Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

OLine if AC can't play


lennymoore24

Recommended Posts

If AC can't play against Tampa, I actually think that best Oline would be:

 

LT Reitz

LG Mewhort

C Holmes

RG Thornton

RT Good

 

I don't like switching Mewhort to tackle and bringing in Louis.  I think Good will do a solid job at RT.  And the faster Holmes is back in at center, the better.

 

What do you all think would be best Oline while AC is out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately they are going to go with:

 

Reitz-Louis-Harrisson-Thornton-Mewhort

 

I agree that Reitz-Mewhort-Holmes-Thornton-Good would be the better option. 

 

I don't think the team has officially announced their decision but given that Good hasn't been active or seen any playing time I would be surprised that he breaks into the lineup.  And clearly they liked Mewhort enough at RT to start him there this season.

 

I guess we shall see on Sunday tho... Or if we get any reports from practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If AC can't play against Tampa, I actually think that best Oline would be:

 

LT Reitz

LG Mewhort

C Holmes

RG Thornton

RT Good

 

I don't like switching Mewhort to tackle and bringing in Louis.  I think Good will do a solid job at RT.  And the faster Holmes is back in at center, the better.

 

What do you all think would be best Oline while AC is out?

 

 Lenny, you saw what i saw.

 Harrison was really Not Good against Atlanta.

 AC & Reitz were/are very mediocre. Ugh!

 Reitz & Mewhort at tackle will be Phug----leeeee!

 A slowed down AC will be Yikes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't really matter what we think. Last week's lineup after AC's injury will be starting this week.

No, it doesn't matter what we think.  I don't think any forum member has illusions that their posts here influence the powers that be.

 

Last week's lineup is not necessarily going to be this weeks.  On game day they can only dress 45, so they make due with who is available.  Now that they have time to try out some different combinations they may have a different lineup than what they were forced to do on game day.  They may not, they may feel the line that finished the game is the best, but it does not have to be so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it doesn't matter what we think.  I don't think any forum member has illusions that their posts here influence the powers that be.

 

Last week's lineup is not necessarily going to be this weeks.  On game day they can only dress 45, so they make due with who is available.  Now that they have time to try out some different combinations they may have a different lineup than what they were forced to do on game day.  They may not, they may feel the line that finished the game is the best, but it does not have to be so.

 

How much of the problem against Atlanta do you think was bad line calls from Harrison?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LT-Reitz

LG-Mewhort

C-Harrison

RG-Thornton

RT-Good...If Good is simply in over his head by lets say Halftime I'd bite the bullet and put Herremans in at RT which he has experience at...In no way shape or form do I want to see Lance Louis play RT

 

I'm kinda more interested in seeing if we can exploit Gosder Cherilus with Robert Mathis andNewsome by flipping Cole and Mathis from time to time and  bringing in Newsome in from time to time if Cole continues to prove ineffective if we can get Tampa in 3rd and long situations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me its just depressing that todd herremans has fallen so far off the radar that the coaches haven't even mentioned him in any of the equations.

Yes. This has been the biggest disappointment to me from FA. I can't tell you how much I was pumped when they signed him. Herremans years @ Philly were very solid ones. It's still a head scratcher to me. Really thought he'd be a major contribution to the OL on a consistent basis. ...smh... Dunno what happened. Age catching him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. This has been the biggest disappointment to me from FA. I can't tell you how much I was pumped when they signed him. Herremans years @ Philly were very solid ones. It's still a head scratcher to me. Really thought he'd be a major contribution to the OL on a consistent basis. ...smh... Dunno what happened. Age catching him?

I thought he was solid but I didn't see him coming here and fixing the O Line problems or being that missing piece

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Certainly appears that way. Was he playing against mostly 4-3 or 3-4 in Philly? So many changes there at various times, I've forgotten.

Just depends on the team defensive philosophy that week, Sometimes 43, other times 34. He has played RT and RG at Philly before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. This has been the biggest disappointment to me from FA. I can't tell you how much I was pumped when they signed him. Herremans years @ Philly were very solid ones. It's still a head scratcher to me. Really thought he'd be a major contribution to the OL on a consistent basis. ...smh... Dunno what happened. Age catching him?

 

 

From reports I read , he was bad last year.. and thats why he was cut. I guess often 2+2 is 4. Add another year to a player losing his skills and this is what you get. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good was not even on the active roster last week, which means he was not at Atlanta to play when A.C. went down.

 

I do like Good starting this week though.  Less moving parts to plug him in, He's a mauler in the run game,-which is what Indy needs- and M.H. throws fast enough to account for Goods learning curve in pass protection.

 

Just makes too much sense to me......so Indy will probably not do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather have Herremans at RT than Good at this point since he's played it before.  (ducks under a desk).  He may do better at this position.  

 

He has more Pro experience. 

 

I'm surprised that they haven't given him a second look.  The first two games were complete trash for most of the offense and not just the line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather have Herremans at RT than Good at this point since he's played it before.  (ducks under a desk).  He may do better at this position.  

