Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Mike Adams says Colts D didn't get enough respect


RockThatBlue

Recommended Posts

My thoughts are coaching and the inability of the offense to do anything at all in that game had as much to do with it as anything. NE made adjustments and steam rolled us in the second half.

 

It was 17-7 at the half and we had gifted them points with the Cribbs fumble the decision to try a 51 yard fg in that weather at Foxboro, led to short fields Brady cashed them in for TD's I am pretty sure a questionable roughing the passer call was in there somewhere as well.

 

The offense had 17 first downs and 200 total yards. That was a team effort to get killed in that game. Lost the turnover battle 3-1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh....I think everyone knew it would be a close game. They did play great in that game but playing an injured Manning who clearly was laboring in his throws I don't think it was a shock the world moment. I expected us to win that game based off of Denvers OL issues and Peytons injury and the fact that JT that torched us week 1 had already dissappeared at that point in the season from his little nagging injuries. I WAS surprised how well we protected Luck and how dumb Del Rio was for putting Talib on TY when everyone with even half a brain would have put their best cover corner in Harris on him.

 

That all said nobody remembers the runner up....you have to FINISH THE JOB. People are always going to remember how we got rolled by the Patriots and no one cares about the Bengals or Broncos. Just like no one really cares that Denvers offense was one of the greatest of all time in 2013 but how they finished against the Seahawks. Just like Patriots in 2007 and the flop they put up against the Giants. Mike....finish the job...you will get all the credit you desire!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Denver didn't give the Colt's defense enough respect and probably thought that they had it in the bag. Teams like New England probably don't have any respect for the Colts and probably still won't this coming season until the Colts finally beat them. Being consistent is the really huge issue that Mike Adams needs to realize. Sure he may be doing his job, but a few other players may be slipping or just flat out had a bad game. Have to keep that momentum going through each game and maintain consistency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get his point. The defense held Denver's dangerous offense to 13 points, in Denver, and all the talk was about how Peyton Manning was hurt, possibly done, etc. Even I spent more time talking about how terrible Denver's gameplan was (on both sides). I think the defense deserved a head nod. They get talked about badly when they play bad; they should get some credit when they play well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could make the case that the opposite is true and our D got too much respect.  People, including myself, thought the New England game would be a close one.  Many analysts were saying we were finally ready to beat the Pats; they respected our team and our defense enough to say it would be a close game.  Then we got blown out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is correct. They executed wonderfully.

 

This defense isn't bad... the Patriots are very good at exposing their weaknesses, but their weaknesses our lessening season on season. Next year, we will have a better pass rush and better run defense (even though our run defense wasn't awful). We still need to solve our lack of ability to cover the middle of the field... but one weakness is not as bad as three (or two and a half).

 

Our defense will be good next year barring major injuries, rest assured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean he is right about the Denver win but when that same defense lays down the next week...... Adams is a vet who should know a team is defined by its last game and when that game is not competitive for almost 3 Quarters what does he expect? Again...maybe if the Colts actually were competitive against NE but there has been no competition

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the logic here is that the defense shouldn't get credit because Denver was gifted possessions, of which the defense also defended? Ok.

Also chances are that the strategy changes if Sanders catches the deep pass. Crazy, I know. The bus to what-if-ville will never arrive.

No, the logic is they don't deserve any credit. They've done nothing to earn it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, the logic is they don't deserve any credit. They've done nothing to earn it

 

And that's exactly what his point is. Your comment couldn't be any more wrong.

 

The Broncos averaged 30+ points a game in the last month of the season. The scored 28+ 10 times throughout the season. And in Denver, our defense held them to 13 points. They deserve credit for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, the logic is they don't deserve any credit. They've done nothing to earn it

Right. I mean getting to the AFC Championship game was a fluke-i-fied accidental mistake waiting to happen after 18 games. Why would the defense ("No, the logic is they don't deserve any credit. They've done nothing to earn it.") extract any supportive accolades from fans with that logical reasoning?

Please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that's exactly what his point is. Your comment couldn't be any more wrong.

 

The Broncos averaged 30+ points a game in the last month of the season. The scored 28+ 10 times throughout the season. And in Denver, our defense held them to 13 points. They deserve credit for that.

He doe not listen to logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right. I mean getting to the AFC Championship game was a fluke-i-fied accidental mistake waiting to happen after 18 games. Why would the defense ("No, the logic is they don't deserve any credit. They've done nothing to earn it.") extract any supportive accolades from fans with that logical reasoning?

Please.

You don't deserve credit when you get washed up the following week.

This ain't kindergarten, not getting a juice box for doing good one time. Do it consistently, then you can look for respect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that's exactly what his point is. Your comment couldn't be any more wrong.

The Broncos averaged 30+ points a game in the last month of the season. The scored 28+ 10 times throughout the season. And in Denver, our defense held them to 13 points. They deserve credit for that.

Nope, means nothing. Defense plays top flight one week, pop warner level the next. You don't deserve credit for being inconsistent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't deserve credit when you get washed up the following week.

