Question of the Day - 11/26 "Washington Game"

[sb41champs]

   Does the change in quarterback - from RG III to Colt McCoy - help or hinder the Colts ??    

[HungarianColtsFan]

Actually it should be neutral, whoever plays we shouldn't overlook skins or fear them. Go out, play hard, play your best and win.

 

Anyway IMO Redskins' locker is pumped by benching RGIII, I think they trust McCoy better, so their spirits must be flying high.

[sfergson727]

We have a tendency to make no name quarterbacks look incredible, so I think it hurts us.

[MTC]

I would think hinder.

[crazycolt1]

We have a tendency to make no name quarterbacks look incredible, so I think it hurts us.

Does it ever get tiresome being so negative? Besides, there are zero no name QBs in the NFL. There are only 32 starters and if you are a NFL fan you pretty much have heard of them all.

[wesd2890]

Does it ever get tiresome being so negative? Besides, there are zero no name QBs in the NFL. There are only 32 starters and if you are a NFL fan you pretty much have heard of them all.

It sure does get exhausting reading it. (Negativity)

[sfergson727]

Does it ever get tiresome being so negative? Besides, there are zero no name QBs in the NFL. There are only 32 starters and if you are a NFL fan you pretty much have heard of them all.

Does it ever get tiresome being in LA LA land?  There is more than ample proof to back up what I said.

[southwest1]

So, Colt McCoy complete a pass & RG3 can't. That's not a slam against Colt BTW because he's a nice kid It's just my belief that INDY should be able to get a W this week without too much trouble. 

[RockThatBlue]

It helps the Redskins because hes looked better than RG3 IMO. But we should still beat them by 2 touchdowns, if not more.

[southwest1]

I have a neighbor that lives near me that is both a diehard Giants & Redskins fan who just moved to WI from NJ. Not a good year for him actually team wise.

 

I wonder if I should check in on him when INDY smokes Washington this weekend? Hmmm...I guess he can stuff his face with turkey, ham, & pie tomorrow to cushion the blow of yet another loss. 

[crazycolt1]

Does it ever get tiresome being in LA LA land?  There is more than ample proof to back up what I said.

Is that the best childish reply you can come up with? No substance, just argumentative. List the names if you have them.

[sfergson727]

Is that the best childish reply you can come up with? No substance, just argumentative. List the names if you have them.

Yeah, because your initial response was so filled with content as well.  Do you own homework.  If you have followed the Colts in the past, you would know that back up quarterbacks tend to fair very well against us.  Thus, yes, we probably the change in QB's will hinder us.  What is the BFD with that statement?

[sfergson727]

Excuse the typo in my last response, never should type before the morning coffee.  Omit the "we" in my last sentence.

[crazycolt1]

Yeah, because your initial response was so filled with content as well.  Do you own homework.  If you have followed the Colts in the past, you would know that back up quarterbacks tend to fair very well against us.  Thus, yes, we probably the change in QB's will hinder us.  What is the BFD with that statement?

Where is your list? A couple of times can not be considered a habit.

[krunk]

We have a tendency to make no name quarterbacks look incredible, so I think it hurts us.

 

I can't think of any no name quarterback that we've made look good this year.  Every loss we've had has been to very good to up and coming quarterbacks.  Brady, Manning, Foles, Rothlessberger.

 

 

Now if you mean no name running backs like Jonas Gray I will agree!

[open window]

Fitzmagic NO, Charlie Whitehurst NO, Chad Henne NO, Blake Bortles NO, you have nothing to back up your ridiculous claim at least for this season. Maybe the one time last year when Case Keenum had a good half, that isn't a trend just an anomaly.

 

 

 

We have a tendency to make no name quarterbacks look incredible, so I think it hurts us.

[crazycolt1]

Yeah, because your initial response was so filled with content as well.  Do you own homework.  If you have followed the Colts in the past, you would know that back up quarterbacks tend to fair very well against us.  Thus, yes, we probably the change in QB's will hinder us.  What is the BFD with that statement?

Sorry If ruffled your feathers. The reason my comment was worded like that is your talking in the past. Those players, coaches and GMs are all not here now. They have zero to do with the past. Because what you call a no name QB had a good game against us over the last 25 years does make it a common practice.

[sfergson727]

Sorry If ruffled your feathers. The reason my comment was worded like that is your talking in the past. Those players, coaches and GMs are all not here now. They have zero to do with the past. Because what you call a no name QB had a good game against us over the last 25 years does make it a common practice.

No problem, hope you had a happy Thanksgiving.

[sb41champs]

   I think it hinders the Colts - because there is a limited sample (and video) of Colt McCoy playing for Washington.  It makes preparation harder.

 

 

   I think it helps Washington.  RGIII is still living the life of a primadonna - thinking that L's are teammates fault - but - not his.  He clearly doesn't understand the level of "leadership by example" in the NFL.

 

 

   That said - I think the Colts will win Sunday.

[ColtsPens2011]

I think it doesn't matter they have the Dallas game film to assess him running the offense. You could put any QB on the Redskins roster and we will still win.

[oldunclemark]

It helps the Redskins because hes looked better than RG3 IMO. But we should still beat them by 2 touchdowns, if not more.

The change helps Washington...Robert cant play