Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Team of the Decade


JerodMayo51

Recommended Posts

I'm not getting the ugly kid thing at all. If the Colts are ugly , what does it make the teams that didn't even make the playoffs ?

 

You know your fellow colts fans are trying to claim that this thread was started in an effort to gloat about a team's success.   And that one should not gloat on a forum.

 

Then you come along within a few hours and come out with a comment pointing out that some teams don't even make the playoffs, and direct that comment directly at a fan from one of those teams, and a division rival to boot.  :highfive2:

 

Priceless.   

 

It did not take more than a few hours for one of their own to violate a practice they are claiming should not happen on a forum board. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If you don't get it, best to stay out of it. It was a joke, even the poster I said it to thought it was funny. I meant no harm, I promise :)

 

 

I get it as you mean it as nothing you could ever say would go over my head. I just find it funny that a Houston fan would talk about the Colts being "ugly children." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know your fellow colts fans are trying to claim that this thread was started in an effort to gloat about a team's success.   And that one should not gloat on a forum.

 

Then you come along within a few hours and come out with a comment pointing out that some teams don't even make the playoffs, and direct that comment directly at a fan from one of those teams, and a division rival to boot.  :highfive2:

 

Priceless.   

 

It did not take more than a few hours for one of their own to violate a practice they are claiming should not happen on a forum board. 

Oh my you need to read the post ! it had nothing to do with any team at all .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know your fellow colts fans are trying to claim that this thread was started in an effort to gloat about a team's success.   And that one should not gloat on a forum.

 

Then you come along within a few hours and come out with a comment pointing out that some teams don't even make the playoffs, and direct that comment directly at a fan from one of those teams, and a division rival to boot.  :highfive2:

 

Priceless.   

 

It did not take more than a few hours for one of their own to violate a practice they are claiming should not happen on a forum board. 

 

 

I'm not the one that referred to the Colts as "ugly children" when I"m a Houston fan. Amazing you don't get it but what can I say ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think it's pretty much nonsense that NE's achievements had a lot to do with Spygate. However the guy that started this thread is troll like and this was no doubt started to rub out noses in the dirt. So if I can annoy him and his buddies by saying they are cheaters , it's my prerogative to do so. JJ as I said is a good guy but he used very poor judgment monitoring this thread in the manner he did. If there was something wrong going on here Nadine or another moderator would have taken care of it. I know I'm to suppose to be making these comments but I can use time off if need be.

Hey I was trying to keep things on track. For myself I was just reading the numbers (including the other teams).  I could have said nothing like I do most of the time and it would just end up people fighting going over the edge and getting locked. You know how it goes. I see that was a mistake :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get it as you mean it as nothing you could ever say would go over my head. I just find it funny that a Houston fan would talk about the Colts being "ugly children."

Yeah it flew right over your head. You want to be offended. Okay, so be it. Be offended. Ugly kids.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey I was trying to keep things on track. For myself I was just reading the numbers (including the other teams).  I could have said nothing like I do most of the time and it would just end up people fighting going over the edge and getting locked. You know how it goes. I see that was a mistake :)

 

 

If ever a thread needed to be locked its this one . My bad for calling you out as you really do never partake in any of this kind of nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not the one that referred to the Colts as "ugly children" when I"m a Houston fan. Amazing you don't get it but what can I say ?

Another one to go right over your head. He was saying you're being a hypocrite, that's what he was saying. I never called the Colts ugly kids either so stop lying.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it flew right over your head. You want to be offended. Okay, so be it. Be offended. Ugly kids.

Not offended nor do I think it flew over my head. If someone says "he came over to our forum and called our kids ugly" , I would assume the kids to mean our football team.. the Colts. So enlighten me and tell me what I;m missing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not the one that referred to the Colts as "ugly children" when I"m a Houston fan. Amazing you don't get it but what can I say ? 

 

I know you didn't but Basspapaw called them Ugly Kids (post #75), so what right does it give you to bring out the failures of the Texans when Basspapaw called the colts ugly kids?  I am confused.

 

Where is the connection between Basspapaw and the Houston Texans that allowed you to point out that they have not made the playoffs. 

 

Help me out here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another one to go right over your head. He was saying you're being a hypocrite, that's what he was saying. I never called the Colts ugly kids either so stop lying.

 

He made about as much sense as you do. Go ahead and tell me who the "ugly kids are ?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another one to go right over your head. He was saying you're being a hypocrite, that's what he was saying. I never called the Colts ugly kids either so stop lying.

