Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

NFL 101 Awards - Peyton wins AFC & AP NFC Offensive Players of the year


bayone

Recommended Posts

Manning, Peterson top list of 101 Award winners

 

as already noted in  separate topic  COLTS  Chuck Pagano and Bruce Arians    shared the AFC coaching

honor.

KUDOS TO 2 DESERVING COACHES BTW

 

 http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2013/football/nfl/wires/01/15/2020.ap.fbn.101.awards.0174/index.html#ixzz2I5W87drQ

 

THESE ARE NOT THE AP's NFL SEASON AWARDS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Calvin Johnson deserved the NFC OPOY award. He had better stats and he actually broke the record.

 

hes a good choice too, i wont argue that, esp as live in lion country so know feats better than others, he is this Cities only bright spot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Calvin Johnson deserved the NFC OPOY award. He had better stats and he actually broke the record.

 

I can't agree with you there. Johnson broke the record while his QB attempted an NFL record number of pass attempts. Peterson was the only offensive weapon on the team and was behind the record by nine yards even though he had 60 less carries than Dickerson did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't agree with you there. Johnson broke the record while his QB attempted an NFL record number of pass attempts. Peterson was the only offensive weapon on the team and was behind the record by nine yards even though he had 60 less carries than Dickerson did.

And who are the other offensive threats on the Lions?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5,000 yard passer Matt Stafford; compared to Christian Ponder.

True enough, just saying as live 4 miles north of Detroit all y u hear about is Megaton and no matter what, somehow the Lions will find a way to lose, its in their natuire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't agree with you there. Johnson broke the record while his QB attempted an NFL record number of pass attempts. Peterson was the only offensive weapon on the team and was behind the record by nine yards even though he had 60 less carries than Dickerson did.

 

Whats forgot about Perterson is that in 1st 5 games or so he was good but not special and Migraine Harvin was their main weapon & did quite well, when he went down Peterson went crazy good, imagine if Harvin was out from day 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
    • Things have now gone from bad to worse.     After I explained myself, I was kind of hoping you’d simply come back with “I’m sorry, I misunderstood you,  may bad.”  And we’d be done with this.  It would be over.      But instead, you double down on the roommate issue and follow up by questioning everything I said by breaking down some of my comments and what you think I really meant by them.     In other words, you’re telling me my motive, my meaning, as if you know my meaning better than I do.    It’s interesting to me…. I was recently told there’s an unofficial moderator policy:  don’t attack the poster, attack the argument.    Well, I don’t see that here.  You attacked me personally the first time and instead of a simple apology, you’ve double downed on a bad hand by attacking me personally AGAIN.      Why you’re comfortable telling me you know my meaning , my intention, better than I do is mystifying to me.  And frankly, I think you’re comfortable doing this because one of us is a moderator, and it certainly is NOT me.     I’ll say it again: you misunderstood my meaning, and intention,  the first time, and you’ve misunderstood me even worse the second time.   As I said before, I’m happy to withdraw and apologize for “go figure”, but the negative inference was not my intention.  Poorly phrased, I give you (in two posts now).   I don’t know what else to say…. I’m hoping this brings this very unfortunate exchange to an end.       
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...