Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

The Khaled Holmes Thread (Merge)


texascolt

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Shipley was in there to start.

Nope, Holmes started. I don't know when Shipley got in, but he took at least one snap.

I haven't rewatched the game yet, but Holmes got soundly beat on the first snap of the game. He was to block the DT to his right, and couldn't get in front of him. That's why the play went for a loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there would be some comments about Holmes starting at center.

 

Did he?  I'll wait for Ben Gundy's analysis.  It's too painful to re-watch the game.

Holmes started.  Shipley was NOT in there to start and have you not noticed that the line has progressively got worse since Shipley was benched.  Shipley was in on one play the jumbo package when they got the TD. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, Holmes started. I don't know when Shipley got in, but he took at least one snap.

I haven't rewatched the game yet, but Holmes got soundly beat on the first snap of the game. He was to block the DT to his right, and couldn't get in front of him. That's why the play went for a loss.

 

I saw Shipley in there at the beginning. I don't think it was the first 3 run plays, but I could be wrong. He was definitely in there though. I know you'll rewatch the game. Let us know what snap he went in at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, Holmes started. I don't know when Shipley got in, but he took at least one snap.

I haven't rewatched the game yet, but Holmes got soundly beat on the first snap of the game. He was to block the DT to his right, and couldn't get in front of him. That's why the play went for a loss.

 

I think it's being a little harsh to say that Holmes got soundly beat on the first run play.  The player he was to block was a man and a half away from Holmes, there was no way he was going to get over there unless that Dlineman decided to stand still for a couple of seconds.  The blocking should have been changed pre snap by whoever was making the line calls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's being a little harsh to say that Holmes got soundly beat on the first run play. The player he was to block was a man and a half away from Holmes, there was no way he was going to get over there unless that Dlineman decided to stand still for a couple of seconds. The blocking should have been changed pre snap by whoever was making the line calls.

The center generally makes the line calls, no? It's a reach block. The guy wasn't a man and a half away, otherwise the RG would have been responsible for holding him up while Holmes got off the ball. Not a good scheme, obviously, but Holmes was supposed to block the guy who blew up the play. Maybe soundly beat is strong, but he was the man, and didn't get there. I don't know how else to say it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The center generally makes the line calls, no? It's a reach block. The guy wasn't a man and a half away, otherwise the RG would have been responsible for holding him up while Holmes got off the ball. Not a good scheme, obviously, but Holmes was supposed to block the guy who blew up the play. Maybe soundly beat is strong, but he was the man, and didn't get there. I don't know how else to say it.

 

Usually it is the center, but it doesn't have to be.  The center is used because he is equal distance from both tackles.  I will double check on the distance, but I thought yesterday while I was watching the play Holmes had to move pretty far to make that block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually it is the center, but it doesn't have to be. The center is used because he is equal distance from both tackles. I will double check on the distance, but I thought yesterday while I was watching the play Holmes had to move pretty far to make that block.

He did have a ways to go. It wasn't an easy play to make, but he didn't make it either way.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The center generally makes the line calls, no? It's a reach block. The guy wasn't a man and a half away, otherwise the RG would have been responsible for holding him up while Holmes got off the ball. Not a good scheme, obviously, but Holmes was supposed to block the guy who blew up the play. Maybe soundly beat is strong, but he was the man, and didn't get there. I don't know how else to say it.

 

Just a fyi, 1959Colts had a good breakdown of that first run in the thread about the Oline problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, Holmes started. I don't know when Shipley got in, but he took at least one snap.

I haven't rewatched the game yet, but Holmes got soundly beat on the first snap of the game. He was to block the DT to his right, and couldn't get in front of ham. That's why the play went for a loss.

 

There's another guy in another thread that makes a good point regarding that play, which makes a good case for Holmes regarding that play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The center generally makes the line calls, no? It's a reach block. The guy wasn't a man and a half away, otherwise the RG would have been responsible for holding him up while Holmes got off the ball. Not a good scheme, obviously, but Holmes was supposed to block the guy who blew up the play. Maybe soundly beat is strong, but he was the man, and didn't get there. I don't know how else to say it.

 

 

The center generally makes the line calls, no? It's a reach block. The guy wasn't a man and a half away, otherwise the RG would have been responsible for holding him up while Holmes got off the ball. Not a good scheme, obviously, but Holmes was supposed to block the guy who blew up the play. Maybe soundly beat is strong, but he was the man, and didn't get there. I don't know how else to say it.

