Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

So do you feel better about the Colt's divisional chances now?


JPFolks

Recommended Posts

Had to get a good laugh reading over the Texans Forums.  Somebody said "Did somebody sneak a letterman jacket on the plane or something?"

 

I remember that Letterman Jacket game when Kubiak was there.  They went to New England and got Smoked just like yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 181
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

7 hours ago, JPFolks said:

After watching the complete annihilation of the Texans tonight by the Patriots, and realizing that with a win this week at worst we'll be 1 game behind in our division after a 0-2 start, I wonder if anyone is feeling a little better about at least winning our division.  Sure, it's not anything to be too excited about, as we look like the same old AFC South, but it was the first chance I had to see this supposed Juggernaut Houston offense and as bad as we have played the Patriots, I don't believe we ever got whooped that badly, shut out by a 3rd team rookie QB making his first start with 4 days notice.  

 

Of course, for the pessimists out there, there's plenty to talk about as well, such as New England winning their 5th Super Bowl with Tom Brady which sure looks more likely than not at this time.  They are simply better coached (and drafted) than anyone else.  They had their second best player Gronk only playing a handful of plays and several other key starters out in addition to Brady and currently have the best record in Football.  The NFC looks down this year (I mean, Seattle, Arizona, Green Bay, Carolina all look worse than last year and the Viking lost their starting QB AND their HOF Running Back but still might be the best team in the NFC. Cincy and Pittsburgh in the AFC looked discombobulated at times, but I expect both to fight it out for a first round bye in the end but New England sure looks like a huge favorite and even something like losing their starting (or in their case their first 2 QB's) didn't seem to phase them at all.  

 

Yeah, I know, it's only week 2.... but New England had to put everyone on alert in the league that an angry Brady coming back against Cleveland is just going to be hoping on an already rollin' train.  If we can win the next 5 games (all should be winnable) we may be able to compete with everyone once we get our guys back each week over that stretch and be ready for a much tougher final 9 games.  San Diego may be the toughest game in that stretch and historically we play awful against them, but I feel much better seeing Houston humiliated and their confidence sunk.   

 

What do you guys think? 

Here's a quote from one of the Texans forum posters as I read along:

 

"Point #4-OB is gonna have to tone it down with Miller. Miller just hasn't been very effective running the ball much at all, and if he keeps going at this rate he's just gonna get hurt bad. A lot of it is shoddy protection, but it's becoming more and more evident that he just isn't used to this workload. I'm confident he will get better, but until then we can't be pounding it with him as often as we have been."

 

I remember we had a discussion about Lamar Miller a while back.  He's nothing close to Arian Foster in terms of what he can do for that offense.

 

So far he's averaged 3.6 yards a carry through 3 games. 21 to 28 carries a game. Don't get me wrong because I think he's got some talent.  Doesn't show up when you need him to though.

 

Gores YPC is higher than him right now and he'd probably get more yards if we gave him 20 plus carries.  Not that I'm suggesting that in any way.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add onto what I said above no I don't feel better.

 

-The Texans loss does not give us a pass rush.

-The Texans loss does not help our non existent run game

-The Texans loss does not heal Moncrief

-The Texans loss does not give us more athletic coverage ILB's

-The Texans loss doesn't get David Parry off the field on pass rush snaps and McGill/Ridgeway on the field along with Kerr.....Parry has been on the field for 42 pass rush snaps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel better about the Colts chances when we solve the Colt Related issues that hold us back.  I'm not worried about the teams we play.  Enemy is in our own camp and we have to subdue him.  Don't think everything will be solved this year, but we are capable of solving most of the execution related issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bravo4460 said:

Sometimes I feel like we worry about other teams in the division too much. We shouldn't hope for the other teams to be bad just so the Colts can win. We should worry about the Colts getting better and actually winning a game. The rest of the division doesn't matter if the Colts continue to get out coached and out played every game. I usually try and be positive but the Colts have shown nothing that says they can squeeze into the playoffs or win the division. 

