Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

The Colts should've drafted Tevin Coleman


Recommended Posts

If you're gonna swing on offense, you mine as well have made it a can't miss player like Coleman. He's going to do wonders down in ATL. Can you imagine the great play-action the Colts could've got going with Coleman in the backfield? I can't even believe Coleman lasted that long on the board. While I think either TJ Yeldon or Melvin Gordon are the two most talented backs that were drafted this year, I think Coleman going 73rd is laughable. This year's WR class was DEEP. So deep that Sammie Coates went 87th. The Colts could easily have gotten a quality WR later in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If you're gonna swing on offense, you mine as well have made it a can't miss player like Coleman. He's going to do wonders down in ATL. Can you imagine the great play-action the Colts could've got going with Coleman in the backfield? I can't even believe Coleman lasted that long on the board. While I think either TJ Yeldon or Melvin Gordon are the two most talented backs that were drafted this year, I think Coleman going 73rd is laughable. This year's WR class was DEEP. So deep that Sammie Coates went 87th. The Colts could easily have gotten a quality WR later in the draft.

That's not necessarily true. Quality wide receivers are hard to find in the late rounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steelers:

Antonio Brown, Martavis Bryant, Sammie Coates, Leveon Bell.

Coates stinks! He's a one trick pony. He was good for a deep ball or two per game at auburn then the easy routes like slants and all he dropped most of the time. He stinks. Dorsett is 10x better and I don't even like the Dorsett pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same here. Robinson has a higher ceiling than Coleman who is a bit overrated IMO.

He gets so much hype cause UI stinks at football so if you're the bright spot on a poop team, you get hype cause you're the only reason to watch the team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're gonna swing on offense, you mine as well have made it a can't miss player like Coleman. He's going to do wonders down in ATL. Can you imagine the great play-action the Colts could've got going with Coleman in the backfield? I can't even believe Coleman lasted that long on the board. While I think either TJ Yeldon or Melvin Gordon are the two most talented backs that were drafted this year, I think Coleman going 73rd is laughable. This year's WR class was DEEP. So deep that Sammie Coates went 87th. The Colts could easily have gotten a quality WR later in the draft.

 

 

So who (just for the record) would you have taken at 1.29 ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He gets so much hype cause UI stinks at football so if you're the bright spot on a poop team, you get hype cause you're the only reason to watch the team

 

It's pretty obvious to anyone who knows anything about football how talented Coleman is. And he went to a great offensive team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty obvious to anyone who knows anything about football how talented Coleman is. And he went to a great offensive team.

"Great offensive team" :funny::spit:

What was their record last year? Were they in the top 25 for offense?

No, they weren't

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is exactly what I needed to convince myself to take a break from the forum for a bit.

See you all again when things become a bit more thought provoking...

See, I have that same thought but I know there's a lot of forum members on here that only have this forum as their means for :colts: news and since I follow most of the Colts reporters on twitter I get on here to share the news. I figure it's the least I can do, gotta be considerate you know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See, I have that same thought but I know there's a lot of forum members on here that only have this forum as their means for :colts: news and since I follow most of the Colts reporters on twitter I get on here to share the news. I figure it's the least I can do, gotta be considerate you know?

I agree. The news has been on the decline lately and it opens things up to these trolly type posts. Training camp is not that far away. Maybe I will post something that I thought about posting a day or two ago and didn't get around to it. For now, I have to go get something to drink. BRB!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even close

Good argument, I suppose your next argument will involve Colemans fantastic numbers and his long darting runs as means to validate how good you believe he was......and admittedly they are fantastic numbers and there was many long runs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a tiny receiver

 

Nice defection.  Put up who you would have drafted so we can revisit and have at good laugh at your expense. So far you have given yourself the leeway of about 230 players .. could you narrow that down a bit ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Downs broke out in year one. He has incredible quickness off the line, and is fast enough to take most any match up deep. He also sees holes in the  zones instantly, he is a great slot. We do have all the necessary receiving weapon to exploit a D. Of course a 3rd WR that plays fast would be a great add. 3rd rd makes sense.  
    • I don't think the defense is the same old. For starters, our defense is no longer undersized, and doesn't struggle against the run.   If the Colts draft a man coverage corner in the first round, it will signal a major departure from the previous way of doing things, and it probably means Gus Bradley is gone after this season. I'm not against any of that happening. I just don't expect it, based on the established pattern.   As for what Ballard said in his presser, he also acknowledged that the expected top three boundary corners were unavailable for most of the season. Brents was our highly drafted rookie, and only played 9 games; Flowers played four games; Rodgers was released. That left us with rookies and journeyman playing corner most of the season. With Brents in Year 2 and hopefully healthy, Flowers back and healthy, another year in for Jaylon Jones, that gives Bradley a lot more to work with in the secondary. And I think that's more what Ballard was implying with his comments. Otherwise, he probably would have signed a veteran corner already.
    • Are you going to tell me that I haven’t heaped tons of thanks on you?   How many times have I said thank you and that you are way too kind with your praise?  The answer is many.   I’m sorry you seem not to remember those moments.     Sorry about the headache.  The feeling was mutual.  
    • That has always been my issue going back to the Polian years. They preferred undersized players to fit this scheme. That was great when they had a lead and played indoors. The problem  is that teams started running the ball to keep Peyton on the bench. Plus, u get in bad weather and on grass, their speed is negated and they are just a bunch of undersized players getting blown off the ball. I am in favor of building a team that can play in any environment and that can run various schemes. I see flexibility with the offence, however the D is the same old. That's why I think this is an important draft defensively. Will the Colts stray from their previous tendancies of drafting players that fit the Seattle scheme or will they deviate and say draft a man corner? Last year we were all on the edge of our seats when a trade was made at 3. Will we get our qb at 4? We were all on pins and needles till they made that pick. This draft has that same excitement for me. At 15 will Ballard and company do something different? This team needs a play maker on D and I contend that is their biggest need. I don't believe they get that player moving back.  Sure u may get him at 15 but if u really want a playmaker, this just might be the year to say move up and get a guy like Mirchell and Latu who may fall because of the medical. I am not in favor of getting a wr or te. Richardson, if he is the guy, should deliver explosive plays with our current roster.  Jot a fan of Gus and this scheme, but I really don't think he has a lot to work with and Ballard kind of eluded to that in his post season pressers.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...