Wow, This is crazy Im not sure who is the rival anymore, But you got my point, I thought everyone would. I spelled it out pretty clearly didnt I? Anyway Im just going to stay away, and hate the patriot cheaters in silence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey I was trying to keep things on track. For myself I was just reading the numbers (including the other teams).  I could have said nothing like I do most of the time and it would just end up people fighting going over the edge and getting locked. You know how it goes. I see that was a mistake :)

No problem JJ. I do think you gave me the ample time to voice my thoughts and opinion. It is nothing personal but it don't take a blind person to see the bait aspect of a lot of Patriot fans. They know very well before they make the post that it will stir the pot. It is done with that intention. It does seem that the Patriot fans are immune to being regulated as the Colt fans are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you didn't but Basspapaw called them Ugly Kids (post #75), so what right does it give you to bring out the failures of the Texans when Basspapaw called the colts ugly kids?  I am confused.

 

Where is the connection between Basspapaw and the Houston Texans that allowed you to point out that they have not made the playoffs. 

 

Help me out here?

Wow , it was not in reference to any team please read the post again . I guess i meant if you go looking for trouble in your enemies house,you will probably find it(trouble that is)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or because you're baiting and don't even know what Spygate was.

Why do you say this all the damn time? We can all use google as much as you can. We know what Spygate was, don't have to be a Patriots fan to know the truth. Just stop already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not offended nor do I think it flew over my head. If someone says "he came over to our forum and called our kids ugly" , I would assume the kids to mean our football team.. the Colts. So enlighten me and tell me what I;m missing

I dropped the whole thing and joked to make the tension die down. That's it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you didn't but Basspapaw called them Ugly Kids (post #75), so what right does it give you to bring out the failures of the Texans when Basspapaw called the colts ugly kids?  I am confused.

 

Where is the connection between Basspapaw and the Houston Texans that allowed you to point out that they have not made the playoffs. 

 

Help me out here?

 

Basspapaw stated that you don't come to another team's forum and call their kids ugly. I would take "kids " to mean the team of the fans . Quiz who is a texan fan made the comment if they are ugly , what can you do.. Something to that effect. If you think I made a huge leap to assume that the "ugly kids " would be the colts , then so be it. That said I would think you could make the correlation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dropped the whole thing and joked to make the tension die down. That's it.

 This whole thread has really become very stupid. I understand that you didn't really knock the Colts and it's no big deal what was or is meant by the ugly kid thing. Lets drop it and move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow , it was not in reference to any team please read the post again . I guess i meant if you go looking for trouble in your enemies house,you will probably find it(trouble that is)

 

oh man . . . you need to read what I was saying to DW49.

 

First, this thread has some colts fans claiming foul that a pats fan is trying to gloat regarding a certain fact about the pats and the colts fans are saying rivals should not gloat against their rivals.  Poor taste and all of that and so on and so on.

 

Second, you and Quizboy have a side conversation regarding forum etiquette in which you state "well if you go to someone's house and point out "X", there are going to be consequences."   Fair enough point taken.  Quizboy then makes a joke well then you should not have "X."  (i.e. emphasis on a joke and much less something you brought up).   Translation, Quizboy was making a joke that is your fault that you have X, but it reality is not as you could not help but have X, but that it why its a joke and we that little "lol" at the end of the post. 

 

Third, out of nowhere and specifically not addressing the conversation you and Quizboy where having about forum etiquette, DW49 then chimes in and gloats about the fact that the colts have made the playoffs and his rival team Texans have not with his comments.

 

Fourth, I just closed the loop by correctly pointing out that, like they say about glass houses, those who complain about gloating should not do it themselves, and it only took a few hours for one of your guys to violate that policy that was established by his brethren on the board.

 

Brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh man . . . you need to read what I was saying to DW49.

 

First, this thread has some colts fans claiming foul that a pats fan is trying to gloat regarding a certain fact about the pats and the colts fans are saying rivals should not gloat against their rivals.  Poor taste and all of that and so on and so on.

 

Second, you and Quizboy have a side conversation regarding forum etiquette in which you state "well if you go to someone's house and point out "X", there are going to be consequences."   Fair enough point taken.  Quizboy then makes a joke well then you should not have "X."  (i.e. emphasis on a joke and much less something you brought up).   Translation, Quizboy was making a joke that is your fault that you have X, but it reality is not as you could not help but have X, but that it why its a joke and we that little "lol" at the end of the post. 