 

If the Colts played the Patriots instead of the Texans the result would have been the exact same, maybe worse. The Texans actually have a defense.

 

Thanks to good coaching though, the Patriots had a great game plan going into the game and it was obvious that they had the advantage.

 

I do however agree that once everyone one the defense is healthy for the Colts, (If that's even possible at this point) then the Colts could possibly turn things around. They have to prove it first. 

I agree, good post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OffensivelyPC said:

The bottom line is, we're not a super bowl caliber team.  Doesn't really matter if we win the division or not.  

 

This is exactly right.  

 

Does winning a garbage division, whether your the Texans, Colts or Jags, really mean anything if you are far below the best teams in the conference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the Texans did last night was so much worse than anything the Colts have the past 2 games. We went to Denver, with our scrub 2nd string defense, and actually hung in there until 1:49 or something like that. The Texans have JJ Watt, Clowney, and Wilfork, were going against a 3rd stringer, and they were a complete non-factor. The Texans were NEVER in that game last night, and proved on national television that they're pretenders.

 

That 3rd stringer looked OK vs the Texans D, and I think Luck just might throw for 500 yards against them. Just use the same strategy as New England used: double team Watt & Clowney, and let Kelly or Mewhort single Wilfork.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, HungarianColtsFan said:

 

I'm obviously biased, but Hungary is a great place, and Budapest has developed a lot in past few years.

Budapest had a very similar look and vibe and personality as Chicago where I lived previously.  We also found no shortage of people who spoke fluent English.  We were ill unfortunately (got some food poisoning) so we sat at our balcony between the Key Bridge and the Parliament building facing towards it with the Danube between us. I have a photo of me with my feet up on the balcony rail looking at the Parliament building while watching the Colts play on my laptop.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, JPFolks said:

Budapest had a very similar look and vibe and personality as Chicago where I lived previously.  We also found no shortage of people who spoke fluent English.  We were ill unfortunately (got some food poisoning) so we sat at our balcony between the Key Bridge and the Parliament building facing towards it with the Danube between us. I have a photo of me with my feet up on the balcony rail looking at the Parliament building while watching the Colts play on my laptop.  

 

 

That must have been a game to remember!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, zibby43 said:

High-quality (not to mention very reasonable) post.

 

I agree that there are plenty of reasons to be optimistic.  I'm anxious to see how the Colts' defense performs once it becomes fully healthy.  Anderson, Davis, Green and Geathers will make the defense a much better tackling one.   P. Robinson is still an unknown quantity at this point.  I have a feeling that Farley will make an impact on defense, albeit in a reserve role, by the end of the season.  The arrow is pointing up on that kid and it speaks volumes that he was retained over Guy. 

 

Still worried about the pass rush and our LBs in coverage.

 

It seems that a lot of teams in the league are going smaller, faster, and more athletic on defense (something the Colts used to be in the Polian, 4-3, Tampa 2 days), whereas the Colts are stuck with bigger, heavier, and less athletic personnel (a line of thinking that has already fallen out of favor in the NFL with the league becoming one dominated by elite WRs and pass-catching RBs).

 

Size is great on the DL, and Anderson is plenty athletic, but the LBs are slow and lumbering.  And we are still desperately lacking explosive pass rushers that can play with burst and good lean.

 

Finally . . . I'm sold on Will Fuller.  But I'm not sold on Brock Osweiler. 

I feel at times like we was ahead of the curve and also behind.  Like we had small fast guys when everyone was playing big. Now we big but every one else is fast lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ColtsBTM12 said:

When I first looked at our schedule when it was released, I quickly thought to myself that we needed to get off to a fast start (5-2 or better) within the first 7 games because they are all winnable and like you said the final 9 are much tougher. These next few games will be huge and I truly believe they will define our season. Even with the division up for grabs, if we don't get hot right now I just don't see us making the playoffs because things get much tougher past week 7. We can't afford to be 3-4 or worse going into a stretch of games that includes KC, GB, Pit, NY, and Minn.

