Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

The last time we played the Packers


RockThatBlue

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, ColtStrong said:

The last time we played the Pack we had a decent team. Now I expect them to shred us.

What was decent about that defense? We had worse parts then than we do now..On offense The line we had was bad, we could barely run the football and Reggie was the best receiver. We have a better group of receivers now and I think I will take Gore over Donald Brown.

 

I think that 2012 team had a bit more fight in them due to the Chuck Strong movement. And to be honest with you Green Bay looks similar too. It's all Aaron Rogers and no running game just like it was in 2012. Defensive pieces for them look about the same too. Packers might be playing worse defense now than they were then. Theyve given up a number of points. Game is just being played in Lambeau.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, krunk said:

What was decent about that defense? We had worse parts then than we do now..On offense The line we had was bad, we could barely run the football and Reggie was the best receiver. We have a better group of receivers now and I think I will take Gore over Donald Brown.

 

I think that 2012 team had a bit more fight in them due to the Chuck Strong movement. And to be honest with you Green Bay looks similar too. It's all Aaron Rogers and no running game just like it was in 2012. Defensive pieces for them look about the same too. Packers might be playing worse defense now than they were then. Theyve given up a number of points. Game is just being played in Lambeau.

That team was just better. The record says it all.  better coached and maybe better talent 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gabriel Alexander Morillo said:

That team was just better. The record says it all.  better coached and maybe better talent 

No we had a really soft schedule. Which of the personnel was better. Tell me that? You wont have much to speak on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, krunk said:

What was decent about that defense? We had worse parts then than we do now..On offense The line we had was bad, we could barely run the football and Reggie was the best receiver. We have a better group of receivers now and I think I will take Gore over Donald Brown.

 

I think that 2012 team had a bit more fight in them due to the Chuck Strong movement. And to be honest with you Green Bay looks similar too. It's all Aaron Rogers and no running game just like it was in 2012. Defensive pieces for them look about the same too. Packers might be playing worse defense now than they were then. Theyve given up a number of points. Game is just being played in Lambeau.

Everything you said may be true. Oh well. I don't debate any more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reggie went off!!! My favorite game of reggies (hence my pic, those awesome orange gloves he got fined for anyways) he was such a monster and one of my favorite luck era games, was such an impressive win.. man I miss converting 3rd downs with ease to Reggie 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, krunk said:

No we had a really soft schedule. Which of the personnel was better. Tell me that? You wont have much to speak on.

Well, off the top of my head, we had Reggie Wayne, a younger Mathis and Freeney,  Antoine Bethea, and probably a better defensive coordinator; we also had Arians. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, krunk said:

No we had a really soft schedule. Which of the personnel was better. Tell me that? You wont have much to speak on.

 

That team was definitely better. 

 

Mathis, Freeney and Hughes, none of them had monster years, but they were better than whatever we have at pass rusher right now. Bethea at safety, Freeman at ILB. The DL wasn't great. Neither was the OL. Offensive skill guys were about the same, with Reggie having a great year. 

 

I wasn't a fan of Arians' offense, but he called a few great games, and that was probably one of them. Chud hasn't called a great game this year. 

 

I'd definitely take the 2012 Colts over the 2016 Colts, if you're taking a snapshot. I think these Colts are somewhat dysfunctional, but there are some young guys that are foundational pieces, hopefully, so I think they'll be in good shape if they do the right things moving forward. I wouldn't want to go back to that roster, which played over its head. But this team is playing below its capabilities right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, MOB said:

One of the best and most memorable games I've seen them play. No one was stopping Reggie that game. 

I was very proud of that team that day. Overcoming losing your coach for a while and being able to do that. 

 

This video makes me miss Reggie Wayne so much :( 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Gabriel Alexander Morillo said:

Lol the record says It all, man. The record is what shows how good your team is. And this year we stink. we haven't even played the real teams yet either 

Still didn't answer my question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, RockThatBlue said:

I was very proud of that team that day. Overcoming losing your coach for a while and being able to do that. 

 

This video makes me miss Reggie Wayne so much :( 

 

Watching that video made me realize how underrated he is outside of colts fans, dude was a master of splitting the defense with his route running, all so natural and with ease

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Gabriel Alexander Morillo said:

Lol the record says It all, man. The record is what shows how good your team is. And this year we stink. we haven't even played the real teams yet either 

 

 Not really.
 We won 11 games 3 years in a row with 5-6 win rosters.
 A joke we won 8 games last season.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, RockThatBlue said:

Thought this was worth posting. Reggie Wayne was an absolute monster.

 

One of my favorites of the Luck era.

