Cole and Irving

[indyagent17]

They both got sacks today, this is coming for a long time I'm glad they finally both got one

[COLTS449]

Cole hasn't been too good this year. In fact he's been pretty bad. He has to go this offseason, but yeah he did play well today. I really like Irving.

[21isSuperman]

Cole got a sack, but he's been pretty bad all year.  Irving, on the other hand, showed some promise when he played

[Ja'Crispy]

Cole got a sack and then McGill was called for a personal foul on the same play. Cmon man!

[zibby43]

I was ready to throw in the towel on Irving but man, he has really started to look like his old, Denver self. 

[Defjamz26]

Cole hasn't been too good this year. In fact he's been pretty bad. He has to go this offseason, but yeah he did play well today. I really like Irving.

Yeah Cole can follow AJ right out the door this offseason. Colts will be drafting a pass rusher early anyways.

[CR91]

Yeah Cole can follow AJ right out the door this offseason. Colts will be drafting a pass rusher early anyways.

 

number one hopefully. buckner from oregon. Id love to get him. crazy athetic and would fit our scheme

[BullsColtsFan1]

I am pretty sure Irving got his sack as soon as he entered the game.  It was good to see Cole get after the QB a little bit.

[Jonathan24]

Yeah Cole can follow AJ right out the door this offseason. Colts will be drafting a pass rusher early anyways.

 

 

If grigs is still there I wouldnt be so sure about that

[2bcoltfan]

Yeah Cole can follow AJ right out the door this offseason. Colts will be drafting a pass rusher early anyways.

We could use some depth at wide receiver.

[ColtsLegacy]

Cole hasn't been half as bad as the forum makes him out to be. He has created a lot of pressure, just hasn't finished. Plus, he's a good run defender, which is taken for granted.

[krunk]

Wondering why they've had Sio Moore inactive?

[OffensivelyPC]

11 minutes ago, krunk said:

Wondering why they've had Sio Moore inactive?

Their treatment of Sio has confused me.  On the one hand, I kind of understand why he hasn't seen a ton of snaps, which was discussed in another thread a while back.  Basically, the Colts appear intent on sticking with Freeman, which I'm okay with.  With respect to Jackson, he's the play caller and logistically, you're not going to take him out and stick in a guy who's been with the team for only a couple months.  That doesn't leave a ton of snaps to go to Moore.  But inactive?  It has to be health or depth (i.e. we're getting thin at quite a few positions these days).

[cbear]

Irving just hasn't played much and has been hurt quite a bit as I recall.

Cole hasn't been Dwight Freeney that's for sure, but I don't think he's been a bust either.  Maybe in their new rush package where he lines up inside, he might be more productive.

[Smash Mouth]

I don't think that Cole was brought here to be just another guy.  Ok, he's been solid against the run. But we need him to get sacks

[Hoosiernsavga]

Irving said he finally is feeling close to 100% before the ATL game. If he can get going and stay consistent it changes the entire defense! 

Honestly in my opinion if we could get a solid corner to replace Toler. I like this defense! 

[jskinnz]

On November 30, 2015 at 8:16:19 PM, ColtsLegacy said:

Cole hasn't been half as bad as the forum makes him out to be. He has created a lot of pressure, just hasn't finished. Plus, he's a good run defender, which is taken for granted.

 

You mean to tell me sacks are not the only measure of a DE/OLB success?

[Coffeedrinker]

On 11/30/2015, 7:16:19, ColtsLegacy said:

Cole hasn't been half as bad as the forum makes him out to be. He has created a lot of pressure, just hasn't finished. Plus, he's a good run defender, which is taken for granted.

I disagree.  That has been my biggest complaint about Cole is he has not been creating much pressure at all.  In 11 games he has 10 hurries.  In the running game he's been pretty much a non factor with only 24 tackles and 6 stuffs for -7 yards.

I think that is bad play.