Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Are we contenders?


riftastic28

Recommended Posts

I feel we are ..  Our defense is soft but with a good draft and free agency I think we could make a run . The offense put up 20+ every week . I even think are secondary is good we just didn't have a pass rush ... we need a D line and line backers . The O line looked alot better towards the end of the season . Decent running game and wide outs  we could make a push . I think afc championship wouldn't be far fetched . What do you guys think 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just now, Smonroe said:

As long as we have 12, we're contenders.  

Pretty much this, but don't leave out 13 either.  And if 21 can regain his 2013 form somehow that's bonus.

 

Add a stud runstuffer, a stud passrusher and a solid #2 corner to this team and you have a team that when fully healthy can compete with any other NFL team on a given day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

As long as we have 12, we're contenders.  

I would love to believe this, but Drew Brees and the Saints have shown lately that you can have a great QB and a potent offense, but Without defense, you're not a contender. The Colts just fielded one of the worst defenses in recent Colts history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

We COULD be a contender....    but currently we are not.

 

Simply saying a good draft and a good free agency and we're back in business is just too simplistic.

 

Getting one of those right is hard enough and you're hoping for both.   

 

IF and I'm stressing the word IF,  we get both right,  then we could be good enough to win the division.    But making the playoffs is different than making a good run in the playoffs.      And we're more likely to be two years away from making a deep run in the playoffs.      

 

Our defense is terrible.    Making it good enough to go far in the playoffs will not likely get done in one off-season.

 

It COULD,   but it's not likely.

 

Patience is going to be key.    Both for the franchise and the fan base.     So far the fan base has not done a good job of being patient.     Will be interesting to see how they react in 2017.......

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't agree more with the premise of this thread.  Considering our offense is elite we definitely have a better chance to rebound than other middling teams.  All Ballard has to do really is to turn our horrible defense into an average unit, and, voila, we'd be contenders. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the majority are optimistic about the new year and possibly have had too much to drink on Valentine's day lol. We have an outside chance to win the division, and that's it. We are nowhere near a contender. Our offense is still figuring things out and is inconsistent. We need a WR to step up other than Hilton, we need a TE to emerge as a leader, and we need our O-Line to have a starting 5 we can count on. The defense is just terrible. It's needs to be stripped from the bone and almost started over. Basically have a bunch of starters who should be backups, and the guys who could be starters like Henry Anderson and Clayton Geathers are iffy. 8-8 and a transition year IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Let me see after the Draft and Free Agency. Anything is possible if the Falcons can go to the SB.

The Falcons Offense was more consistent then ours and struck fast and hard. The other difference between them and us is despite how bad their defense was, they had an excellent pass rush. It'll take the best case scenario of hitting on FA and the draft in that area alone just to match them from last year. After that, we'll have to miraculously beat the Steelers and Pats, something Luck and Pagano have yet to do. Or just avoid them in the playoffs completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's more to the story than just our defense. Disregard stats and rewatch our games. We'd start out slow thus putting our defense on the field way too much. Those 10th in the league stats happened when we were down trying to play catch-up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, a06cc said:

There's more to the story than just our defense. Disregard stats and rewatch our games. We'd start out slow thus putting our defense on the field way too much. Those 10th in the league stats happened when we were down trying to play catch-up.

Bingo, we looked like the 2013 Redskins with RGIII last year in that regard, it was infuriating to watch. If we actually scored in the 1st half, we were inconsistent in the 2nd half. Never played a full game of football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

I think the majority are optimistic about the new year and possibly have had too much to drink on Valentine's day lol. We have an outside chance to win the division, and that's it. We are nowhere near a contender. Our offense is still figuring things out and is inconsistent. We need a WR to step up other than Hilton, we need a TE to emerge as a leader, and we need our O-Line to have a starting 5 we can count on. The defense is just terrible. It's needs to be stripped from the bone and almost started over. Basically have a bunch of starters who should be backups, and the guys who could be starters like Henry Anderson and Clayton Geathers are iffy. 8-8 and a transition year IMO.

Bingo! We have a leader the guy just needs to stay healthy. DA is not respected here or paid closely attention too. Thus the poking of the eyes of Talib. Von Miller couldn't get to Luck because of Allen. So that's way the situation came about. Allen is our muscle guy, he gets in the minds of our players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, riftastic28 said:

Are defense this year was terrible . Yet we finished 8-8 .500 . With the worse defense in the league . If the defense was some what decent I think we would of gone 10-6 easy . You can't argue you that . 

