Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Dontari Poe scheduled to visit


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 822
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

4 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

If his parameters are only a one year deal why bring him in to negotiate?  That could easily be done over the phone and once you hit his number bring him in to sign.  I could see a one year deal as a fallback if a multiple deal cannot be reached.  I think they are working on a multiple year deal. 

 

I think so too.

 

But I think it's 2 or 3 years and not 5.

 

I'm fine with 2 or 3 years.  

 

But I'm not OK with anything longer.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Gabriel Alexander Morillo said:

I'm pretty sure half the posts in this thread are something to the tune of "I trust Ballard to know firsthand if Poe's back is an issue, etc. etc." 

We get it people. You can connect the dots between Ballard being a Chiefs front office guy and Poe being an ex-player.... christ. lol

 

I really hope you're right NCF but I got a bad feeling about this. Hopefully Ballard doesn't make that mistake. I'd be happy with a 2-3 year deal. Usually good DTs continue being good into their 30's so we'll get a good look at how he holds up over 3 years and make the determination from there. 

 

I've posted the same thing about Ballard.     He should know Ballard depth.

 

The only reason for all my posts is to calm down those who think we're giving Poe a 5-year deal at more than 10 Mill per with a big guarantee.     I don't see that happening.

 

I'd like the Colts to sign Poe if he's healthy.      I'll take a deal for 1 or 2 or 3 years,  but not more.

 

And yes,   I do trust Ballard. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I think so too.

 

But I think it's 2 or 3 years and not 5.

 

I'm fine with 2 or 3 years.  

 

But I'm not OK with anything longer.

 

I have been thinking 3 all along but his last contract was 4 so we might have to go there. Not the end of the world.   I would trust them to make it a good deal for both sides.  I think Ballard knows what he's doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I've posted the same thing about Ballard.     He should know Ballard depth.

 

The only reason for all my posts is to calm down those who think we're giving Poe a 5-year deal at more than 10 Mill per with a big guarantee.     I don't see that happening.

 

I'd like the Colts to sign Poe if he's healthy.      I'll take a deal for 1 or 2 or 3 years,  but not more.

 

And yes,   I do trust Ballard. 

 

 

I wasn't referring to you with that part of my reply. Just the other people who keep repeating the same thing as if no else can read the other 50 replies stating the same reasoning. I trust Ballard too and think he will at the very least make our defense look competent with talent alone next year. It's up to Monachino to coach their level of play up 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm trying to settle into the idea of signing Poe. I'm finding it hard to do. Hankins and Logan are still available, that might be why. Neither of them have the injury history Poe does, and I think they're both better pass rushers. (Hard to believe, but our OL did a pretty good job against Poe in 2016.) Poe is definitely good, so I wouldn't complain about adding him, assuming the contract isn't outrageous.

 

Poe reportedly wants a one year deal, presumably because he's seen the early offers in free agency and isn't impressed. The Colts are willing to do a long term deal, but I assume they aren't going to get crazy. If it were up to me to determine the contract for Poe, here's what I would present.

 

Two year contract, $22m. Guaranteeing $10m in Year 1 ($5m roster bonus), with incentives that can take it to $11m (Pro Bowl, All Pro, sacks). Year 2 is $11m, non guaranteed. Here's the catch: Year 2 is a player option, and it would have to be exercised by the first day of the new league year. If Poe declines the option, he becomes a UFA, and he cannot be tagged. So if he has a great year, he can hit the market again right away. If he doesn't have a great year and isn't sure of his market, he can opt in to Year 2, but it's not guaranteed unless he's on the roster Week 1 of the regular season. If he does hit free agency and leaves, the Colts would be eligible for a comp pick. And in any event, both sides could agree to new terms prior to the new league year. 

 

In this way, neither side has to commit long term, both sides get some flexibility, and if they part ways, it's what both sides wanted. It also incentives Poe to have a great season -- not just for pay incentives, but to have another shot at free agency while he's still in his mid 20s and after a great year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, Superman said:

I'm trying to settle into the idea of signing Poe. I'm finding it hard to do. Hankins and Logan are still available, that might be why. Neither of them have the injury history Poe does, and I think they're both better pass rushers. (Hard to believe, but our OL did a pretty good job against Poe in 2016.) Poe is definitely good, so I wouldn't complain about adding him, assuming the contract isn't outrageous.

 

Poe reportedly wants a one year deal, presumably because he's seen the early offers in free agency and isn't impressed. The Colts are willing to do a long term deal, but I assume they aren't going to get crazy. If it were up to me to determine the contract for Poe, here's what I would present.

 

Two year contract, $22m. Guaranteeing $10m in Year 1 ($5m roster bonus), with incentives that can take it to $11m (Pro Bowl, All Pro, sacks). Year 2 is $11m, non guaranteed. Here's the catch: Year 2 is a player option, and it would have to be exercised by the first day of the new league year. If Poe declines the option, he becomes a UFA, and he cannot be tagged. So if he has a great year, he can hit the market again right away. If he doesn't have a great year and isn't sure of his market, he can opt in to Year 2, but it's not guaranteed unless he's on the roster Week 1 of the regular season. If he does hit free agency and leaves, the Colts would be eligible for a comp pick. And in any event, both sides could agree to new terms prior to the new league year. 

 

In this way, neither side has to commit long term, both sides get some flexibility, and if they part ways, it's what both sides wanted. It also incentives Poe to have a great season -- not just for pay incentives, but to have another shot at free agency while he's still in his mid 20s and after a great year. 

 

Love it!      :thmup:

 

Thoughtful as always!   

