Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

I'm starting to believe that only the Denver Broncos can stop the Patriots from AFC supremacy


coltkingABC

Recommended Posts

i know that it is early, but the Patriots are blowing away with the AFC. The Colts look weak, unimpressive, and with the organizational rumors it doesn't look like they can make it far in the playoffs unless they go on a 2011 New York Giants Cinderella run. The Steelers? Without Roethlisberger, I don't know. The Ravens aren't so well this year. The Bengals, I don't trust them in January. I think that the Broncos can be the only team to be the AFC alternative to the Patriots in the Super Bowl. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 259
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I am really not sure why the Pats fans are so confident they can win in Mile High. Denver will win that game and I would bet any of them. Peyton beat them by 10 in the AFC Title Game just a little over a year ago. I would actually be surprised if Denver lost that game and I am not even being biased toward Peyton.

Have you even watched either team this season? Denver is entirely reliant upon its defense. The Patriots' front seven will put a ton of pressure on immobile Peyton.

Oh, and Brady OWNS Wade Phillips defenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you even watched either team this season? Denver is entirely reliant upon its defense. The Patriots' front seven will put a ton of pressure on immobile Peyton.

Oh, and Brady OWNS Wade Phillips defenses.

I have. I know the Patriots are great but Peyton usually plays them well at home. I do think you guys are the team to beat overall but just think the Broncos will win that game. Broncos was my bold prediction to win it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

broncos dont look impressive

The offense has been one dimensional. Hillman ran well last week, but for the most part the ground game has been M.I.A.

Their O line isn't very good, and father time is catching up to Manning.

Defensively they have a solid pass rush and those guys can make big plays at crucial times, but I think people (media and fans) need to pump the brakes on calling the Denver defense "super bowl level". They have played some pretty bad teams thus far. Their best opponent was KC who could of easily won that game of it wasn't for that crazy Charles fumble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen the Pats struggle in Denver a few times. So I do give the Broncos some shot in Denver to beat them. In Foxboro? Nope.

 

 

I also want to see how NE does in the coming weeks and if they can sustain all season. Keep in mind they have just played 3 games and somehow people act like they have zero chance of ever being beaten ever again. 

 

If I was a Patriots fan I would hope it's not a repeat of 2007, since we all remember how that ended.......

 

And for the record if NE beats us up soon in Indy then they beat us up. So what, it's not like it's abnormal to us and would be a shocker. What would be more shocking is if we won or at least kept it closer in a competitive game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The AFC is really a hot mess this year. The top three teams remain Pats, Cincy and Denver. Pats and Cincy do NOT play each other but both teams play Denver so it is those two games IMO that will decide HFA. I also expect Cincy to drop a couple of games in their division although the way Pitt and the Ravens have looked, they may sweep.

 

I see Cincy as the main challenger to the Pats as they are a complete team with Dalton playing great this year. They have also given the Pats some issues over the years. So right now I would put them as the biggest challenger along with the Bills if they can become more disciplined which I have my doubts about. I just don't see Denver having enough O to stay with the Pats this year. We will know more after GB comes to Denver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If I was a Patriots fan I would hope it's not a repeat of 2007, since we all remember how that ended.......

 

2007 was one of my favorite all time seasons as a Pats fan. As awful as it was to lose the SB, I would gladly take another undefeated season. What a ride that was all season and it made the post-season unbelievably exciting to see if they could get to 19. Obviously I want to win the SB but honestly, after Feb. 1 and the fourth ring, I would love to see this team just keep breaking history so another 16-0 season would do just that and if they get the 5th then that is just icing on top. But one game at a time. I really don't expect 16-0. Just so hard to do. The Packers IMO have a legit shot at 16-0 too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A healthy and unsuspended Steelers team can beat New England.

They were minus Leveon Bell and Martavis Bryant on opening night....and still moved the ball quite effectively at Foxboro. They just didn't cash it in for TDs.

I know people hate em' but if Pittsburgh eeecks out a playoff berth and Ben and company are relatively healthy....they will be very dangerous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A healthy and unsuspended Steelers team can beat New England.

They were minus Leveon Bell and Martavis Bryant on opening night....and still moved the ball quite effectively at Foxboro. They just didn't cash it in for TDs.

I know people hate em' but if Pittsburgh eeecks out a playoff berth and Ben and company are relatively healthy....they will be very dangerous.

