Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Ray Rice Suspended


PrincetonTiger

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 273
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It sounds like there are some conflicting reports in which some say that she might have hit him first.  So perhaps the 2 games is just based on the complete lack of clarity as to what exactly happened.

 

The video people talk about apparently doesn't show much.  

 

It would be good if I could get a unbiased article that tells the full story as to who hit who first, what the video actually shows etc etc.  

 

Also worth remembering that Rice hasn't been charged with a crime.  They don't need his wife's permission or testimony to charge him with a crime if they have other evidence to support it, so it sounds like things are not actually very clear cut. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like there are some conflicting reports in which some say that she might have hit him first.  So perhaps the 2 games is just based on the complete lack of clarity as to what exactly happened.

 

The video people talk about apparently doesn't show much.  

 

It would be good if I could get a unbiased article that tells the full story as to who hit who first, what the video actually shows etc etc.  

 

Also worth remembering that Rice hasn't been charged with a crime.  They don't need his wife's permission or testimony to charge him with a crime if they have other evidence to support it, so it sounds like things are not actually very clear cut.

I can't believe that the NFL didn't wait until charges were filed to suspend him
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like there are some conflicting reports in which some say that she might have hit him first.  So perhaps the 2 games is just based on the complete lack of clarity as to what exactly happened.

 

The video people talk about apparently doesn't show much.  

 

It would be good if I could get a unbiased article that tells the full story as to who hit who first, what the video actually shows etc etc.  

 

Also worth remembering that Rice hasn't been charged with a crime.  They don't need his wife's permission or testimony to charge him with a crime if they have other evidence to support it, so it sounds like things are not actually very clear cut. 

  Terrelle Pryor was suspended five games for breaking NCAA rules vs Ray Rice being suspended two games for knocking his fiance unconscious. It just seems ridiculous to me.  Also, I couldn't care less who swung first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Terrelle Pryor was suspended five games for breaking NCAA rules vs Ray Rice being suspended two games for knocking his fiance unconscious. It just seems ridiculous to me.  Also, I couldn't care less who swung first. 

 

From what I'm reading him knocking her out was a rumor.

 

And who started the violence is to me very critical.  I'm sorry I don't buy into this idea that a real man should stand there and take it just cause it's a woman.  She's an adult too, decisions have consequences including decisions to become violent with another person.  

 

A grown up consequence of becoming violent with someone bigger and stronger then you is that you may get hit back and hurt in the process.  

 

Mature adults female or male don't start violence.  But I don't buy into the idea that either one should have to stand there and take it, even if the person starting the violence is smaller then them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I'm reading him knocking her out was a rumor.

 

And who started the violence is to me very critical.  I'm sorry I don't buy into this idea that a real man should stand there and take it just cause it's a woman.  She's an adult too.  

Did you see the video where he is carrying her unconscious?  And you believe a man should a hit a woman not walk away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you see the video where he is carrying her unconscious?  And you believe a man should a hit a woman not walk away?

 

I think if a woman hits him first he has every right to respond violently in proportion to stop her attacks.  Yes.  (I'm saying this as a general rule I honestly have no idea what happened between Rice and his wife.)

 

To say that he should just walk away is silly.  First of all walking away isn't always an option and secondly saying that infantilizes women.  If women are adults capable of making decisions that have adult consequences and dealing with those adult consequences then they should not at any point be shielded from those consequences.  If I go up and hit Ray Rice I'd expect he'd hit me back and given that he's a professional football player and I'm a slightly overweight guy who's entirely un-athletic I would expect that he would likely win that fight.  

 

Of course personally I wouldn't walk up and hit anyone no matter what I felt my odds where of winning.  Because I don't believe in starting violent confrontations.

 

The first grown up rule about violence is that it's not a good idea to start violent confrontations because if you do you could end up hurt.  I think women can handle those consequences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if a woman hits him first he has every right to respond violently in proportion to stop her attacks.  Yes.  

 

To say that he should just walk away is silly.  First of all walking away isn't always an option and secondly saying that infantilizes women.  If women are adults capable of making decisions that have adult consequences and dealing with those adult consequences then they should not at any point be shielded from those consequences.  

 

The first grown up rule about violence is that it's not a good idea to start violent confrontations because if you do you could end up hurt.  I think women can handle those consequences.

