Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Which NFL teams make it most difficult for their O-Line in Pass Pro?


AntonMcG

Recommended Posts

This is a very interesting analysis from Neil Hornsby at Pro Football Focus.

 

He has assessed which offenses ask the most of their offensive line in pass protection by considering the types of plays they run.

 

post-11362-0-52154700-1422479882_thumb.j

 

Based on these metrics, we are second only to the Titans on how much we ask our O-Line to do.

 

Whilst I don't believe this data is entirely conclusive, it does tell us that the limited talent on our o-line is not being compensated for as much as it could be. This, coupled with the ineffectiveness of our man-blocking in the run game, really show that there are fundamental schematic issues that are potentially hampering our offense.

 

Should we have had more three-step drops and quicker throws?

 

Should we incorporate more roll outs given Luck's athleticism? Seattle O-Line was asked to do the least and had by far and away the most roll-outs.

 

Discuss...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the stuff people were killing Bruce Arians for (me included) during the 2012 season.

Arians has left a trail of injured/beat up quarterbacks going back to Cleveland. Love the guy, but his lack of concern for the QB drives me nuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It certainly was. The one thing Hamilton has incorporate more of is checkdowns.

 

Part of this is Luck. He likes to hold the ball and sit in the pocket until the last minute, when he could be taking off and running. Sometimes he misses wide open guys on the backside of the play. Not dogging him, just saying, it's not all about the scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of this is Luck. He likes to hold the ball and sit in the pocket until the last minute, when he could be taking off and running. Sometimes he misses wide open guys on the backside of the play. Not dogging him, just saying, it's not all about the scheme.

I don't think Luck's decision making is factored in to these numbers. It is purely play design, unless Luck is taking extra steps back to buy more time (we both know he's not).

No question Luck likes to hold onto the ball, but a significant portion of that is down to play design and getting guys deep. I think these numbers prove that there are some real schematic questions to ask when talking about our o-Line effectiveness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Luck's decision making is factored in to these numbers. It is purely play design, unless Luck is taking extra steps back to buy more time (we both know he's not).

No question Luck likes to hold onto the ball, but a significant portion of that is down to play design and getting guys deep. I think these numbers prove that there are some real schematic questions to ask when talking about our o-Line effectiveness.

 

That's my fault. I assumed this was the time in the pocket / time to throw / time to sack chart from PFF, which I was looking at earlier today.

 

Now, having looked at it, you're right, the drop isn't really up to Luck (unless we're talking about plays he changes). I would combine both charts to come up with a better overall understanding of how teams ask their lines to pass block. I'd throw in the play action numbers, also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's my fault. I assumed this was the time in the pocket / time to throw / time to sack chart from PFF, which I was looking at earlier today.

 

Now, having looked at it, you're right, the drop isn't really up to Luck (unless we're talking about plays he changes). I would combine both charts to come up with a better overall understanding of how teams ask their lines to pass block. I'd throw in the play action numbers, also.

No question... effective play action would alleviate a lot of the pressure, but so would spending a bit of time looking at how Josh McDaniels builds a playbook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, we should have incorporated more short passes and 3 step drops. It was painful to watch during some of those games (the Pittsburgh one stands out) where the defense is blitzing like crazy and we can beat the blitz with a 3 step drop and a quick throw, but we didn't.

The failure to make teams pay for the blitz has drove me bananas. I don't know its a Luck thing or our offense but it happens often. You see other teams torch a D when trying to blitz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the numbers the Colts had significantly more drop backs than other teams and a higher percentage of 7 step drop backs.  You could argue that the Colts should use less 7 step drop backs, but I think the biggest issue the lack of a decent running attack which, IMO, led to the big difference in the total number of drop backs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, we should have incorporated more short passes and 3 step drops. It was painful to watch during some of those games (the Pittsburgh one stands out) where the defense is blitzing like crazy and we can beat the blitz with a 3 step drop and a quick throw, but we didn't.

that is all on pep calling plays or Luck not being able to process a blitz. I'm guessing Luck is smart enough to process a blitz after getting hit a few times. We didn't seem to really play the checks own game too much until the first 2 playoff games and then we went away from it with the pats.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of this is Luck. He likes to hold the ball and sit in the pocket until the last minute, when he could be taking off and running. Sometimes he misses wide open guys on the backside of the play. Not dogging him, just saying, it's not all about the scheme.

I agree about luck not running often enough. Even if it's 3 yards and a slide, he had some huge wide open holes to get through while he say there and patted the ball waiting for a deep play to open up and then get killed, through an incomplete ball, a pick or every once in a while, hitting the big play. He needs to run run run more next season when his guys downfield are blanketed and they dare the team to run the ball. Until we find a competent RB and build a better oline, this part has to be built in along with more dump offs. The OC and luck needs to learn a more control the ball 5-7 yards at a time early and then hit big late when the defense is worn out. How is this so hard in pro football to adjust to?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Idk?   I think Ballard has a lot more control on how this is disseminated than you are giving him. I'm sure he has final approval, this isn't like the in season NFL hard knock thing.(Which we still controlled what was put out there) This is a team made draft video to get fans hyped.     It did the job for me     I do agree that, that was just a random comment about a guy(being there at #15) they were actually generally talking about in natural conversations and the sound bite was used there. I don't think it was just a comment made to place at the end intentionally. Whether that guy might be there, or is someone who should no doubt be there is the question, and what should we take from it ending that way    And it might not of even been his idea to put that at the end, but when presented how to end it, agreed this is the best way to get the fans talking about it.     Either way it was a great cliff hanger. Like I said it brought about some conversation, so I think it did it's part.
    • I watched the semi final game between Washington and Texas last night and Odunze and Polk just destroyed Texas. Penix had around 400 yards. 
    • I’ll have to search for Hicks’ break-down.  I hadn’t seen much tape of Bowers until a couple of weeks ago when I watched a highlight reel, and that was very impressive.  I’m just nervous about how hard it seems to be to predict TE success…
    • I was thinking a bit about what Ballard said in that clip from "Behind the Colts", about "he's not going to get much bigger". No idea if he was talking about Worthy... but if he is... he's right. Whether Worthy ends up playing at 165 or 176... this is still extremely small and light. Whether he's in the 1st percentile or 5th percentile of athlete's in weight in the league, this doesn't change the type of player and type of worries you would have about him with any significance. So... in a way, I kind of find that conversation a bit pointless. IMO the question should be - okay. he is small... and he will always be small. Can we work with that? And can we live with the risk of injury for that small of a player? And the answer can be no here... I'm not saying we necessarily need to take that risk. 
    • You think the Ed Dodds you see in edited clips here is the same as the Ed Dodds who interviews with teams?   I don’t know you or anyone would think that?      He’s very much respected around the NFL which is why multiple teams ask to interview with them most every year. 
  • Members

    • Two_pound

      Two_pound 734

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 17,302

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 13,817

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DoubleE Colt

      DoubleE Colt 331

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,150

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,792

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kc77

      Kc77 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,150

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Archer

      Archer 1,753

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...