Pitt is the team I fear the least if they should make it in. The Pats and Brady have literally owned them since 2001. Bell would not have made a difference in Foxboro as the Pitt D could not even get lined up. Had that game been played later and the Pats O was even more sync they would have put 50 on the Steelers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pats secondary will be ripped into ashes by quality QBs

Let's see how they play with Giants.

I do think that game in NY will be tough just based on past history. But Eli has not been great this season. He is the 17th ranked QB behind the likes of Foles, Tyrod Taylor, Weeden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think that game in NY will be tough just based on past history. But Eli has not been great this season. He is the 17th ranked QB behind the likes of Foles, Tyrod Taylor, Weeden.

He turns into great when he plays the Pats.

 

I am sure you know a thing or two about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He turns into great when he plays the Pats.

 

I am sure you know a thing or two about that.

I would not say that. He has had some great drives to win the game but it was more his defense that carried the day which is not the same this year as his champ years. But he does have some pretty good offensive weapons at his disposal too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pitt is the team I fear the least if they should make it in. The Pats and Brady have literally owned them since 2001. Bell would not have made a difference in Foxboro as the Pitt D could not even get lined up. Had that game been played later and the Pats O was even more sync they would have put 50 on the Steelers.

Just curious, which AFC team are you worried or we just send the Pats to SB?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not say that. He has had some great drives to win the game but it was more his defense that carried the day which is not the same this year as his champ years. But he does have some pretty good offensive weapons at his disposal too.

Well Pats have no defense this year. You keep forgetting that little fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Pats have no defense this year. You keep forgetting that little fact.

Their defense has been better than expected, especially the secondary. Right now statistically they are middle of the road. They added two guys during the bye to stop the run better. I expect them to improve over the season as they did last but really if the Pats win the SB again it will be on the back of Brady like it was last post-season. I don't have any illusions about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way. The Broncos offense is lethargic this season. No run game and Peyton looks like his arm is barely attached. The Broncos are just waiting to get beat IMO. The Chiefs beat themselves and the Vikings could've won that game if they gave AP more touches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pitt is the team I fear the least if they should make it in. The Pats and Brady have literally owned them since 2001. Bell would not have made a difference in Foxboro as the Pitt D could not even get lined up. Had that game been played later and the Pats O was even more sync they would have put 50 on the Steelers.

The Pats defense was suspect that night no matter how you spin it. I can see a high scoring shootout for sure, but 50 points is pure hallucination.

As for history beyond the current season....it means next to nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pats defense was suspect that night no matter how you spin it. I can see a high scoring shootout for sure, but 50 points is pure hallucination.

As for history beyond the current season....it means next to nothing.

How were they suspect? They let up a total of 14 points until the final two minutes when they went into the prevent to waste he clock and Pitt got the last garbage time TD to get to 21.

 

You are right past history does not count except mentally. Pitt has never been a team to make the Pats shake even a little whether the game was in Foxboro or Pitt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their defense has been better than expected, especially the secondary. Right now statistically they are middle of the road. They added two guys during the bye to stop the run better. I expect them to improve over the season as they did last but really if the Pats win the SB again it will be on the back of Brady like it was last post-season. I don't have any illusions about that.

You are probably the only person on  earth who thinks pats won because of Brady but no one is surprised with what you think.

 

If its all Brady, Pats should have had 3 score lead by 4th quarter so Wilson cant catch up. But you needed Malcolm Butler to get you a SB. Ask Brady he will admit. And Darelle Revis didn't do anything. What a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are probably the only person on  earth who thinks pats won because of Brady but no one is surprised with what you think.

 

If its all Brady, Pats should have had 3 score lead by 4th quarter so Wilson cant catch up. But you needed Malcolm Butler to get you a SB. Ask Brady he will admit. And Darelle Revis didn't do anything. What a joke.

Sure he was only SB MVP going 37 for 50 against the LoB and engineered the most historic comeback in SB history. And Revis played his worst game of his career vs Baltimore where again Brady threw 50 times for another historic comeback win ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure he was only SB MVP going 37 for 50 against the LoB and engineered the most historic comeback in SB history. And Revis played his worst game of his career vs Baltimore where again Brady threw 50 times for another historic comeback win ...

Yet he was at the mercy of Malcolm Butler

 

Keep hiding from the truth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bengals look good. They've struggled in the postseason though.