I had us going 10-6 but didnt realize our Defense would be that bad. If it improves at all we can win 9 or 10 games. Nobody in our Division is world beaters and we have the best QB in the Division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, riftastic28 said:

Are defense this year was terrible . Yet we finished 8-8 .500 . With the worse defense in the league . If the defense was some what decent I think we would of gone 10-6 easy . You can't argue you that . 

Probably, Luck is good enough to get 8 wins by himself, despite poor coaching and a poor team around him. He is still human and can't do it all though. The fact is, our defense isn't better, so we aren't a 10-6 team. It regressed from screwing up the 2013 draft and not drafting defense in the 2012-2014 drafts. You can't just say if our defense is better. It hasn't been top tier for over 20 years. There's no guarantee it'll be a big improvement after the draft unless the picks hit. You are dealing in hypotheticals and that's a bad way to debate or have a conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, riftastic28 said:

Are defense this year was terrible . Yet we finished 8-8 .500 . With the worse defense in the league . If the defense was some what decent I think we would of gone 10-6 easy . You can't argue you that . 

 

Well, we were very fortunate not to finish 6-10 so...
 And i expect all 3 of our division rivals to be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

So is Houston, they could've easily been 6-10. They could've lost both games to us and lost to the Jags and Bengals which they were real lucky to win those games. You can say that about any team.

Well, the Texans are getting J.J. Watt back next year. Add him to the no1 defense, and that's a recipe for disaster in h2h games vs them. It's sink or swim for us. Titans have 6 draft picks in the top 75, Jags have a new coach and another high pick, could easily take someone like Fournette, which would be a disaster, and the Texans always seem to draft well. We have to have a solid draft, and have less room for error than the other teams due to a poor overall team and less picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

Well, the Texans are getting J.J. Watt back next year. Add him to the no1 defense, and that's a recipe for disaster in h2h games vs them. It's sink or swim for us. Titans have 6 draft picks in the top 75, Jags have a new coach and another high pick, could easily take someone like Fournette, which would be a disaster, and the Texans always seem to draft well. We have to have a solid draft, and have less room for error than the other teams due to a poor overall team and less picks.

I have to see how the Draft goes first and what we do in Free Agency. What the Texans, Titans, and Jags do as well before I can really I give an honest opinion but none of them have a QB like ours that I do know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

Probably, Luck is good enough to get 8 wins by himself, despite poor coaching and a poor team around him. He is still human and can't do it all though. The fact is, our defense isn't better, so we aren't a 10-6 team. It regressed from screwing up the 2013 draft and not drafting defense in the 2012-2014 drafts. You can't just say if our defense is better. It hasn't been top tier for over 20 years. There's no guarantee it'll be a big improvement after the draft unless the picks hit. You are dealing in hypotheticals and that's a bad way to debate or have a conversation.

I have to disagree . We can only get better that's how bad we are on defense . Although I think the Secondary isn't as bad as we think . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, riftastic28 said:

I have to disagree . We can only get better that's how bad we are on defense . Although I think the Secondary isn't as bad as we think . 

Actually we can stay the same and draft busts on defense. The years with Peyton Manning we had bad defenses consistently and it cost us in the playoffs. Just cause it can only get better doesn't mean it well. You have to hit on the players, whether it be FA or the draft, and in the last 20 years, we've had a poor track record of it. The secondary has potential and a leader in Vontae, but the safeties will be inexperienced without Adams, and the nonexistent pass rush makes life difficult for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, riftastic28 said:

I really like this Ballard guy just look at what he did with the cheifs . If we comes anywhere close to the cheifs defense I say superbowl. Luck is a top 5 QB 

That's the hope, that he'll be able to do with the Colts what he did with the Chiefs. We'll have Luck instead of Alex Smith. It still takes time to build a team from scraps though, so a SB won't happen soon, especially with the Pats and Steelers still on top. I can see winning the division this year, but I don't see beating the Steelers or Pats. It'll be a game of hot Potato, trying to dodge them in the playoffs, should we make it there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Falcons did it for years so did the Panthers. We beat the Falcons with Matt Hasselbeck at QB in Atlanta in 2015.

What do that have to do with colts, falcons gonna be back to there 10-6 or 9-7 selves, panthers fell apart after one good season 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This surgery of Luck also plays a factor this coming season. Timing is always key.  A few things come to mind about this team for me.

1. Luck getting rid of the ball 1 second faster. 

2. WR's not getting jammed at the beginning of their routes. Also lack of routes ran in our playbook. (Thus the firing)

3. Playing with a lead!

4. A running game

5. Keep the defense off the field.

Colts have never been known for a defense and I'll never expect it. That's how this team is built. Balance has always been with this team. It's get a lead and rush the passer to play with the lead. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, riftastic28 said:

I really like this Ballard guy just look at what he did with the cheifs . If we comes anywhere close to the cheifs defense I say superbowl. Luck is a top 5 QB 

 

Let's be clear,  Ballard was NOT the GM at Kansas City.      John Dorsey was.