So by that logic is Ok for an adult to strike a child who is violent toward them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I'm reading him knocking her out was a rumor.

 

And who started the violence is to me very critical.  I'm sorry I don't buy into this idea that a real man should stand there and take it just cause it's a woman.  She's an adult too.  

 I hope you realize that there are more options than A) take it or B) knock your girlfriend unconscious.   If it is just a rumor he threw me for a loop by apologizing for it.  Very sneaky...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So by that logic is Ok for an adult to strike a child who is violent toward them?

 

Depends on the age and capabilities of a child.  

 

A 16 year old attacking you is different from a 7 year old attacking you.

 

If a young child attacks you, then you can restrain them rather easily.  Recalling that I said these things where adult consequences.  

 

This isn't necessarily true of adult women.  If you watched the video JayZ's presumably trained bodyguard was having a hard time at restraining his sister in law.  

 

If he hadn't had the bodyguard there . . . how was he going to walk away?  He was in an elevator!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on the age and capabilities of a child.  

 

A 16 year old attacking you is different from a 7 year old attacking you.

 

If a young child attacks you, then you can restrain them rather easily.  

 

This isn't necessarily true of adult women.  If you watched the video JayZ's presumably trained bodyguard was having a hard time at it.

Ok then don't you think most men could restrain a woman who they are physically bigger/stronger then without knocking then unconscious? The degree here of retaliation is what is heinous. A man has every right to defend himself from injury and restrain the woman without knocking her out. And in this situation we are talking about Ray Rice who physically dominates his fiancé.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if a woman hits him first he has every right to respond violently in proportion to stop her attacks.  Yes.  (I'm saying this as a general rule I honestly have no idea what happened between Rice and his wife.)

 

To say that he should just walk away is silly.  First of all walking away isn't always an option and secondly saying that infantilizes women.  If women are adults capable of making decisions that have adult consequences and dealing with those adult consequences then they should not at any point be shielded from those consequences.  If I go up and hit Ray Rice I'd expect he'd hit me back and given that he's a professional football player and I'm a slightly overweight guy who's entirely un-athletic I would expect that he would likely win that fight.  

 

Of course personally I wouldn't walk up and hit anyone no matter what I felt my odds where of winning.  Because I don't believe in starting violent confrontations.

 

The first grown up rule about violence is that it's not a good idea to start violent confrontations because if you do you could end up hurt.  I think women can handle those consequences.

Ridiculous  ~  I find it hard to believe that a man of his "size" and strength  couldn't restrain a woman from hitting him, without resorting to violence himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on the age and capabilities of a child.  

 

A 16 year old attacking you is different from a 7 year old attacking you.

 

If a young child attacks you, then you can restrain them rather easily.  Recalling that I said these things where adult consequences.  

 

This isn't necessarily true of adult women.  If you watched the video JayZ's presumably trained bodyguard was having a hard time at restraining his sister in law.  

 

If he hadn't had the bodyguard there . . . how was he going to walk away?  He was in an elevator!  

Ok I'll bite.  What about old ladies?  How about the disabled?  Where do I draw the line when dishing out "adult consequences"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok then don't you think most men could restrain a woman who they are physically bigger/stronger then without knocking then unconscious? The degree here of retaliation is what is heinous. A man has every right to defend himself from injury and restrain the woman without knocking her out. And in this situation we are talking about Ray Rice who physically dominates his fiancé.

 

As I also said he has a right to respond violently in proportion to the attack.  If he went overboard then he's culpable for going overboard, but still less culpable then someone who started the violence in the first place.  

 

So while I would say, yeah he probably went overboard in his self defense I'm not gonna go feeling sorry for his wife if she started the violence in the first place.  If I hit Ray Rice and he knocked me out. . . no one would feel sorry for me.  

 

The decision to engage in violence itself is an adult decision and women are at no more of a disadvantage then men at that.  The violence may be physical but the decision to start it is entirely mental.  And so if she started the fight, I don't feel sorry for her, in fact I would recommend she get help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I also said he has a right to respond violently in proportion to the attack.  If he went overboard then he's culpable for going overboard, but still less culpable then someone who started the violence in the first place.  

 

So while I would say, yeah he probably went overboard in his self defense I'm not gonna go feeling sorry for his wife if she started the violence in the first place.  If I hit Ray Rice and he knocked me out. . . no one would feel sorry for me.  

