IcEWoLF

Winners and Losers for the 2017 free agency discussion!

Recommended Posts

Let's discuss this...these are just few...

 

I think the winners are:

Jaguars, for picking up a very good corner back and adding Calais Campbell, their defense is gonna be stacked going in the draft. All they really need is a better QB, and people are saying they may end up bringing Romo.

 

I also think the Browns are winners, 11 picks in the first two rounds in 2017/2018, they might become a relevant franchise by 2019, they will need a franchise QB, maybe Jimmy Garappolo? 

 

Losers:

Redskins, they are bringing back Cousins, but he ain't go no weapons on offense, what is Cousins going to do with no receivers? 

 

Houston, they lost their best corner, sure they free up some room dumping Brock however they lose that 2nd round pick next year, they still need to fill that QB position and more weapons on offense.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Jacksonville has some long green invested on the defensive side of the ball, for sure/

  Eventually, they have to start moving up in the standings....

 

Browns lost Pryor and I dont know why.....what will they do at QB?

 

I thought the Bears finally turned the page from Jay and Alshon Jeffrey...

Glennon can play and they added some secondary depth....plus they still have the No. 3 pick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's too early yet but so far I like what New England has done tbh.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, IcEWoLF said:

Let's discuss this...these are just few...

 

I think the winners are:

Jaguars, for picking up a very good corner back and adding Calais Campbell, their defense is gonna be stacked going in the draft. All they really need is a better QB, and people are saying they may end up bringing Romo.

 

I also think the Browns are winners, 11 picks in the first two rounds in 2017/2018, they might become a relevant franchise by 2019, they will need a franchise QB, maybe Jimmy Garappolo? 

 

Losers:

Redskins, they are bringing back Cousins, but he ain't go no weapons on offense, what is Cousins going to do with no receivers? 

 

Houston, they lost their best corner, sure they free up some room dumping Brock however they lose that 2nd round pick next year, they still need to fill that QB position and more weapons on offense.

Good post. It isn't just they brought in more big money guys but winners. Real hard nosed vets at dirty job positions. I think Coughlin will turn around the thinking in that organization. They still don't have a qb so I'm not sure how far they can go but it starts at the top down. Why Cleveland and NE are also winners. Thinking outside the box and getting big pieces to build off of. Cleveland is going to turn that around...and NE is going to have a great shot at back to back. This run started with 3 SBs in 4 years and may finish that way. I think Pittsburgh is taking a last run at it with addditions to their secondary. I like what Chicago is doing.

 

Losers is definitely Houston...weaker on defense and had to pay a 2nd just to get rid of their starting qb. That's bad. I don't like what San Diego did...don't think they got better...still holes on that line and thin at WR. Washington is a train wreck that's clear. AFC East looks like they are all rebuilding (again). Green Bay...I mean it is almost laughable their approach to FA. It's one thing to be cautious but they are down right frightened. Still a lot of time left but that is where I stack it now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Jaguars look to continue their pattern of winning the offseason Lombardi, only to severely underwhelm and underperform when it matters.  Last year, I thought they'd be a real threat.  I've learned my lesson

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, 21isSuperman said:

The Jaguars look to continue their pattern of winning the offseason Lombardi, only to severely underwhelm and underperform when it matters.  Last year, I thought they'd be a real threat.  I've learned my lesson

They have a huge question mark at QB. I honestly can't tell if Bortles will be a good or gawd awful QB.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, JimJaime said:

They have a huge question mark at QB. I honestly can't tell if Bortles will be a good or gawd awful QB.

He was great a couple of years ago.  He was brutal last year.  His throwing mechanics are bad; he dips the ball down during his throwing motion.  I think he needs a good offensive-minded head coach (McDaniels?) to help set him straight.  We'll see how Marrone does with him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, 21isSuperman said:

The Jaguars look to continue their pattern of winning the offseason Lombardi, only to severely underwhelm and underperform when it matters.  Last year, I thought they'd be a real threat.  I've learned my lesson

 

Getting rid of Gus Bradley has been their best move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎3‎/‎11‎/‎2017 at 11:03 AM, JimJaime said:

They have a huge question mark at QB. I honestly can't tell if Bortles will be a good or gawd awful QB.