 

He has more Pro experience. 

 

I'm surprised that they haven't given him a second look.  The first two games were complete trash for most of the offense and not just the line. 

This doesn't have to do directly with Herremans  because he had some solid years in Philly but after so many years just starting a player just because he has pro experience (as opposed to Good for example who has little) is not a good enough reason to not give a rookie a shot IF said veteran is not good at his position in my opinion....Example: Lance Louis....Bad O Lineman benched for Thornton who previously only had 20 starts in 2 years prior to this year.

 

Now Thornton has shown mixed results (But has certainly gotten better as a pass blocker) and may not prove to be the answer going forward (I'd draft a Guard maybe to compete with him next year) but the alternative is Lance Louis who has no business being on the field unless an emergency happens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This doesn't have to do directly with Herremans  because he had some solid years in Philly but after so many years just starting a player just because he has pro experience (as opposed to Good for example who has little) is not a good enough reason to not give a rookie a shot IF said veteran is not good at his position in my opinion....Example: Lance Louis....Bad O Lineman benched for Thornton who previously only had 20 starts in 2 years prior to this year.

 

Now Thornton has shown mixed results (But has certainly gotten better as a pass blocker) and may not prove to be the answer going forward (I'd draft a Guard maybe to compete with him next year) but the alternative is Lance Louis who has no business being on the field unless an emergency happens

Maybe, but Herremans has shown that he has the ability to be at least mediocre on the line.  I think he played two games with the Colts on the line and I'm not saying that he's great by any means.  I'm all for putting Good in at some point if need be but with Castanzo out it and a rookie in at RT, it makes it a very difficult decision.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I originally stated, I thought Good will play.  He is a good player.  I know,I know, he hasn't played in  an regular season game. But he has the size and feet. He will be a good player. I think he is better than any other options.  I wouldn't be surprised if by next year he is the starter and Reitz gets kicked inside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I originally stated, I thought Good will play.  He is a good player.  I know,I know, he hasn't played in  an regular season game. But he has the size and feet. He will be a good player. I think he is better than any other options.  I wouldn't be surprised if by next year he is the starter and Reitz gets kicked inside.

i hope that doesn't happen next year because that means the Colts won't have addressed the oline in the off-season outside of maybe the center spot.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That has always been my issue going back to the Polian years. They preferred undersized players to fit this scheme. That was great when they had a lead and played indoors. The problem  is that teams started running the ball to keep Peyton on the bench. Plus, u get in bad weather and on grass, their speed is negated and they are just a bunch of undersized players getting blown off the ball. I am in favor of building a team that can play in any environment and that can run various schemes. I see flexibility with the offence, however the D is the same old. That's why I think this is an important draft defensively. Will the Colts stray from their previous tendancies of drafting players that fit the Seattle scheme or will they deviate and say draft a man corner? Last year we were all on the edge of our seats when a trade was made at 3. Will we get our qb at 4? We were all on pins and needles till they made that pick. This draft has that same excitement for me. At 15 will Ballard and company do something different? This team needs a play maker on D and I contend that is their biggest need. I don't believe they get that player moving back.  Sure u may get him at 15 but if u really want a playmaker, this just might be the year to say move up and get a guy like Mirchell and Latu who may fall because of the medical. I am not in favor of getting a wr or te. Richardson, if he is the guy, should deliver explosive plays with our current roster.  Jot a fan of Gus and this scheme, but I really don't think he has a lot to work with and Ballard kind of eluded to that in his post season pressers.
    • The move happened before the 1984 season. To put in perspective how great Luck was here, here are the top 3 QBs over 40 seasons here win wise: Regular Season as a starter 1. Peyton Manning = 141 wins 2. Andrew Luck = 53 wins 3. Jim Harbaugh = 20 wins   Post Season as a starter 1. Peyton Manning = 9 wins (won the SB in 2006) 2. Andrew Luck = 4 wins 3. Jim Harbaugh = 2 wins   Luck had 33 more wins than Jim did and 2 more playoff wins than Jim did. Luck is so far ahead of any QB (not named Peyton) regarding wins in the Regular Season and Post Season that it is laughable.   
    • I wonder whether there's anything to his reporting. Either way, I think he'd be better at safety / nickel. Even if the Colts view him as a boundary corner, I think they view corner as a Day 2 position.    DeJean definitely helped himself on his testing. I don't think the 40 time was concerning, even if I wasn't blown away by it. His explosive numbers were very good; if you watch his high school basketball clips, you'll see his explosiveness. And like stitches said, the Colts love explosive DBs, maybe even more than they love fast DBs.    And yeah, I side-eye any timed speeds when they don't happen at the Combine. There's hand timing, some surfaces are different, I've read that some tracks have a slight grade to them, etc. I don't know how they prepare all the 40 tracks, but I know that everyone that runs at the Combine gets the same surface, same conditions, etc. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...