 

 

 

 

 

honestly, i feel the loss of Reggie is what has hurt this team for 2 seasons now.  not just on the field but in the locker room especially

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, krunk said:

No we had a really soft schedule. Which of the personnel was better. Tell me that? You wont have much to speak on.

normally you and i are on the same side of things, but I gotta disagree. I think the 2012 team would beat the 2016 Colts 99 times out of 100.

 

As for who was better.

 

Bethea > Geathers/Green

Freeny/Hughes > Walden

Mathis in his prime > 2016 washed up Mathis

Reggie/TY > TY/Dorsett

 

 

just to name a few

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Superman said:

 

That team was definitely better. 

 

Mathis, Freeney and Hughes, none of them had monster years, but they were better than whatever we have at pass rusher right now. Bethea at safety, Freeman at ILB. The DL wasn't great. Neither was the OL. Offensive skill guys were about the same, with Reggie having a great year. 

 

I wasn't a fan of Arians' offense, but he called a few great games, and that was probably one of them. Chud hasn't called a great game this year. 

 

I'd definitely take the 2012 Colts over the 2016 Colts, if you're taking a snapshot. I think these Colts are somewhat dysfunctional, but there are some young guys that are foundational pieces, hopefully, so I think they'll be in good shape if they do the right things moving forward. I wouldn't want to go back to that roster, which played over its head. But this team is playing below its capabilities right now. 

Finally, we agree on something. A team is only as good as they play. no matter the "talent" on the roster 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, krunk said:

Still didn't answer my question

Depends on what you're willing to concede 

 

2012 online: Gave up less sacks, hits and pressures on way more pass attempts. So they're better 

 

2012 receivers: Reggie/TY is 100 times better than Ty/Dorsett

 

2012 safeties: Bethea=Adams (debatable either way IMO) Zibikoeski=Green 

 

2012 Linebackers>2016 linebackers and that one might be the biggest difference honestly 

 

2012 cornerbacks: They don't have the namepower of our 2016 guys, but I'm pretty sure they gave up less ypg on average and I certainly don't remember them getting bum bossed by a bunch of scrub quarterbacks. Our DC hid their weaknesses better than monachino 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gabriel Alexander Morillo said:

Depends on what you're willing to concede 

 

2012 online: Gave up less sacks, hits and pressures on way more pass attempts. So they're better 

 

2012 receivers: Reggie/TY is 100 times better than Ty/Dorsett

 

2012 safeties: Bethea=Adams (debatable either way IMO) Zibikoeski=Green 

 

2012 Linebackers>2016 linebackers and that one might be the biggest difference honestly 

 

2012 cornerbacks: They don't have the namepower of our 2016 guys, but I'm pretty sure they gave up less ypg on average and I certainly don't remember them getting bum bossed by a bunch of scrub quarterbacks. Our DC hid their weaknesses better than monachino 

 

So true. Cory Redding was still able to contribute valuable minutes on the DL. We won a lot of close games that year, we were a scrappy team playing with house money, I felt. We didn't have colossal mental mistakes as a team. Luck could get away with staring at Reggie and throwing it because Reggie normally knew which zones to sit inside and was Luck's comfort zone, big time. 4 years later, Luck still does it but there is no wide out with such a high floor as Reggie now on the team. Higher ceiling on a given day, TY, but not the high consistent floor that Reggie brought in 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, aaron11 said:

what did they do wrong?

 

when guys are done you let them go.  most careers end on a low note like that

Reggie wanted to play & retire a Colt, the Colts could've easily given Reggie a cheap, team friendly deal for a farewell season...

Sure he may have had nagging injuries & may have lost a step, but his familiarity alone would've made him more valuable than Johnson was that season...

It would've been the class thing to do...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Buck Showalter said:

Reggie wanted to play & retire a Colt, the Colts could've easily given Reggie a cheap, team friendly deal for a farewell season...

Sure he may have had nagging injuries & may have lost a step, but his familiarity alone would've made him more valuable than Johnson was that season...

It would've been the class thing to do...

EXACTLY!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Superman said:

 

That team was definitely better. 

 

Mathis, Freeney and Hughes, none of them had monster years, but they were better than whatever we have at pass rusher right now. Bethea at safety, Freeman at ILB. The DL wasn't great. Neither was the OL. Offensive skill guys were about the same, with Reggie having a great year. 

 

I wasn't a fan of Arians' offense, but he called a few great games, and that was probably one of them. Chud hasn't called a great game this year. 

 

I'd definitely take the 2012 Colts over the 2016 Colts, if you're taking a snapshot. I think these Colts are somewhat dysfunctional, but there are some young guys that are foundational pieces, hopefully, so I think they'll be in good shape if they do the right things moving forward. I wouldn't want to go back to that roster, which played over its head. But this team is playing below its capabilities right now. 

