Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts should have traded for Mankins


BProland85

Recommended Posts

He was just traded today to Tampa for a backup TE and probably a 6th round pick. We could have easily fixed our interior woes on the OL with trading for him. Then next offseason, cut Cherilus and his big contract, and play Mewhort at RT.

 

Mankins is still only 32 and has at least 3 more good years in him. Could have instantly helped our run game and possibly propelled this OL to be superbowl contenders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But we wouldn't have to give up a pick.

Yeah but a 4 isn't enough to make that up to me, draft picks are overrated when talking about star players. A 1st round pick is worth twice what a first rounder who has reached expectations is in a trade, that's ridiculous. Look at Vontae- drafted in the first, played as well as they hoped, and was shipped off for a full round later pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a 4th rounder, and the Bucs have been DESPERATE for guards. Yes, more desperate than us. And it would have cost us a TE with proven ability, not a project like Swoope or a deep reserve like Doyle or Saunders. Either Fleener or Allen, for sure.

 

So, good for the Bucs. Weird for the Pats (guess Gronk isn't ready, but who is gonna play guard now?) Not a good potential move for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a 4th rounder, and the Bucs have been DESPERATE for guards. Yes, more desperate than us. And it would have cost us a TE with proven ability, not a project like Swoope or a deep reserve like Doyle or Saunders. Either Fleener or Allen, for sure.

 

So, good for the Bucs. Weird for the Pats (guess Gronk isn't ready, but who is gonna play guard now?) Not a good potential move for us.

 

I think we could have talked them out of a TE being needed by giving up a 3rd. Feels weird having all first 3 picks intact for the first time in 3 years :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we could have talked them out of a TE being needed by giving up a 3rd. Feels weird having all first 3 picks intact for the first time in 3 years :).

 

I think they wanted a productive TE. Maybe we could have talked them down to Doyle, but I doubt it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think a fourth or fifth round pick is sooo valuable that it wouldn't be worth it. This is weird on the part of the Pats, but maybe BB knows something Lovie doesn't. 

 

Not weird at all if you consider a few things.

 

1) History of similar moves - see Richard Seymour. 

2) Always better to get rid of a player one too soon than one year too late.  I am sure he has actuarial type info on when production for someone of Mankin's age and position starts to decline.

3) Have a trading partner who is desperate

4) Maybe it also speaks to Gronk's early availability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was just traded today to Tampa for a backup TE and probably a 6th round pick. We could have easily fixed our interior woes on the OL with trading for him. Then next offseason, cut Cherilus and his big contract, and play Mewhort at RT.

 

Mankins is still only 32 and has at least 3 more good years in him. Could have instantly helped our run game and possibly propelled this OL to be superbowl contenders.

 

Nah. Gos has been solid on the RT spot. Why cut a guy who is actually playing well on the OL? There's three spots in the center to worry about, and you're advocating cutting someone not in one of those three...

 

LG Is important, but I don't think Logan would have been a solution. Very much like the Ravens signing Deion Sanders, that could've been a trade and 10 mil wasted on a guy who was past his prime.

 

I'm more interested in seeing the youngsters develop, rather than continue to shift and change the line every time Luck is sacked (Which some members here seem to want to do).

 

The OL is going to take a year or so to develop- that's just a fact. Castonzo and Cherilus are definitely staying.

 

If I were to cut anyone on the offensive line, it would be Thornton- but it's still too early to judge him, as he's only had one year in the league and he was out of position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question that has to be asked is why would the Pats trade him?  Behind him they have a guy who was an UDFA from 2013 and a rookie 6th round pick.  Not that those guys can't be good, but I doubt if either is as good as Mankins is right now... unless Mankins has declined a lot this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question that has to be asked is why would the Pats trade him?  Behind him they have a guy who was an UDFA from 2013 and a rookie 6th round pick.  Not that those guys can't be good, but I doubt if either is as good as Mankins is right now... unless Mankins has declined a lot this year.

TE desperate! Could make another move lots of money now available. maybe Incogneto? I know spelled wrong!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not weird at all if you consider a few things.

 

1) History of similar moves - see Richard Seymour. 

2) Always better to get rid of a player one too soon than one year too late.  I am sure he has actuarial type info on when production for someone of Mankin's age and position starts to decline.

3) Have a trading partner who is desperate

4) Maybe it also speaks to Gronk's early availability.

Fair enough and I totally agree about the desperation of the Bucs, but I don't think Brady's window to win again this year or next is increased by this move, assuming BB isn't getting one over on Lovie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was just traded today to Tampa for a backup TE and probably a 6th round pick. We could have easily fixed our interior woes on the OL with trading for him. Then next offseason, cut Cherilus and his big contract, and play Mewhort at RT.

 

Mankins is still only 32 and has at least 3 more good years in him. Could have instantly helped our run game and possibly propelled this OL to be superbowl contenders.

 

He was just traded today to Tampa for a backup TE and probably a 6th round pick. We could have easily fixed our interior woes on the OL with trading for him. Then next offseason, cut Cherilus and his big contract, and play Mewhort at RT.

 

Mankins is still only 32 and has at least 3 more good years in him. Could have instantly helped our run game and possibly propelled this OL to be superbowl contenders.

 

 Don`t think you have any of it right. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Happy Draft Day to the folks who are in Indiana! (And east coast) lol. If this actually happens today I don’t know what I would do. Pipe dream or not, I’m READY for this draft to start! 
    • Ok, just so I'm reading it right.  You are saying that I responded to another poster by mentioning RG in passing, as a means to bait a lurking you into starting a debate about RG vs CB, for which you feel justified doing because I mentioned RG and Luck's history.   Why don't you just stick to the possibilities of why Ballard might want to draft an olineman high?  That's what I did.
    • Its not even a serious counter, because there was never a tie in made that suggested his injuries were caused by a porous oline in the first place.  That was a tie in made to try tp point out Moose was wrong, when he didn't even tie the two together.  They were separate sentences.   Built into the idea that AR should be protected better is the appearance that AR may be fragile, based upon the situations behind his injuries.  AR was injured.  Ballard may want to protect him better.  The issue of possible fragility is built into it, IMO. is how I read Mooses comments.  Not that it was because of the level of oline protection.
    • Kirk did have the Vikings at the top of the division in the 2022 season at 13-4. He was injured last year. Oh well have fun with your new QB.    You act like I don't know Vikings football, comical because I like the team and follow them a lot. You and @NFLfansay Kirk doesn't know situational football. In 2022 he was the best situational QB in the league. Vikings were 11-0 in games decided by 3 points or less. It is because Kirk handled most situations right. You don't go 11-0 in games 3 points or less and not be a smart QB. 
    • Maybe I am the one who will end up with egg on his face but I just don’t get why people think the Colts are actually going to draft an olineman with their first pick.  Nelson and Kelly returned to their pro-bowl playing status.  Raimann looks to be a very good young left tackle and the Colts have made it pretty clear they see Smith as one of the most underrated tackles in football.  They aren’t drafting a right guard in the first round, Nelson was exception, and even then Fries held his own at right guard last year.  They aren’t going to draft a guy who isn’t going to start next year either in the first round.  The starting oline is probably the least of their worries going into this draft.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...