 

Third, out of nowhere and specifically not addressing the conversation you and Quizboy where having about forum etiquette, and not letting it go, DW49 then chimes in and gloats about the fact that the colts have made the playoffs and his rival team Texans have not with his comments.

 

Fourth, I just closed the loop by correctly pointing out that, like they say about glass houses, those who complain about gloating should not do it themselves, and it only took a few hours for one of your guys to violate that policy that was established by his brethren on the board.

 

Brilliant.

OK?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh man . . . you need to read what I was saying to DW49.

 

First, this thread has some colts fans claiming foul that a pats fan is trying to gloat regarding a certain fact about the pats and the colts fans are saying rivals should not gloat against their rivals.  Poor taste and all of that and so on and so on.

 

Second, you and Quizboy have a side conversation regarding forum etiquette in which you state "well if you go to someone's house and point out "X", there are going to be consequences."   Fair enough point taken.  Quizboy then makes a joke well then you should not have "X."  (i.e. emphasis on a joke and much less something you brought up).   Translation, Quizboy was making a joke that is your fault that you have X, but it reality is not as you could not help but have X, but that it why its a joke and we that little "lol" at the end of the post. 

 

Third, out of nowhere and specifically not addressing the conversation you and Quizboy where having about forum etiquette, DW49 then chimes in and gloats about the fact that the colts have made the playoffs and his rival team Texans have not with his comments.

 

Fourth, I just closed the loop by correctly pointing out that, like they say about glass houses, those who complain about gloating should not do it themselves, and it only took a few hours for one of your guys to violate that policy that was established by his brethren on the board.

 

Brilliant.

 

 

I hardly was "gloating" about the Colts making the playoffs What a ridiculous stretch you are making. All I did was give him a little jab for poking a little fun at the Colts. Comparing what I said to the long legacy your guy posted and said I gloated like he did is really ridiculous. I mean fact is it's a little "risky" when you poke fun at someones team when your team is far below their team. Yeah... I should have let it go as Quiz really didn't men anything by it but you are really stretching it calling it gloating and comparable to that large pile of crap your guy posted. So grow up and get real

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here's what we have so far:

11 of the 12 Patriot balls were under inflated.

Rapaport and Schefter try to downplay it, to the point where Schefter says four times in one interview, There are people who think the Colts cheated by letting air out of the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem JJ. I do think you gave me the ample time to voice my thoughts and opinion. It is nothing personal but it don't take a blind person to see the bait aspect of a lot of Patriot fans. They know very well before they make the post that it will stir the pot. It is done with that intention. It does seem that the Patriot fans are immune to being regulated as the Colt fans are.

Fair enough and we'll discuss that for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not worth getting excited about. It's a pretty worthless viewpoint anyway.

One snap at the very end of one game placed the Patriots at the top of this list instead of at the Choker of the Decade list.

Any 'gloating' about this imaginary award is not worth getting vexed about.

Although I did notice our regular cry baby troll made a guest appearance yet again. What a surprise.

And nice to see a couple of mods having a little tussle. Pistols at dawn! All good fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huge kudos to you for putting JJ in his place. I like the guy but he really had no business monitoring this thread in the manner he did. If Colt fans needed to be put in their place , he should have let another moderator do it. Reasons for that are obvious. I also think he is taking offense to Colts fans referring to Spygate and deflation gate. Hard to pin it down but he makes reference to discussing this post with more "intelligence" and I think called it "baiting." If Colt fans want to put an * to NE achievements , that's their prerogative. They also have the right to take a different view to Spygate than what Virdulant has now posted for the 183rd time. I never saw him (JJ) step in and stop NE fans from making the case that Luck and Dalton were the same guy in that ridiculous thread a while back. That was every bit as much of a "bait" as Colt fans did in this thread.

It wasn't my intent to put him in his place. I did disagree with his viewpoint. He was speaking as a poster, not a mod; as someone who posts a lot and disagrees with people a lot, I don't think he's wrong to do that. I was also speaking as a poster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

then why destroy the evidence?

You mean the evidence shown at his press conference? Goodell said why.

Once again. The tapes were of what 80,000 people could all see.

That's ALL that was in the tapes. Goodell said so, BB had said so, etc.

Conspiracy theorists of the world unite !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you say this all the damn time? We can all use google as much as you can. We know what Spygate was, don't have to be a Patriots fan to know the truth. Just stop already.

