Pick one

[gnet550]

If you could pick one free agent for the Colts to get who would it be and why?

I would choose Suh to give us the nastiness the defense lacks.

[21isSuperman]

Assuming we aren't looking realistically and not worrying about cost, either Dez Bryant or Revis

[BlueCollarColts]

Dez Bryant. 

[Scully]

Imagine Darelle Revis opposite Vontae Davis

[12isthenew18]

Imagine Darelle Revis opposite Vontae Davis

or mccourty and adams

[BProland85]

Dez Bryant...not even close. Suh is great, but is a few years older than Bryant. Our weapons for Luck would be ridiculous.

[coltsfanmurf]

Yeah I would have to agree.  If we are just saying $$ is no object, then I say Dez.  Realistically I would like McCourty or Dan Williams if $$ is right.

[UKColt13]

Dez. No contest. Dude is a beast.

[Dustin]

Suh

[Valpo2004]

Knighton . . . 

 

Really want to improve the D-line without Suh's troubles.

 

Dez will cost too much and I don't want to spend big money on a WR.  I think it's foolish actually.  Andrew Luck would set passing records and then have an early exit from the playoffs.  

 

We need to stop the run and we need to run the ball.  

 

Tom Brady beats us year after year after year after year because his team just runs the ball on us.

[ScissorMeTimbers]

Justin Houston.

[Iancolts]

Knighton Suh Fairley and Adrian Peterson

[Gavin]

Suh or Houston

[BOTT]

Suh

Can't believe people would rather have a high priced WR than a dominant defensive lineman.

[bertjones#1]

Suh ... Just because he's younger than Revis.

[John Dee]

I say Suh and honestly,....     If Irsay wants him I think this could very well happen,.     

 

The question is who is the team willing to sacrifice? 

 

I hate giving a DL not named Watt that kind of cheez but ....      he is the next best thing...  

 

I would do it.

[Devildog]

Suh

[wig]

Houston.

 

As for Suh, it would be ridiculous to give him a big contract unless we switched to a 34.

[Clem-Dog]

Houston.

As for Suh, it would be ridiculous to give him a big contract unless we switched to a 34.

I assume you meant 4-3 DT instead of 3-4 NT and I agree. There is a possibility he could fit as a 3-4 DE in our current scheme though. Regardless, if we brought in a defender of his caliber I'm pretty sure Chuck would adjust the front-7 around him.