Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Training Camp 8/3/15 (Merged)


UKColt13

Recommended Posts

What would you consider "living up to that first round selection?" Not being sarcastic, just curious. I'd personally be happy if he's healthy and productive and plays well at OLB. I'm not interested in seeing the Colts try to fit a square peg into a round hole just because fans want to see the next coming of Dwight Freeney. I'm not implying that that's what you want either, but I feel like a lot of people are labeling him a bust because he's not getting a lot of sacks.

How about making some sort of impact. He was drafted to rush the passer and he is horrible at it. He's a bust because he can't play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 223
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There might be a team that could part with a 6th or 7th for him that needs wr help. If he goes on waivers, there's no guarantee that a team will definitely get him, because waivers go in order through the teams. Hence, a team offering a late round pick to make sure they get him.

From where I'm sitting, and no disrespect meant, but to think the Colts can get anything for a 4th year guy that is at best a 4th or 5th receiver that has been BARELY able to make their roster, well, despite his very good hands and all the rooting for the under dog that fans like to do, fact is the Whalen is a marginal player. I would be utterly shocked if any team would give up anything for him.

I like Griff and I like the work ethic he brings to the table, but I think he is a special teamer / emergency fill in at best. He's a guy that if he doesn't make the team now (which I don't think he will), he's a cut / put on waivers guy that some other team will maybe pick up, after he clears waivers. #harsh_truth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly the reason I HATE the Dorsett pick to this day.  

 

The guy is literally going to be our starting kick returner and that's it.  And next year?  Unless TY doesn't get re-signed or Andre/Moncrief falls off. . . more of the same.  

 

BPA in the first round sounds great but you have to have some sort of idea or plan of how they are going to get on the field often.  And I just don't see that with Dorsett.  

 

What are you talking about?

 

Are you under the impression he's not going to play WR in 3 and 4 WR sets?

 

That's what he was drafted for.     The ST return stuff is an added bonus.

 

If you think he's not going to play a fair amount of WR,   I think you're going to be surprised.    Whether that's good or bad is completely up to you.    But he's going to play WR a fair amount.

 

I'm surprised you don't know this..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying Whalen is bad, he's just not gonna make it here. The WR depth has caught up to him. We took Dorsett #1 that's why I put him there, he's not going anywhere he's a lock. Hilton & Johnson & Moncrief are locks. Moncrief opened yesterday lined up a #3

It's just no room for Whalen unless Carter or Brown get injured or stink it up

Whalen will go somewhere like Washington or something and play. Just not here in Indianapolis

So do you put Werner in our top 3 or 4 LB? We took him #1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bingo. I hate the pick, not the player. I'm sure Dorsett will flourish here.... but that was a deep WR draft could've got anyone smh

But the past is the past, just gotta hope for the best at this point. But Grigson is shooting 1/4 so far on first rounders

Luck (hit)

Trent (bust)

Bjoern (looking like a bust)

Dorsett (TBD)

 

Yeah I'm with you I don't think he's a bad player it's just he got drafted to a team with one of the deepest WR corps in the league and is going to have a hard time finding his way on the field.  

 

If I'm picking a first rounder I want to see him at the least contributing as a rookie and starting by year 2 min.  We don't know when Dorsett is going to start. . . Malcom Brown on the other hand was likely a day 1 starter.  

 

But I also am becoming afraid that we're investing heavily into having a "star wars offense" and not putting much investment in our defense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you talking about?

 

Are you under the impression he's not going to play WR in 3 and 4 WR sets?

 

That's what he was drafted for.     The ST return stuff is an added bonus.

 

If you think he's not going to play a fair amount of WR,   I think you're going to be surprised.    Whether that's good or bad is completely up to you.    But he's going to play WR a fair amount.

 

I'm surprised you don't know this..........

 

This year I don't see him getting in much except in 3rd and long situations in 4 WR sets.  You don't spend a 1st rounder on your #4 WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You realize I was responding to a person who speculated we'd trade Griff for a 3rd of 4th Round pick?

 

I wasn't inferring your post was incorrect. His value is nothing or at best a 7th. I was just saying IMO , it would be nothing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Griff, poor guy can't move up the depth chart when the Colts turn around signing Andre Johnson, draft a WR in the 1st, and still have Hilton & Moncrief and 2 stud TE's. lol

The writing is clearly on the wall

...the floor, the ceiling, the roof...

virtually no chance of him making it as WR. Gotta be our top gunner or something if he's going to make the 53, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This year I don't see him getting in much except in 3rd and long situations in 4 WR sets.  You don't spend a 1st rounder on your #4 WR.

 

You do realize they will play football in 2016 too, right?

 

And the belief that they won't get him time in anything but the situation you outlined above is pure nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This year I don't see him getting in much except in 3rd and long situations in 4 WR sets.  You don't spend a 1st rounder on your #4 WR.

no you spend it on a guy you think can be a future number two or number one depending on what the Colts do with Hilton. This pick is so much like the year they took Reggie it's not even funny. If this guy turns out anything like Reggie, who himself took a couple,of years to catch on as a starter, then it will be a good pick. Give it time not all draft picks have to be judged good or bust by the end of their rookie year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our offense is about having mismatches on every single snap. Dorsett will be an integral part of that, as will TY, AJ, DRM, Coby and Dwayne.

