they players that left.  We added size and strength. 

I like the players too.  But Walden, Cole, Mathis, and Adams are all players that would have left no matter who was GM.  I know we're not talking about GMs, but I think any GM could have made the moves Ballard has made without trying too hard.

 

And I think we are seeing that even though a team may have gobs of cap space, there still aren't many free agents who are worthy of spending it on.  

 

As far as Luck's career, it will always benefit from having a great defense, but changing the offense to better suit his skills is what would directly benefit his career, IMO.  Hopefully that will happen some.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, DougDew said:

Luck should have been put into a more of a WC-based offense from day 1.  Not a power-run, man-blocking, play-action, vertical, offense.

 

That philosophy came from the top.  Nowhere else.

 

At the time I was very critical of Arians' offensive system as we were wedded to long developing vertical plays behind a patchwork O line with a rookie QB. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, SteelCityColt said:

 

At the time I was very critical of Arians' offensive system as we were wedded to long developing vertical plays behind a patchwork O line with a rookie QB. 

It worked well when Arians actually ran it.  Not so well when somebody other than Arians ran Arians' offense.  Go figure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, DougDew said:

I like the players too.  But Walden, Cole, Mathis, and Adams are all players that would have left no matter who was GM.  I know we're not talking about GMs, but I think any GM could have made the moves Ballard has made without trying too hard.

 

 

Yes, but I know of one ex GM who would not have made these moves.    Other GM's would have overpaid to make a splash with one or 2 house hold names.     I like that Ballard realizes that this team has too many holes to fill for them to pay high dollar for any one free agent.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Myles said:

Yes, but I know of one ex GM who would not have made these moves.    Other GM's would have overpaid to make a splash with one or 2 house hold names.     I like that Ballard realizes that this team has too many holes to fill for them to pay high dollar for any one free agent.  

I can't believe that any GM would not let Adams, Cole, and Walden walk in favor of younger players.  This isn't a few months removed from going to the the AFCCG and you load up on vets to try to push over the top, but keep the contracts cap friendly so you don't mortgage the future.  

 

That's a very sound strategy after having gone 11-5 and to the AFCCG.

 

The situation of building from an 8-8 record demands a different approach.   Whether or not they would sign Sheard or Simon as the replacement is less known, but there aren't that many RUSH or SAMS available so the chances are pretty good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, DougDew said:

I can't believe that any GM would not let Adams, Cole, and Walden walk in favor of younger players.  This isn't a few months removed from going to the the AFCCG and you load up on vets to try to push over the top, but keep the contracts cap friendly so you don't mortgage the future.  

 

That's a very sound strategy after having gone 11-5 and to the AFCCG.

 

The situation of building from an 8-8 record demands a different approach.   Whether or not they would sign Sheard or Simon as the replacement is less known, but there aren't that many RUSH or SAMS available so the chances are pretty good.

You are forgetting about Grigson.   He would not have made these moves.   He would have once again took a chance and tried to hit the lottery.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Myles said:

You are forgetting about Grigson.   He would not have made these moves.   He would have once again took a chance and tried to hit the lottery.  

?.

Not sure when he did that other than possibly the year after just missing the SB, but that's not a bad plan, especially if it doesn't mortgage the future.

 

I thought Grigson's problem, so I have read, was that he DIDN'T sign enough star players, not that his problem was that he brought in stop gap players to cap friendly deals....like Ballard is doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, DougDew said:

?.

Not sure when he did that other than possibly the year after just missing the SB, but that's not a bad plan, especially if it doesn't mortgage the future.

 

I thought Grigson's problem, so I have read, was that he DIDN'T sign enough star players, not that his problem was that he brought in stop gap players to cap friendly deals....like Ballard is doing.

His issues were mostly poor drafts, but on FA he didn't sign many big strong young players.   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just hope luck isn't the next Dan Marino. Big numbers, but no championship

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like the assessment. I would personally include Mingo in pleasant surprises, the guy is all around the ball all the time, he is rejuvinated it seems with us after lackluster play in Cleveland and NE. I also would include Mack in pleasant surprises as i believe we have only seen glimpses of the REAL Mack attack yet due to the coaches not playing him, i understand we have a proven veteran RB on the team, after this season when Gore leaves im fully confident Mack will assume the number 1 role and become a top 5 running back in the league. Then lastly i would put the Oline in dissapointments, as you stated nobody expected them to blow anyone away but i personally dont think anyone expected them to be as bad as the have been either.
    • Geathers was having a great season last year under monachino before his neck injury I think he will be fine he needs to play more man to man.
    •   ^^^ ban this user!! ^^^
    • It was the only show I watched or listened to on ESPN. Now that they are no longer a team I will have no need to tune into ESPN at all.
    • I think you have done a very nice assessment of our teams progress and where we are right now.  Most of the teams improvement has come on the defensive side of the ball coming from additions and improvement from our young players.  The loss of Luck for the year and the hurried assimilation of Brissett to the lineup certainly has not helped the offense meet our preseason expectations.  I read where Doyle was second in the league in receptions among TE's before the Pittsburgh game.  A stat that blew me away actually.  Who knows what a healthy Luck and a better OL  would have done for Moncrief and the rest of the WR's.   I think you have to congratulate the coaches for this progress and continued improvement that we have seen from this team.  They have gotten better and that's what we are looking for.  It might be a lost season record wise but if you are looking at player and overall team development you have to be pleased with the great progress they have made this year.  No one is happy with the record but you can not ignore the overall improvements that have been achieved.  Everyone is looking forward to new coaches next year but this years staff has done some pretty impressive work teaching and improving the overall contributions of our players.  
  • Members

    • krunk

      krunk 8,264

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltfreak

      Coltfreak 555

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • crazycolt1

      crazycolt1 6,775

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • life long

      life long 200

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 100GFB

      100GFB 741

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • gspdx

      gspdx 103

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Derakynn

      Derakynn 1,214

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ar7

      ar7 235

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Redbull

      Redbull 4

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 669

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active: