Colts dangerous team for Demarco Murray also among best landing spots for Ndamukong Suh

[NBColtsFanatic]

http://teamstre.am/1EHFIQHFox Sports. D.Murray

http://teamstre.am/1K9UzbpBleacher Report. N.Suh

Both rumors or just not guaranteed.

I don't want Murray at all, Suh is intriguing.

Thoughts?

[BProland85]

Yeah don't want a RB when we could just draft one in this good class.

[BigQandTheManiac]

Idk what it is about Murray but i just don't see him being all that good next season.

[Dark Superman]

Murray is more likely, but I'll never count Grigson out of any signing.

[CR91]

please no murray. rbs that get 400 touches are useless

[wesd2890]

Lol.. people are funny.. you guys would rather draft an unproven player over a dominant player yet to be in his prime.. Murray would vastly improve this team

[COLTS449]

I really hope we don't even consider Murray. We can get his clone in the 2nd round (Coleman). Suh, Oh yes. Please Grigs sign this beast. Suh would single handedly turn our defense around 360 degrees IMO. We'd still need a couple other pieces, but we really need a guy like Suh. Then if Mathis comes back healthy, and Newsome keeps getting better, we could conceivably have 3 game wreckers in the front 7.

[CanuckColt]

please no murray. rbs that get 400 touches are useless

Yeah, Murray is all set up for an injury-filled season with low production when he does play.

[TKnight24]

please no murray. rbs that get 400 touches are useless

He wouldn't get 30+ touches here cause we have other weapons. He'll just be here to be a threat out the backfield so teams like the Patriots can stop whooping us by playing coverage all game cause they know we can't run!

[CanuckColt]

Yeah Grigs, go get Suh ...and forget those 3 average+ bums you were gonna spend these millions on.

[wig]

Murray is a perfect example of buying high. He just got abused from an overworked year behind the best line in the NFL.

[CR91]

He wouldn't get 30+ touches here cause we have other weapons. He'll just be here to be a threat out the backfield so teams like the Patriots can stop whooping us by playing coverage all game cause they know we can't run!

 

400 touches means injuries and lack luster production. we're not gonna get the same murray

[Derakynn]

I would be very upset of we signed Murray.

[mattceinicram]

Demarco Murray will not produce nearly as much as he did at Dallas without that O-line

[mattceinicram]

I really hope we don't even consider Murray. We can get his clone in the 2nd round (Coleman). Suh, Oh yes. Please Grigs sign this beast. Suh would single handedly turn our defense around 360 degrees IMO. We'd still need a couple other pieces, but we really need a guy like Suh. Then if Mathis comes back healthy, and Newsome keeps getting better, we could conceivably have 3 game wreckers in the front 7.

4 if you count Art Jones

[danlhart87]

I really hope we don't even consider Murray. We can get his clone in the 2nd round (Coleman). Suh, Oh yes. Please Grigs sign this beast. Suh would single handedly turn our defense around 360 degrees IMO. We'd still need a couple other pieces, but we really need a guy like Suh. Then if Mathis comes back healthy, and Newsome keeps getting better, we could conceivably have 3 game wreckers in the front 7.

you mean 180 not 360

[COLTS449]

you mean 180 not 360

 

LOL, yeah I guess. I meant like all the way around. LOL.

[Nobody]

If we signed Murray it would have to be for no more than $4million

[The Peytonator]

I'll be honest, I'm pleasantly surprised so many people here are against signing Murray.

 

I echo the sentiment.

[esmort]

Lol.. people are funny.. you guys would rather draft an unproven player over a dominant player yet to be in his prime.. Murray would vastly improve this team

 

You mean people would rather draft a fresh running back, from a deep running back class, for a fraction of the cost .... over an injury prone RB who was used hard last season, and will want a huge contract .... you're right what is everyone thinking ... "people are funny" 

[aaron11]

Demarco Murray will not produce nearly as much as he did at Dallas without that O-line

maybe, maybe not.  he averaged 4.7 ypc.

 

bradshaw was 4.7

 

herron was 4.5

 

granted murray did it with more carries

[corgi]

I'll be honest, I'm pleasantly surprised so many people here are against signing Murray.

 

I echo the sentiment.

A lot of the forum seems to be against signing everybody though...

[oldunclemark]

I'd talk to Suh....see what he'd accept..understanding we'll have to pay Andrew, TY and the TEs soon

[Patagonia Chris]

If you look at the other 9 RB's in history who have carried the ball as many times as DeMarco Murray has in a season their careers have never recovered afterwards. Many weren't 1,000 yards back ever again.