 

Exactly. Can you imagine the DB struggles with 2 TY Hiltons out there along with Andre Johnson and our monster TE's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So do you put Werner in our top 3 or 4 LB? We took him #1

Nope. Werner is going into his 3rd yr I believe and has shown me nothing. Newsome out shined him last year. Now bring in Cole and his snaps are being reduced. I don't expect much from Werner this year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TY, DRM and Allen on the field for a few snaps, rotate in Dorsett, Fleener and AJ...what defense could possibly keep up with that.

one that can get to the QB and take advantage of our line. I am glad we have Andrew who can move but the line has to hold up to give luck time to use those weapons. While I think the line should be better I am waiting to see it on the field.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

one that can get to the QB and take advantage of our line. I am glad we have Andrew who can move but the line has to hold up to give luck time to use those weapons. While I think the line should be better I am waiting to see it on the field.

 

They're gonna have to utilize some screens and other quick release throws to neutralize teams with strong pass rush talent. I for one would love to see Dorsett catching bubble screens with 3 blockers out in front of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're gonna have to utilize some screens and other quick release throws to neutralize teams with strong pass rush talent. I for one would love to see Dorsett catching bubble screens with 3 blockers out in front of him.

thats good but still to take full advantage of the weapons your line has to hold up to let Luck read the defense. You can't run screens and quick throws all game every gsme or teams will adjust.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This year I don't see him getting in much except in 3rd and long situations in 4 WR sets.  You don't spend a 1st rounder on your #4 WR.

 

Perhaps I'm not following your meaning.

 

Your first sentence says Dorsett is not going to play much.

 

Your second sentence says Dorsett IS going to play a lot.

 

Can you clarify?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps I'm not following your meaning.

 

Your first sentence says Dorsett is not going to play much.

 

Your second sentence says Dorsett IS going to play a lot.

 

Can you clarify?

 

Our #4 WR isn't going to play a lot.  We have 2 good TE's and RB's to factor in.  Plus usually an RB for checkdowns and picking up blitzes.  

 

They arn't going to be leaving Fleener and Allen on the sidelines to bring Dorsett in unless it's a 3rd and really long where Dorsett's speed might give us more of an advantage over having bigger bodied TE's.  (Who are more suited to underneath stuff)

 

If you start counting TE's in the mix then Dorsett is the #6 receiver at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is the 4th day of practice, they didn't actually practice on Sat. I also saw an article that said that the night practice was the first in pads.

 
 
 
FYI, this is what I was shown on another post.
 
 

This would be true of the Colts, according to the NFL training camp rules.  But other teams started earler, so can be in day 4 before the Colts are.  Here's the rules-

 

Day 1: Limited to physical examinations, meetings, and classroom instruction; no on-field activities other than running and conditioning

Day 2-3: No contact permitted, no pads worn (This means no pads until Tuesday for the Colts)

Day 4 and on: Two-a-day practices permitted with following rules:

    Players may be on the field for a total of no more than 4 hours per day;

    Players may participate in no more than 1 padded practice per day, which shall be no longer than 3 hours of on-field activities;

    There must be at least a 3 hour break after the practice, and the second practice on the same day may only be for a maximum of the remaining available on-field time,  and shall be limited to only "walk-through" instruction (i.e., no helmets, full-speed pre-snap, and walking pace after the snap).

    The three-hour limit on padded practices shall begin as soon as position coaches begin to coach players on the field.

    In the event that a Club begins a padded practice but such practice is cancelled within sixty minutes of its commencement due to inclement weather or for any other reason beyond the Club's control, such practice shall not count as a padded practice

    A "padded practice" shall be defined as a practice in which players are required to wear helmets and shoulder pads, in addition to any other equipment required by the Club.

    It is not a padded practice if, 1) QBs, kickers, punters, and/or long snappers only wear helmets and/or shoulder pads during practice at the option of the player(s); 2) a player who suffered a head injury is directed by a club physician to wear a helmet as a precautionary measure; 3) the quarterback and/or the defensive player who receives signals from the coaching staff via helmet communication wear helmets during the team period in which helmets are used for such communication.

Film

Teams have to film all on-field activities, and maintain a copy of any film until 30 days after the start of the regular season. The NFLPA can review the films only upon the filing of a complaint alleging a violation the Article 23.

Expenses, per diem, room and board

A player's contract pays a base salary, but that base salary is generally only paid during the 17 weeks of the regular season. Players can request an alternate pay schedule, but for base salary, payment comes during the regular season.

During training camp, players receive compensation in a variety of ways. Section 2 of the Article provides that all players players will receive room and board during the pre­-season training camp. Additionally, if a player has not established residence in the team's city, the team has to provide housing between training camp and the Tuesday prior to the team's first regular season game.