Then why do so many of you misrepresent it? Heck, Adonis referred to a website claiming that the Patriots taped Jets' practices .
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the current standings for teams of this new decade:

 

 

 

Super Bowl Victories
t-1. New England Patriots (1)
t-1. Seattle Seahawks (1)
t-1. Baltimore Ravens (1)
t-1. Green Bay Packers (1)
t-1. New York Giants (1)

Conference Championships
t-1. New England Patriots (2)
t-1. Seattle Seahawks (2)
t-3. Baltimore Ravens (1)
t-3. Green Bay Packers (1)
t-3 New York Giants (1)

Conference Championship Game Appearances
1. New England Patriots (4)
t2. Seattle Seahawks (2)
t2. Baltimore Ravens (2)
t2. Green Bay Packers (2)
5. New York Giants (1)

Division Titles
1. New England Patriots (5)
2. Green Bay Packers (4)
3. Seattle Seahawks (3)

t4. Indianapolis Colts (2)

t4. Baltimore Ravens (2)


Playoff Wins
t1. New England Patriots (7)
t1. Baltimore Ravens (7)
t1. Seattle Seahawks (7)
4. Green Bay Packers (6)
5. New York Giants (4)

Playoff Appearances
t1. New England Patriots (5)
t1 Green Bay Packers (5)
t3. Baltimore Ravens (4)
t3. Seattle Seahawks (4)
4. Indianapolis Colts (3)

Regular Season Record
1. New England Patriots (63-17, .788)
2. Green Bay Packers (56-23-1, .706)
3. Baltimore Ravens (52-28, .650)
4. Seattle Seahawks (50-30, .600)
5. New York Giants (41-39, .513)

Point Differential
1. New England Patriots (+863, avg season +173, avg game +10.8)
2. Green Bay Packers (+573, avg season +115, avg game +7.2)
3. Seattle Seahawks (+402, avg season +80, avg game +5.0)
4. Baltimore Ravens (+328, avg season +66, avg game +4.1)
5. New York Giants (+17, avg season +3, avg game +0.2)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the current standings for teams of this new decade:

 

 

 

Super Bowl Victories

t-1. New England Patriots (1)

t-1. Seattle Seahawks (1)

t-1. Baltimore Ravens (1)

t-1. Green Bay Packers (1)

t-1. New York Giants (1)

Conference Championships

t-1. New England Patriots (2)

t-1. Seattle Seahawks (2)

t-3. Baltimore Ravens (1)

t-3. Green Bay Packers (1)

t-3 New York Giants (1)

Conference Championship Game Appearances

1. New England Patriots (4)

t2. Seattle Seahawks (2)

t2. Baltimore Ravens (2)

t2. Green Bay Packers (2)

5. New York Giants (1)

Division Titles

1. New England Patriots (5)

2. Green Bay Packers (4)

3. Seattle Seahawks (3)

4. Baltimore Ravens (2)

5. New York Giants (1)

Playoff Wins

t1. New England Patriots (7)

t1. Baltimore Ravens (7)

t1. Seattle Seahawks (7)

4. Green Bay Packers (6)

5. New York Giants (4)

Playoff Appearances

t1. New England Patriots (5)

t1 Green Bay Packers (5)

t3. Baltimore Ravens (4)

t3. Seattle Seahawks (4)

5. New York Giants (1)

Regular Season Record

1. New England Patriots (63-17, .788)

2. Green Bay Packers (56-23-1, .706)

3. Baltimore Ravens (52-28, .650)

4. Seattle Seahawks (50-30, .600)

5. New York Giants (41-39, .513)

Point Differential

1. New England Patriots (+863, avg season +173, avg game +10.8)

2. Green Bay Packers (+573, avg season +115, avg game +7.2)

3. Seattle Seahawks (+402, avg season +80, avg game +5.0)

4. Baltimore Ravens (+328, avg season +66, avg game +4.1)

5. New York Giants (+17, avg season +3, avg game +0.2)

Great stats. Hard to believe there have been 5 different SB champs this decade. That is pretty cool.

 

Pats are still the model of consistency too. The point differential is eye popping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One more stat to add to your list. Since their last SB win, here are the post-season records of the elite QBs.

 

Brady (last SB win previous to this year was 2004) - 12-8 (includes this season)

Rodgers (last SB win 2010) - 2-4

P. Manning (last SB win 2006) - 4-7

Brees (last SB win 2009) - 2-3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by Superman, March 2, 2015 - discussing a member of this site
Hidden by Superman, March 2, 2015 - discussing a member of this site

Yea seriously.. a lot of people would find these statistics interesting and useful

I'm sure you will be getting a vacation after this one. This thread was closed already

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...