This ain't kindergarten, not getting a juice box for doing good one time. Do it consistently, then you can look for respect

C'mon, man. Surely you jest. Going to the AFC Championship game is 'inconsistent" ? Respect? I guarantee you the Colts had a plethora of respect _after_ the crushing loss to the Patriots across the NFL and its fans. Blowouts happen. Do you want me to list all the losses suffered by great teams that should've gone to Super Bowls ? Be fair. Games like that occur ... pure and simple ... whether it's defense or offense that falters, or both.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean I guess. It didn't help they got blown out the next week. 

I've posted this a number of times: The defense played solid that game until about midway through the 3rd Q. The offense put them in a bad way because they were constantly going 3 and out and the defense was gassed by about halftime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, means nothing. Defense plays top flight one week, pop warner level the next. You don't deserve credit for being inconsistent

Are you honestly telling me that if our D was terrible in an (fictional) AFCCG, but we still managed to win somehow, and then we went to the superbowl and held a Peyton Manning lead team (also fictional) to 13 points and we won that you wouldnt be saying they deserved credit for it?.....

Please.... you would be fawning over their ability to turn it around and produce when they had to etc etc etc..... 

The door swings both ways man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who keep wanting to bring up how bad the defense was in the New England game, mind telling me how great the offense was? Luck and the OFFENSE was * poor the ENTIRE game. The offense had how many short/3 and out drives? Lets not mention the turnovers. The defense is eventually going to wear down when it keeps being put back on the field over and over.

Blame can't be placed solely on one side (Defense) when the other was just as bad if not worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally doesn't matter if Peyton was hurt. During the playoffs everyone is playing hurt with something. Because if was Manning an excuse was made up. If anything that should be noted is in 2013 the first time we played Denver at home. Our defense gave teams the "blue print" on beating the Broncos. We played them first and played physical against their WR's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that the defense didn't have their flaws, but our run game was a big part of all those

three and outs that helped on wearing down the defense.

 

Build the schtoinking lines and everything falls into place. We will have a run game to

keep drives going and our defense would stop the run and cause more 3 and outs

from the opposition.

 

This isn't rocket science folks......it starts and ends in the trenches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, means nothing. Defense plays top flight one week, pop warner level the next. You don't deserve credit for being inconsistent

I want to see you walk up to one member of that defense and tell them what you said.  Your Pop Warner butt would get smashed.  :explode:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Any chance we take a OT with the 1st pick?
    • FWIW:   Today I listened to a guy from The Athletic interviewed on ESPN.   (Darren Lee). He said interviewing GMs at the combine, almost all view DeJean as a safety except two teams.  He thinks the Colts and Jags view DeJean as a corner.     I don’t know this reporter, never seen him before, so I can’t speak to his credibility.  But it sounds like he did a lot of homework.     And I appreciate your view on pro day times being reliable or not.   I’m always skeptical on pro days.  But I thought DeJean helped himself on his testing.  
    • I could care less what he does. Been too long ago.
    • I’m with ya..     I'm not sure we’re going WR at 15 either.  I think we could go DE, and it’s possible we could go CB as well.   Gosh,  I love Mitchell and really like Arnold as well.  And if we trade back I would be fine with McKinstry or a DE on defense or one of the 2nd tier of WRs that could be there in the 20’s.  So many options.   I keep reminding myself, every pick could produce a surprise, because I think Ballard will have so many options to choose from.      Im also not sure Ballard will use all 7 rounds.   He finished in 5 rounds in his first draft 2017,  and he finished in 6 rounds in 2019.   Maybe he uses all 7 rounds, but I’m not confident we will.     One week from tonight.   
    • My Final Mock Draft   15. Brock Bowers, TE,  6’4 245 Lbs, Georgia - Blue Chip Prospect.  Rare combination of acceleration, speed and body control. Hands-catcher operating with good coordination and technique. With Pittman on the outside Bowers will control the middle of the field and seams. AR Will develop much quicker into a top 10 QB with Bowers as his TE.  46. TJ Tampa, CB, 6’1, 190 Lbs, Iowa State - Elite physical traits. Plays with good positioning throughout routes. Very good in press Coverage and Zone. Expect him to compete in training camp and be named a starter.      82. Calen Bullock, S, 6’2 190 lbs, USC - Elite physical traits. He has the range to play single-high safety, the athleticism to line up over the slot and the ball skills to chalk up impressive on-ball production. Expect him to compete in training camp for the starting S position.    117. Tez Walker,  WR,  6’2 195 Lbs, UNC - Elite speed with very good body control. Career average of 30.7 yards on touchdown receptions. Gives us very good depth and competition with Pierce.    151. Grayson Murphy, DE, 6’3 260 Lbs, UCLA - Shows impressive quickness and change of direction to help turn speed to power as a rusher. Good depth.    191.  Keaton Bills, G, 6’5 320 Lbs, Utah - Cerebral player, quick to react to twists and stunts up front. Very good depth. 
  • Members

    • Goatface Killah

      Goatface Killah 2,000

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 200

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,089

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tdblue17

      tdblue17 6

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C_Lew

      C_Lew 176

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,110

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Robert Johnson

      Robert Johnson 206

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts52761

      colts52761 90

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheEdgeis1

      TheEdgeis1 74

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 473

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...