The only game in there that worries me is the steelers. 

 

Green Bay looks off, Minnesota lost their QB and RB, KC and NY aren't exactly scary either 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, csmopar said:

The only game in there that worries me is the steelers. 

 

Green Bay looks off, Minnesota lost their QB and RB, KC and NY aren't exactly scary either 

Yeah but we don't have the benefit of the doubt either. The way the Colts have looked these first two games I would be scared of any team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ColtsBTM12 said:

Yeah but we don't have the benefit of the doubt either. The way the Colts have looked these first two games I would be scared of any team.

Granted but I also think we're better when healthy for sure. Getting a healthy secondary is really gonna help more than most think. Yes, we're 0 and 2 but we also lost 2 very tight games, and that's with practice squad players on Defense.  We were 2 very dumb coaching calls away from being 2 and 0 with that defense. So I'm confident. Now if we lose sunday, then I'll start to really get nervous

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, csmopar said:

Granted but I also think we're better when healthy for sure. Getting a healthy secondary is really gonna help more than most think. Yes, we're 2 and 0, but we also lost 2 very tight games, and that's with practice squad players on Defense.  We were 2 very dumb coaching calls away from being 2 and 0 with that defense. So I'm confident. Now if we lose sunday, then I'll start to really get nervous

The defense will hopefully be better when we get guys back, but it'll take time for those guys to comeback and return to form. And the way people are continuing to drop like flies, it really could take some time .Due to injuries, I don't know if we will ever get a true glimpse of the potential of our defense this season. But yeah, we need to win on Sunday. I won't be too confident or optimistic until we get that first win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I try not to read too much into what a team does in the first two weeks of a season.

 

We've started 0-2 the last 3 years in a row....   and in 2014 the Colts still went all the way to the AFC Championship game.

 

That said.....

 

I feel somewhat better that Texas has yet to put it altogether yet...

 

I feel somewhat better than J'Ville has yet to put it altogether yet...

 

I'm a little concerned that Tennessee is better than we all think......

 

But,  the sooner we get healthy,  the better we'll be and we should at least be competitive the rest of the way.

 

At least, that's my hope.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

What the Texans did last night was so much worse than anything the Colts have the past 2 games. We went to Denver, with our scrub 2nd string defense, and actually hung in there until 1:49 or something like that. The Texans have JJ Watt, Clowney, and Wilfork, were going against a 3rd stringer, and they were a complete non-factor. The Texans were NEVER in that game last night, and proved on national television that they're pretenders.

 

That 3rd stringer looked OK vs the Texans D, and I think Luck just might throw for 500 yards against them. Just use the same strategy as New England used: double team Watt & Clowney, and let Kelly or Mewhort single Wilfork.

 

I completely disagree with this. 

 

Houston, on a short week, plays IN New England against a team that they have zero ability to game plan for....

 

Meanwhile Bill and his staff have 3years worth of tape on the Texans, and intimate knowledge of nearly all of the Houston coaches....

 

This is a game you look back on and think to yourself "no duh" that happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't fear the second half of the schedule as much as others. Yes, its going to be tough, but this team is going to get healthy, and with a healthy Defensive line and backfield, they can hold their own. This team will evolve and improve through the season. 

I think the O-line will get better as both Ryan and Good gain more experience, and with Haeg evolving into the go to backup. 

 

Honestly, its the offensive scheme that has me worried; Chud has to step it up in San Diego. Use the passing game to set up the run. Utilize short passes to the WRs, TEs and RBs. Protect Luck by getting the ball out sooner. Do that and the team has an excellent chance to win Sunday. And once they get one under their belt, they will be off and running. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Hoose said:

I don't fear the second half of the schedule as much as others. Yes, its going to be tough, but this team is going to get healthy, and with a healthy Defensive line and backfield, they can hold their own. This team will evolve and improve through the season. 