They are the most complete of all the undefeated teams in the league. Top 5 scoring offense. Top 10 points allowed defense. But as you say, Jan is the proving ground. But they are in position to run away with the North with no Ben and the Ravens being a shadow of themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In ten or less days and counting. At Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis Indiana The New England Patriots are going to walk on the field thinking they've already won, that this should be an easy 'W.' But that will be our team's mindset as well. (Perhaps not the "easy" part)

This time around, they will not walk all over us. It's time we expose who we are as a team..as a supportive fanbase..We do not presume the role of a whipped puppy already in submission. No! While some will have their doubts and rightfully so as they are entitled, those doubts must be set aside come the day of reckoning.

The Patriots will suffer their first loss of the season against our Colts. If you think/feel otherwise than my friends..*lightly rests hand on shoulder for dramatic effect*..you have already been defeated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know that it is early, but the Patriots are blowing away with the AFC. The Colts look weak, unimpressive, and with the organizational rumors it doesn't look like they can make it far in the playoffs unless they go on a 2011 New York Giants Cinderella run. The Steelers? Without Roethlisberger, I don't know. The Ravens aren't so well this year. The Bengals, I don't trust them in January. I think that the Broncos can be the only team to be the AFC alternative to the Patriots in the Super Bowl.

[Allow me to dissect this piece by piece]

-----------------------------------------

. I agree that it is early and that all signs point to New England being the AFC Powerhouse thus far. For starters, they aren't banged up like other teams are.

. Do not allow the media or hearsay of information within the organization to sway your opinions. Let the pieces fall where they may if/when the time comes. Do we have all the answers? No, but we'll find them as the season unfolds. What has unimpressed me is the instant gelling expectation in regards to the Offense. Listen to Frank Gore & Andre Johnson's post game interview. Andre Johnson says it best here. Why are you worried about any other team? I suggest taking it one game at a time, in segments. It's about how we develop or evolve. From the caterpillar into the butterfly. Pretty soon this cocoon shell will break off a bit at a time.

. Denver Broncos have beaten who? Lions, Vikings, Chiefs, and Ravens. Not exactly the cream of the crop. It's quick and easy to say that this team or that team will go all the way based upon being undefeated in the first few games. Some teams will just take longer to find that chemistry, but it doesn't mean they won't or that they can't just because they did not start off undefeated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the extra information. I'll be honest, I was working so I just glanced at the headline and didn't have time to read the article. Definitely a little misleading, but it was my bad for not actually reading it. He has all the talent in the world. If the Colts can draft him and keep his health in check and ensure there aren't real character concerns, I'd be happy.
    • So only 19-21 players with 1st rd grades and he’s willing to trade up for the right player if he’s in striking distance.  So how many of those 21 players would be available at 15 If he’s trying to strengthen the team with a difference making player in a position of need.  The key being 1st rd grade in a position of need.  I don’t see him going inside the top 5 but I think he’s going to do it somewhere starting with pick 9.  I think he would consider Bowers, Nabors , Odunze, and Turner as candidates for being the right player.  I think he will move up for one of those three players starting at pick 9 depending on how the draft falls.  19-21 is a small number and a number of those positions are not a position of need.  Can’t see him waiting. I think he likes our secondary too. I think he told us he’s prepared to move up to try for a playmaker if he falls within striking distance.  I think he’s going to do it.  
    • Ballard uses the trade backs as his way of filling out the depth if you don't see him add many people in FA then you can almost bank on a trade back or two to fill roster holes
    • I've been telling y'all by things he has said previously and the way he handled FA what we would probably do.
    • I think people know I favor   a DE or corner at 15. However, how would people feel if they went Murphy? I know people see it as a strength with Buckner and Stewart. Buckner has just resigned, however he will be 31. Stewart is primarily a run first DT. By drafting Murphy, u could be getting your 3 tech of the future, and they are hard to get. If Richardon becomes a star, it might be their only chance to swing this early in the draft for a position u covet.  U could also have a great interior pass rush and therefore affecting the opposing teams Oline and in essence making the D as a whole better. We all know Ballard loves the 3tech and showed that by trading a 1st for Buckner. Could be an interesting wrinkle to the draft.
  • Members

    • Reboot

      Reboot 46

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DattMavis

      DattMavis 291

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 20,630

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,115

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 4,554

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CheezyColt

      CheezyColt 890

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 3,731

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DoubleE Colt

      DoubleE Colt 331

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • OLD FAN MAN

      OLD FAN MAN 1,262

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 2,669

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...