Overall I'm speaking about the personnell.   I think the players we have on this D line are better than that 2012 squad.  The difference is the key players on this D line are injured.  There was only one decent player on that 2012 D line and that was Redding.   The linebackers you can speak about Freeman and Mathis at that time.  Freeney had about maybe 4 sacks that year.  Hughes I can't recall and Walden has more sacks than Him and plays the run better than he did.  Mathis was really the only guy that got consistent pressure on that squad, but because of Freeman they get a slight nod.    

 

I remember you didn't even feel Bethea played well that season and over the past couple of years Adams has been better than him or at least in the same league. Geathers has been bad the last couple of games, but he's a better player than Zibikowski.   And what was behind Zibikowski?  Joe Lefeged.  I'd take a struggling TJ Green over him.  

 

Cornerbacks I'd say this team is a bit better, but it's not a blow out.  Overall I think that 2012 team just had more fight about themselves, mainly because of Chuck Strong.  This 2016 team like you said plays below what they are capable of doing.  People call them sorry and they live up to it instead of pushing all their chips to the table and playing above that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, krunk said:

Overall I'm speaking about the personnell.   I think the players we have on this D line are better than that 2012 squad.  The difference is the key players on this D line are injured.  There was only one decent player on that 2012 D line and that was Redding.   The linebackers you can speak about Freeman and Mathis at that time.  Freeney had about maybe 4 sacks that year.  Hughes I can't recall and Walden has more sacks than Him and plays the run better than he did.  Mathis was really the only guy that got consistent pressure on that squad, but because of Freeman they get a slight nod.    

 

I remember you didn't even feel Bethea played well that season and over the past couple of years Adams has been better than him or at least in the same league. Geathers has been bad the last couple of games, but he's a better player than Zibikowski.   And what was behind Zibikowski?  Joe Lefeged.  I'd take a struggling TJ Green over him.  

 

Cornerbacks I'd say this team is a bit better, but it's not a blow out.

Your player by player breakdown seems reasonable enough in comparing the 2012-2016 squads, however, the 2012 squad seemed to play more inspired ball, coming up with key stops/plays in some crucial moments...

Definitely a more disciplined team overall as well, less penalties, etc.

 

I always heard the long standing adage about the worth and value of veteran presence in the locker room, & always pseudo believed in it, but, also questioned the amount of influence veteran presence could truly make over a team of 'supposed' professionals...

 

Now seeing the difference in the team from 2012-2016, & especially this season without guys like Reggie & Redding, I will buy into that belief system & value of the veteran mentor-ship & presence all day now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buck Showalter said:

Your player by player breakdown seems reasonable enough in comparing the 2012-2016 squads, however, the 2012 squad seemed to play more inspired ball, coming up with key stops/plays in some crucial moments...

Definitely a more disciplined team overall as well, less penalties, etc.

 

I always heard the long standing adage about the worth and value of veteran presence in the locker room, & always pseudo believed in it, but, also questioned the amount of influence veteran presence could truly make over a team of 'supposed' professionals...

 

Now seeing the difference in the team from 2012-2016, & especially this season without guys like Reggie & Redding, I will buy into that belief system & value of the veteran mentor-ship & presence all day now...

Yeah I mentioned that.  That squad was inspired by Chuck Strong and wanting to play well for Pagano while he was battling cancer.   This team seems like they think high of themselves in a way that is counter productive.   They think they can play bad and sloppy half the year and come back and win the division and it's likely not to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
    • Things have now gone from bad to worse.     After I explained myself, I was kind of hoping you’d simply come back with “I’m sorry, I misunderstood you,  may bad.”  And we’d be done with this.  It would be over.      But instead, you double down on the roommate issue and follow up by questioning everything I said by breaking down some of my comments and what you think I really meant by them.     In other words, you’re telling me my motive, my meaning, as if you know my meaning better than I do.    It’s interesting to me…. I was recently told there’s an unofficial moderator policy:  don’t attack the poster, attack the argument.    Well, I don’t see that here.  You attacked me personally the first time and instead of a simple apology, you’ve double downed on a bad hand by attacking me personally AGAIN.      Why you’re comfortable telling me you know my meaning , my intention, better than I do is mystifying to me.  And frankly, I think you’re comfortable doing this because one of us is a moderator, and it certainly is NOT me.     I’ll say it again: you misunderstood my meaning, and intention,  the first time, and you’ve misunderstood me even worse the second time.   As I said before, I’m happy to withdraw and apologize for “go figure”, but the negative inference was not my intention.  Poorly phrased, I give you (in two posts now).   I don’t know what else to say…. I’m hoping this brings this very unfortunate exchange to an end.       
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...