I think the O-line will get better as both Ryan and Good gain more experience, and with Haeg evolving into the go to backup. 

 

Honestly, its the offensive scheme that has me worried; Chud has to step it up in San Diego. Use the passing game to set up the run. Utilize short passes to the WRs, TEs and RBs. Protect Luck by getting the ball out sooner. Do that and the team has an excellent chance to win Sunday. And once they get one under their belt, they will be off and running. 

 

So yes, I think they can stil win it. But it's not Houston Who will be the toughest rival: it's the Jags. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, OffensivelyPC said:

The bottom line is, we're not a super bowl caliber team. 

 

No way.

 

So, the AFC South leader, probable winner was blown out by the Patriots?  What's new?

 

Can we actually win a game before we start creating threads like this?

 

No, can we win a quarter, can we get a lead in a game before we start creating threads like this?

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have got a few games/predictions wrong this season so far but I still firmly believe the best Houston will go is 9-7 and I said the Jags would be crap and they are 0-2 so far. Titans got a nice win over the Lions but they still aren't a threat to win the Division IMO. A win on Sunday would be huge and build momentum so we will see. I think we have as good a chance as anyone of winning the Division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, JPFolks said:

After watching the complete annihilation of the Texans tonight by the Patriots, and realizing that with a win this week at worst we'll be 1 game behind in our division after a 0-2 start, I wonder if anyone is feeling a little better about at least winning our division.  Sure, it's not anything to be too excited about, as we look like the same old AFC South, but it was the first chance I had to see this supposed Juggernaut Houston offense and as bad as we have played the Patriots, I don't believe we ever got whooped that badly, shut out by a 3rd team rookie QB making his first start with 4 days notice.  

 

Of course, for the pessimists out there, there's plenty to talk about as well, such as New England winning their 5th Super Bowl with Tom Brady which sure looks more likely than not at this time.  They are simply better coached (and drafted) than anyone else.  They had their second best player Gronk only playing a handful of plays and several other key starters out in addition to Brady and currently have the best record in Football.  The NFC looks down this year (I mean, Seattle, Arizona, Green Bay, Carolina all look worse than last year and the Viking lost their starting QB AND their HOF Running Back but still might be the best team in the NFC. Cincy and Pittsburgh in the AFC looked discombobulated at times, but I expect both to fight it out for a first round bye in the end but New England sure looks like a huge favorite and even something like losing their starting (or in their case their first 2 QB's) didn't seem to phase them at all.  

 

Yeah, I know, it's only week 2.... but New England had to put everyone on alert in the league that an angry Brady coming back against Cleveland is just going to be hoping on an already rollin' train.  If we can win the next 5 games (all should be winnable) we may be able to compete with everyone once we get our guys back each week over that stretch and be ready for a much tougher final 9 games.  San Diego may be the toughest game in that stretch and historically we play awful against them, but I feel much better seeing Houston humiliated and their confidence sunk.   

 

What do you guys think? 

Short term memory?  While we didn't get shut out, and it was Tom Brady in there, our AFC Champtionship game was a pretty big whooping in my humble opinion.... Hopefully we've learned from those mistakes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Way too early to pick in this division. Look at the Jags for one example week one they are Kings, week two they are paupers. The new big boss Texans were shown the door in Gillette Stadium and their tails are still sore from dragging. The Titans I don't think will get better or worse this season, they are a 500 club. The Colts aren't going much further with the injury list that won't go away. Bottom line for the AFC South will be the last quarter and who is healthy. Right now after week tow it is a pipe dream to honestly believe the Colts are better than Pittsburgh and New England. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, compuls1v3 said:

Short term memory?  While we didn't get shut out, and it was Tom Brady in there, our AFC Champtionship game was a pretty big whooping in my humble opinion.... Hopefully we've learned from those mistakes!

