COLTS449

Are we wasting away Lucks career?

Are we wasting away Lucks career?   81 members have voted

  1. 1. Are we wasting away Lucks career?


Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

212 posts in this topic

3 hours ago, Myles said:

Are they wasting him?   Currently, right now, No.   I think Ballard is doing some good things and I think that will continue.

 

What on earth are you seeing?

 

Ballard has signed....and RE-SIGNED... some stop-gap defensive players to stop-gap contracts to replace the stop-gap players who left.

 

On offense, he got rid of 1 TE and has yet to find a third TE, and replaced a C/OG another C/OG when we have a capable backup C.

 

The offseason, at best, has been one giant push...so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, DougDew said:

What on earth are you seeing?

 

Ballard has signed....and RE-SIGNED... some stop-gap defensive players to stop-gap contracts to replace the stop-gap players who left.

 

On offense, he got rid of 1 TE and has yet to find a third TE, and replaced a C/OG another C/OG when we have a capable backup C.

 

The offseason, at best, has been one giant push...so far.

I disagree.   The current team is better than last years team.   The difference is the depth and potential we have now.  I'm not saying it is vastly better, but other than the punter, I like the players we signed more than they players that left.  We added size and strength. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Myles said:

I disagree.   The current team is better than last years team.   The difference is the depth and potential we have now.  I'm not saying it is vastly better, but other than the punter, I like the players we signed more than they players that left.  We added size and strength. 

I like the players too.  But Walden, Cole, Mathis, and Adams are all players that would have left no matter who was GM.  I know we're not talking about GMs, but I think any GM could have made the moves Ballard has made without trying too hard.

 

And I think we are seeing that even though a team may have gobs of cap space, there still aren't many free agents who are worthy of spending it on.  

 

As far as Luck's career, it will always benefit from having a great defense, but changing the offense to better suit his skills is what would directly benefit his career, IMO.  Hopefully that will happen some.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, DougDew said:

Luck should have been put into a more of a WC-based offense from day 1.  Not a power-run, man-blocking, play-action, vertical, offense.

 

That philosophy came from the top.  Nowhere else.

 

At the time I was very critical of Arians' offensive system as we were wedded to long developing vertical plays behind a patchwork O line with a rookie QB. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, SteelCityColt said:

 

At the time I was very critical of Arians' offensive system as we were wedded to long developing vertical plays behind a patchwork O line with a rookie QB. 

It worked well when Arians actually ran it.  Not so well when somebody other than Arians ran Arians' offense.  Go figure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, DougDew said:

I like the players too.  But Walden, Cole, Mathis, and Adams are all players that would have left no matter who was GM.  I know we're not talking about GMs, but I think any GM could have made the moves Ballard has made without trying too hard.

 

 

Yes, but I know of one ex GM who would not have made these moves.    Other GM's would have overpaid to make a splash with one or 2 house hold names.     I like that Ballard realizes that this team has too many holes to fill for them to pay high dollar for any one free agent.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Myles said:

Yes, but I know of one ex GM who would not have made these moves.    Other GM's would have overpaid to make a splash with one or 2 house hold names.     I like that Ballard realizes that this team has too many holes to fill for them to pay high dollar for any one free agent.  

I can't believe that any GM would not let Adams, Cole, and Walden walk in favor of younger players.  This isn't a few months removed from going to the the AFCCG and you load up on vets to try to push over the top, but keep the contracts cap friendly so you don't mortgage the future.  

 

That's a very sound strategy after having gone 11-5 and to the AFCCG.

 

The situation of building from an 8-8 record demands a different approach.   Whether or not they would sign Sheard or Simon as the replacement is less known, but there aren't that many RUSH or SAMS available so the chances are pretty good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, DougDew said:

I can't believe that any GM would not let Adams, Cole, and Walden walk in favor of younger players.  This isn't a few months removed from going to the the AFCCG and you load up on vets to try to push over the top, but keep the contracts cap friendly so you don't mortgage the future.  

 

That's a very sound strategy after having gone 11-5 and to the AFCCG.

 

The situation of building from an 8-8 record demands a different approach.   Whether or not they would sign Sheard or Simon as the replacement is less known, but there aren't that many RUSH or SAMS available so the chances are pretty good.

You are forgetting about Grigson.   He would not have made these moves.   He would have once again took a chance and tried to hit the lottery.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Myles said:

You are forgetting about Grigson.   He would not have made these moves.   He would have once again took a chance and tried to hit the lottery.  

