Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Alabama vs Clemson


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

4 hours ago, Cynjin said:

I thought Alabama would win it before the playoffs started, so I will stick with them.  However, their offense has to play a lot better than it did against Washington for Alabama to win, IMO.

Washington did have a pretty good defense, but I agree. I doubt they'll play like that 2 games in a row.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm taking Clemson to win by a TD. I think Clemson's OL can sustain against Alabama's defensive front and allow Watson to take advantage of Alabama's secondary. I also believe Bama is going to struggle to score. Clemson has the secondary to match up with Bama's wide receivers and allow their defensive front to focus on the running game and Jalen. Clemson 24-17.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

Man,  I hate Alabama

Clemson was talking all of this smack on how they were going to get revenge and they absolutely have stunk up the joint. Bama dominates the game without even having a QB that can pass haha. Only team I have ever seen like them are the Nebraska teams of 94 and 95 but even Tommie Frazier could pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jvan1973 said:

These two teams are much better than OSU.  They lost a bunch of players before this season.    They really over achieved getting as far as they did

I know alot of people say OSU was overrated.  Do you agree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Gramz said:

How did Clemson shutout Ohio State...??

 

OSU played about as badly offensively as they possibly could with a good portion of that being on the play-caller's whom got released or resigned after the Clemson game. OSU overachieved on a lot this season, but as Jvan pointed out, they were one of the youngest teams in CFB. With the class that's coming in and the guys that are returning, they'll be a top team again next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Game over. It was over after Clemson went down 14-0. 

 

You don't beat Alabama when you constantly mess around and turn the ball over. 

 

 

Hang your head in shame Clemson. Just like that Giants...One whole week of running their mouths and all this big talk only to screw it all up. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Synthetic said:

 

Game over. It was over after Clemson went down 14-0. 

 

You don't beat Alabama when you constantly mess around and turn the ball over. 

 

 

Hang your head in shame Clemson. Just like that Giants...One whole week of running their mouths and all this big talk only to screw it all up. 

 

Clemson isn't out of it.  Down by ten, plenty of game left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Synthetic said:

 

Game over. It was over after Clemson went down 14-0. 

 

You don't beat Alabama when you constantly mess around and turn the ball over. 

 

 

Hang your head in shame Clemson. Just like that Giants...One whole week of running their mouths and all this big talk only to screw it all up. 

 

Its a 3 point game. Lets not hand Bama the trophy quite yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can too. And that will tell us everything we need to know about how the view him. It will tell us their feelings on the tight end room, and what direction they pick from there will tell us even more.    but if they take him at 15, we won’t know much about what might have happened, as they will be landing someone they had rated highly and fell to them. 
    • Glad that’s over…    if I wanted to argue about it, I would have responded far more in depth than pointing out how you were attempting to gaslight me. I did not. Meaning I was ending my part of whatever the argument was. You “putting a finality to it” and then listing bullet points tells me it was the argument you wanted all along, which makes sense why you brought Grigson up in the first place. Bait, hook, gaslight. Almost got me buddy. You are a funny guy, Doug 
    • Putting a finality on an argument you want to have.   There is a theory that Ballard won't draft a OL high because ARs injuries were not caused by a poor oline.  I felt it important to note that since Luck's major injuries were also not caused by his oline, Ballard could still want to improve it like he did in 2018 simply because AR is The Franchise. And its important to point that out because there has been a running (false) narrative for about 9 years that Luck's oline was the (main) reason for his injuries that kept him out of games.  The (false) narrative is based upon, IMO, a detest of Grigson, and not reality about the facts (or strong rumors) behind the kidney laceration and snowboarding shoulder. Therefore, mentioning Grigson and the (false) narrative was germain to the point about Ballard possibly drafting Oline high this draft to protect AR. Mentioning Grigson shouldn't trigger a CB vs RG discussion, unless people reading it are gaslighted by their own reading lens.
    • That is a very inaccurate description of what happened.  At this point it’s history and doesn’t need to be revisited but I will say Chloe adds value to this board and should be and is by most encouraged to post, even if people don’t always agree with her.  
    • My response was in regards to another posted suggesting that the Colts need to get the pick right when it comes to picking a WR. I agree with you .
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...