 

 

The center generally makes the line calls, no? It's a reach block. The guy wasn't a man and a half away, otherwise the RG would have been responsible for holding him up while Holmes got off the ball. Not a good scheme, obviously, but Holmes was supposed to block the guy who blew up the play. Maybe soundly beat is strong, but he was the man, and didn't get there. I don't know how else to say it.

It is an impossible block for the center to reach block the tackle. Either the TE, OT, OG or FB/TE would block the D tackle. In football 101 you know that. Ask any coach, then please correct your account of what you think happened on the first play of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is an impossible block for the center to reach block the tackle. Either the TE, OT, OG or FB/TE would block the D tackle. In football 101 you know that. Ask any coach, then please correct your account of what you think happened on the first play of the game.

It's laughable how wrong you are, telling me how wrong I am, and so rudely...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is an impossible block for the center to reach block the tackle. Either the TE, OT, OG or FB/TE would block the D tackle. In football 101 you know that. Ask any coach, then please correct your account of what you think happened on the first play of the game.

 

Seriously?     This is your first post here?

 

No one knows you and yet you choose to go on the offensive right out of the gate?

 

And you have no idea who attacked.     But you chose to do it anyway.     Wow.

 

Pretty impressive.......      but for all the wrong reasons.....

 

What a way to start here....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is an impossible block for the center to reach block the tackle. Either the TE, OT, OG or FB/TE would block the D tackle. In football 101 you know that. Ask any coach, then please correct your account of what you think happened on the first play of the game.

 

 

It's laughable how wrong you are, telling me how wrong I am, and so rudely...

Fortunately, most of us are past Football 101.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's laughable how wrong you are, telling me how wrong I am, and so rudely...

 

 

It's laughable how wrong you are, telling me how wrong I am, and so rudely...

Did not mean to be rude, but if you call an off tackle run and plan to block the unblocked penetrating tackle with the center then please explain to me how the center has a chance to make that block. The DT is already upfield as the center is moving down the line. Hope you dont find this rude but it makes some kind of sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did not mean to be rude, but if you call an off tackle run and plan to block the unblocked penetrating tackle with the center then please explain to me how the center has a chance to make that block. The DT is already upfield as the center is moving down the line. Hope you dont find this rude but it makes some kind of sense.

 

Fair enough. I believe the defender was lined up in the gap. As I said before, it's not an easy block to make, but it appeared that it was Holmes block. I can't look at the play right now, but I will. And another poster has a breakdown of the play that I haven't had a chance to look at yet.

 

But it's not true that it was impossible for the center to reach the DT, and the center is often called on to block the DT on off guard or off tackle run plays. Most of the time, the RG will help at the snap while the center gets off the ball. It may be that Louis messed it up, but your previous comment suggested that a center will never be used to block a DT, and that's just not accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously?     This is your first post here?

 

No one knows you and yet you choose to go on the offensive right out of the gate?

 

And you have no idea who attacked.     But you chose to do it anyway.     Wow.

 

Pretty impressive.......      but for all the wrong reasons.....

 

What a way to start here....

Guys I did not plan any attack, I thought I was pointing out that a coach would not design a play for the center to block the DT on a off tackle run.  It will never work.  Superman said " It wasn't an easy play to make, but he didn't make it either way." That sounds like what? Sounds like you are pinning a 5 yard loss to start the game on the C missing his block. If you think that is the case then we have to agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys I did not plan any attack, I thought I was pointing out that a coach would not design a play for the center to block the DT on a off tackle run.  It will never work.  Superman said " It wasn't an easy play to make, but he didn't make it either way." That sounds like what? Sounds like you are pinning a 5 yard loss to start the game on the C missing his block. If you think that is the case then we have to agree to disagree.

 

When you write this in your very first post on a website....  "Ask any coach, then please correct your account of what you think happened on the first play of the game."     That's going to be read by others who don't know you as an attack.   Especially against one of the smartest, sharpest and brightest posters here....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough. I believe the defender was lined up in the gap. As I said before, it's not an easy block to make, but it appeared that it was Holmes block. I can't look at the play right now, but I will. And another poster has a breakdown of the play that I haven't had a chance to look at yet.