A shut out is a rarity in the NFL.  A blowout is not.  Houston has now been shut out 2 times in 4 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, JPFolks said:

A shut out is a rarity in the NFL.  A blowout is not.  Houston has now been shut out 2 times in 4 games.

Yeah and every single time Houston roles into that New England game its with the league talking about how good they are. How improved on defense and what not. Blow out every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to say the NFC "looks down" after just a few weeks. I personally think Carolina will be strong all year and have a chance to go back to the SB again. Seattle is another team who often peaks in the second half of the season. 

 

In the AFC, divisional chances are just that.......meh right now. It's a bad bad division. And I would not even count out the Titans either if they win at home this weekend vs. Oakland. 

 

The sad thing is nobody in this division has a snow balls chance in hell of probably getting by the Pats or Steelers or maybe even a few other AFC teams come playoff time. Our best bet is the Bengals in the playoffs who love to find ways to blow it anyway.

 

Do I feel BETTER about our division chances? Maybe........but not sure it matters much if I think we get mauled later. We still have major major weaknesses on this team right now even if we squeaked by a few middle of the pack to bad teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Hoose said:

So yes, I think they can stil win it. But it's not Houston Who will be the toughest rival: it's the Jags. 

 

Well, the Jags won't probably win enough overall games but they WILL show up for us this year. They often do in at least one game. I am not expecting the game in London to be easy at all........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Jules said:

Hard to say the NFC "looks down" after just a few weeks. I personally think Carolina will be strong all year and have a chance to go back to the SB again. Seattle is another team who often peaks in the second half of the season. 

 

In the AFC, divisional chances are just that.......meh right now. It's a bad bad division. And I would not even count out the Titans either if they win at home this weekend vs. Oakland. 

 

The sad thing is nobody in this division has a snow balls chance in hell of probably getting by the Pats or Steelers or maybe even a few other AFC teams come playoff time. Our best bet is the Bengals in the playoffs who love to find ways to blow it anyway.

 

Do I feel BETTER about our division chances? Maybe........but not sure it matters much if I think we get mauled later. We still have major major weaknesses on this team right now even if we squeaked by a few middle of the pack to bad teams.

I don't think we're disagreeing... teams will emerge and decline in ways we don't see yet, but I think after seeing Houston's performance, winning our division (which is always the first goal) is clearly doable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/24/2016 at 0:05 AM, #12. said:

 

No way.

 

So, the AFC South leader, probable winner was blown out by the Patriots?  What's new?

 

Can we actually win a game before we start creating threads like this?

 

No, can we win a quarter, can we get a lead in a game before we start creating threads like this?

 

 

 

 

Pretty hard to talk about winning the division when - at least at the time this thread was created - we were 0-2.  lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, OffensivelyPC said:

Pretty hard to talk about winning the division when - at least at the time this thread was created - we were 0-2.  lol.

 

Right? 

 