 

The decision to engage in violence itself is an adult decision and women are at no more of a disadvantage then men at that.  The violence may be physical but the decision to start it is entirely mental.  And so if she started the fight, I don't feel sorry for her, in fact I would recommend she get help.

I guess we will just disagree here as I don't believe a man should ever hit a woman except in self-defense. And of course we don't know what provoked her in the first place or if she was the one to get violent first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok I'll bite.  What about old ladies?  How about the disabled?  Where do I draw the line when dishing out "adult consequences"?

 

You make it sound like I relish the counter violence.  I'm saying there are consequences to starting a violent confrontation and counter violence is one.  

 

The old may not have the same mental capacity.  

 

And quite frankly I don't think I've ever seen a person who's disabled but fully mentally capable start a violent attack.  However if they did and where fully mentally capable then, they start the attack it's their fault when they get hurt doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess we will just disagree here as I don't believe a man should ever hit a woman except in self-defense. And of course we don't know what provoked her in the first place or if she was the one to get violent first.

 

You don't believe a man should hit a woman except in self defense. . . Isn't that the same thing I'm saying??

 

I'm just saying if she hit him first, he has the right to defend himself including hitting her back.

 

I'm not here advocating that a man start violence with a woman. . . in fact quite frankly I'd say just the opposite, I don't believe in starting violent confrontations at all no matter the size, gender, or age of the other person.

 

But I do believe in being able to defend yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does that mean that beating down your woman is only half as bad as smoking a doobie?

This is what I thought too.  What a terrible decision by the league.  Not just beating her, but with Rice's size, the force he could generate could cause some serious long-term damage.  2 games is far too short for beating someone.  I find it so savage and pathetic that the only way they could resolve their issue (if it even got resolved) was to resort to violence.  I don't know what the exact story is, but to knock your girlfriend/fiance unconscious is worthy of far more than a 2 game suspension

 

Ever heard of Ronda Roussey. There are some strong women out there people.  :cheer2:  :disco:

I'm a big Rousey fan!  She scares the heck outta me though.  I wouldn't wanna make her mad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't believe a man should hit a woman except in self defense. . . Isn't that the same thing I'm saying??

 

I'm just saying if she hit him first, he has the right to defend himself including hitting her back.

No. Because he knocked her out. A man of his size could have restrained her without punching her back. There are so many other options then doing what he did. And when I say self-defense, I don't mean a closed fist punch to the face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Because he knocked her out. A man of his size could have restrained her without punching her back. There are so many other options then doing what he did. And when I say self-defense, I don't mean a closed fist punch to the face.

 

How do you know, you where not there.  

 

Now I admit that most likely his response was not proportional and so he is culpable for that.  But he's still less culpable then her presuming she started it.  If I attacked Ray Rice no one would be worried about a disproportional response.

 

Lets up it and say I attacked an NFL offensive lineman.  I'm a chubby 225. . . an NFL offensive lineman probably has a greater size advantage over me then the 5'7" Ray Rice has over his wife.  If I went and tried to punch a 300 pound NFL offensive lineman. . . how many people do you think would be feeling sorry for me after he laid my butt out?  I guarantee no one would be worried about me, they would just call me stupid for trying to start a fight with a guy that's bigger and stronger then me.  And they would be right.

 