[bestQBever]

I'm glad most of you have the same opinion as I on Murray. He's just a product of that O line.

[MrNLM]

I would rather have Mark Ingram, Boom Herron, Vick Ballard(hopefully), and a rookie.

 

If we get Murray I will be so upset... then if he starts playing well I will go to the greener side of the pasture.

[nburgmei]

I'd be thrilled if we signed Murray...if we already had a proven offensive line for him to run behind...which we don't...so...don't like it.

[bestQBever]

I really hope we don't even consider Murray. We can get his clone in the 2nd round (Coleman). Suh, Oh yes. Please Grigs sign this beast. Suh would single handedly turn our defense around 360 degrees IMO. We'd still need a couple other pieces, but we really need a guy like Suh. Then if Mathis comes back healthy, and Newsome keeps getting better, we could conceivably have 3 game wreckers in the front 7.

Coleman is not Murrays clone. Coleman is an electric home run hitter. Murray isn't.

[Bulldog Colt]

Omar Kelly        ✔ @OmarKelly

Follow

Two names I've heard for Indianapolis. Frank Gore and CJ Spiller. Every good back is lining up to be with Andrew Luck. Colts are Lucky.

7:22 PM - 24 Feb 2015

[corgi]

Coleman is not Murrays clone. Coleman is an electric home run hitter. Murray isn't.

For the $ I guess I'd prefer Coleman, but I don't know if he will have the success everyone is thinking he will in the NFL. At least Murray has proved he can produce.

[dw49]

http://teamstre.am/1EHFIQHFox Sports. D.Murray

http://teamstre.am/1K9UzbpBleacher Report. N.Suh

Both rumors or just not guaranteed.

I don't want Murray at all, Suh is intriguing.

Thoughts?

 

 

No offense , but reports like that mean no more than some * like myself pointing out that the Colts have a lot of cap room and need a new #1 RB. It could be the furthest thing in Grigson's mind to use around 6+ mill of cap room on a RB. Nor do we know if he would even consider spending around 14-15 mill per year on a DT. So my thoughts , you ask for them , are those two links can be flushed down the toilet as they bring nothing that wasn't very obvious to the table. 

[Bbswatching]

I really hope we don't even consider Murray. We can get his clone in the 2nd round (Coleman). Suh, Oh yes. Please Grigs sign this beast. Suh would single handedly turn our defense around 360 degrees IMO. We'd still need a couple other pieces, but we really need a guy like Suh. Then if Mathis comes back healthy, and Newsome keeps getting better, we could conceivably have 3 game wreckers in the front 7.

So he would make our Defense exactly the same? I think you ment 180.  But I agree we should sign Suh.  And I would rather have Murry then an unproven Rb.  We need a real threat at rb.  Not another could be.

[Luck_Is_Skilled]

Melvin Gordon (Clap, Clap, Clap, Clap, Clap)

[COLTS449]

So he would make our Defense exactly the same? I think you ment 180.  But I agree we should sign Suh.  And I would rather have Murry then an unproven Rb.  We need a real threat at rb.  Not another could be.

 

LOL, yeah man I've already explained it, but yeah I meant like he would completely turn it around. So yeah 180. LOL.

[crazycolt1]

Lol.. people are funny.. you guys would rather draft an unproven player over a dominant player yet to be in his prime.. Murray would vastly improve this team

If you take a closer look at Murray's career I think he has had one season he hasn't missed time due to injury. That's going all the way back to high school. No thank you.

[JColts72]

I would rather have Mark Ingram, Boom Herron, Vick Ballard(hopefully), and a rookie.

 

If we get Murray I will be so upset... then if he starts playing well I will go to the greener side of the pasture.

U joking right? about wanting those backs you mentioned then Murray? Why the dislike for a top back. Folks there's no Faulk coming out of this draft. Give me a break about Boom/Ballard; they get high marks only because nobody wants to see Trent. Ballard has been injury-riddled and Boom coughs up the ball to much.

[colts_100nascar17fan]

No murray, he would suck behind this o-line. He needs a great line to be any good just like all rb's.

[JColts72]

A lot of the forum seems to be against signing everybody though...

Yeah why go after Suh too? Too good of a stud player. Does not fit the soft D Colts are famous for.

[Coltswarriors]

I would MUCH rather have AP if he's cut.

[bestQBever]

For the $ I guess I'd prefer Coleman, but I don't know if he will have the success everyone is thinking he will in the NFL. At least Murray has proved he can produce.

I could step in and get 3 yards a carry behind that O line. Not saying Murray is bad, but he may as well be unproven considering the drastic drop off between the cowboys line and ours.