Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

QB Controversy


hawkeyes

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Haven't actually compared the stats of the two, but come on - QB controversy or what?

 

What if Luck comes back and starts getting hammered again?  Who will continue to blame an OL that has kept MH basically clean the last two games?

 

WTG Hasselbeck!

MH has played well. Kudos. But here's the difference: Frank Gore 98 yards rushing. Completely changes the Colts offense. It becomes balanced. It becomes more diffucult for a defense to defend. It opens up passing lanes. It opens up playaction. When Luck gets back we need Gore to keep getting the ball and meaningful yards. END OF STORY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yah Im totally serious too eh?   GEEESH some of you guys need to lighten up a bit!

 

Fact is Hasselbeck has played a whole lot better than Luck with the same team around him.... What I was really getting at is I hope Luck has learned a great deal from watching from the sidelines the last two games.  If he is truly a football genius he should have .... we shall see.  If he comes out and continues to throw horrible picks and get hit/sacked half a dozen times we will know for certain that he is not as smart about learning from his mistakes as some would like to think he is!

I actually agree with you on this. We`ve heard how "intelligent" Luck is from day 1 but yet he continually goes for the chunk yardage or throws high passes over the middle..almost cringe worthy. Holding onto the ball too long also, while Hasselbeck did more 3 step drop backs and zip the ball was gone. That's what I`d like to see more than anything else offensively moving forward, move the chains with shorter throws and runs then bomb away when the chance presents itself. Luck CAN do it, just has to change his ways and improve   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't actually compared the stats of the two, but come on - QB controversy or what?

 

What if Luck comes back and starts getting hammered again?  Who will continue to blame an OL that has kept MH basically clean the last two games?

 

WTG Hasselbeck!

 

You know, I would normally suggest this is a feeble attempt at sarcasm but I have seen enough off-the-wall stuff from you to believe you are truly serious about this which can only be rebutted with a...

 

Dear God...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt played against 2 bad teams and won. He didn't turn the ball over and played smart. But he obviously doesn't have the arm strength anymore, can't make all the throws as they say. The offensive line gave him surprisingly good protection vs Watt and the Texans! It's great we have Matt, but the ability level isn't even freakin close between he and Andrew, you're kidding yourself if you think it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya, Luck has never spread the ball around his entire career :facepalm:

But he is not doing it this season. If i remember correctly the 2nd game this season, he mostly targeted Hilton. Hilton was basically the entire offense that game. I'm not talking about his entire career but this season. He have not distributed the ball well either that is Luck fault or Hamilton fault. The way the offense was run yesterday is how Luck should be running.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hasselbeck did great! Sad to say, I was just waiting for an INT like I've become accustomed to from the first 3 games. Pleasant surprise. Crazy how much better the offense can be without 238472934 OL penalties and 4 turnovers a game.

 

Props to MH! Now I'm ready for some healthy Luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yah Im totally serious too eh?   GEEESH some of you guys need to lighten up a bit!

 

Fact is Hasselbeck has played a whole lot better than Luck with the same team around him.... What I was really getting at is I hope Luck has learned a great deal from watching from the sidelines the last two games.  If he is truly a football genius he should have .... we shall see.  If he comes out and continues to throw horrible picks and get hit/sacked half a dozen times we will know for certain that he is not as smart about learning from his mistakes as some would like to think he is!

 

Nice one.  For a second there, I was fearing for your mental well being!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he is not doing it this season. If i remember correctly the 2nd game this season, he mostly targeted Hilton. Hilton was basically the entire offense that game. I'm not talking about his entire career but this season. He have not distributed the ball well either that is Luck fault or Hamilton fault. The way the offense was run yesterday is how Luck should be running.  

 

You mean the game when Moncrief had 7 catches for 122 yards and a TD? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GIVE LUCK THE SAME PLAY CALLING! But Luck also has to realize he needs to take the small gains sometimes. He worries about the big play and forces things to much. He'll be fine. Props to Hasselbeck though.

Luck doesn't have Hasselbeck's quick release...I wonder if it can be learned.

 

Aaron Rogers has a great quick release.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Luck has another bad game, Pep, Grigs, Pags, or the OL will get the blame again I'm sure.  That being said, I hope Luck plays lights out.

 

I too hope Luck is lights out from here on out, but I have absolutely nothing to base that hope on because he has proven time and time again that he is not learning from his mistakes!

 

When are people going to realize that Matt isn't running the same offense?

Well aren't you Sherlock Holmes?   

 

Course that has nothing to do with decision making and fundamentals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I too hope Luck is lights out from here on out, but I have absolutely nothing to base that hope on because he has proven time and time again that he is not learning from his mistakes!

 

Well aren't you Sherlock Holmes?   

 

Course that has nothing to do with decision making and fundamentals. 

 

Well aren't you the smartest person to ever type a complete sentence on a message board.

 

I never stated that, so congrats on trying to come off as crass and succeeding! 