And Jay-Z's bodyguard is a lot bigger then Ray Rice and he was having trouble with Jay-Z's sister in law. . . And she wasn't attacking him which is an advantage because all he had to do was hold her back not try to attempt to stop attacks from 4 different limbs at once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I knew I had a favorite last year, but I thought I would be good with whoever the Colts picked... and this was until the odds for the Colts picking Levis hit -4000 or something of the sort about half an hour before the draft and my heart completely dropped. In a way I'm happy the odds-makers completely missed on this one... it showed me how I really felt about those players and made me even more appreciative for us drafting Richardson an hour later.    So... you would be good with any of them... but who do you REALLY want?    On your question... if I had to guess, most Colts fans haven't watched this QB draft extensively. I know I haven't. So his statistical profile doesn't scream 1st rounder so... possibly why not many people really like him. Also keep in mind that this is compared to the other 3. 2 of them have been crowned as the next big thing for a while now and the third one won the Heismann with some exceptional performaces throughout the year. 
    • My sleepers: (meaning, the kind of players coaches would like to have, more than what consensus big board gives credit to them. Some of them might need couple of years to attain their high potential, if drafted into suitable coaching environment, so a lot depends on that. Some of them have injury concerns too).   Most of them are high IQ players or high-effort, high-motor players - two traits I look for from the Drafted players, list is long but I like these guys.. gonna be interesting to see where they land and how it works out for them in long run.    Payton Wilson, LB, NC State Caelen Carson, CB, Wake Forest Kiran Amegadjie, OT, Yale Maason Smith, IDL, LSU Christian Mahogany, OG, Boston College Max Melton, CB, Rutgers Zak Zinter, OG, Michigan Bucky Irving, RB, Oregon Khyree Jackson, CB Oregon Dylan McMahon, C, NC State (good fit for Browns)  Tykee Smith, SAF, Georgia Ainias Smith, WR, Texas A&M Cam Hart, CB, Notre Dame Michael Barrett, LB Michigan Malachi Corley, WR, Western Kentucky Beaux Limmer, IOL, Arkansas   Kamren Kinchens, S, Miami McKinnley Jackson, IDL, Texas A&M Kalen King, CB, Penn State Justin Eboigbe, IDL, Alabama    Jacob Cowing, WR, Arizona Beau Brade, SAF, Maryland Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville Jalyx Hunt, EDGE, Houston Christian (I'm hoping for day 3 Vikings pickup, as Flores could work wonders with him)  Jaheim Bell, TE, Florida State Brennan Jackson, EDGE, Washington State  Delmar Glaze, OT, Maryland Myles Cole, EDGE, Texas Tech Kristian Boyd, DT, Northern Iowa Javontae Jean-Baptiste, DL, Notre Dame Jordan Magee, LB, Temple Myles Harden, CB, South Dakota Jalen Green, EDGE, James Madison (UDFA Target prospect)  Trey Taylor, S, Air Force (UDFA prospect) Eyabi Okie-Anoma, EDGE, Charlotte Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto  Sundiata Anderson, EDGE, Grambling State  Daequan Hardy, CB, Penn State (Special Teams, Returner)  Emani Bailey, RB, TCU   As for Vikings, I don't wanna rush to draft QB if the team isn't confident in the guys they could move up in draft range, and I'd like to just draft impact players that build the roster at this point.   Build the team, draft a franchise QB at right time, don't rush and ruin years trying to make someone work out in the NFL. 
    • If you are relying upon history, does accuracy matter?  I think the reason Smith ended up at RT is because the coaches tried him there out of necessity and he played well, and stayed there due to the coaches wishes.  I don't think that FO guys had much to say about it, because Smith was in fact drafted to be a G, not the RT.  Ballard's own words after day 2 of that draft was that they drafted Smith a bit higher than they had him ranked, because he was the "last remaining starting caliber G on the board".   So it does fit that Smith was not drafted by Ballard or the FO to be a RT...in part because of the measurables and arm length.   Also directing this response to @Matthew Gilbert
    • Same. And that's because over time that level of depth eventually decays. 
    • I don't think players like Davis (and especially Bryan, who I don't think will make the final 53) should impact our draft strategy at all. Not even a little bit. If we like Byron Murphy, figure out what to do with those other guys later. The other versatile guys you mention don't scratch the itch the way Murphy would be expected to -- he should be looked at as a disruptive 3T who plays there every down, not a matchup guy or passing downs guy.    If anything, maybe it's the other way around. The Colts already had a feel for the DTs in draft class and knew they wouldn't get what they want in the draft, so they addressed the position in free agency. And after this weekend, that might help people better understand the strategy at DB and WR...    The bolded really gets at the heart of it. I like Murphy, but I'm not offering him as a great player that you just have to take a chance on. But when it comes to draft strategy, I think taking the best players is the way to go. I'm directly opposed to needs-based drafting, and to passing on a really good prospect because you have backup level veterans already on the roster. 
  • Members

    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,584

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TrueBlue4ever

      TrueBlue4ever 323

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,313

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • midmoColtsfan

      midmoColtsfan 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 52

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,816

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,191

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,452

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,303

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pkbrux

      pkbrux 104

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...