?.

Not sure when he did that other than possibly the year after just missing the SB, but that's not a bad plan, especially if it doesn't mortgage the future.

 

I thought Grigson's problem, so I have read, was that he DIDN'T sign enough star players, not that his problem was that he brought in stop gap players to cap friendly deals....like Ballard is doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, DougDew said:

?.

Not sure when he did that other than possibly the year after just missing the SB, but that's not a bad plan, especially if it doesn't mortgage the future.

 

I thought Grigson's problem, so I have read, was that he DIDN'T sign enough star players, not that his problem was that he brought in stop gap players to cap friendly deals....like Ballard is doing.

His issues were mostly poor drafts, but on FA he didn't sign many big strong young players.   

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just hope luck isn't the next Dan Marino. Big numbers, but no championship

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, CR91 said:

I just hope luck isn't the next Dan Marino. Big numbers, but no championship

That would suck!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I understand that but just answer this, who's better MJ or LeBron? I honestly could not stand Michael Jordan which some just ignore when I Post. I hated him more than I do LeBron but I don't get  caught up in the moment either and just say someone's the best ever when they don't have the resume to back it up.  I also think Magic was better than LeBron, lets say LeBron wins it all and wins Finals MVP this season: -Magic 5-4 in Championships -LeBron has him 4-3 in League MVP's -LeBron would have him 4-3 in Finals MVP's -Magic 5-4 in Finals, LeBron 4-4 in Finals -LeBron much more Points in his career -Magic much more Assists in his career -Neither have won Defensive Player of the Year.   To me this is much more of a debate and almost dead even, both are pretty even Rebounders as well. Magic still would be the greater winner though and nobody is going to tell me the Boston teams that Magic beat aren't as great as the Warrior teams are now - that is close but Boston was loaded back then as well.  
    • I'm really not trying to get into this discussion because I understand both sides but the people who try to make it look like it is not a discussion really get to me.   People talk about the rings but I don't think one of LeBron's teams were as good as MJs and the Warriors this year and last year were better than any team Jordan played.   And also about the playoff point stat. LeBron did play 33 more games but still has fewer attempts than MJ did. Just shows you how much Jordan shot the basketball. LeBron will be top ten in assists when he retires.
    • Why is that? Just asking. You do know the Jazz were favored by Vegas going into the 1998 Finals and Jazz had HCA but the Bulls still beat them. Also lets say LeBron wins this year. That would give him 4 Championships. If LeBron wins and wins Finals MVP it would be: Jordan 6-4 in Championships Jordan 5-4 in League MVP's/this wont change Jordan 6 Finals MVP's, LeBron would have 4 Jordan 6-0 in Finals, LeBron would be 4-4 Jordan has 10 Scoring Titles, LeBron has 1 Jordan has won Defensive Player of the Year once, LeBron has never won that. Jordan still has more Career Points and hasn't even played as long as LeBron has. -Not trying to start anything but you don't have a leg to stand on saying that. Jordan beats him in nearly everything imaginable that is most important. LeBron now has more Playoff Points but he has played 33 more games to do so. I cant debate with anyone because I list facts that back up my stuff while others just get on here and say LeBron is the best just because.
    • The ball should be placed where the body part that rules a player down hits. Not where the ball was when that happened. If you are going to spot the ball on a sideline grab where the recievers toes are though the ball is out if bounds, then the same spot rule should apply anywhere else on the field
    • The other thing that I like about cats is their fascination with Christmas trees & ornaments that hangs from it's real or fake branches. Cats tend to like batting ornaments playfully around. You know low hanging stuff or items that catch sunlight just right.    Many years ago, Gypsy my calico cat long since gone now started batting a boot yarn ornament with her paw & she got her claw stuck. As a matter of fact, the tree started to topple in her direction, I stopped it just in time from landing on her. I said "Gypsy are you okay?" She looked at me as if to say. "Thanks for the save SW1. My life almost flashed between my eyes & it wasn't pretty at all."    A few Christmas's later, Gypsy started playfully batting around the same ornament & I replied "Now be careful Gypsy. You remember what happened last time right?" She meowed back at me as if to say "Darn it, you're no fun at all. Off to my favorite spot to snooze for a few hours then."    Yeah, we had an understanding. We gave each other space & we know when to check in & say hey what's up? Cats are cool that way. They know when to leave you alone & when to make sure your okay. 
  • Welcome New Members

  • Members

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.