Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

How much trade value does boom herron have?


12isthenew18

Recommended Posts

And why would we trade Boom when he is the most productive back from last season on the current roster? Makes no sense whatsoever

Frank Gore

Zurlon Tipton

Vick Ballard

Would be the group if Boom got traded. Who in their right mind would keep Ballard over Boom?

:scorebad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Washing machine an a bag of golf balls .. Why trade him ? Why did we even resign him .. Fumble machine did he rush for 100 yards in a game this season ? Nope he didn't .. I'd prefer karlos Williams from fsu on the later rounds

So a RB can't have a good game if he doesn't rush for 100 yds? Makes sense. Anyone who watched the playoffs knows he was a big part of those wins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Chucklez, He does not have any trade value but he will be an important cog in our running back rotation. This all depends too if Ballard comes in healthy. He is well rested

I'd love nothing more than for Ballard to come back healthy and play like he did in his rookie season, but you have to be realistic about a guy coming off of two straight season ending non contact injuries.

If he came back like he played in his rookie season and we had the 1-2 punch of Gore and Ballard with Boom as the change of pace back that can hit you for 50 yards, then suddenly our RB depth chart looks almost as good as anyone's in the NFL... But that is a big big ask... I dont expect anything more than for Ballard to maybe beat out Tipton for the 3rd string role and that is if he is healthy enough at all.... I wouldnt be shocked if we had to let him go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never understood it..... wanna trade the players who actually produce, but want the ones who don't/didn't produce to stay on the team. Smh, backwards

I agree with you on that.

Why the hell would you trade a player who's working just fine and cheaply in your system... some people need to put the madden game away....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A conditional 7 is the best we could hope for.    Otherwise,  no trade value.

 

The biggest problem is you're looking at one of the best and deepest classes of running backs the NFL has seen in a very, very long time.

 

There are "Boom level" RB's down to the 6th round and maybe beyond that as well.

 

That makes trading a guy like Boom almost impossible.

 

Besides,  no need to trade him.   Depth is always a good thing and he could still be 3rd string.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you on that.

Why the hell would you trade a player who's working just fine and cheaply in your system... some people need to put the madden game away....

 

nah, they don't need to put the Madden game away...then they'll have more free time to start more threads like this.  They DO need to stop trying to apply Madden to real life though . lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have no other young RB with potential.

 

Therefore, if he was worth a draft pick, then we should keep him

                  if he is not worth a draft pick, then the thread is pointless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Once players think you have the right coach and a franchise quarterback everything changes.  Night turns into daylight.
    • That would be a typical Falcon move... Lol !   Verse is a nice player but to me you absolutely take the player from Alabama who's a one man wrecking crew.   The SEC is a much tougher conference as well.  No disrespect to FSU which is playing in a much softer conference.   However, if the Falcons bit on Verse, Turner could fall to 15.
    • I don’t think he’s fairly being judged here. There’s been reports every single year that we were the high bidder and yet lost out. I truly think most of that comes down to the fact we really don’t have much to offer in terms of things not counting as salary. No franchise QB proven yet, no bikini clad babes or beaches, income tax etc. 
    • I have macro, philosophical pushback, which is basically covered in this article: "The draft is an absolute petri dish for every cognitive bias underneath the sun." "Teams massively overestimate their abilities to delineate between stars and flops, and because of that they overvalue the 'right to choose' in the draft." "'I firmly do not believe you trade a high pick, which is going to be a difference-maker, in order to pick up two picks,' he (Polian) said. "But that's the issue, one former NFL executive pointed out. That logic assumes the player you're initially picking will actually become a difference-maker." "'The problem for everyone in sports is that nobody wants to admit how random and arbitrary it is,' the former NFL executive said. 'Admitting that it's arbitrary takes away from your specific abilities.'" So my pushback is that talking yourself into a specific player is inherently risky. Ask the Panthers. Doesn't mean you can't be right, but I think if you analyze the results of trade-ups for prospects, there's no consistent success. You can tell me all day long that MHJ and Nabers are the best prospects of the last five years -- and I don't necessarily disagree -- but the truth is that no one really knows what they'll become in the NFL. And the way we talk about our favorite prospects doesn't accurately reflect that reality. We're all guilty at times of talking about these guys like they're locks, but history tells us that anyone can bust, at any spot in the draft.   My more specific pushback is that I think the way this year's draft is expected to go at the top will result in the Colts still having a great menu of options available at #15, and they can still get a prospect they really like who has playmaker potential without trading up. Especially if you're eyeing a WR. So as much as I would love to have one of the top three receivers, I don't see the value in moving up this year. (And I'll admit a personal bias: I love Brian Thomas Jr, and think we'd be in great shape if we drafted him at #15.)
  • Members

    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,097

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,117

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 6,515

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 20,579

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 8,950

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,726

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DattMavis

      DattMavis 290

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PRnum1

      PRnum1 3,082

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...