Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Should we trade up for Leon Sandcastle?


SilentHill

Recommended Posts

I really think he can help our secondary, with the Chiefs projecting to take him #1 overall in this years draft, what are the odds that we can trade up and get him? How many picks / players would we have to give up?

I hear this new guy "Rob Anders" is who we should try to snag personally........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leon Sandcastle  doin the blue  awesome , Mike Ditka says give away all your picks this dude is the real deal " And we know what a * savant he turned out to be  " So heck yeah I'm on board I'm buying  .   Pat McAfee can show him all the best places to swim in Broad Ripple . Bring on the Ugly .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sandcastle plays D.

Read the scouting report.

Geez.

I heard he plays both ways.  Either way we can't be going after anything other than o-line that must be our top priority and till it's addressed we can't even think about anything else.  To even think about going after anyone who isn't on the o-line shortens Andrew Luck's career by a year.  That about covers it.  Oh I forgot the generic cheap shot at RG3...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard he plays both ways. Either way we can't be going after anything other than o-line that must be our top priority and till it's addressed we can't even think about anything else. To even think about going after anyone who isn't on the o-line shortens Andrew Luck's career by a year.

I was just kidding haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard he doesn't tackle...I'll pass.

Actually, that is true. He made too many "business decisions" not to do his job. This is why I hate Deion as an NFL analyst. He always talks on the air about toughness, fighting through injury, & making tackles & he never did those things at either Baltimore or as a member of the Skins. Shut up Deion Sanders, you hypocrite.  :facepalm:  haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was not serious. It was serious in terms of being a real need it was more sarcasm directed at people who get upset if bring up signing anything other than o-line this off-season.

Lol safe to say me being sarcastic, just led to me being confused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can too. And that will tell us everything we need to know about how the view him. It will tell us their feelings on the tight end room, and what direction they pick from there will tell us even more.    but if they take him at 15, we won’t know much about what might have happened, as they will be landing someone they had rated highly and fell to them. 
    • Glad that’s over…    if I wanted to argue about it, I would have responded far more in depth than pointing out how you were attempting to gaslight me. I did not. Meaning I was ending my part of whatever the argument was. You “putting a finality to it” and then listing bullet points tells me it was the argument you wanted all along, which makes sense why you brought Grigson up in the first place. Bait, hook, gaslight. Almost got me buddy. You are a funny guy, Doug 
    • Putting a finality on an argument you want to have.   There is a theory that Ballard won't draft a OL high because ARs injuries were not caused by a poor oline.  I felt it important to note that since Luck's major injuries were also not caused by his oline, Ballard could still want to improve it like he did in 2018 simply because AR is The Franchise. And its important to point that out because there has been a running (false) narrative for about 9 years that Luck's oline was the (main) reason for his injuries that kept him out of games.  The (false) narrative is based upon, IMO, a detest of Grigson, and not reality about the facts (or strong rumors) behind the kidney laceration and snowboarding shoulder. Therefore, mentioning Grigson and the (false) narrative was germain to the point about Ballard possibly drafting Oline high this draft to protect AR. Mentioning Grigson shouldn't trigger a CB vs RG discussion, unless people reading it are gaslighted by their own reading lens.
    • That is a very inaccurate description of what happened.  At this point it’s history and doesn’t need to be revisited but I will say Chloe adds value to this board and should be and is by most encouraged to post, even if people don’t always agree with her.  
    • My response was in regards to another posted suggesting that the Colts need to get the pick right when it comes to picking a WR. I agree with you .
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...