 

But it's not true that it was impossible for the center to reach the DT, and the center is often called on to block the DT on off guard or off tackle run plays. Most of the time, the RG will help at the snap while the center gets off the ball. It may be that Louis messed it up, but your previous comment suggested that a center will never be used to block a DT, and that's just not accurate.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxGSreWQUhYtWVJWcVFVSkVta3c/view?usp=sharing

 

#98 is lined up at DT over the OT. The C makes contact with the DT when he is 3 yards in the backfield making a bee line to the RB. There is no way this play was designed with the C blocking the DT. The C reaches the DT but it is impossible to block him at that angle and I dont think it would ever be drawn up that way. Didnt mean for you to understand that the C never blocks a DT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxGSreWQUhYtWVJWcVFVSkVta3c/view?usp=sharing

 

#98 is lined up at DT over the OT. The C makes contact with the DT when he is 3 yards in the backfield making a bee line to the RB. There is no way this play was designed with the C blocking the DT. The C reaches the DT but it is impossible to block him at that angle and I dont think it would ever be drawn up that way. Didnt mean for you to understand that the C never blocks a DT. 

 

Coincidentally, I'm rewatching right now.

 

The DT was further down the line than I realized. It's very bad execution, and a doomed play. It looks like Louis should have have been helping right at the snap, which would have given Holmes time to get off the ball. For Holmes to have made that block would have been pretty spectacular, even more so than I realized earlier. I have to take most of the blame away from Holmes and put it on Louis, I think.

 

Bigger problem is that we shouldn't have run the ball to the right on that play. The Cowboys were loaded on that side of the field, and we had more favorable numbers on the left side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coincidentally, I'm rewatching right now.

 

The DT was further down the line than I realized. It's very bad execution, and a doomed play. It looks like Louis should have have been helping right at the snap, which would have given Holmes time to get off the ball. For Holmes to have made that block would have been pretty spectacular, even more so than I realized earlier. I have to take most of the blame away from Holmes and put it on Louis, I think.

 

Bigger problem is that we shouldn't have run the ball to the right on that play. The Cowboys were loaded on that side of the field, and we had more favorable numbers on the left side.

 

First, it makes me feel like the original call from Pep is a poor one.    Why run to the side where all the new guys on our line are on the very first play?    Let them get their feet wet -- at least, a little....

 

Second,  why didn't Andrew simply audible to the other side?   It's not like he's not allowed or doesn't know how.....

 

Very curious.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, it makes me feel like the original call from Pep is a poor one.    Why run to the side where all the new guys on our line are on the very first play?    Let them get their feet wet -- at least, a little....

 

Second,  why didn't Andrew simply audible to the other side?   It's not like he's not allowed or doesn't know how.....

 

Very curious.....

 

This is what I am curious about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I am curious about.

me too. I'm nothing but a fan, certainly no expert. But with Holmes making his first start, Louis being a backup, and still injured Nixon making a start as backup RT, didn't make sense to me to try running behind them to start the game
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxGSreWQUhYtWVJWcVFVSkVta3c/view?usp=sharing

 

#98 is lined up at DT over the OT. The C makes contact with the DT when he is 3 yards in the backfield making a bee line to the RB. There is no way this play was designed with the C blocking the DT. The C reaches the DT but it is impossible to block him at that angle and I dont think it would ever be drawn up that way. Didnt mean for you to understand that the C never blocks a DT. 

 