That said, thank God AFC South.  You complete one pass play and feel like you're right back in the mix.  lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My sleepers: (meaning, the kind of players coaches would like to have, more than what consensus big board gives credit to them. Some of them might need couple of years to attain their high potential, if drafted into suitable coaching environment, so a lot depends on that. Some of them have injury concerns too).   Most of them are high IQ players or high-effort, high-motor players - two traits I look for from the Drafted players, list is long but I like these guys.. gonna be interesting to see where they land and how it works out for them in long run.    Payton Wilson, LB, NC State Caelen Carson, CB, Wake Forest Kiran Amegadjie, OT, Yale Maason Smith, IDL, LSU Christian Mahogany, OG, Boston College Max Melton, CB, Rutgers Zak Zinter, OG, Michigan Bucky Irving, RB, Oregon Khyree Jackson, CB Oregon Dylan McMahon, C, NC State (good fit for Browns)  Tykee Smith, SAF, Georgia Ainias Smith, WR, Texas A&M Cam Hart, CB, Notre Dame Michael Barrett, LB Michigan Malachi Corley, WR, Western Kentucky Beaux Limmer, IOL, Arkansas   Kamren Kinchens, S, Miami McKinnley Jackson, IDL, Texas A&M Kalen King, CB, Penn State Justin Eboigbe, IDL, Alabama    Jacob Cowing, WR, Arizona Beau Brade, SAF, Maryland Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville Jalyx Hunt, EDGE, Houston Christian (I'm hoping for day 3 Vikings pickup, as Flores could work wonders with him)  Jaheim Bell, TE, Florida State Brennan Jackson, EDGE, Washington State  Delmar Glaze, OT, Maryland Myles Cole, EDGE, Texas Tech Kristian Boyd, DT, Northern Iowa Javontae Jean-Baptiste, DL, Notre Dame Jordan Magee, LB, Temple Myles Harden, CB, South Dakota Jalen Green, EDGE, James Madison (UDFA Target prospect)  Trey Taylor, S, Air Force (UDFA prospect) Eyabi Okie-Anoma, EDGE, Charlotte Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto  Sundiata Anderson, EDGE, Grambling State  Daequan Hardy, CB, Penn State (Special Teams, Returner)  Emani Bailey, RB, TCU   As for Vikings, I don't wanna rush to draft QB if the team isn't confident in the guys they could move up in draft range, and I'd like to just draft impact players that build the roster at this point.   Build the team, draft a franchise QB at right time, don't rush and ruin years trying to make someone work out in the NFL. 
    • If you are relying upon history, does accuracy matter?  I think the reason Smith ended up at RT is because the coaches tried him there out of necessity and he played well, and stayed there due to the coaches wishes.  I don't think that FO guys had much to say about it, because Smith was in fact drafted to be a G, not the RT.  Ballard's own words after day 2 of that draft was that they drafted Smith a bit higher than they had him ranked, because he was the "last remaining starting caliber G on the board".   So it does fit that Smith was not drafted by Ballard or the FO to be a RT...in part because of the measurables and arm length.   Also directing this response to @Matthew Gilbert
    • Same. And that's because over time that level of depth eventually decays. 
    • I don't think players like Davis (and especially Bryan, who I don't think will make the final 53) should impact our draft strategy at all. Not even a little bit. If we like Byron Murphy, figure out what to do with those other guys later. The other versatile guys you mention don't scratch the itch the way Murphy would be expected to -- he should be looked at as a disruptive 3T who plays there every down, not a matchup guy or passing downs guy.    If anything, maybe it's the other way around. The Colts already had a feel for the DTs in draft class and knew they wouldn't get what they want in the draft, so they addressed the position in free agency. And after this weekend, that might help people better understand the strategy at DB and WR...    The bolded really gets at the heart of it. I like Murphy, but I'm not offering him as a great player that you just have to take a chance on. But when it comes to draft strategy, I think taking the best players is the way to go. I'm directly opposed to needs-based drafting, and to passing on a really good prospect because you have backup level veterans already on the roster. 
    • I suppose Murphy being the next Donald is possible, but I wouldn’t think it’s likely.     As for Smith playing right tackle, I believe I was simply echoing Ballard’s initial viewpoint.  That Smith’s short arms made him an unlikely RT.  And that he had to be talked into it by Morocco Brown and Ed Dodds.   I don’t think I was stating MY personal view.    As for skillset vs measurements.  I think it’s been an issue for all of us because Ballard has such specific requirements for each position.  So we factor that into our judgements. 
  • Members

    • ChuggaBeer

      ChuggaBeer 1,756

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 153

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • boo2202

      boo2202 672

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • VikingsFanInChennai

      VikingsFanInChennai 2,990

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hark

      Hark 978

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Hammonds

      John Hammonds 4,928

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ShuteAt168

      ShuteAt168 961

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 311

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,313

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C0LT5

      C0LT5 86

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...