 

Ballard was in personnel and was Dorsey's top guy,  but it's not clear exactly what he did with KC.     He's as new to being a GM as Ryan Grigson was 5 years ago.

 

I like the Ballard too....    I just don't want to get too carried away until we see what he does......

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theoretically, Ballard could go pass rusher and , go all offense with every other pick.  Stud RB, FA linemen, etc...(hypothetical)...and we could score more points than our opponents every game, get an occasional sack, and get in the playoffs and lose.  Not smart but that could happen.  Maybe win a playoff game ala KC game.  T

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the OL takes a big leap forward next year, and the defense will get better, because it literally can't get any worse, and the schedule is soft. Those 3 factors alone would likely make the Colts front runners in the South, but still not Super Bowl contenders.

 

All signs are pointing to the Pats being elite again, along with Pittsburgh and Oakland. Even if the defense is better, it won't be improved enough to hold it's own in a road playoff game against any of those 3 teams. And that's what it'll take, because even if they win the South, it's unlikely they'll have a better record than that trio. That would pretty much mean that they're the 1 seed, and I don't see that happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rick Venturi today on the radio said he is more of a fan of speed with corners then what Ballard has done. He said young corners have to be able to recover from mistakes. I would almost like rodgers instead of Brent’s.
    • BBZ, what do you mean when you say Brents will be successfully targeted because of his size and speed? Aren't those his good traits? 
    • Right. But we also are expected to draft a corner, So the fact that DeJean can play either position, makes me think Ballard could have his eye on him.
    • As a Ballard type player, he seems to fit the bill.  Big 10. Excels at zone coverage. Elite athlete. Special Teams standout, Good tackler. etc. Colts may be able to trade back, and still land DeJean   Considered one of the Safest picks. Seven 2024 NFL Draft Prospects Who Are Safest Bets to Succeed at Next Level https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10113875-7-2024-nfl-draft-prospects-who-are-safest-bets-to-succeed-at-next-level   DB Cooper DeJean, Iowa   A fractured fibula during a November practice tempered any excitement regarding Cooper DeJean's draft status. So he's not been in the same conversations as the class' top defensive backs, specifically Toledo's Quinyon Mitchell and Alabama's Terrion Arnold. DeJean's profile projects just as well or better than the aforementioned cornerbacks.   Three specific attributes set DeJean's floor higher than anyone else among the back end.   First, the reigning Big Ten Defensive Back of the Year presents the positional flexibility and traits to start at cornerback or safety at the professional level, with B/R's Cory Giddings highlighting his coverage skills:   "DeJean excels in zone coverage, but he's versatile enough to play man as well. He shows a smooth backpedal and the ability to keep his leverage and quick footwork with few wasted steps. Although he transitions well, there are times where DeJean hops into his breaks; allowing a step of separation.   "When in zone, DeJean does a great job of reading and reacting to the quarterback's eyes. Pairing that skill set with his route recognition, he often puts himself in good position with leverage and positioning.   "While working downfield, DeJean has the strength necessary to hand-fight with tight ends and bigger receivers, as well as the speed necessary to carry twitchier receivers downfield. He also does a very good job of locating the ball and playing through the catch point."   Second, the high school track standout is an elite athlete who captured Iowa state titles in the long jump and 100-meter dash. Many expected him to blow the doors off Lucas Oil Stadium. Unfortunately, he wasn't ready to test in Indianapolis after being cleared a few weeks earlier.   "His acceleration is incredibly fluid and super powerful," NFL combine trainer Jordan Luallen told The Athletic's Bruce Feldman last summer. "He's the best athlete I've seen in person, pound for pound."   Finally, DeJean adds significant value as an elite collegiate returner. Big Ten coaches also awarded him Return Specialist of the Year this past season. DeJean averaged 13.1 yards per punt return over the last two seasons. A top-notch contributor anywhere along the defensive backfield and on special teams will provide excellent value in the NFL.   Potential Landing Spots: Indianapolis Colts, Philadelphia Eagles    
    • He could, but I think he's way more athletic than people give him credit for and projects way better as CB. Definitely could be a good safety, but I think if we drafted him, he fits well as a boundary corner for us.
  • Members

    • NJFanatic

      NJFanatic 45

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,219

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts52761

      colts52761 89

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Southern Cal

      Southern Cal 7

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,237

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • joecolts

      joecolts 471

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 1,899

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsbluefan

      Coltsbluefan 222

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C_Lew

      C_Lew 176

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Clem-Dog

      Clem-Dog 155

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...