Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

austriancolt

Colts Senior Bowl Interviews Update

10 posts in this topic

According to walterfootball.com Colts interviewed/talked to:

 

Vance McDonald TE (6'4 - 262lb) - Rutgers

 

Ty Powell DE/LB (6'3 - 250lb) - Harding University

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
According to walterfootball.com Colts interviewed/talked to:

 

Vance McDonald TE (6'4 - 262lb) - Rutgers

 

Ty Powell DE/LB (6'3 - 250lb) - Harding University

I guess McDonald is looking Impressive from what Im reading about it. He looks quick and runs his routes very smoothly and has big hands(10 inches). Uses them to grab balls out the air. Showing good effort on blocking as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wonder why they talked to McDonld?

probably looking for a TE to run 3TE sets like Pep and Luck did at Stanford... I was reading about how Pep expects all of his receivers to be able to block in the run game... just a thought...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
probably looking for a TE to run 3TE sets like Pep and Luck did at Stanford... I was reading about how Pep expects all of his receivers to be able to block in the run game... just a thought...

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
probably looking for a TE to run 3TE sets like Pep and Luck did at Stanford... I was reading about how Pep expects all of his receivers to be able to block in the run game... just a thought...

They have Weslye Saunders a great blocking tight end they don't need another.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Colts talked to Ej Manuel today. Back-up possibly or probably just doing due dillegence.

Luck took Chandler Harnish to the Pro Bowl with him..   I bet CH is Indy's backup next season.     JMV on 1260 said he has heard for "fact" that DS will not be back.

 

Maybe seeing if Manuel is interested in playing G...  heheh..  he sure ain't no QB...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So sorry for your loss.  I like to think James now has the best seats to watch the games along with others who have gone before him.  
    • Denver got lot of compensatory picks but I think they actually lost, considering what could've been. If the cutoffs had been more favorable, if Okung contract would have counted as just 1 yr, 5M deal, they could've gotten   3rd 3rd 4th 7th   Instead, they got   3rd 5th 7th 7th
    • Glad to see the Pacers win last night. It was very much needed with the losing streak and the PG talk. We will make the Playoffs but probably wont do much once there. Lets not kid ourselves though as in the big picture of things the Warriors are going to spank everyone including the Cavs. Cavs will come out of the East but have a less of a chance of beating the Warriors this season than last. Cavs had their 1 year miracle, got a Title for Cleveland but to think they will beat the Warriors 2 years in a row is a stretch. Warriors will have HCA again and they now have Durant to go with the other 3. LeBron is only 3-4 in Finals play as well. He dominates a weal Eastern Conference but against the West his teams are below .500 in the Finals. My money is on the Warriors, LeBron just doesn't have that unbeatable invincible factor that Michael Jordan had being 6-0 in Finals. Jordan is the GOAT and it's not even debatable and Magic ruled the 80's when rough Basketball was aloud. The stuff Draymond Green is doing now, players in the 80's would laugh it off. This generation of players are way too pampered.
    • ALL RBs are luxury picks. One of the most overrated and useless positions, as is Safety. Look at how badly DeMarco Murray flopped after leaving the Cowboys.   I'd even take an elite Kicker or Punter over an elite RB any day.
    •   Thanks for that. I have no problem drafting for need. Actually I lean that way.   But most people here are strongly for drafting BPA, but when they were making selections, the players drafted mostly addressed needs. (Not always but in much of the picks.) Even in the first round, whenever we had to make a concensus pick, we asked ourselves what the team's needs were as opposed to "who the BPA is". So, I just wondered if people truly believed in drafting BPA as opposed to drafting BPA at a position of need.
  • Members

    • Carlos Danger

      Carlos Danger 783

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Boomstick1

      Boomstick1 297

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 204

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rock8591

      rock8591 409

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nesjan3

      Nesjan3 315

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cjrichard

      cjrichard 38

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Peytonator

      The Peytonator 1,867

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 5,437

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,607

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Defjamz26

      Defjamz26 2,120

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.