 

Just what I was hoping to read.      I've been hoping you'd come along and drop some knowledge into this thread.   

 

Many, many thanks!              :colts:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Superman said:

I'm trying to settle into the idea of signing Poe. I'm finding it hard to do. Hankins and Logan are still available, that might be why. Neither of them have the injury history Poe does, and I think they're both better pass rushers. (Hard to believe, but our OL did a pretty good job against Poe in 2016.) Poe is definitely good, so I wouldn't complain about adding him, assuming the contract isn't outrageous.

 

Poe reportedly wants a one year deal, presumably because he's seen the early offers in free agency and isn't impressed. The Colts are willing to do a long term deal, but I assume they aren't going to get crazy. If it were up to me to determine the contract for Poe, here's what I would present.

 

Two year contract, $22m. Guaranteeing $10m in Year 1 ($5m roster bonus), with incentives that can take it to $11m (Pro Bowl, All Pro, sacks). Year 2 is $11m, non guaranteed. Here's the catch: Year 2 is a player option, and it would have to be exercised by the first day of the new league year. If Poe declines the option, he becomes a UFA, and he cannot be tagged. So if he has a great year, he can hit the market again right away. If he doesn't have a great year and isn't sure of his market, he can opt in to Year 2, but it's not guaranteed unless he's on the roster Week 1 of the regular season. If he does hit free agency and leaves, the Colts would be eligible for a comp pick. And in any event, both sides could agree to new terms prior to the new league year. 

 

In this way, neither side has to commit long term, both sides get some flexibility, and if they part ways, it's what both sides wanted. It also incentives Poe to have a great season -- not just for pay incentives, but to have another shot at free agency while he's still in his mid 20s and after a great year. 

 

From the Colts perspective I'm not sure why you'd do this.  If he plays well, he opts out and you can't tag him. If he plays poorly, you cut him and lose all compensatory value. I see it as a much worse option than a 1 year deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wig said:

 

From the Colts perspective I'm not sure why you'd do this.  If he plays well, he opts out and you can't tag him. If he plays poorly, you cut him and lose all compensatory value. I see it as a much worse option than a 1 year deal. 

 

If he has a great year and plans to opt out, you still have a month between the end of the season and the start of free agency to sign him to a new deal. If he plays poorly and you cut him, it's just the same as cutting any player after a bad year.

 

And of course, there's the in between -- he plays pretty well, good enough to keep him, not good enough for him to go back to free agency -- and you have a second year with him. The conclusion of that second year gets treated like the end of any free agent deal, and the team would still have tag rights and still be in line for a comp pick if he leaves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have some reservations about Poe. The reported back issue is concerning. So is his production drop off in 15/16 compared to 13/14.

 

However, I do believe he can improve the defense as much as any free agent this year. I also don't think that giving Poe a 3 year deal (as an example) will handcuff the team too much. There are not a ton of players due for a major extension soon. They can take a gamble on Poe and not lose much roster/cap flexibility over the next couple of years.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.nfl.com/news/bill-tobin-longtime-nfl-executive-dies-at-age-83   He drafted some all time great players like Harrison, and of course is famous for his verbal match with Mel Kiper. RIP!
    • Then begs the question. Do u want to say draft a MJH at 4 and turn around in 4 years or would u say draft Turner and pay him 30mill in 4 years? All day every day for the franchise rush end. I am not a big believer in 30 mill for a wr. Reid is a fantastic coach and look what he did with Hill.
    • I literally just posted that clip, it's where the conversation about QBs started.
    • Funny you brought this up.  I just listened to an interview Ballard did today with Rich Eisen.  He asked him if he has given any thought on how many quarterbacks will be taken before our pick and how many does he think.  He said sure we go through those evaluations.  It helps us with for planning purposes.  He asked him how many.  4 or 5 or 6?   He laughed out loud at 6.  He said Rich if it’s 6 we will be so excited.  Let’s hope so.  He also said the draft board is not yet set.  Won’t be until the night before the draft.  He also said he has had multiple conversations with other GM’s concerning the draft.  Preparing themselves for opportunities that could take place.  And they will continue up until the draft starts.  He said trade conversations won’t really materialize until you are within three picks of any trade.  Giving you time to finalize it.  Interesting interview.  Oh he pretty much ruled out moving up for Harrison.   Going up into the top of the draft would be very costly for him he said.  Thinks he’s a great talent but he thinks he’s pretty much out of our reach.
    • I personally wouldn’t touch Williams with a 10 foot pole. He seems like a distraction and cancerous. He may be Uber talented but I don’t feel like he is a winner, and don’t feel like his heart is in it. I think he gets the bag and just sets it on cruise control. There is absolutely nothing to base this off of aside from my gut feeling.  Maye Daniels  Penix Nix McCarthy   Maye is your prototype passer and I think his deficiencies are easily fixed with good coaching.   Daniels seems the most limited to me, proficient and will be very dependent on where he goes.    Will always have a soft spot for Penix, he throws such a pretty deep ball. His 40 time should have opened some eyes.   Nix is probably the safest pick IMO. I think he’s got the tools to fit nearly any offense. Has the athleticism, arm talent and I think he’s got the between the ears to excel in most offenses.   I see the appeal with McCarthy, he was as unselfish as they come allowing the run game to shine instead of checking to pass plays. I think his ceiling is a solid game manager.  
  • Members

    • compuls1v3

      compuls1v3 1,975

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 13,760

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lester

      lester 269

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 8,973

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Iron Colt

      Iron Colt 128

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 1,426

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indeee

      Indeee 1,832

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,570

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,777

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Archer

      Archer 1,747

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...