 

Also, please, Sherlock Holmes? People still us that as a shot in 2015? Insult to the character lol.

 

I have already praised Hasslebeck's decision making and ball security on this board, but yeah... we beat the Jags and Texans. Luck with a bad shoulder would have embarrassed these teams. And yes, us adjusting to a more suitable offense for Matt has helped him tremendously. So for your next shot, please use another ficitonal super detective k thnx!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's really not about a quick release. It's about short efficient passes instead of 7 step drops.

No...it really is about his release.  I just watched the full replay of the game again this afternoon. 

Hasselbeck was dropping back, making a decision and getting the ball out, all very quickly.

The O-line played great but they did not need to hold their blocks nearly as long as Andrew makes them do...and Hasselbeck's actual release IS quicker than Andrew.

Andrew plays quarterback just like BIG Ben...waiting and waiting for someone to get open, then taking the hit to make the play...not very smart, and Andrew is supposed to be a smart guy.  Andrew just keeps extending the play and making his O-line look worse...a lot of the apparent bad O-line play is Andrew stretching the play out and expecting protection for the whole time.

Andrew still has a lot to learn about QB play in the NFL...Peyton had it figured out by year 4 and got rid of the ball much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I blame Pep for this.

 

Why did Pep waited until Luck to get hurt and finally realized that he had to start using short pass games and run games.

 

Why couldn't he do this since Week 1? I hope Pep get hired somewhere this off-season.

Edited by 21isSuperman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't even believe this thread is still in existence.... what are you people smoking?!?!?!

Have you not been paying attention for the last 3 years?!.... Like seriously? WTH?..... Give yourselves a dope slap, get off of that crazy train and wake the F up..... Jesus....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone is saying pep this and pep that...

No one wants to admit what REALLY happened is Hasslebeck showed that in comparison Luck has little skills at making play calls and adjustments at the line at all.

Nearly every big play were from Hasslebeck reading the D and making audible changes at the line, not something Pep did.

 

 

Are you under the impression that Luck doesn't call audibles and make big plays?

 

You think this is something exclusive to Matt Hasselbeck?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goodness gracious.

 

There are no words in the English Language to even create a controversy.    It simply doesn't exist.

 

And anyone who thinks there is a controversy simply doesn't know and understand football.

 

We're not running the same offense with Matt that we are with Andrew.      We may start doing that now,  but we haven't to start the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goodness gracious.

 

There are no words in the English Language to even create a controversy.    It simply doesn't exist.

 

And anyone who thinks there is a controversy simply doesn't know and understand football.

 

We're not running the same offense with Matt that we are with Andrew.      We may start doing that now,  but we haven't to start the season.

Mega-Ditto!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Use Tenn as the comparison game then.  Andrew still made some bad decisions against a bad team.  I think the point is that Andrew has much to learn still.  He can't be a gunslinger all the time.  When the Colts don't turn the ball over, we're still pretty good.  Take the 5-6 yard short throws and move the chains.  Then stretch the field.

You mean the Tennessee game where Luck played very well after the offensive line switch up and what appeared to a change in offensive play calling?

Although, I must say it was nice to finally see some designed roll outs........for Matt Hasselbeck. That's right, not one of the more mobile quarterbacks in the league in Luck, but Hasselbeck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just watching the NFL network and Eric Davis stated what many fans have been saying all along.  The Colts need to change their style of offense to succeed in the NFL, with Andrew Luck.  I think Luck has been taking a lot of notes the last couple weeks and I cannot wait to see the offense come out against the Patriots.  I think this west coast style offense has the ability to score 30+ points against the Patriots but I do think the Patriots could score 40+ points easily on this defense.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya, Luck has never spread the ball around his entire career :facepalm:

 

lol

 

I recall him spreading ti around like crazy in the playoffs last year so its weird for anyone to act like he's never done it or isn't capable of doing it. Actually, a few times during the regularly season last year too.

 

This year he'a just been a bit too greedy, always trying to go for the big play and staring down big play guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol

 

I recall him spreading ti around like crazy in the playoffs last year so its weird for anyone to act like he's never done it or isn't capable of doing it. Actually, a few times during the regularly season last year too.

 

This year he'a just been a bit too greedy, always trying to go for the big play and staring down big play guys.

Against Denver in MileHigh he spread it around a lot, even Nicks had a TD. I agree with you he has spread it around a lot. Just look at the 4th Qtr against the Titans. He even got Dorsett involved with a long TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol

 

I recall him spreading ti around like crazy in the playoffs last year so its weird for anyone to act like he's never done it or isn't capable of doing it. Actually, a few times during the regularly season last year too.

 

This year he'a just been a bit too greedy, always trying to go for the big play and staring down big play guys.