You didn't make it sound like you were saying the C never blocks the DT, it was clear that you were talking about this particular play,  You were right, that would not be Holmes assignment .Unfortunately on this board a lot of times you will get opposition,  just for the sake of opposition,  even though you were correct, and it was obvious that you had went back and taken a good look at the play.  Be prepared for things you didn't say, to be argued into your post. This will happen no matter how clear you make your post, no matter how right you are, that is just the way it is on this forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I knew I had a favorite last year, but I thought I would be good with whoever the Colts picked... and this was until the odds for the Colts picking Levis hit -4000 or something of the sort about half an hour before the draft and my heart completely dropped. In a way I'm happy the odds-makers completely missed on this one... it showed me how I really felt about those players and made me even more appreciative for us drafting Richardson an hour later.    So... you would be good with any of them... but who do you REALLY want?    On your question... if I had to guess, most Colts fans haven't watched this QB draft extensively. I know I haven't. So his statistical profile doesn't scream 1st rounder so... possibly why not many people really like him. Also keep in mind that this is compared to the other 3. 2 of them have been crowned as the next big thing for a while now and the third one won the Heismann with some exceptional performaces throughout the year. 
    • My sleepers: (meaning, the kind of players coaches would like to have, more than what consensus big board gives credit to them. Some of them might need couple of years to attain their high potential, if drafted into suitable coaching environment, so a lot depends on that. Some of them have injury concerns too).   Most of them are high IQ players or high-effort, high-motor players - two traits I look for from the Drafted players, list is long but I like these guys.. gonna be interesting to see where they land and how it works out for them in long run.    Payton Wilson, LB, NC State Caelen Carson, CB, Wake Forest Kiran Amegadjie, OT, Yale Maason Smith, IDL, LSU Christian Mahogany, OG, Boston College Max Melton, CB, Rutgers Zak Zinter, OG, Michigan Bucky Irving, RB, Oregon Khyree Jackson, CB Oregon Dylan McMahon, C, NC State (good fit for Browns)  Tykee Smith, SAF, Georgia Ainias Smith, WR, Texas A&M Cam Hart, CB, Notre Dame Michael Barrett, LB Michigan Malachi Corley, WR, Western Kentucky Beaux Limmer, IOL, Arkansas   Kamren Kinchens, S, Miami McKinnley Jackson, IDL, Texas A&M Kalen King, CB, Penn State Justin Eboigbe, IDL, Alabama    Jacob Cowing, WR, Arizona Beau Brade, SAF, Maryland Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville Jalyx Hunt, EDGE, Houston Christian (I'm hoping for day 3 Vikings pickup, as Flores could work wonders with him)  Jaheim Bell, TE, Florida State Brennan Jackson, EDGE, Washington State  Delmar Glaze, OT, Maryland Myles Cole, EDGE, Texas Tech Kristian Boyd, DT, Northern Iowa Javontae Jean-Baptiste, DL, Notre Dame Jordan Magee, LB, Temple Myles Harden, CB, South Dakota Jalen Green, EDGE, James Madison (UDFA Target prospect)  Trey Taylor, S, Air Force (UDFA prospect) Eyabi Okie-Anoma, EDGE, Charlotte Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto  Sundiata Anderson, EDGE, Grambling State  Daequan Hardy, CB, Penn State (Special Teams, Returner)  Emani Bailey, RB, TCU   As for Vikings, I don't wanna rush to draft QB if the team isn't confident in the guys they could move up in draft range, and I'd like to just draft impact players that build the roster at this point.   Build the team, draft a franchise QB at right time, don't rush and ruin years trying to make someone work out in the NFL. 
    • If you are relying upon history, does accuracy matter?  I think the reason Smith ended up at RT is because the coaches tried him there out of necessity and he played well, and stayed there due to the coaches wishes.  I don't think that FO guys had much to say about it, because Smith was in fact drafted to be a G, not the RT.  Ballard's own words after day 2 of that draft was that they drafted Smith a bit higher than they had him ranked, because he was the "last remaining starting caliber G on the board".   So it does fit that Smith was not drafted by Ballard or the FO to be a RT...in part because of the measurables and arm length.   Also directing this response to @Matthew Gilbert
    • Same. And that's because over time that level of depth eventually decays. 
    • I don't think players like Davis (and especially Bryan, who I don't think will make the final 53) should impact our draft strategy at all. Not even a little bit. If we like Byron Murphy, figure out what to do with those other guys later. The other versatile guys you mention don't scratch the itch the way Murphy would be expected to -- he should be looked at as a disruptive 3T who plays there every down, not a matchup guy or passing downs guy.    If anything, maybe it's the other way around. The Colts already had a feel for the DTs in draft class and knew they wouldn't get what they want in the draft, so they addressed the position in free agency. And after this weekend, that might help people better understand the strategy at DB and WR...    The bolded really gets at the heart of it. I like Murphy, but I'm not offering him as a great player that you just have to take a chance on. But when it comes to draft strategy, I think taking the best players is the way to go. I'm directly opposed to needs-based drafting, and to passing on a really good prospect because you have backup level veterans already on the roster. 
  • Members

    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,584

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TrueBlue4ever

      TrueBlue4ever 323

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,313

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • midmoColtsfan

      midmoColtsfan 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 52

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,816

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,191

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,452

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,303

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pkbrux

      pkbrux 104

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...