That's probably the worst problem, Jim..when you don't know..

Houston knew....and Brock flew......Jax isn't sure and now they have a superbucks defense waiting for a 'maybe' QB

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/11/2017 at 11:50 AM, 21isSuperman said:

The Jaguars look to continue their pattern of winning the offseason Lombardi, only to severely underwhelm and underperform when it matters.  Last year, I thought they'd be a real threat.  I've learned my lesson

 

Yeah I'm quite frankly tired of people talking about "who won free agency" and "who won the draft".  You know what how about in 2 or 3 years we revisit that question and we'll be able to tell you.  Last year I think the Jags won both the draft and free agency but still managed to be one of the worst teams in the NFL.  

 

I'll start saying you won the off season when your off season moves start leading to W's during the real season.  

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎3‎/‎11‎/‎2017 at 6:05 AM, Swan Ronson said:

The Jaguars have won as many off seasons as games the last few years.

you are the 'quote of the week' winner, Swanny!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Winners: Colts. Via the Colts section here the new FAs are all young, healthy and fine young men with heart.

 

Losers: Patriots. They traded for Stone Hands. lmaolmaolmao 

 

Sorry I had to. Offseason humor.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Jules said:

 

Losers: Patriots. They traded for Stone Hands. lmaolmaolmao 

 

 

And gave up a draft pick to the Saints for their most overrated receiver. lmao

 

The love affair with Brandin Cooks will end the minute he has a bad game against a decent corner/safety or when he demands to be paid big money since his ego is through the roof. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    •   Rd1: Quenton Nelson OG (Notre Dame)   Rd2: Roquon Smith ILB (Georgia)   Rd3: Matthew Thomas ILB (Florida State)   Rd4: Andre Dillard OT (Washington State)   Rd5: Myles Gaskin RB (Washington)   Rd6: Nik Needham CB (UTEP)   Rd7: C.J. Conrad TE (Kentucky)  
    • Keep in mind too, the more wins from here on out, will only increase the odds keeping Pagano.         
    • I watch them a bit. I can certainly concede that Hill is the most talented of the three and may be better than I gave him credit for in my post...   Hunt is not that great, imo. He has had a very good season, especially for a rookie, but I think he has overachieved quite a bit. He doesn't have the elite power/speed combo of guys like Fournette or Zeke. I think he's an average (or slightly above) running back in a very good situation. I don't think he would be rated so highly if he ran for Cleveland or Indy.   Just my opinion, though. I'm not married to it, either... I'm sure I've made many foolish statements about young players in the past.    I was just trying to illustrate that the OC in KC (is his name Nagy?) is part of an offense that is playing better than the sum of its parts. How much of that can be attributed to him and how much is Andy Reid is a fair question, though. New HC candidates are always a gamble, though. 
    • Whichever NFC team that has the best interior pass rush will have the best chance to beat the Pats.  It's their Achilles heel.  
    •   I am NOT a fan of tanking.   I argued on behalf of trying to win the last two games of both the 15 and 16 seasons.    The argument was we had a chance to go 8-8 so you absolutely try to win those games.     5 straight seasons without a losing season is a good achievement for any franchise.   But now that we are overwhelmingly likely to finish below 500,  then I feel free to say that while I don't want us to tank,  I will not be upset with any loss.     Even if we lose them all.      I know this is a nuanced position,   but I won't be upset with any losses in the last six games.   All that said....   We stand a decent chance to win a number of these games.     Only the J'Ville game feels like a likely loss.   The other five feels like we've got a decent shot at each.   We should be competitive in those five games.    So, we might surprise to the upside and win more than we might expect.     The team is playing better.   By group,  the defense is getting better,   the special teams are solid,  and even the offense is a little more cohesive and efficeint.     And each unit might get a little better down the stretch.   We might surprise a lot of people,  including ourselves.    
  • Members