Ya I was being sarcastic. The guy had a couple of tough games compicated by no pass protection and cruddy play selection and people act like he never engineered 26 game winning drives in his NFL career. Short memories I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Texans gave us 125 yards and we won by 7. Jax missed a fg. U guys can chant Hasselbeck if u want, I'm all in for Luck. They called a way different game for Hass. Had nothing to do with his decision to spread anything. He just followed the game plan which was play safe, and don't turn ball over. He did exactly what a back up is supposed to do. Let's just be happy we edged thru and move on. Trying to name him a starter means ur trying to play those qb games that CLE and HOU playing. End up like the 49ers, stuck with Kap. They did the same thing. U can't just switch a qb bcuz ur starter got hurt. U get caught all up in the moment like they did with Kap and those guys. Jax and Houston. Gimme a break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't actually compared the stats of the two, but come on - QB controversy or what?

 

What if Luck comes back and starts getting hammered again?  Who will continue to blame an OL that has kept MH basically clean the last two games?

 

WTG Hasselbeck!

Child please...don't think for one second Hasselbeck is the better option long term at QB over Luck. Luck just has some things to clean up but he is FAR more talented than Hasselbeck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He just said MHJ trade up is fantasy land. Some like Steve Smith and Zierlein are ranking Nabers ahead of MHJ so both of those you can pretty much scratch off the trade up list unless they are some how available around pick 10-13. Very unlikely!
    • 2006 has that winning 11 games is enough mentality like so many here. Having a SB level right side of our o-line should be priority one. We are far from it.  We need a shutdown corner that can go man on the many great 4.3 running WR's. This simply allows the deep safety to defend everything else. Instead of Ballard sticking him in the middle of the field knowing that one of his slow corners will get beat deep.  We need a LB for development and depth that can cover better.  And yes a 3rd receiver that gets open quick that can also threaten deep.  With faster, better players on D, Gus could blitz 5 more times a game to get the pressure we need.  I have No Doubt Steichen has taken Ownership, Ballard and his staff to school regarding what we have and what we need.   Pray that 4-5 of our current very young players can become really solid by seasons end. Plus 3-4 really nice draft picks and 2025 and beyond we can be reckoned with.  We need to be amongst the very Best at running the dang ball and pass blocking.   I think if I could move back 5 spots and take Mims at RT and move Smith over that would be great.  Then use the necessary draft capital to get LB Cooper and CB from Rutgers Melton. I would expect Ballard to take Leggett over a CB. That would be a good move to.  I would feel really good about our prospects.
    • I couldn't agree more with the bolded statement.  Once a player is on the team, the only thing his draft position does for him (aside from the money) is maybe give him a little more time to develop.  Mainly because teams are reluctant to admit that their research didn't pan out and they want to see their guy succeed.   As far as defense, I feel the number one responsibility of the GM and the coach is to help the franchise QB be the franchise QB, if you get what I mean.  And until that's proven, if it means sacrificing a need on defense in order to enhance the QB's arsenal, so be it.  But that's just me...    
    • Yeah I didn’t get the impression he felt a huge need to draft a CB.    He was asked about mentioning YAC guys and he said every team wants them. The Colts have had meetings with the two top YAC guys in the draft - Brock Bowers and Malachi Corley. I absolutely think we’re taking Bowers if he falls to us and I even think we may jump up a couple of picks to land him.    If Bowers gets taken ahead of us I feel pretty certain we’re trading back hoping to land another 3rd rounder.    I didn’t catch if they were talking about draft targets or players already on the roster when they talked about on dimensional guys? My initial thought was Pierce.    I think it’s a given we’re taking at least one Olineman this draft, but that’s not really anything new. 
    • My guesses based on this presser:   - Ballard will NOT draft a CB in the 1st... maybe at all? Everything he's saying seems to suggest he likes the group we have and he wants to see them play and have a chance to develop. I'm almost certain if Mitchell for example is there at 15... we pass on him... either for trade back or for an offensive weapon... or DE? - Ballard WILL trade back. If not in the 1st... then later in the draft... but most probably in the 1st. IMO he pretty much advertised to his potential customers by telling them how many 1st round grades he has. Teams 19-21 are welcome to call and will receive warm greetings from Ballard. Rams, Steelers, Dolphins?  - He seemed to be talking about a specific someone one dimensional offensive weapon when he was talking about them just having had a meeting about a certain player... about whether them and the coaching staff see the way he can be used the same way... and if they agree on this, IMO this is a potential target for the Colts. The names that come to mind - Brian Thomas Jr and Xavier Worthy... A lot of the other WRs are more well rounded...  - The Colts LOVE the OL class both at the top and in depth. I have seen some OL experts suggest there might be 10 starting centers in this draft... and the OTs class in the 1st is like nothing I've ever seen. Can we draft an OL in the 1st? Doubt it... but absolutely expect a few shots on day 2 and 3.   
  • Members

    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,730

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MB-ColtsFan

      MB-ColtsFan 2,654

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 13,762

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,199

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Iron Colt

      Iron Colt 128

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,775

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,442

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 309

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,286

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DoubleE Colt

      DoubleE Colt 331

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...