Section 3 and 4 provide that all players will receive per diem payments starting the first day of training camp, and ending one week prior to the team's first regular season game. There is one rate for rookies and "first year" players, and another rate for veteran players. A "first year" player is a player who has not completed a season in which a year of "credited service" has been earned. Players on the practice squad would be an example of that. Rookies and first year players get a per diem at a weekly rate of $925, while veterans get a per diem at a weekly rate of $1,700.

Section 8 provides that the team will reimburse all players under contract for reasonable travel expenses incurred in reaching training camp from the players' residences. The players need to submit vouchers. If a player is released by the team, he will be reimbursed for their return trip to their residence, upon submission of vouchers

 

Thus, Day 4 of Colts camp is Tuesday, yes?  If it is at or beyond day 4 of cowboys camp, they can be in pads.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our #4 WR isn't going to play a lot.  We have 2 good TE's and RB's to factor in.  Plus usually an RB for checkdowns and picking up blitzes.  

 

They arn't going to be leaving Fleener and Allen on the sidelines to bring Dorsett in unless it's a 3rd and really long where Dorsett's speed might give us more of an advantage over having bigger bodied TE's.  (Who are more suited to underneath stuff)

 

If you start counting TE's in the mix then Dorsett is the #6 receiver at best.

 

I think he's going to play more than you think he's going to play.

 

He may not play as much as we want a #1 pick to play,  but more than a #4 WR or a #6 receiver in general might expect to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From where I'm sitting, and no disrespect meant, but to think the Colts can get anything for a 4th year guy that is at best a 4th or 5th receiver that has been BARELY able to make their roster, well, despite his very good hands and all the rooting for the under dog that fans like to do, fact is the Whalen is a marginal player. I would be utterly shocked if any team would give up anything for him.

I like Griff and I like the work ethic he brings to the table, but I think he is a special teamer / emergency fill in at best. He's a guy that if he doesn't make the team now (which I don't think he will), he's a cut / put on waivers guy that some other team will maybe pick up, after he clears waivers. #harsh_truth

This is correct!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. Werner is going into his 3rd yr I believe and has shown me nothing. Newsome out shined him last year. Now bring in Cole and his snaps are being reduced. I don't expect much from Werner this year

So being a number one pick doesn't make you a top 3 or 4 talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This year I don't see him getting in much except in 3rd and long situations in 4 WR sets. You don't spend a 1st rounder on your #4 WR.

sure you do. If your first two options are questionable to be here three years from now. And he will probably pass moncrief on the depth chart by midseason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the line does not hold up all the receivers don't mean squat as Andrew will be watching from the hospital bed. Unfortunately, the line talent and ability does not match the skills firepower potential.    

 

That's what you guys were yelling last year and he passed for close to 5000 yards.  The pass blocking will be fine, the run blocking is what needs and looks to be improving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the line does not hold up all the receivers don't mean squat as Andrew will be watching from the hospital bed. Unfortunately, the line talent and ability does not match the skills firepower potential.

Stop with the offensive line bashing. Yes, it's not the best in the league, we get that. But Andrew Luck is also part of that problem. There's plays when the offensive line does their jobs but he holds the ball entirely too long instead of throwing the ball away

Hopefully with all these weapons that stops

:rantoff:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It depends on how good AR will be, if he is good we can win 11 with the help of another great player, we won 9 with Minshew, should have been 10. 
    • Gotta have a trade partner.Big ? Is would Arizona trade back that far knowing they’re gonna miss out on one of those top 3 Wr’s.I would also call New England and Los Angeles too.I don’t see MHJ getting past the 4th pick unless a Minnesota or Denver trades up for one of those top QB’s.I also don’t see the Giants if they stay put at 6 not taking Nabors I think that’s who they got they’re eyes on with that pick.
    • I think this probably isn't an objective viewpoint. I think you want fireworks, and you're an eternal optimist. Nothing wrong with that, but I think a more practical viewpoint is to acknowledge that taking huge chances isn't exactly a recipe for success. (You're going to point to examples that worked out; I'm going to counter with twice as many that failed.)   The bolded especially. First, it seems like you chose 11 games because you feel like that's the target to keep up with the Texans. Second, I don't think the Colts are one player away from keeping up with the top tier of the AFC. I think a lot has to go right for the Colts to be in the mix with the Chiefs, etc. I said at the beginning of the offseason, I think we're still one draft class away from being in those discussions.   But if you can talk yourself into one guy being the answer, just one playmaker holds the key for the Colts to be in contention, then yeah, identify your favorite prospect and bang the table for the Colts to do whatever they have to to get that player. That would be awesome for us. But I think the reason Ballard doesn't do that is because it's flawed team building (historically speaking), not because he's afraid.. You can promise steak dinners based on your hunches, but that's not exactly how I want the GM to make decisions.
    • Even in 2021 draft Chase was selected 5th by the Bengals, best move they have ever made. That gave Burrow gigantic help. They did the right thing and got Burrow what he needed. 
  • Members

    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 4,231

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Lifetime Colt

      Lifetime Colt 154

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 13,755

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Gigc

      Gigc 565

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,089

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 41,394

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rockywoj

      rockywoj 1,762

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Btown_Colt

      Btown_Colt 1,290

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lester

      lester 269

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 1,192

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...