Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Who in the NFL is more handsome than Tom Brady?


James

Recommended Posts

Hey Jules, didn't you say earlier on this topic that you once dated a short or vertically challenged man once? I applaud tall women who do that because a lot of men are too vain to even attempt dating a woman not the same height as them. 

 

I find that both cool & fascinating: Romantic pairings you seldom see in society. Everything from height differences, to weight differences, to cultural/language differences, to interracial couples. It takes a ton of courage to be bold & endure the odd looks & public backlash that inevitably almost always follows taking such a risk. 

 

Sorry Jules, if SW1 got to personal there. I do respect your privacy naturally. 

 

Yeah this guy was maybe somewhere in the 5'6 range. I am closer to 5'9 then 5'8 myself (somewhere in there depending how you measure lol) and with my boots on at times I can appear to be extremely tall. My sister is close to 6 feet barefoot so I have a tall-ish family.

 

He was a good guy and I think his ex before me was 5'3.We didn't have any issues with the height thing since I didn't feel it was that vast in difference, but I used to wear flatter shoes at times without even realizing it since I didn't want to tower over him in the back of my mind.

 

I was engaged once years ago to a guy who I thought was the perfect height for me. He was 5'10 and a half. Once I dated a guy for a long time who was 6'4......

 

Been all over the map in height. Doesn't really mean much in the end. It's about the person. You can be a jerk or a great person if you are tall or short. Problem with some short men is that I do think it can bother them but they won't always say this out loud. Our society is obsessed with the idea of a tall dark strong and handsome prince charming for women.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 246
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah this guy was maybe somewhere in the 5'6 range. I am closer to 5'9 then 5'8 myself (somewhere in there depending how you measure lol) and with my boots on at times I can appear to be extremely tall. My sister is close to 6 feet barefoot so I have a tall-ish family.

He was a good guy and I think his ex before me was 5'3.We didn't have any issues with the height thing since I didn't feel it was that vast in difference, but I used to wear flatter shoes at times without even realizing it since I didn't want to tower over him in the back of my mind.

I was engaged once years ago to a guy who I thought was the perfect height for me. He was 5'10 and a half. Once I dated a guy for a long time who was 6'4......

Been all over the map in height. Doesn't really mean much in the end. It's about the person. You can be a jerk or a great person if you are tall or short. Problem with some short men is that I do think it can bother them but they won't always say this out loud. Our society is obsessed with the idea of a tall dark strong and handsome prince charming for women.

Well, I am tall (6'1) and handsome in the dark. Does that count?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly Jules. Anna Nicole Smith & that rich old oil tycoon old enough to be her grandfather comes to mind. So repulsive & disgusting IMO.  If that's NOT a marriage for a trophy wife & financial security on the other side, I have no idea what a fake marriage truly is...

 

anna-nicole-smith-j-howard-marshall.jpg

 

Martial arts training is a good idea because you may not have time to pull out pepper spray from your purse if you are blitzed by a surprise stalker etc. etc. 

 

 

Oh gosh at that picture.....

 

I know love can happen with anyone at any time but lets not kid ourselves with "some" relationships.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I am tall (6'1) and handsome in the dark. Does that count?

LOL! I can just picture your dating profile as a young strapping lad BHC: Prefers long moonlit walks on the beach & the alluring mystique of midnight black shades for the benefit of all romantic parties involved. Just kidding! 

 

SW1 is no prince either, but comedians land pretty women all the time. That's what I keep telling myself anyway.  haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

SW1 is no prince either, but comedians land pretty women all the time. That's what I keep telling myself anyway.  haha

 

Well my biggest weakness has always been Woody Allen films, especially the older ones. So yes a sense of humor can go a long ways with the ladies. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, his looks is a big part of his image as a footballplayer. Opponents are secretly jealous of Brady.

That's why Suggs is always complaining and talking trash about Brady. It has a certain effect.

Suggs is secretly jealous of Peyton Mannings good looks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Round 1 - #15 A. Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas B. Brian Thomas, WR, LSU C. Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia   Round 2 - #46  A. Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M B. Marshall Kneeland, DE, Western Michigan C. Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State   Round 3 - #82 A. Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon B. Darius Robinson, DE/DT, Missouri C. Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State   Round 4 - #117 A. Jalyx Hunt, DE, Houston Christian B. Mason McCormick, OG, South Dakota State C. Malik Washington, WR, Virginia   Round 5 - #151 A. Beaux Limmer, OC, Arkansas B. Tanor Bortolini, OC, Wisconsin C. Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville   Round 6 - #191 A. Decamerion Richardson, CB, Mississippi State B. Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto C. Nick Gargiulo, OC, South Carolina   Round 7 - #234 A. Millard Bradford, SS, TCU B. Mark Perry, FS, TCU C. Dalton Tucker, OG, Marshall   BONUS: Will the Colts trade the #15 pick this year?  A: Yes, they will trade back.  
    • Yeah... Richardson needs players who can separate and who can get open deep. IMO "give the inaccurate QB a contested catch receiver with large catch radius" is one of the tropes that hasn't proven to work well. Contested catches have about 50-55% success rate even with the best of contested catch receivers and with relatively accurate QBs... now if you think AR's accuracy is not good, drop that rate even more. The best way to give a relatively inaccurate QB better chance to complete passes is to give him a WR who separates and and who is open so the QB would have more of a margin for error to throw the ball a little behind or ahead or a little higher or lower than ideal. (we are not talking about uncatchable balls here... those will be uncatchable for anyone really). In that regard, one thing I would agree about is - we need WRs who have good hands and have good ball skills.   And this is ignoring that AR has indeed been pretty good with his accuracy on passes at intermediate and long range. His biggest problem coming into the league was the short stuff and he was already showing improvements in that deparment before he got injured.    And Worthy is the WR who created the most separation from anybody in this draft :   
    • Richardson  accuracy  on deep balls is his strength.  Hence why you pair an elite deep threat in worthy.
    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
  • Members

    • stitches

      stitches 19,240

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ShuteAt168

      ShuteAt168 956

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...